[07:55] <Mirv> I'm suggesting the profile independent key migration patch at https://code.launchpad.net/~timo-jyrinki/compiz/migrate-profile-independent/+merge/123685
[08:03] <didrocks> Mirv: hey, you will need to change the packaging to include 03_migrate_profile_independent.py and the new .convert files, do you want to handle it before I approve your branch?
[08:03] <didrocks> (otherwise, looking good to me)
[08:05] <didrocks> ah, just something on if not client to be picky :)
[08:06] <sil2100> Mirv: is the g-d-c patch you were working on already working?
[08:08] <Mirv> didrocks: yes, I've the packaging change waiting
[08:10] <Mirv> sil2100: starting to...
[08:21] <Mirv> doing a test build first
[08:46] <Mirv> didrocks: lp:~timo-jyrinki/compiz/ubuntu.0982 would be ready to be pushed to lp:ubuntu/compiz, after which migrate-profile-independent could be approved
[08:46] <Mirv> it contains the 0.9.8.2 + expo patch + migration as cherry picked
[08:47]  * didrocks looks
[08:53] <didrocks> Mirv: ok, looking good to me, the tests with the new compiz stacks are done in parallel that you are looking the gconf migration tool fix?
[08:53] <didrocks> looked*
[08:53] <Mirv> didrocks: yes, that's the plan
[08:54] <Mirv> but just to get lp:ubuntu/compiz up-to-date for now
[08:54] <didrocks> Mirv: right! Done and branch approved
[10:40] <MCR1> didrocks: Hi :) Do you know if it is correct and desired behavior that currently all devices show up in the Launcher, not only mounted ones ?
[10:42] <didrocks> MCR1: I have the "only mounted" option by default here, let me check what's the real default
[10:43] <didrocks> MCR1: seems I have the default here
[10:43] <didrocks> did you get anything changed, like in ccsm?
[10:43] <didrocks> (3rd tab for the unity plugin, experimental, show devices)
[10:45] <MCR1> didrocks: hmm, I do not know where I can even change this option - I do not have it in Experimental tab... but I already know that you are usually right, so I'll search again...
[10:46] <didrocks> MCR1: ccsm -> unityshell plugin -> experimental tab?
[10:46] <didrocks> you don't see it there?
[10:46] <MCR1> maybe I got blind or got some old xml file messing up my settings
[10:47] <didrocks> you just have two tabs?
[10:47] <MCR1> no 3
[10:47] <didrocks> what is called the third?
[10:47] <MCR1> but it is not under experimental
[10:47] <MCR1> experimental is there
[10:47] <didrocks> ah :)
[10:47] <didrocks> hum, yeah, old xml file I would say
[10:48] <didrocks> MCR1: try to locate any unityshell.xml in /usr/local/ or in your home directory
[10:48] <MCR1> ok
[10:53] <MCR1> didrocks: This is unityshell.xml.in from trunk: http://pastebin.com/tgD8D900
[10:54] <MCR1> didrocks: It is not there either (or I am really blind)
[10:54] <didrocks> MCR1: no you're right, but I'm running the distro version, not staging
[10:54] <didrocks> so seems to be a change in staging, andyrock? ^
[10:54] <MCR1> didrocks: And it seems to default to showing all drives, which messes up the launcher big-time
[10:54] <andyrock> didrocks, hey
[10:55] <didrocks> hey :)
[10:55] <MCR1> (if you have multiple partitions)
[10:55] <didrocks> andyrock: do you know anything about the optional to only showing mounted drive in the launcher by default being removed?
[10:55] <didrocks> (it was defaulting to only showing mounted drive before)
[10:55] <andyrock> didrocks, yeah and the design is changed :)
[10:55] <didrocks> andyrock: so, showing everything by default?
[10:55] <didrocks> andyrock: is there any FFe and UIFe for that?
[10:56] <MCR1> and no possibility to turn this off ?
[10:56] <andyrock> MCR1, you can blacklist it
[10:56] <andyrock> didrocks, i think it has been merged before FF
[10:57] <didrocks> andyrock: again and again, we don't care about being merged before FF or not. The question is: "was it into distro before FF"
[10:57] <didrocks> andyrock: FF is for ubuntu, ubuntu doesn't have to know about upstream's status
[10:57] <didrocks> andyrock: can you please open one? and have popey's team tracking that
[10:57] <didrocks> it's a FFe/UIFe
[10:57] <andyrock> didrocks, yep of corse... sorry about that
[10:58] <popey> thanks andyrock, let sil2100 / Mirv know and they can track it in the global spreadsheet of dooooom
[10:58] <didrocks> andyrock: please paste the bug # here as well
[10:58] <andyrock> didrocks, will do after lunch
[10:59] <didrocks> andyrock: please point on it the commit of the change as well
[10:59] <didrocks> popey: hope that your team will finally start to look at merge requests
[10:59] <didrocks> or should I look for you even during my holidays? :/
[10:59] <MCR1> didrocks: What do you think about some clean-up for the unityshell ccsm configuration ?
[10:59] <didrocks> MCR1: too late for this cycle
[10:59] <MCR1> didrocks: ok
[11:00] <didrocks> MCR1: but why not for next one
[11:00] <didrocks> we have enough FFe/UIFe flying everyday TBH
[11:00] <MCR1> The tab "Experimental" does not sound very stable and does not say anything about its contents...
[11:00] <didrocks> MCR1: right, but it's still a change that is maybe documented somewhere
[11:01] <MCR1> There should be tabs like "Launcher", "Panel", etc
[11:01] <didrocks> so let's follow processes
[11:01] <didrocks> and will have this separation next cycle :)
[11:01] <MCR1> So if I want to clean up and bring structure into this mess of options I would have to write a blueprint for it ?
[11:02] <didrocks> MCR1: that would be even better to have a clear place to look at those, yeah :)
[11:03] <MCR1> ok, next cycle I'll do that then...
[11:15] <sil2100> didrocks: can I release the new unity 5.16 tarball?
[11:20] <sil2100> didrocks: https://code.launchpad.net/~sil2100/unity/precise_sru-2 <- here's the packaging
[11:21] <MCR1> didrocks: Not good: http://imagebin.org/228002 - but if you can turn them off in 12.04 then this is a regression bug that can be fixed, no ?
[11:24] <MCR1> didrocks: Also there is no option in CCSM->unityshell to change autohide/always-visible <- Did this also get lost this cycle ?
[11:32] <MCR1> andyrock, didrocks: bug 1049069
[11:33] <andyrock> MCR1, it's not a regression
[11:36] <andyrock> MCR1, and I think it's an opinion
[11:36] <MCR1> andyrock: oh okay - then I'll remove that word
[11:37] <MCR1> andyrock: I also cannot change the launcher autohide/alway-visible behavior in CCSM unityshell ?
[11:38] <andyrock> MCR1, let me check
[11:39] <andyrock> MCR1, ccsm->unity->behaviour->Hide Launcher
[11:39] <didrocks> sil2100: no
[11:39] <MCR1> andyrock: I am blind ;)
[11:39] <didrocks> sil2100: did you see that all FFe and UIFe issues are fixed?
[11:40] <MCR1> andyrock: sry
[11:40] <didrocks> sil2100: I warned them on the ML in addition to that, they are still not fixed fom what I see
[11:40] <didrocks> so what do you want to release? :/
[11:40] <didrocks> I told in the email as well that it's unreleasable, did you read it?
[11:41] <didrocks> popey: please ^
[11:42] <sil2100> didrocks: SRU I want to release?
[11:43] <sil2100> didrocks: so the SRU is not releasable for precise?
[11:45] <didrocks> sil2100: as the SRU, sorry, I read 6. not 5., but last time we talked there was a nux issue?
[11:45] <didrocks> is it fixed?
[11:46] <didrocks> andyrock: the gsettings key didn't change, right?
[11:48] <andyrock> didrocks, are you talking about com.canonical.unity.devices... ?
[11:48] <sil2100> didrocks: chase fixed it in geis it seems
[11:49] <sil2100> didrocks: at least that's what he said in the e-mail - the issue was in the API v1 that precise is using, he made a regression there
[11:52] <davmor2> hey guys on the apps lens there looks to be a huge gap infront of the apps available for download is this known?
[11:53] <didrocks> sil2100: ok, do you have some test results with old unity/new nux, and another for new both?
[11:53] <didrocks> sil2100: the verification is only that multitouch is working
[11:53] <didrocks> andyrock: sorry, about the show/hide launcher
[11:54] <andyrock> didrocks, i think not...
[11:57] <didrocks> andyrock: ok, thanks :)
[11:57] <andyrock> np
[13:43] <Mirv> there's now an initial Compiz 0.9.8.2 testing PPA at https://launchpad.net/~timo-jyrinki/+archive/compiz-quantal-testing2
[13:43] <Mirv> it includes a first attempt at a patch to gsettings-data-convert to support string to string array conversions in migrations. tested to be working, even though not pretty.
[14:00] <didrocks> sil2100: what about 11.10 for the renaming?
[14:01] <sil2100> didrocks: all merges are ready, some changes are already in trunks - but we want to first finish precise
[14:04] <didrocks> sil2100: ok, thanks
[14:05] <didrocks> sil2100: so, just waiting for the cross checks for unity/nux/unity-2d, isn't it?
[14:05] <didrocks> sil2100: btw, did you get results on unity-2d?
[14:09] <sil2100> didrocks: we only made for unity/nux
[14:09] <sil2100> didrocks: we didn't prepare a release for unity-2d yet
[14:10] <Mirv> mmh, the expo patch also included in the PPA package might have a problem. added a note to the description page.
[14:10] <sil2100> didrocks: the cross-checks for unity/nux are ready already
[14:10] <sil2100> didrocks: it's in the docs
[14:37] <fginther> didrocks, I finally have a MP for the 11.10 version of unity for the libgeis rename: https://code.launchpad.net/~fginther/unity/oneiric-libgeis-rename/+merge/123760.  There are packaging changes here: lp:~fginther/unity/oneiric-libgeis-rename-packaging
[14:41] <didrocks> fginther: thanks, are all reverse dependencies dealt with in oneiric?
[14:42] <fginther> didrocks, yes, the new packages are in -proposed
[14:43] <didrocks> fginther: so, back to precise
[14:43] <didrocks> geis was uploaded to precise-proposed, right?
[14:44] <fginther> didrocks, correct
[14:47] <davidcalle> om26er, heya
[14:48] <om26er> davidcalle, hey!
[14:48] <davidcalle> om26er, how are you?
[14:48] <om26er> davidcalle, thanks, i am great and you :-)
[14:48] <davidcalle> om26er, me too :)
[14:48] <om26er> davidcalle, going to UDS ?
[14:49] <davidcalle> om26er, sure, you too I imagine :)
[14:49] <om26er> davidcalle, yeah, lets see ;-)
[14:49] <davidcalle> om26er, not sure you can make it?
[14:50] <om26er> davidcalle, i applied for visa yesterday
[14:50] <om26er> davidcalle, it'll take 15working days, so then i'll be sure to know
[14:50] <davidcalle> om26er, oh ok, let's hope it works!
[14:51] <davidcalle> om26er, by any chance, are you able to bump priority on ayatana-design bugs?
[14:52] <om26er> davidcalle, no, that's only for design team
[14:52] <om26er> and they prolly don't like someone else changes that as well
[14:53] <davidcalle> om26er, ok, I will ping them directly, it's about conflicting keys (again).
[14:53] <om26er> davidcalle, give me the bug number as well, so we could track that better
[14:54] <davidcalle> https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity-lens-photos/+bug/1049090
[15:28] <mhr3> davidcalle, hey, the photos lens icon for the lens bar will land soon in lp:unity, can you make sure the paths point to it?
[15:28] <mhr3> davidcalle, same for category icons actually
[15:29] <mhr3> although those are in unity-asset-pool
[15:29] <davidcalle> mhr3, /usr/share/icons/unity-icon-theme/places/svg/group-photos.svg ?
[15:29] <mhr3> yes
[15:29] <davidcalle> mhr3, okay
[15:31] <davidcalle> mhr3, I don't see group-photos
[15:32] <davidcalle> mhr3, (in your branch)
[15:33] <mhr3> davidcalle, whoops, lens-nav-photo in unity
[15:34] <mhr3> hmm, no category icons for those in asset-pool
[15:34] <mhr3> davidcalle, so nvm, keep the category icons where you have them :)
[15:34] <mhr3> just the lens bar icon then
[15:35] <davidcalle> mhr3, I'm already using this path for the lens bar, but I actually need to use the new friends-photos and the service-* (I currently ship my own version of these in the lens).
[15:36] <davidcalle> group-friends*
[15:37] <mhr3> davidcalle, so we actually miss only the camera category icon
[15:37]  * didrocks mumbles UIFe :)
[15:37] <davidcalle> mhr3, ok
[15:47] <mhr3> davidcalle, so the cat icon for photos will get in u-a-p as well
[15:48] <davidcalle> mhr3, ok :)
[17:36] <bschaefer> mhr3, hey were you having problem compiling unity with libnux-core complaining about pthreads undefined symbols?
[17:36] <bschaefer> (thought I saw you say something about that a week or so ago)
[17:37] <mhr3> was with unity, not nux
[17:37] <bschaefer> hmm what was the problem?
[17:37] <mhr3> cmake
[17:37] <mhr3> sam changed stuff in the CMakeLists and it started working again
[17:38] <bschaefer> o, alright. Thanks!
[17:38] <mhr3> plus it all started because compiz added some linker flag
[19:24] <wamicho> hey i am new to unity please how  do you change the color of the fonts on the top panel ?
[19:38] <wamicho> hey i am new to unity please how  do you change the color of the fonts on the top panel ?
[20:44] <doko> cursing the unity-staging team building every commit on powerpc :-(
[20:44] <doko> hell, please stop it!!!
[20:44] <doko> there are better things to build
[20:45] <doko> dbarth, jasoncwarner_, whoever: ^^^
[21:17] <jasoncwarner_> doko that is going to be thumper and olli
[21:17] <doko> jasoncwarner_, thanks for forwarding