[00:28] jbicha, I notice the gtk symbolic icon bug affects the gnome classic status icons [00:30] oh? I don't think I've run GNOME Classic this week [00:30] that's why we need a QA team :) [00:32] the status icons seem to use ambiance theme [00:32] and hence the coloured icons are displayed instead of symbolics [02:12] so there's a new kernel that supposedly fixes the undefined video mode problem [02:13] that's a pretty quick turnaround [02:34] jbicha, yeh very quick [02:35] aside from the coloured icons making this worse, gnome classic will still show wrong power icons once that gtk bug is fixed [02:35] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-panel/+bug/1050695 [02:35] Ubuntu bug 1050695 in gnome-panel (Ubuntu) "gnome-panel does not obey icon theme" [Undecided,New] [02:52] could you include a screenshot, gnome classic looks the same to me as it looked in precise [03:01] ok, added [03:02] you know if it were up to me, i'd Incomplete that bug [03:02] um [03:03] how's that different? [03:03] the icons are full color [03:03] in the status area [03:03] and they are also from Ambiance not Adwaita [03:03] here's a question: [03:04] do application icons *have* Adwaita themed icons shipped with them? [03:04] ('tis valid) [03:04] well things like nautalius do [03:04] "things like nautilus" [03:04] jbicha, /query? [03:05] unrelated technical question [03:05] the icon on bottom left corner is adwaita icon [03:07] darkxst: are you sure those aren't Adwaita icons? they sure like Adwaita icons to me and light-themes isn't even installed on my VM [03:07] jbicha, screenshot for compare? [03:07] TheLordOfTime: sure [03:07] and also, seriously, unrelated tech question :P [03:08] TheLordOfTime: there's nothing to compare, his screenshot looks just like my fresh Ubuntu GNOME install [03:08] jbicha, where's the ISO? [03:08] * TheLordOfTime was going to VM it [03:09] ... after this system finishes its kernel updates [03:11] unfortunately, from a bugsquad perspective, i dont' see enough information in this bug, that'd technically rule it as "incomplete" [03:11] ... but apparently i'd want to test first :P [03:11] * TheLordOfTime digs around for ISOs === ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-gnome to: Ubuntu GNOME Remix | Alpha 2 is out! Download from https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuGNOME/ReleaseNotes/12.10Alpha2 | Pastes to http://paste.ubuntu.com | http://gnomebuntu.org/ | https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-gnome [03:12] TheLordOfTime: download link is in the channel topic ^ [03:12] unfortunately, from a bugsquad perspective, i dont' see enough information in this bug, that'd technically rule it as "incomplete" [03:12] ... but apparently i'd want to test first :P [03:12] jbicha, ^ repost of what i said after you died [03:16] I guess the bug is that gnome-themes-standard probably doesn't ship symbolic icons for the specific icon names that the indicators are looking for [03:16] ...or the bug could be that the indicators are looking for the wrong icon names but I believe it would be too late to fix that for 12.10 if that's the case [03:17] if it would require renaming Ubuntu icon theme icons [03:19] might need further information or details [03:20] if it were my call, the bug would be incomplete, but that's me [03:20] someone could poke around the indicator's source code and see what it's doing [03:22] the bug as it stands is pretty damn ambiguous, you have to admit [03:22] as it stands, at least, its incomplete. [03:22] (again, IMO) [03:22] i'm headed off to beat my girlfriend in Halo on the xbox, then go to bed ;P [10:06] * smartboyhw has just finished compiling a daily build again [12:25] Yo jbicha [12:43] good morning [12:46] ah timezones! [12:47] lol [13:07] jbicha, you had any progress getting artwork and slideshow? [13:07] jbicha: I do wonder: Are you a canonical employee/ [13:08] smartboyhw, this is a community resping [13:08] remix even [13:09] lol since I saw my gmail saying that jbicha sent through canonical.com [13:12] smartboyhw: no, but I have an ubuntu.com email which Canonical manages [13:12] Ah that's why:) [13:12] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Membership [13:12] jbicha: How are ya? [13:12] jbicha: Getting membership in I think October or Nov [13:18] I started using Ubuntu in 2006 and didn't get membership until 2011 [13:18] I should have applied sooner actually [13:18] What? That's long [13:18] 6 months is usually enough [13:21] not exactly [13:22] Well 5 YEARS is a bit too long, I think maybe 1 to 2 years [13:22] it's not 6 months of use, it's at least 6 months of "significant" involvement [13:22] Don't I know;) [13:26] jbicha, so boot bug wasnt fixed so quickly after all? [13:26] darkxst: Anyway it is not the Remix problem I think, upstream it is [13:27] smartboyhw, yeh its definately ubuntu bug [13:28] Wait for the ubuntu devs then [13:31] jbicha: You do work a lot on docs I see:) [13:34] yeah, I need other people to do docs stuff too but it's a bit challenging to get involved in it [13:34] it doesn't require knowing programming though [13:34] docbook is too difficult to me:) [13:34] smartboyhw, did I even address that question to you? no need to jump in with random answers! [13:36] oh, well, ubuntu-docs itself uses Mallard now which is simpler than docbook, but yeah [13:39] :) [16:18] oww... okay, so maybe staying awake for 40 hours is bad *yawn* [16:28] TheLordOfTime: go to sleep! [16:53] i just woke up after sleeping [16:53] ended up passed out on the floor, apparently *yawn* [17:09] can someone please give me a little sound troubleshooting advice [17:09] hello? [17:10] patience [17:10] !patience [17:10] Don't feel ignored and repeat your question quickly; if nobody knows your answer, nobody will answer you. While you wait, try searching https://help.ubuntu.com or http://ubuntuforums.org or http://askubuntu.com/