[01:37] I don't usually post links like this to #ubuntu-motu, but I'm sure every single one of you will enjoy this. http://www.pointerpointer.com/ [01:42] DktrKranz: ah ok thanks for clarifying :) that's reassuring :) [06:46] good morning === JanC is now known as Guest57134 [07:38] hi. Could this package synced (http://changelog.debian.net/shishi)? [07:38] http://changelog.debian.net/shishi [07:44] alo21: why? from the changelog it looks like only a FTBFS was fixed on architectures not supported in Ubuntu [07:45] geser: what type of arch is? [07:47] according to the mentioned bug it's 64-bit big endian (s390x, ppc64, sparc64) [07:49] geser: ok... this one (http://changelog.debian.net/python-melangeclient)? [07:51] that's looks like something we might want [07:53] geser: I am looking around LP, and it seems there is no bug about this sync. Have I open one? [07:54] I'll start a hangout on air about ubuntu development in a bit - any developer who wants to be part of the hangout on air? === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan [08:12] * ajmitch will just watch quietly :) [08:34] hggdh: can you help me for a while? [08:35] * nigelb doesn't think hggdh would be awake. [08:36] sorry... I I made a mistake [08:36] nigelb: could you? [08:36] What do you need? If I can't someone else can, for sure. [08:37] I found a package wich can be sybced from Debian... now have I open a bug on LP? [08:49] alo21: i thought there was a command-line tool to request syncs.... look that the sync documentation on the wiki [08:52] requestsync [08:52] Laney, you make it too easy. [08:53] Laney: xnox does requestsync open a bug on LP? [08:53] alo21: yes [08:53] xnox: cool.. I thik this is the right link : https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SyncRequestProcess [08:57] !sync [08:57] Helpful information for filing a sync request can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SyncRequestProcess [08:57] yeah [09:00] Laney: I have a doubt about the .orig archive. I would like to sync python-melangeclient [09:00] Laney: is this (http://packages.debian.org/source/unstable/python-melangeclient) the right link to download the .orig archive? [09:04] yes, but you can use pull-debian-source to get it too [09:05] (there is pull-lp-source for ubuntu also) === dholbach_ is now known as dholbach [09:08] thanks [09:57] I have a source within debian folder too... I apllied a patch and now I should create .org.tar.gz archive. Have I use dh_make --createorig? [09:58] Starting September 14, ending September 19, 23:59 PST: declaration of [09:58] candidates. Remember that candidates must be an ATC (and a Foundation [09:58] that's a paste fail [09:58] sorry about that :) [10:06] alo21: you shouldn't need to be recreating orig tarballs [10:06] alo21: what patch system does this package use? [10:07] tumbleweed: quilt [10:07] right, so your patches will live in debian/patches [10:07] yes [10:09] tumbleweed: I have the source whit debian folder inside... [10:10] tumbleweed: now I should run debuild -S -sa [10:10] tumbleweed: but it asks me about .orig arichive [10:11] alo21: what are you doing? packaging something new? [10:11] tumbleweed: upgrade [10:12] tumbleweed: must .orig archive be the same? [10:12] you take the tarball the upstream provides, and name it ../PACKAGE_VERSION.orig.tar.COMPRESSION [10:13] also, I thought Laney found you more useful things to look at, right now, than upgrading packages? [10:14] tumbleweed: sorry.. I did not understand [10:14] what bit do you not understand? [10:16] tumbleweed: what did Laney find for me? [10:17] weren't you looking at things to sync from Debian? [10:18] tumbleweed: yes... and I founnd it. Now I am creating the package, then test it and last requestsync [10:19] why don't you just get teh package from Debian? [10:19] you shouldn't need to bo doing any of this by hand [10:20] tumbleweed: in fact I downloaded the package from LP 'pull-lp-source ' [10:20] why don't you just pull-debian-source package? [10:21] rather than taking the Ubuntu one, and trying to change it to match the Debian changes [10:22] tumbleweed: If I download the source from debian, is the patch apllied? [10:23] what patch? [10:23] tumbleweed: patch inside deina/patch [10:23] patches* [10:23] yes, they'll all be applied [10:23] well, all the ones configured to be applied in debian/patches/series [10:26] thanks === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away === broder_ is now known as broder === Pici` is now known as Pici === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away === DktrKranz is now known as Guest14632 === Kiall is now known as zz_Kiall === Phantomas1 is now known as Phantomas === Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan === micahg_ is now known as micahg === s1aden is now known as sladen === dk is now known as Guest92822 === almaisan` is now known as al-maisan === Phantomas1 is now known as Phantomas === hrww is now known as hrw === ScottK2 is now known as ScottK === Kiall is now known as zz_Kiall === zz_Kiall is now known as Kiall === medberry is now known as med_ === ikonia_ is now known as ikonia === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away === barry` is now known as barry === wgrant_ is now known as wgrant === JanC_ is now known as JanC === huats_ is now known as huats === Guest14632 is now known as DktrKranz === itnet7_ is now known as itnet7 === Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan === lan3y is now known as Laney === Guest92822 is now known as dk === dk is now known as Guest34744 === Guest34744 is now known as dk === Bchstelze is now known as Bachstelze === ral_ is now known as ral === Kiall is now known as zz_Kiall === zz_Kiall is now known as Kiall === ajmitch_ is now known as ajmitch === sbeattie is now known as retro-grouch === retro-grouch is now known as sbeattie [23:00] Someone good with GTK/GDK here? Got some threading question [23:02] dupondje: there is #gtk+ on irc.gnome.org [23:02] tsimpson: i'm there, but quite silent it seems :p