[05:36] <dupondje> hi, home come so many i386 builders are disabled?
[07:12] <dupondje> i386 12 511 jobs (8 hours)
[07:12] <dupondje> bam! :(
[07:18] <wgrant> Hm, where'd they all go this time
[07:19]  * wgrant kicks the builders back to life again
[07:21] <dupondje> kick them hard :)
[07:22] <dupondje> but thx :)
[07:44] <mlankhorst> ugh, I want to copy a whole bunch of packages from 1 ppa to another and hitting a timeout error  OOPS-064d5b676b462b402dbcbc5ba5e22a13
[07:46] <wgrant> mlankhorst: Have you tried copying them in smaller batches?
[07:46] <wgrant> eg. one at a time?
[07:47] <mlankhorst> not yet
[07:47] <wgrant> But reasonably sized batches should work
[07:47]  * mlankhorst was trying 50
[07:47] <wgrant> That's a lot :)
[07:48] <dupondje> builds are catching up :)
[07:48] <dupondje> sweet
[07:48] <wgrant> Yeah, could be a while until there's no queue, though
[07:49] <mlankhorst> yeah I built the renamed x server stack in my own ppa that had armel enabled (would be nice to have armhf too)
[10:16] <dupondje> This is weird, when you build a receipt, you get a low build score. But if you click on 'Request build(s)', you get a build score of 2605
[10:21] <czajkowski> dupondje: have asked and this is ok. manual receipes are scored higher it seems
[10:25] <maxb> There's some sense to scoring something a human asked for explicitly above an automatic build
[10:26] <czajkowski> maxb: aye wgrant is explaning to me
[10:26] <czajkowski> still learning
[10:38] <dupondje> ok then its good :)
[10:52] <pfarrell> hi! is there a magical pbuilder command I can issue to try to build my package on quetzal, like the launchpad PPA does?
[10:53] <pfarrell> my package doesn't build on quetzal and I would like to debug it
[10:59] <wgrant> pfarrell: Have you tried pbuilder?
[11:00] <pfarrell> wgrant: yes, I tried pbuilder, but I get E: No such script: /usr/share/debootstrap/scripts/quetzal
[11:00] <pfarrell> (I've never used pbuilder before)
[11:01]  * pfarrell has to go to a meeting -- back in a little bit
[11:01] <tsimpson> it's quantal
[11:01] <mgz> seeing it refered to by animal rather than verb is odd
[11:03] <tsimpson> no one would ever be able to spell the releases if we used the animal names ;)
[11:05] <mgz> oneiric wasn't very easy.
[11:51] <pfarrell> ah.
[11:51] <pfarrell> that is an easy solution
[11:51] <pfarrell> thank you
[11:56] <pfarrell> and once the build fails -- how do I chroot in to take a look?
[11:56] <pfarrell> (assuming I've just done pdebuild -- --distribution quantal)
[12:06] <pfarrell> actually, never mind, I'll just make a chroot.
[14:22] <kalxas> hi all, I am trying to build a recipe locally before pushing upstream and I get the following error: E: owslib changes: changed-by-address-malformed Angelos Tzotsos <kalxas@ubuntu-VirtualBox>
[14:23] <kalxas> the problem is that bzr dailydeb creates a changelog message with different e-mail than the one I use to sign the package
[14:23] <kalxas> does anyone know where to change this default kalxas@ubuntu-VirtualBox?
[14:24] <dobey> that's not the e-mail address that launchpad will use
[14:24] <dobey> but you can probably set DEB_EMAIL and it should use that instead
[14:26] <kalxas> dobey, where do I set this?
[14:26] <TheLordOfTime> you need to set two things:
[14:26] <TheLordOfTime> DEBEMAIL and EMAIL
[14:26] <TheLordOfTime> with export commands in your .bashrc
[14:26] <TheLordOfTime> give me a sec, i can get you the syntax
[14:27] <kalxas> thanks
[14:27]  * TheLordOfTime SSH's to his server to get the information
[14:27] <dobey> is it DEBEMAIL or DEB_EMAIL?
[14:27] <dobey>        DEBEMAIL, EMAIL, DEBFULLNAME, NAME
[14:27] <dobey>               See  the above description of the use of these environment vari‐
[14:27] <dobey>               ables.
[14:27] <dobey> from "man dch"
[14:28] <TheLordOfTime> dobey:  its debemail
[14:28] <TheLordOfTime> dobey:  i can confirm this, MOTUs helped me with this issue about a year ago :P
[14:28] <dobey> yes. i just checked the man page :)
[14:28] <TheLordOfTime> http://paste.ubuntu.com/1200645/
[14:28] <TheLordOfTime> kalxas:  ^
[14:28] <TheLordOfTime> that pastebin contains sample data
[14:29] <TheLordOfTime> replace it with your own, then add those lines to the end of your ~/.bashrc
[14:29] <kalxas> thanks TheLordOfTime
[14:29] <TheLordOfTime> then in terminal, do source ~/.bashrc
[14:29] <TheLordOfTime> AFTER you've edited the file
[14:29] <TheLordOfTime> it should then correctly utilize the email you specify
[14:29] <TheLordOfTime> i had to do this to make it use my @ubuntu.com email instead of my personal :P
[14:30] <dobey> i don't set it by default simply because i use different e-mails for different things
[14:30] <TheLordOfTime> mmm
[14:30] <TheLordOfTime> 95% of the time i'm uploading package fixes, either via debdiffs to bugs or to my PPA(s) for testing
[14:30] <TheLordOfTime> so... :Po
[14:30] <TheLordOfTime> :P *
[14:31] <TheLordOfTime> had to do something similar for my GPG key
[14:31] <dobey> right. and since i'm editing the changelog anyway, i just put in the right e-mail address; and i use the -k option for debuild
[14:31] <TheLordOfTime> mhm
[14:31]  * kalxas testing
[14:32] <dobey> kalxas: anyway, if you're only building it locally to test, you can also just ignore that error
[14:33] <dobey> launchapd recipes will use the e-mail address of the lp user that rquested the build of the recipe
[14:33] <TheLordOfTime> unless the builders break again
[14:33] <dobey> which is in itself somewhat of a bug, but it does use valid addresses
[14:33] <TheLordOfTime> i've seen it happen :P
[14:34] <kalxas> kalxas@ubuntu-VirtualBox:~$ source .bashrc
[14:34] <kalxas> bash: export: `=': not a valid identifier
[14:34] <kalxas> bash: export: `Angelos Tzotsos': not a valid identifier
[14:34] <kalxas> bash: export: `=': not a valid identifier
[14:34] <kalxas> bash: export: `gcpp.kalxas@gmail.com': not a valid identifier
[14:34] <kalxas> bash: export: `=': not a valid identifier
[14:34] <kalxas> bash: export: `gcpp.kalxas@gmail.com': not a valid identifier
[14:34] <dobey> it really should use noreply@launchpad.net as the address
[14:34] <TheLordOfTime> !pastebin | kalxas
[14:34] <TheLordOfTime> hmm
[14:34] <TheLordOfTime> i'll have to double check the syntax
[14:34]  * TheLordOfTime yawns
[14:34] <TheLordOfTime> unfortunately that means i have to drop this job fixing a windows sql server
[14:35] <TheLordOfTime> (don't ask why)
[14:35] <TheLordOfTime> but i can't (mission critical for a company i do IT work for)
[14:35] <dobey> get rid of the whitespace around the =
[14:35] <kalxas> dobey, I cannot ignore this error, the build fails
[14:35] <TheLordOfTime> kalxas:  remove the whitespace around the = signs
[14:35] <TheLordOfTime> and the error we meant was the invalid email error you were having
[14:36] <dobey> kalxas: and you do need the quotes around "Your Name"
[14:36] <kalxas> ok done
[14:36] <dobey> and your e-mail address
[14:37] <kalxas> ok bzr dailydeb now works
[14:37] <kalxas> so I guess lauchpad will create this ok
[14:38] <dobey> daildeb built the source package just fine before. it was just lintian complaining about the e-mail afterward
[14:39] <kalxas> how can I create the deb locally now? dbuilder?
[14:40] <kalxas> sorry, pbuilder
[14:40] <kalxas> ?
[14:40] <dobey> pbuilder or sbuild, yes
[14:40] <kalxas> hmm is sbuild easier?
[14:41] <dobey> sbuild is preferred, and is what the builders use, as i understand
[14:41] <TheLordOfTime> aiui, they use a forked sbuild
[14:41] <TheLordOfTime> with a few modifications
[14:41] <TheLordOfTime> at least on PPA builders
[14:52] <ahasenack> hi, I copied a bunch of packages from one ppa to another, and got 34 emails with the subject "Launchpad internal error"
[14:52] <ahasenack> body of the email is like "Launchpad encountered an internal error during the following operation: copying a package.  It was logged with id OOPS-c625e9039665b0a083dad3b641848545.  Sorry for the inconvenience."
[14:52] <ahasenack> I suppose I need to try again, one package at a time perhaps? Which will take a lot of clicking on my part
[14:53] <czajkowski> smaller chunks ahasenack
[14:54] <mgz> ahasenack: CannotCopy: twisted-web 12.0.0-1~ppa1~lucid1 in lucid (same version has unpublished binaries in the destination archive for Lucid, please wait for them to be published before copying)
[14:54] <ahasenack> mgz: what about OOPS-329e1dfc32ab270dc3c9ad8c90f6f2cb ?
[14:55] <mgz> ahasenack: same but with zope3 3.5~bzr23-0landscape2~bzr7~lucid1
[14:55] <ahasenack> hm, I don't think I copied zope twice
[14:55] <ahasenack> it's the last one from the list
[14:55] <ahasenack> anyway
[14:55] <ahasenack> I'll wait a bit to see what arrives intact
[14:56] <mgz> feels like that should not be an oops, but an error email instead...
[14:57] <mgz> presumably CanontCopy is not correctly subclassed or there needs to be another except statement
[15:13] <ahasenack> mgz: there are a bunch of error notifications now showing up in the target ppa page, there is no "remove all" link, right?
[15:13] <ahasenack> I have to click on one by one
[15:13] <ahasenack> https://launchpad.net/~landscape/+archive/lds-proposed/+packages being the target
[15:15] <TheLordOfTime> unless one's an LPAdmin, i dont think that's visible
[15:15] <TheLordOfTime> IIRC, that's a private project/team/PPA
[15:15] <TheLordOfTime> (for the record ;P)
[15:16] <ahasenack> yeah, I know, and I hit bugs all the time because it's a private project :)
[15:16] <ahasenack> or ppa
[15:17] <TheLordOfTime> :P
[15:18] <TheLordOfTime> tell me about it, i'm running a local builder on my network, similar to how the PPA builders work
[15:18] <TheLordOfTime> and apparently the system hates me
[15:18] <TheLordOfTime> every upload, there's at least one bug
[15:18] <TheLordOfTime> and its  usually an issue of PEBKAC because i forgot a ; or something :P
[15:18] <ahasenack> I think I will delete the packages and copy again, slowly this time
[15:18] <mgz> ahasenack: I think that's right, czajkowski: know any better? ^
[15:18] <ahasenack> comparing the failed list with what ended up there, for 30+ packages, is harder
[15:19] <ahasenack> 30 * 2, actually, or so
[15:19] <czajkowski> mgz: stand up bbiab
[15:21] <mgz> ahasenack: a note to launchpad users about your pain might be a good way of making sure it gets seen
[15:21] <mgz> I've certainly never tried to copy 30 ppa packages before, but I'm sure others have
[15:21] <TheLordOfTime> i've copied a total of, oh, 15 at once?
[15:22] <TheLordOfTime> most of them were in one of my staging PPAs anyways :P
[15:22]  * TheLordOfTime always has a staging PPA :P
[15:22] <ahasenack> mgz: I used to do it slowly some weeks ago, but I saw today that something changed, now it says that it "queued the request", so I thought it would handle 30 this time
[15:23] <ahasenack> mgz: before if I selected 30 or so at once, the request would eventually timeout and I would get an oops
[15:31] <czajkowski> ahasenack: 30 is a lot
[15:31] <czajkowski> and someone else had a similar issue this morning and did it in smaller groups and no issues
[19:04]  * dobey really wishes lp recipes and arch all packages would build on any available builder, and not only i386
[19:08] <lifeless> so do we :)
[19:08] <lifeless> dobey: btw did you see my ping yesterday ? Probably middle of your sleep period..
[19:16] <dobey> lifeless: ah yes, was asleep. i haven't really had time to look at lptools at all, unfortunately. you already uploaded it to debian previously though, right?
[19:22] <lifeless> dobey: I don't think I have :)
[19:22] <lifeless> dobey: I may be wrong
[19:22] <lifeless> Maintainer: Ubuntu Developers <ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com>
[19:22] <lifeless> Original-Maintainer: Robert Collins <robertc@robertcollins.net>
[19:22] <lifeless> I'm wrong.
[19:22] <lifeless> dobey: so, I guess the thing is, I'm not driving it anymore. I'm happy to do another debian upload if an 'upstream' release is done etc.
[19:22] <czajkowski> had to happen at some point :p
[19:22] <lifeless> czajkowski: :P
[19:23] <czajkowski> lets note the date and time :p
[19:23] <dobey> lifeless: i'll see if i can find a little time to do a release
[19:23] <lifeless> dobey: that would be the cool
[22:31] <joey> any LP experts around?
[22:32] <joey> I'm try to find out about "teams_by_name[team]" and see if there is a "branches_by_name" equiv (which there doesn't appear to be)
[22:33] <joey> no joy in apidoc
[22:33] <karni> sinzui: Hey man o/ Just wanted to let you know the fix for product release finder seemed not to work .apk's (per http://people.canonical.com/~karni/android/u1f/ ) and I've published the file manually at https://launchpad.net/ubuntuone-android-files
[22:33] <mwhudson> joey: pretty sure you can look up a branch by "unique name", e.g. ~mwhudson/project/name
[22:34] <karni> sinzui: Maybe we can get it to work one day :) Or maybe I did something wrong. The file is still there, just never got picked up.
[22:34] <mwhudson> joey: https://launchpad.net/+apidoc/devel.html#branches-getByUniqueName
[22:34] <joey> will check it out, thanks mwhudson
[22:34] <mwhudson> joey: if that isn't what you want, i don't understand what you want :)
[22:36] <sinzui> karni, https://launchpad.net/ubuntuone-android-files/trunk release pattern does not match the file in your directoy
[22:37] <karni> sinzui: Hahaha, I forgot to update that? Oh maaan :)
[22:37] <karni> sinzui: Sorry to bother! :)
[22:38] <sinzui> karni, np I learned the hardway. I had to fix 120 project a few years ago
[22:38] <karni> sinzui: :O oh man :)
[22:39] <karni> There we go. Have a nice evening all!