[00:01] <nov503> Hi, anyone can help me a little bit? I'm quite confused at what "commission" means and does…
[00:02] <nov503> in MAAS, when I click "accept&commissioning", the nodes machine are in shutdown status..how can they commision with the server?
[00:36] <grizcreative> need some help with torrentflux on ubuntu server, any takers?
[00:40] <bigjools> nov503: it will power up the declared node (assuming you set power params properly) and have it send a message to the maas server before it shuts down
[00:44] <nov503> bigjools: could you give me some keywords on this to search for?  should i use something like pxe?
[00:45] <bigjools> nov503: you need to set the power parameters in the "edit node" page and then make sure the node is set to PXE boot
[00:46] <bigjools> nov503: this page takes you through the process: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam/MAAS#Installation_and_initial_set-up
[01:20] <nov503> bigjools: thanks for that! I'm looking at it
[01:20] <bigjools> np
[01:43] <slyboots> Hey, Anyone able to think of a reason why a ubuntu-server client would fail to have its hostname resolved by DNS?
[01:43] <lifeless> if DNS isn't configured?
[01:43] <slyboots> IT pulls a ip address from the DHCP server, I've got several other clients (windows, linux, freebsd)
[01:43] <slyboots> And all work OK, they get the IP, and can ping other machines via their hostname
[01:43] <slyboots> But this *one* box wont
[01:44] <slyboots> I can ping other machines OUT from the box via their hostnames OK.  But no other machine on the network will accept its hostname
[01:46] <slyboots> Hm, okay, it looks like its actually an issue with the DNS server
[02:02] <mp__> is there a way to estimate the needed specs for cpu and hdd/ssd speed of a kvm server?
[02:03] <patdk-lap> sure
[02:04] <patdk-lap> estimate what everything on the kvm server will need
[02:04] <patdk-lap> add up all the cpu requirements, add a percentage extra for kvm overhead
[02:09] <mp__> i probably shouldn't have said "estimate"
[02:12] <patdk-lap> estimate, know exactly, heh
[02:12] <patdk-lap> when your talking about kvm/xen/lxc/..., it doesn't matter
[02:13] <patdk-lap> whatever is installed in those kvm/xen/lxc/... is what will dictate what you need
[02:13] <patdk-lap> kvm server will run happy on an core2duo with 256megs ram, on a usb stick
[02:14] <patdk-lap> but your kvm guests probably won't be so happy
[02:15] <mp__> tell me more about happy kvm guests
[03:38] <nov503> hi, anyone can use avahi boot successfully ? https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam/MAAS/AvahiBoot
[03:39] <nov503> i tried this, but the client machine just run into a console
[03:40] <bigjools> did you not get the option to "install with MAAS" ?
[04:59] <nov503> bigjools: no…i don't…there is just some output of normal linux boot info
[04:59] <bigjools> nov503: ok it's possible that it can't see your maas service then, is it running and on the same subnet?
[05:00] <nov503> i think so, they can ping each other
[05:01] <nov503> bigjools: looks like this guy has the same problem
[05:01] <nov503> https://lists.launchpad.net/maas-devel/msg00312.html
[05:01] <bigjools> that doesn't necessarily mean they are on the same subnet
[05:02] <bigjools> or that maas is running
[05:03] <bigjools> nov503: no it's a different problem
[05:03] <nov503> they have the same ip prefix, i don't know how to make sure maas is running though
[05:04] <nov503> i used the cd install, install from mass server, they can find that server and enlist itself
[05:04] <bigjools> ok
[05:04] <bigjools> I am not sure then, sorry.  I've not personally done anything with Avahi so you might want to post a question on the mailing list yourself
[05:05] <nov503> bigjools:  thanks for help. Sure, i can do that. Or maybe I can try the dhcp way
[05:06] <bigjools> yeah that will work for sure
[05:06] <bigjools> just pxe boot it
[05:06] <nov503> bigjools: what i'm thinking is set the next_server to the maas master in the existing dhcp server.
[05:06] <bigjools> correct
[05:07] <nov503> bigjools: but i've already installed maas-dhcp in the maas server, do i need to remove it?
[05:07] <bigjools> no, just reconfigure
[05:07] <bigjools> assuming no other dhcp server is running on your network
[05:08] <nov503> hmm…there is one running, i want to use that one
[05:08] <nov503> and set that one's next_server to the maas server
[05:08] <nov503> instead of making maas server take over the dhcp
[05:08] <bigjools> ok then uninstall maas-dhcp
[05:09] <nov503> thanks, do i need to remove dhcpmasq then?
[05:09] <bigjools> no
[05:09] <nov503> ok, hope that can work! I will try it tomorrow
[05:10] <nov503> many thanks for the help!
[05:11] <bigjools> np
[05:34] <tazmania> some help with php on my ubuntu server 10.04LTS.  Apache2, html/s, and cgi are working fine except for php.  I keep getting prompt to download the php file instead of showing on the page.
[05:37] <tazmania> I have visited many faqs on setting up php on ubuntu server
[06:28] <Daviey> Ugh, python-quantumclient depwait on clifftab .. adam_g / zul
[06:28] <Daviey> (in Precise PPA)
[06:29] <sisteczko> Welcome. After upgrade 10.04 -> 12.04 I suffer problems with my Linux Software Raid array. Does anyone here could try to troubleshoot the problem?
[06:30] <sisteczko> Most relevant information should be on http://askubuntu.com/questions/186666/mdadm-fails-after-10-04-12-04-upgrade
[07:04] <ae01> I'm need some help.
[07:05] <ae01> Could you pls.
[07:07] <ae01> http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2057140
[07:11] <ae01> Hello
[07:20] <sisteczko> ea01: Not an answer to you question, but the line "sudo chmod +x openerp_6.1-latest-1_all.deb" is not needed.
[07:21] <sisteczko> ae01: Please explain what to you mean by "This code before I'm copying from my preseed"? It is not English enough ;-)
[08:00] <linocisco> As I have no internet at home. I run ubuntu guest on vbox at work where I could use internet .Some times I tried to copy /var/caches/apt/archives to USB flash drives and take it home and on my home ubuntu server, I tried dpkg -i *.* but got error always. that is not helpful for me. It is not easy to use aptonCD everytime to waste CD daily
[08:07] <Daviey> ugh. http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6648
[08:15] <linocisco> what is quantal-server?
[08:15] <linocisco> is it different server?
[08:15] <Jeeves_> Newer (beta) versino
[08:19] <linocisco> next beta version of ubuntu server 12.04 x.x.x ?
[08:20] <dax_roc> Should dnsmasq be installed on 12.04 upgrade, or is it present on Desktop only ?
[08:23] <linocisco> i installed ubuntu desktop 12.04 on vbox and install required packages and copy from its /var/cache/apt/archives to USB flash drives and take it home to install on my ubuntu server 12.04 with no internet access. I installed by using dpkg -i *.* and got many errors. no packages were installed
[08:31] <dax_roc> rip resolvconf out and install dnscache I think.
[09:28] <mp__> will i face performance issues connecting sata-6 hdds to sas 2.0 interfaces?
[09:34] <Daviey> roaksoax: hey, in Quantal -  o maas-provision: maas-provision maas-provision-common python-maas-provision isn't seeded.. We probably need to make them transitional and seeded
[09:42] <linocisco> what is the meaning of seeded?
[09:52] <Daviey> linocisco: each ubuntu flavour has a seed, which is an index of packages it cares about, and supports.  This lists is evaluated to also include it's dependencies, using a tool called germinate.
[10:22] <riz0n> Hello. I have Ubuntu Server 12.04 with Postfix,Dovecot,Spamassassin,Clamav,and Amavis. Can someone tell me where I can edit the rules? The filter sets SPF_FAIL to 0.919 and I would like to set it to something like.... 10 ;)
[10:24] <riz0n> I have my filter cut-off at a level 3, but some still pass through and I see that they all have the same SPF_FAIL similarity. SPF records has been an adopted standard for many years now. If the host doesn't have a valid SPF record, then I want to score the message high enough for the Spamassassin/Amavis to flag it as spam.
[10:39] <linocisco> Daviey, Seed, germination. those sound like I am learning Botany. Who gave those kind of names?
[10:57] <IamTrying> Hello
[10:57] <IamTrying> I have two virtual host for ubuntu and its apache package.
[10:58] <IamTrying> Very odd in my Red hat enterprise linux / CentOS / Fedora it works like cake.
[10:58] <IamTrying> But in Ubuntu 12.04 its a nightmare
[10:58] <IamTrying> Here is some dump: https://gist.github.com/3713062
[10:58] <IamTrying> Now when i browse http://site1 it goes to /var/www/html
[10:59] <IamTrying> Where it should be going to /var/www/html/site1/public
[10:59] <IamTrying> Its not doing that
[10:59] <IamTrying> Beside that i made sure also: $ a2enmod rewrite ; /etc/init.d/apache2 restart # still same problem exist. but no error throwing now.
[10:59] <IamTrying> How can i resolve this plz?
[11:01] <IamTrying> uvirtbot, is this the bug related to my query?
[11:02] <IamTrying> OK - you are Mr. Bot. Is there anyone alive here. Is this a dead channel or what? Hello Launch time, i hope you dont mind to throw some alphabets on my ubuntu apache journey.
[11:17] <IamTrying> Never mind, dead room.
[11:21] <xnox> IamTrying: you should not use *:80 in all stanzas
[11:21] <xnox> IamTrying: that will fail
[11:22] <xnox> IamTrying: use site1:80, site2:80 and it will work
[11:22] <xnox> IamTrying: do not have a default *:80 "catch-all" cause it will catch _all_
[11:22] <IamTrying> OK - xnox. IC now. great help.
[11:23] <IamTrying> OK - it was catching all yes
[11:23] <xnox> IamTrying: read apache docs ;-) $ sudo /etc/init.d/apache2 restart
[11:23] <xnox> is "debian/ubuntu" way of restarting apache, it will check the syntax and bail to restart if syntax is wrong
[11:25] <IamTrying> OK - problem is resolved thanks to your site1:80 vs *:80 theory.
[11:25] <IamTrying> Thanks a lot xnox
[11:26] <patdk-lap> xnox, that restart was true only before upstart
[11:26] <xnox> patdk-lap: apache2 will not be converted to an upstart job anytime soon, because of all the things it can do apart from simply starting/stopping apache daemon
[11:27] <xnox> patdk-lap: apache2 is still an init script ;-)
[11:27] <patdk-lap> well, as long as it's not an upstart script
[11:27] <patdk-lap> but service works for both :)
[11:31] <roaksoax> Daviey ok i thought the plan was tondrop them from the archive but will do
[11:35] <Daviey> roaksoax: hmm, ok.. depending if we do the feature SRU, we might still need it?  changing the contents?  if not, we should probably Replaces: ?
[11:36] <Daviey> roaksoax: if you raise a removal bug, i'll happily process that.. but just make sure you have worked out both the upgrade plan and potential SRU handling
[11:39] <roaksoax> Daviey it replaces/conflicts with maas-provision and that unintalss maas-provision only
[11:42] <roaksoax> Daviey  that doesnt uninstall -common or python-maas-provision but if they are dropprd from the atchive we will be good
[11:43] <roaksoax> or should at leaeast
[11:43] <roaksoax> both cjwatson and slangasek recomended that if it was to be removed
[11:44] <roaksoax>  but i will check again with them
[11:44] <Daviey> roaksoax: hmm, just dropping them from the archive won't help it get removed from peoples machines
[11:51] <roaksoax> Daviey on upgrade they would if they are gone from the archive wouldnt they? how could we test that in reality?
[11:56] <sazawal> My filesystem is showing I have 9.6 GB free and 5 GB available on / partition. As well as 21.3 GB free and 2.8 GB available on another partition. Doesn't it looks like Ubuntu is reserving too much space for root?
[12:05] <fidel> hi - i just realize imapsync is gone in 12.04. anything else you can recommend if i want to copy several accounts from 1 server to another
[12:05] <fidel> imapcopy might be an option right?
[12:07] <sazawal> My filesystem is showing I have 9.6 GB free and 5 GB available on / partition. As well as 21.3 GB free and 2.8 GB available on another partition. Doesn't it looks like Ubuntu is reserving too much space for root?
[12:11] <xnox> sazawal: by default we install single partition.... did you manually partition?
[12:14] <sazawal> xnox, yes I did
[12:15] <xnox> sazawal: ..... ext4 defaults is 5% reserve
[12:15] <sazawal> xnox, Is it okay, if I move all the reserved space to available space in other partition
[12:15] <ogra_> you dont want to install any apps or so ?
[12:16] <xnox> do you want /var/log/* to kill your server ?!
[12:16] <sazawal> xnox, yes but it is already doing that in root partition
[12:17] <ogra_> you definitely want the space in /usr to install additional apps, space in /var for package caches and logs and space in /boot to carry the incrementing kernel upgrades
[12:18] <ogra_> fi you can make sure all these are on the other partition you can indeed shrink your / partition
[12:30] <demoo201> can anybody in the house help out on vpn route config on zentyal server
[12:32] <demoo201> can anybody in the house help out on vpn route config on zentyal server
[12:35] <demoo201> can anybody in the house help out on vpn route config on zentyal server
[12:38] <demoo201> can anybody in the house help me out on vpn route config on zentyal server
[12:38] <Daviey> demoo201: no. bencer might.. but please stop asking.
[12:39] <demoo201> sorry when i didnt get any response from anybody
[12:40] <bencer> demoo201: you might ask on #zentyal
[12:40] <demoo201> alright thanks
[12:40] <bencer> demoo201: usually if nobody replies means that they don't know or they are busy
[12:40] <bencer> make you question and wait patiently :)
[12:42] <demoo201> am sorry i will be right back pls
[12:42] <zul> good morning
[13:37] <hallyn> stgraber: all right, 3 fixes queued in ubuntu:lxc.  looking back over the list for other lightweights
[13:37] <hallyn> stgraber: do you agree we need FFE for the upstartify change, or can we call that a bugfix (since it fixes a delay on 'stop lxc')?
[13:38] <hallyn> stgraber: oh!  pls try the ubuntu:lxc, and tell me if the init msgs going to console is going to upset ppl.
[13:38] <stgraber> hallyn: I think we'd need a FFe for the upstartify change
[13:41] <hallyn> stgraber: ok.  let's just hold off on it then.  there's enough to worry about
[13:41] <hallyn> huh.  my screen just went black for 3 secs, then came back
[13:45] <stgraber> hallyn: just went through the diff in ubuntu:lxc. For kmsg, I'll had to test to see how annoying it's but I'm more worried by things outside upstart logging to kmsg
[13:48] <hallyn> stgraber: well right now they end up just printing to /dev/kmsg as a file
[13:48] <hallyn> so i think this is an improvement
[13:49] <hallyn> (/dev/kmsg device node doesn't get created by debootstrap apparently)
[13:49] <stgraber> hallyn: agreed
[13:50] <hallyn> hm, no, in an older quantal container it was created as a chardev.  but in others not.  how in?
[13:51] <stgraber> hallyn: I'm pushing a small apparmor change to ubuntu:lxc
[13:51] <stgraber> hallyn: I'll then go look at the staging git for other bugfixes we should include
[13:51] <hallyn> ok
[13:52] <stgraber> hallyn: did you have a chance to fix that shutdown() bug yet?
[13:54] <hallyn> stgraber: no.  lemme do that right now.
[13:54] <hallyn> did you want to grab the mp in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxc/+bug/1050351 ?
[13:54] <stgraber> hallyn: probably. I'll look at it and fix in both shell and python version
[14:01] <stgraber> hallyn: merged wgrant_'s branch
[14:03] <hallyn> stgraber: ok.  (hence my failed push :)
[14:03] <hallyn> that's for lxc-start-ephemeral?
[14:05] <stgraber> hallyn: yep
[14:10] <wgrant> stgraber, hallyn: Thanks.
[14:10] <hallyn> stgraber: i'm going to re-fetch, apply debdiff, and push.  are you not modifying it for the next 5 mins?
[14:10] <stgraber> hallyn: when you have a sec, I have a few commits in https://github.com/stgraber/lxc/commits/master that I'd like to see pushed to the staging branch (would be good to have your changes in git too)
[14:11] <stgraber> hallyn: I'm not touching bzr for the next 5 mins
[14:12] <donspaulding> I need to transfer over 100,000 files from a server with a full disk over the network to a server with a larger disk.  I can't seem to get the netcat incantation right.
[14:13] <donspaulding> On the receiving end, I run this:   nc -l 3452 | bunzip2 -vvv | tar -x
[14:13] <hallyn> stgraber: yes, i have several changes to push too.  will lookat yours right now.  (just pushed bzr)
[14:13] <donspaulding> On the sending end, I run this:  tar -c new/|bzip2 -vv9|nc bigbox1 3452
[14:13] <hallyn> stgraber: do you think i should add ecryptfs mounts to lxc-start next to your overlayfs ones?
[14:14] <stgraber> hallyn: that sounds like a good idea, yes.
[14:14] <donspaulding> However, both terminals just sit there with a "stdin: " prompt.
[14:14] <donspaulding> If I type into the receiving ends stdin: it echoes to the sending end.
[14:14] <donspaulding> Anyone know what's going on?
[14:21] <hallyn> stgraber: looks good, pushing
[14:21] <stgraber> hallyn: cherry-picked all the python-lxc fixes from upstream.
[14:21] <hallyn> stgraber: and put them where?
[14:22] <stgraber> hallyn: do you think we should replace test.py by the new examples/api_test.py
[14:22] <stgraber> hallyn: ubuntu:lxc
[14:22] <hallyn> i'm goign to now take my pending ubutnu:lxc patches and push them to my github tree for you to review
[14:22] <hallyn> uh, sur
[14:22] <hallyn> sure
[14:22] <hallyn> well, what's the advantage?
[14:22] <hallyn> tbh i'ts a bit terse to be an example
[14:23] <stgraber> well, test.py just contained a bunch of commands, api_test.py at least uses everything that's in the API
[14:23] <hallyn> perhaps an ultra-simple 'create-and-run-container' python script would serve as a godo example
[14:23] <hallyn> true
[14:23] <hallyn> ok, then, sure why not :)
[14:24] <hallyn> but i'm thinking "take this command and run it in a freshly created precise container".  without any cloning.  ultra-simple but prehaps useful to someone, and helpful
[14:33] <stgraber> hallyn: pushed one more commit to my branch for when you have a sec (cleanup of api_test, will be included in ubuntu:lxc)
[14:36] <hallyn> stgraber: hm, i'm not happy with how my cherrypicks are leaving history.  'git log staging..stgraber' is showing commits which exist in staging.
[14:37] <hallyn> anyway, pushed
[14:38] <stgraber> hallyn: yeah, I noticed that before, I usually just pull a clean copy of the upstream branch once everything's been merged to clean that up
[14:40] <hallyn> stgraber: oh, *that* is why i thought lxc.mount parsing had been fixed.  it's fixed upstream, but we haven't merged that bck in yet
[14:40] <hallyn> my kingdom for a release :)
[14:42] <hallyn> stgraber: can you review github.com/hallyn/lxc #staging and push to lxc/lxc if it looks ok?
[14:43] <hallyn> i think everything else we have patched in ubuntu:lxc is reflected in github
[14:43] <stgraber> hallyn: ok, doing that now
[14:44] <stgraber> hallyn: we have the double-fork code in ubuntu:lxc right?
[14:44] <hallyn> stgraber: ypu, commit 098d04a4b45daabf7cb5a98e7d02531aa96fbd6d
[14:45] <hallyn> stgraber: are we content with putting things into github and not separately sending email?  or should we, once we're hapy, do a git-send-email for the last week's patches of so?
[14:46] <stgraber> hallyn: I'm fine with just doing stuff on github, if we see that believe want more notifications we can always have the staging branch send e-mails to lxc-devel
[14:52] <stgraber> hallyn: cherry-picked the 3 commits from your branch
[14:55] <stgraber> hallyn: you added ecryptfs only to abstractions-lxc-start-container, not to abstractions-lxc-start-container.in. Fixed that for you, otherwise it'd have got lost at build time :)
[14:55] <hallyn> stgraber: Gah.  thanks.  i didn't realize we had a .in file for that
[14:56] <stgraber> yeah, multi-arch path
[14:56] <stgraber> which is actually kind of wrong...
[14:56] <stgraber> if you have a setup with an amd64 host, i386 container and i386 nested containers, apparmor will fail
[14:57] <stgraber> as it's going to be the profile on the host that'll have to cover everything and the second level of containers will use /usr/lib/i386... and not /usr/lib/x86_64...
[14:58] <stgraber> hallyn: do you see any problem in just changing that to -> /usr/lib/*/lxc/ ?
[14:59] <hallyn> stgraber: i don't.  but is there a better place to put that?
[14:59] <hallyn> that's just for the mount targer reight?
[14:59] <hallyn> ^ 'mount target, right?'
[14:59] <stgraber> mount target and pivot target yeah
[15:00] <hallyn> ideally we could have a different path, with sub-paths, so i can mount ecryptfs path to /whatever/lxc/ecryptfs and then mount that to /whatever/lxc/root
[15:01] <stgraber> indeed. I'm also tempted to say that this really should be /var/lib/lxc/<name>/mount/ or something similar so it's per-container and not likely to race when starting a lot of them
[15:02] <stgraber> possibly with a matching config key to support using an alternate path if the admin doesn't want to use /var for that
[15:03] <hallyn> stgraber: the only thing that could race is the pre-start hook (which shouldn't do mounting)
[15:03] <hallyn> stgraber: bc we use the the mounts are done in a separate ns
[15:04] <hallyn> stgraber: maybe this is worth discussing at uds
[15:04] <hallyn> and leaving as is for now
[15:05] <stgraber> hallyn: well, it'd get racy if you start creating directories outside of the rootfs
[15:05] <stgraber> hallyn: but yeah, probably worth discussing at UDS
[15:05] <stgraber> hallyn: for now I just pushed the change to allow /usr/lib/*/lxc/
[15:05] <hallyn> stgraber: cool
[15:05] <hallyn> yes - creating directories would be racy :)
[15:06] <hallyn> stgraber: but my main prblem right now is that lxc-ls shows 'ecrptfs-root' and 'ecryptfs-root.hold' as containers :)
[15:06] <hallyn> hm.
[15:06] <stgraber> well, lxc-ls is pretty stupid... I'll fix that :)
[15:06] <stgraber> it really should only list /var/lib/lxc/*/config
[15:06] <hallyn> well no - actually that proves that what i'm doing is wrong
[15:07] <stgraber> oh, yeah, and you should have these directories under the container directory in /var/lib
[15:07] <hallyn> the ecryptfs root does have to be in /var/lib/lxc/container/ bc the .hold file will cause a problem with >1 ecryptfs containers
[15:07] <stgraber> not directly in /var/lib/lxc
[15:07] <hallyn> yeah, i didn't do it for apparmor reasons
[15:07] <hallyn> we need a way to say "you can only mount under /var/lib/lxc/@container@/**
[15:08] <hallyn> errand - bbl
[15:08] <stgraber> hallyn: well, that's in the start-container profile right? if so, I'd go with just allowing mounts in /var/lib/lxc/*/
[15:09] <stgraber> hallyn: what we really care about is what you can do from within the container, I don't think we should spend too much effort trying to restrict lxc-start as it's running outside the container and as root anyway
[15:20] <hallyn> stgraber: ok let me fix that then.  were you planning to push new pkg soon?
[15:20] <hallyn> stgraber: i'll open a new bug for it
[15:22] <stgraber> hallyn: I think we have enough things in there now that we probably should upload today once all the remaining fixes are in there (still scanning the upstream branch, but it's looking good so far)
[15:23] <hallyn> stgraber: ok if you're happy with your fixes, i can push once i get the ecryptfs fix in
[15:25] <stgraber> hallyn: test build finished here, so at least I didn't break anything with the few files I've been moving/removing in there. I just finished going through the git branch and I think we're good, didn't see anything relevant to cherry-pick
[15:26] <stgraber> hallyn: so go ahead with the upload once you're done fixing ecryptfs
[15:30] <hallyn> stgraber: ok  (i'll do a lxc-test run first)  will wait until after lunch
[15:30] <hallyn> stgraber: actually i'd appreciate your review of the ecryptfs fix (still working on it)
[15:31] <stgraber> ok
[15:35] <hallyn> what?  how cna the tree have diverged?  ijust pulled it :)
[15:39] <stgraber> hallyn: last revision I pushed was 156
[15:39] <stgraber> seems like that's still what's in the tree
[15:42] <hallyn> stgraber: oh no, you broke build :)  sed: can't read debian/apparmor/*.in: No such file or directory
[15:42] <hallyn> stgraber: should we keep that loop (and fix when it's empty) or remove it?
[15:43] <hallyn> (pushed the ecryptfs fix for nwo)
[15:43] <hallyn> well i'll just remove the loop for now
[15:44] <stgraber> hallyn: doh, not sure why I didn't get that one :)
[15:44] <stgraber> hallyn: thanks for fixing it
[15:47] <hallyn> stgraber: pushed, will test and push after lunch.  ttyl
[16:39] <marcfp> hello
[16:39] <marcfp> i had installed ubuntu 12 and apache with mysql and phpmyadmin too
[16:40] <marcfp> when i try to see my  homepage wichone is maked using php, i only see a blank page, can somebody help me, please ?
[16:46] <marcfp> but if i want see info.php, wichone contain <? phpinfo(); ?> it shows the php page ...
[16:46] <marcfp> can somebody help me, please ?
[16:46] <RoyK> marcfp: you probably need to install libapache2-modphp
[16:46] <marcfp> RoyK: libapache2-modphp ?
[16:47] <marcfp> i think that i had installed it
[16:47] <RoyK> libapache2-mod-php5
[16:47] <RoyK> that is
[16:47] <marcfp> RoyK: libapache2-modphp ?ii  libapache2-mod-php5   ?
[16:47] <RoyK> and perhaps reload or restart apache
[16:48] <marcfp> it is installed
[16:48] <marcfp> RoyK: i had make service apache2 reload and /etc/init.d/apache2 reload
[16:48] <marcfp> sorry, reload no, restart :S
[16:48] <RoyK> restart should be quite sufficient
[16:48] <RoyK> marcfp: which distro version is this?
[16:48] <marcfp> RoyK: ubuntu 12
[16:49] <RoyK> 12.04, then, I guess
[16:49] <jacobw> hi, i'm having a problem with using koan with cobbler
[16:49] <RoyK> marcfp: check /etc/apache2/mods-enabled
[16:49] <RoyK> ls that dir
[16:49] <RoyK> is php5 there?
[16:50] <marcfp> /etc/apache2/mods-enabled/php5.conf  /etc/apache2/mods-enabled/php5.load
[16:50] <RoyK> should work, then
[16:50] <marcfp> there are these
[16:51] <marcfp> but it doesn't work :(
[16:51] <jacobw> http://paste.ubuntu.com/1203012/
[16:52] <RoyK> marcfp: try changing that to <?php ...
[16:53] <jacobw> my problem seems similar to this bug, which is marked fix released as of 2012-01-18
[16:53] <marcfp> RoyK: if i make a new page named "prova.php" and i gonna access to http://localhost/prova.php, i gonna see the page of php information :S (excuse my english mistakes)
[16:53] <RoyK> marcfp: did you try <?php ?
[16:53] <marcfp> i'm goona try it
[16:53] <jacobw> bug #918286
[16:54] <marcfp> RoyK: it makes the same
[16:55] <marcfp> :(
[16:55] <RoyK> marcfp: I just tested on this 12.04.1 install where I didn't have php5 installed - installed libapache2-mod-php5, reloaded apache, created a test page http://smilla.karlsbakk.net/phptest/
[16:56] <marcfp> RoyK: i'm using Ubuntu/Linaro 4.6.3-1ubuntu5
[16:58] <RoyK> marcfp: on arm?
[16:58] <marcfp> RoyK: i'm using virtualbox :S
[16:58] <marcfp> RoyK: no, on amd ahtolon II x4 640 processor
[16:59] <marcfp> intel
[16:59] <marcfp> ie85
[16:59] <marcfp> i386, sorry :s
[16:59] <RoyK> marcfp: I guess #linaro may be better then
[16:59] <marcfp> linaro ?
[16:59] <RoyK> 18:56 < marcfp> RoyK: i'm using Ubuntu/Linaro 4.6.3-1ubuntu5
[16:59] <marcfp> what is it ? (sorry for my dummy question, but i don't know what is it :S)
[16:59] <marcfp> ups
[16:59] <marcfp> :S
[17:02] <marcfp> RoyK: thank's to you :)
[17:03] <RoyK> np :)
[17:03] <marcfp> i had joined into this channel ans asked for my problem :) thanks
[17:03] <hallyn> stgraber: tests passed, pushing to q
[17:06] <RoyK> Some redhat guys at work tells me "redhat solves most bugs, and canonical/ubuntu hardly solves any, but relies on other people's work" Is there anything true about this? If not, where can I find references?
[17:09] <hallyn> RoyK: i'm sure there's a channel more appropriate for that discussion.  #ubuntu maybe.  not sure.
[17:10] <hallyn> oh, hm, didn't run examples/api_test.py.  belatedly doing so now
[17:11] <ogra_> RoyK, yeah, indeed, w're all slackers, we only import the debian packages, twiddle thumpbs for 6 months and make a release ;)
[17:11] <ogra_> the redhat guys have a really deep insight into canonical ... they definitely know how we work ;)
[17:13] <RoyK> ogra_: really, I wasn't trying to blame anything or anyone
[17:14] <ogra_> RoyK, i wasnt referring to you but to the RH guy ;)
[17:14] <ogra_> *guys
[17:14] <RoyK> ogra_: I've been using debian/ubuntu for rather a few years (debian since 1998 or so, later ubuntu), I just wanted to know if anyone had any docs about htis
[17:14] <rmk> RoyK: Let this person check out all the Ubuntu launchpad bugs and responses.
[17:14] <rmk> RoyK: There are thousands of issues where various people have responded with patches, created PPAs with the fixes, etc.
[17:14] <ogra_> RoyK, docs about RH people spreading FUD ? i doubt there are any
[17:15] <RoyK> dunno - perhaps this wheenie is just spreading FUD because he likes things the old way :P
[17:15] <ogra_> the old way?
[17:16] <RoyK> the redhat way, meaning the old way, how things have been at this facility for some time
[17:16] <ogra_> you think dropping /usr, replacing init etc is the "old way" ?
[17:16] <ogra_> (or defaulting to a tmpfs for /tmp to include the last insanity)
[17:16] <RoyK> dunno
[17:17] <RoyK> I'm not trying to start an argument here
[17:17] <ogra_> i know, me neither ...
[17:17] <ogra_> but the above is clearly FUD
[17:17] <ogra_> ask them for docs and numbers first ;)
[17:18] <RoyK> will do. this guy probably has asberger's or worse
[17:18] <RoyK> so it's a bit hard to discuss things with him
[17:18] <marcfp> see you
[17:18]  * patdk-wk hasn't seen rhel fix bugs, normally I have to look elsewhere
[17:18] <ogra_> there are plenty of such guys in the RH world ... *cough*lennartOS*cough*
[17:19] <marcfp> i'm download ubuntu-server distro now
[17:19] <patdk-wk> I have seen both fedora and ubuntu upstream bug fixs
[17:19] <ogra_> right
[17:19] <patdk-wk> bug fixs relevent to me :)
[17:19] <marcfp> and i will install it
[17:19] <RoyK> marcfp: probably safer ;)
[17:19] <ogra_> so claiming such a thing without providing any numbers or docs proving it is pure FUD
[17:20] <RoyK> marcfp: stick to the LTS releases for servers
[17:20] <patdk-wk> I'm also sure ubuntu patchs get covered up, between the upstream to debian then up to the kernel/lib/...
[17:21] <marcfp> stick ?
[17:21] <marcfp> mmmm
[17:21] <marcfp> one moment :S
[17:21] <marcfp> i don't know what stick means
[17:22] <RoyK> marcfp: what I mean, is use LTS releases (12.04 is the latest, 14.04 will be the next) for your server(s)
[17:22] <RoyK> marcfp: the versions between won't be supported very long, but LTS releases are supported five years
[17:22] <RoyK> !lts
[17:23] <patdk-wk> unbetween releases are only supported for 18 months
[17:23] <RoyK> non-LTS-releases, like the upcoming quantal 12.10 release, are supported only 18 months
[17:23] <RoyK> yeah, as patdk-wk said
[17:23] <patdk-wk> inbetween :)
[17:23] <patdk-wk> no wonder that looked odd to me
[17:24]  * patdk-wk open eyes, where is the caffeine
[17:24] <RoyK> unbetween \o/
[17:24] <RoyK> reminds me of a brilliant book by Neal Gaiman, Neverwhere
[17:25] <hallyn> jamespage: are you around?
[17:25] <RoyK> (and if you're interested in that book, don't do the major mistake of downloading and watching the tv series, they suck rather badly)
[17:26] <hallyn> jamespage: wondering if we can try one last time to chat about the blueprint item:
[17:26] <hallyn> Provide a test to check the status of the VM after upgrade (nested VM's)
[17:27]  * patdk-wk would love a movie trilogy of otherland
[17:27] <slyboots> Uh..
[17:27] <slyboots> Anyone know why Ubuntu-server would keep running Dhcpd requests when I've set the entry in /etc/network/interfaces to static?
[17:27] <slyboots> Its really screwing things up..
[17:28] <slyboots> (12.01)
[17:28] <stgraber> hallyn: cool, thanks for the upload.
[17:28] <RoyK> slyboots: probably 12.04?
[17:28] <slyboots> Yes, sorry, 12.04
[17:28] <stgraber> hallyn: do you already call src/python-lxc/examples/api_test.py in lxc-test? if not, that should be a good addition
[17:29] <RoyK> slyboots: pastebin /etc/network/interfaces, please
[17:29] <RoyK> !pastebin
[17:29] <patdk-wk> slyboots, did you reboot, or use ifdown/ifup?
[17:29] <RoyK> or /etc/init.d/networking restart ?
[17:29] <slyboots> networking restart, then when it kept happinging I used ifdown/ifup
[17:30] <RoyK> maybe dhcpcd is still alive?
[17:31] <marcfp> see you
[17:32] <hallyn> stgraber: no, i don't.  good idea
[17:33] <stgraber> hallyn: in theory, if something goes wrong it'll trigger one of the asserts in it causing the script to return non-zero
[17:33] <slyboots> Okay, set a kill signal to dhcpd, with luck that'll sort it
[17:46] <hallyn> stgraber: done, works like a charm :)
[17:58] <theguywithanaxe> Hey
[17:59] <theguywithanaxe> got a quetion for you guys, i have a dual nic on a server and was wondering how i could or if i could use the servers second nic to connect a PC through it to the internet
[17:59] <theguywithanaxe> i've seen somepages on proxy forwarding but im not sure if im headed in the right direction
[18:12] <JanC> theguywithanaxe: somebody else asked the same question on AskUbuntu... http://askubuntu.com/questions/177985/natting-in-ubuntu-server
[18:21] <theguywithanaxe> ty
[18:30] <Korsakof> Hi! Anyone knows if LVM on a whole disk is considered aligned from a SAN point of view?
[18:35] <theguywithanaxe> how do you save with the VI editor?
[18:35] <theguywithanaxe> im used to nano write outs lol
[18:35] <slyboots> :w
[18:39] <Korsakof> escape, :w
[18:41] <RoyK> theguywithanaxe: run vimtutor ;)
[18:41] <RoyK> Korsakof: depends on the SAN system
[18:42] <RoyK> Korsakof: most high-end SANs have thin provosioning and spread out the blocks on whatever spindles they have
[18:42] <Korsakof> RoyK: netapp (ontap) with vSphere 5
[18:43] <RoyK> Korsakof: then just don't think about it - it might be good to change the i/o scheduler, though, but my tests show no significant difference between them
[18:44] <RoyK> some say "use noop", some say "use deadline", cfq is the default, but I'm not sure if that's optimal for such storage
[18:45] <RoyK> cfq does more than a few tricks to sort things according to disk layout
[18:45] <RoyK> that's not what you want when storage is outside of linux' reach
[18:46] <RoyK> deadline is pretty basic, and should work well
[18:46] <RoyK> noop is the most basic of them, just bash out all i/o to the device and let it do its thing, maybe better for some setups
[18:53] <Korsakof> RoyK: Thanks! The guy that is in charge of our SAN keeps telling us that we need to align the partition in our vmdks.
[18:53] <nov503> hi, when I run maas-import-isos, it says : httpd does not appear to be running and proxying cobbler. Anyone has any ideas please?
[18:54] <RoyK> Korsakof: there probably isn't a reason to do so
[18:54] <Korsakof> The tool mbrscan is able to view normal partition table and tell if its aligned or not but it does not detect lvm on a whole disk...
[18:54] <Korsakof> :)
[18:54] <Korsakof> I'm not really surprised to hear that :)
[18:55] <RoyK> thing is, virtualized storage is another cup of tea than working with physical drives
[18:55] <nov503> when i run sudo cobbler check, it says httpd does not appear to be running and proxying cobbler. as well
[18:57] <RoyK> nov503: check the apache logs
[19:02] <theguywithanaxe> yeah that link is  nott helping lol
[19:02] <theguywithanaxe> it sights baad argumments and all the commands are not listed correctly
[19:28] <koolhead17> Daviey, ping ping :)
[19:28] <koolhead17> adam_g, zul hellos
[19:33] <Daviey> koolhead17: hey
[19:34] <koolhead17> Daviey, need you permission sir
[19:34] <Daviey> permission to ask a question?
[19:34] <Daviey> granted
[19:55] <theguywithanaxe> dnsmasq setting to hand out IPs in a range for a network? not sure what im supposed to uncomment
[20:24] <aarcane> I've just installed ubuntu server, and for some reason, the command chattr +i somefile is not working for any value of somefile.  lsattr is failing similarly with Operation not supported While reading flags on
[20:24] <aarcane> it's an ext4 system, so I know it SHOULD work.  it just doesn't.
[20:42] <theguywithanaxe> huh
[21:09] <nov503> Hi, I've seen this problem and solution…does anyone know how to sync the clock for the node?
[21:09] <nov503> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/maas/+bug/992075/comments/2
[21:45] <nov503> I've solved that, thanks
[22:01] <nov503> Hi, when I run pxe booting, my slave machine falls into a shell when commission, and the commission status persists. The apache log says nothing, any one know where the problem may be in?
[23:06] <nov503> Hi, anyone saw this problem before? from syslog in.tftpd[5655]: tftp: client does not accept options
[23:08] <ogra_> whats the problem with it ?
[23:08] <nov503> when i pxe boot the maas slave(commission), it just fall into login promt
[23:09] <ogra_> well, that message is perfectly normal
[23:09] <nov503> and another message is tgtd: conn_close(101) connection closed, 0x2440ec8 1
[23:09] <nov503> and it never finishes commssion
[23:10] <ogra_> well, i have not much knowledge about maas, but if you actually only have these two messages i would go with the second one :)
[23:10] <nov503> thanks for that ! let me search more for it…
[23:11] <ogra_> the first one is just tftpd informing you about the clients features
[23:11] <ogra_> (or non-features)
[23:11] <nov503> make sense, thanks!
[23:20] <Kentos> Hey everyone
[23:20] <Kentos> running into some troubles with connecting through my server to the internet through its second NIC
[23:45] <nov503> Hi, I can't finish the node commission, and the log of /var/log/cloud-init is : searching for data source in ['datasourceNoCloud', []]'datasourceconfigdrive', 'datasourceOVF'] and didin't find them
[23:45] <nov503> does anyone have any ideas?
[23:51] <Kentos> anyone able to help with connecting my pc through my server's second NIC to the internet (which should be on 1st NIC)