[05:36] hi, home come so many i386 builders are disabled? === charles__ is now known as Guest11727 === Guest11727 is now known as charles [07:12] i386 12 511 jobs (8 hours) [07:12] bam! :( [07:18] Hm, where'd they all go this time [07:19] * wgrant kicks the builders back to life again [07:21] kick them hard :) [07:22] but thx :) [07:44] ugh, I want to copy a whole bunch of packages from 1 ppa to another and hitting a timeout error OOPS-064d5b676b462b402dbcbc5ba5e22a13 [07:44] https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=064d5b676b462b402dbcbc5ba5e22a13 [07:46] mlankhorst: Have you tried copying them in smaller batches? [07:46] eg. one at a time? [07:47] not yet [07:47] But reasonably sized batches should work [07:47] * mlankhorst was trying 50 [07:47] That's a lot :) [07:48] builds are catching up :) [07:48] sweet [07:48] Yeah, could be a while until there's no queue, though [07:49] yeah I built the renamed x server stack in my own ppa that had armel enabled (would be nice to have armhf too) === czajkowski changed the topic of #launchpad to: Help contact: czajkowski| Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | User Guide: https://help.launchpad.net/ | Support: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad [10:16] This is weird, when you build a receipt, you get a low build score. But if you click on 'Request build(s)', you get a build score of 2605 [10:21] dupondje: have asked and this is ok. manual receipes are scored higher it seems [10:25] There's some sense to scoring something a human asked for explicitly above an automatic build [10:26] maxb: aye wgrant is explaning to me [10:26] still learning [10:38] ok then its good :) [10:52] hi! is there a magical pbuilder command I can issue to try to build my package on quetzal, like the launchpad PPA does? [10:53] my package doesn't build on quetzal and I would like to debug it === glebihan_ is now known as glebihan [10:59] pfarrell: Have you tried pbuilder? [11:00] wgrant: yes, I tried pbuilder, but I get E: No such script: /usr/share/debootstrap/scripts/quetzal [11:00] (I've never used pbuilder before) [11:01] * pfarrell has to go to a meeting -- back in a little bit [11:01] it's quantal [11:01] seeing it refered to by animal rather than verb is odd [11:03] no one would ever be able to spell the releases if we used the animal names ;) [11:05] oneiric wasn't very easy. === Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan [11:51] ah. [11:51] that is an easy solution [11:51] thank you [11:56] and once the build fails -- how do I chroot in to take a look? [11:56] (assuming I've just done pdebuild -- --distribution quantal) [12:06] actually, never mind, I'll just make a chroot. === Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan === sagaci_ is now known as sagaci === cjohnston_ is now known as cjohnston [14:22] hi all, I am trying to build a recipe locally before pushing upstream and I get the following error: E: owslib changes: changed-by-address-malformed Angelos Tzotsos [14:23] the problem is that bzr dailydeb creates a changelog message with different e-mail than the one I use to sign the package [14:23] does anyone know where to change this default kalxas@ubuntu-VirtualBox? [14:24] that's not the e-mail address that launchpad will use [14:24] but you can probably set DEB_EMAIL and it should use that instead [14:26] dobey, where do I set this? [14:26] you need to set two things: [14:26] DEBEMAIL and EMAIL [14:26] with export commands in your .bashrc [14:26] give me a sec, i can get you the syntax [14:27] thanks [14:27] * TheLordOfTime SSH's to his server to get the information [14:27] is it DEBEMAIL or DEB_EMAIL? [14:27] DEBEMAIL, EMAIL, DEBFULLNAME, NAME [14:27] See the above description of the use of these environment vari‐ [14:27] ables. [14:27] from "man dch" [14:28] dobey: its debemail [14:28] dobey: i can confirm this, MOTUs helped me with this issue about a year ago :P [14:28] yes. i just checked the man page :) [14:28] http://paste.ubuntu.com/1200645/ [14:28] kalxas: ^ [14:28] that pastebin contains sample data [14:29] replace it with your own, then add those lines to the end of your ~/.bashrc [14:29] thanks TheLordOfTime [14:29] then in terminal, do source ~/.bashrc [14:29] AFTER you've edited the file [14:29] it should then correctly utilize the email you specify [14:29] i had to do this to make it use my @ubuntu.com email instead of my personal :P [14:30] i don't set it by default simply because i use different e-mails for different things [14:30] mmm [14:30] 95% of the time i'm uploading package fixes, either via debdiffs to bugs or to my PPA(s) for testing [14:30] so... :Po [14:30] :P * [14:31] had to do something similar for my GPG key [14:31] right. and since i'm editing the changelog anyway, i just put in the right e-mail address; and i use the -k option for debuild [14:31] mhm [14:31] * kalxas testing [14:32] kalxas: anyway, if you're only building it locally to test, you can also just ignore that error [14:33] launchapd recipes will use the e-mail address of the lp user that rquested the build of the recipe [14:33] unless the builders break again [14:33] which is in itself somewhat of a bug, but it does use valid addresses [14:33] i've seen it happen :P [14:34] kalxas@ubuntu-VirtualBox:~$ source .bashrc [14:34] bash: export: `=': not a valid identifier [14:34] bash: export: `Angelos Tzotsos': not a valid identifier [14:34] bash: export: `=': not a valid identifier [14:34] bash: export: `gcpp.kalxas@gmail.com': not a valid identifier [14:34] bash: export: `=': not a valid identifier [14:34] bash: export: `gcpp.kalxas@gmail.com': not a valid identifier [14:34] it really should use noreply@launchpad.net as the address [14:34] !pastebin | kalxas [14:34] kalxas: For posting multi-line texts into the channel, please use http://paste.ubuntu.com | To post !screenshots use http://imagebin.org/?page=add | !pastebinit to paste directly from command line | Make sure you give us the URL for your paste - see also the channel topic. [14:34] hmm [14:34] i'll have to double check the syntax [14:34] * TheLordOfTime yawns [14:34] unfortunately that means i have to drop this job fixing a windows sql server [14:35] (don't ask why) [14:35] but i can't (mission critical for a company i do IT work for) [14:35] get rid of the whitespace around the = [14:35] dobey, I cannot ignore this error, the build fails [14:35] kalxas: remove the whitespace around the = signs [14:35] and the error we meant was the invalid email error you were having [14:36] kalxas: and you do need the quotes around "Your Name" [14:36] ok done [14:36] and your e-mail address [14:37] ok bzr dailydeb now works [14:37] so I guess lauchpad will create this ok [14:38] daildeb built the source package just fine before. it was just lintian complaining about the e-mail afterward [14:39] how can I create the deb locally now? dbuilder? === SamB_Mac_ is now known as SamB_MacG5 [14:40] sorry, pbuilder [14:40] ? [14:40] pbuilder or sbuild, yes [14:40] hmm is sbuild easier? [14:41] sbuild is preferred, and is what the builders use, as i understand [14:41] aiui, they use a forked sbuild [14:41] with a few modifications [14:41] at least on PPA builders [14:52] hi, I copied a bunch of packages from one ppa to another, and got 34 emails with the subject "Launchpad internal error" [14:52] body of the email is like "Launchpad encountered an internal error during the following operation: copying a package. It was logged with id OOPS-c625e9039665b0a083dad3b641848545. Sorry for the inconvenience." [14:52] https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=c625e9039665b0a083dad3b641848545 [14:52] I suppose I need to try again, one package at a time perhaps? Which will take a lot of clicking on my part [14:53] smaller chunks ahasenack [14:54] ahasenack: CannotCopy: twisted-web 12.0.0-1~ppa1~lucid1 in lucid (same version has unpublished binaries in the destination archive for Lucid, please wait for them to be published before copying) [14:54] mgz: what about OOPS-329e1dfc32ab270dc3c9ad8c90f6f2cb ? [14:54] https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=329e1dfc32ab270dc3c9ad8c90f6f2cb [14:55] ahasenack: same but with zope3 3.5~bzr23-0landscape2~bzr7~lucid1 [14:55] hm, I don't think I copied zope twice [14:55] it's the last one from the list [14:55] anyway [14:55] I'll wait a bit to see what arrives intact [14:56] feels like that should not be an oops, but an error email instead... [14:57] presumably CanontCopy is not correctly subclassed or there needs to be another except statement [15:13] mgz: there are a bunch of error notifications now showing up in the target ppa page, there is no "remove all" link, right? [15:13] I have to click on one by one [15:13] https://launchpad.net/~landscape/+archive/lds-proposed/+packages being the target [15:15] unless one's an LPAdmin, i dont think that's visible [15:15] IIRC, that's a private project/team/PPA [15:15] (for the record ;P) [15:16] yeah, I know, and I hit bugs all the time because it's a private project :) [15:16] or ppa [15:17] :P [15:18] tell me about it, i'm running a local builder on my network, similar to how the PPA builders work [15:18] and apparently the system hates me [15:18] every upload, there's at least one bug [15:18] and its usually an issue of PEBKAC because i forgot a ; or something :P [15:18] I think I will delete the packages and copy again, slowly this time [15:18] ahasenack: I think that's right, czajkowski: know any better? ^ [15:18] comparing the failed list with what ended up there, for 30+ packages, is harder [15:19] 30 * 2, actually, or so [15:19] mgz: stand up bbiab [15:21] ahasenack: a note to launchpad users about your pain might be a good way of making sure it gets seen [15:21] I've certainly never tried to copy 30 ppa packages before, but I'm sure others have [15:21] i've copied a total of, oh, 15 at once? [15:22] most of them were in one of my staging PPAs anyways :P [15:22] * TheLordOfTime always has a staging PPA :P [15:22] mgz: I used to do it slowly some weeks ago, but I saw today that something changed, now it says that it "queued the request", so I thought it would handle 30 this time [15:23] mgz: before if I selected 30 or so at once, the request would eventually timeout and I would get an oops [15:31] ahasenack: 30 is a lot === dpm is now known as dpm-afk [15:31] and someone else had a similar issue this morning and did it in smaller groups and no issues === deryck is now known as deryck[lunch] === dpm-afk is now known as dpm === matsubara is now known as matsubara-lunch === czajkowski changed the topic of #launchpad to: Help contact:-| Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | User Guide: https://help.launchpad.net/ | Support: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad === dpm is now known as dpm-afk === deryck[lunch] is now known as deryck === matsubara-lunch is now known as matsubara === dpm-afk is now known as dpm [19:04] * dobey really wishes lp recipes and arch all packages would build on any available builder, and not only i386 [19:08] so do we :) [19:08] dobey: btw did you see my ping yesterday ? Probably middle of your sleep period.. [19:16] lifeless: ah yes, was asleep. i haven't really had time to look at lptools at all, unfortunately. you already uploaded it to debian previously though, right? [19:22] dobey: I don't think I have :) [19:22] dobey: I may be wrong [19:22] Maintainer: Ubuntu Developers [19:22] Original-Maintainer: Robert Collins [19:22] I'm wrong. [19:22] dobey: so, I guess the thing is, I'm not driving it anymore. I'm happy to do another debian upload if an 'upstream' release is done etc. [19:22] had to happen at some point :p [19:22] czajkowski: :P [19:23] lets note the date and time :p [19:23] lifeless: i'll see if i can find a little time to do a release [19:23] dobey: that would be the cool === matsubara is now known as matsubara-afk [22:31] any LP experts around? [22:32] I'm try to find out about "teams_by_name[team]" and see if there is a "branches_by_name" equiv (which there doesn't appear to be) [22:33] no joy in apidoc [22:33] sinzui: Hey man o/ Just wanted to let you know the fix for product release finder seemed not to work .apk's (per http://people.canonical.com/~karni/android/u1f/ ) and I've published the file manually at https://launchpad.net/ubuntuone-android-files [22:33] joey: pretty sure you can look up a branch by "unique name", e.g. ~mwhudson/project/name [22:34] sinzui: Maybe we can get it to work one day :) Or maybe I did something wrong. The file is still there, just never got picked up. [22:34] joey: https://launchpad.net/+apidoc/devel.html#branches-getByUniqueName [22:34] will check it out, thanks mwhudson [22:34] joey: if that isn't what you want, i don't understand what you want :) [22:36] karni, https://launchpad.net/ubuntuone-android-files/trunk release pattern does not match the file in your directoy [22:37] sinzui: Hahaha, I forgot to update that? Oh maaan :) [22:37] sinzui: Sorry to bother! :) [22:38] karni, np I learned the hardway. I had to fix 120 project a few years ago [22:38] sinzui: :O oh man :) [22:39] There we go. Have a nice evening all!