ScottK | debfx: Can you go through and very the fixes you included with 4.8.5 for library file overwrite issues over the weekend, so 4.8.5 can go to -updates on Monday? | 02:55 |
---|---|---|
mah454 | Hello | 06:48 |
mah454 | I want to change default clock format to jalali calendar . | 06:48 |
mah454 | How can do this ? | 06:48 |
debfx | ScottK: I don't think I can verify bugs when I'm the uploader | 07:37 |
apachelogger | mah454: iff one installs with a language/locale that is supposed to happen automatically | 08:07 |
apachelogger | if this is not the case the setting would be in systemsettings' locale configuration | 08:08 |
* shadeslayer tickles apachelogger | 08:16 | |
* apachelogger leaves :P | 08:17 | |
shadeslayer | aw, don't be like that now | 08:18 |
mah454 | apachelogger: i need change it for all new users | 08:22 |
mah454 | chnage default calendar format to jalali for all new users | 08:23 |
mah454 | how can do this ? | 08:23 |
mah454 | this script is true ? clock.calendarType("jalali"); | 09:34 |
mah454 | I want add this to DefaultLayout.js in KDE templates ... | 09:35 |
kubotu | ::qt-bugs:: [1051194] package libqtcore4 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: nicht vollständig gelesen ... @ https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1051194 (by bssmusic) | 09:37 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 1051194 in qt4-x11 (Ubuntu) "package libqtcore4 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: nicht vollständig gelesen in Pufferkopie für Backend dpkg-deb während »./usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQtCore.so.4.8.1«" [Undecided,New] | 09:37 |
shadeslayer | mah454: /usr/share/kubuntu-default-settings/kde4-profile/default/share/apps/plasma-desktop/init/00-defaultLayout.js | 10:14 |
shadeslayer | read that | 10:14 |
mah454 | shadeslayer: I want change default calendar for all users to Jalali | 10:14 |
mah454 | How can do this ? | 10:15 |
shadeslayer | should be doable using plasma desktop scripting | 10:15 |
shadeslayer | read the file I just pointed out | 10:15 |
shadeslayer | then create something like 01-my-defaults.js | 10:15 |
shadeslayer | KDE 4.9.1 packages in staging : https://launchpad.net/~kubuntu-ppa/+archive/staging | 10:20 |
shadeslayer | My upgrade from ninjas went fine last night, so let me know if you have issues | 10:20 |
mah454 | KDE 4.9 stored in kubuntu-update repository ? | 10:22 |
shadeslayer | nope, I've put it in staging atm | 10:23 |
shadeslayer | I'll copy it this evening | 10:24 |
shadeslayer | ( to kubuntu backports ) | 10:24 |
apachelogger | shadeslayer: calendar has nothing to do with plasma | 11:13 |
shadeslayer | apachelogger: I thought he was talking about the plasma widget calendar | 11:14 |
apachelogger | that also obeys klocale I should hope | 11:14 |
apachelogger | mah454: echo $LANG | 11:15 |
mah454 | apachelogger: en_US.UTF-8 | 11:15 |
apachelogger | is that intended? | 11:16 |
apachelogger | great, now I don't see the painting delay from yesterday in ubiquity anymore | 11:25 |
apachelogger | hooray -.- | 11:25 |
shadeslayer | dpkg-source: info: applying bypass-braindead-buildsystem | 11:29 |
shadeslayer | rofl | 11:29 |
mparillo | shadeslayer: When you wrote that the KDE SC 4.9.1 packages are in staging, does that mean you would like somebody to test applying them? I just installed a 10.4.1 virtualized image just in case. | 11:31 |
shadeslayer | mparillo: yus :) | 11:31 |
shadeslayer | mparillo: see https://launchpad.net/~kubuntu-ppa/+archive/staging | 11:31 |
mparillo | so I need to add a new repository to Muon? | 11:33 |
shadeslayer | temporarily, yes | 11:33 |
mparillo | I was going to add under Other Software ppa:kubuntu-ppa/staging | 11:36 |
mparillo | But it asks for something like deb http://... | 11:36 |
shadeslayer | mparillo: use : deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/kubuntu-ppa/staging/ubuntu precise main | 11:37 |
mparillo | So, I use: | 11:37 |
mparillo | deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/kubuntu-ppa/staging/ubuntu precise main | 11:37 |
mparillo | ? | 11:37 |
shadeslayer | yep | 11:37 |
shadeslayer | I just do add-apt-repository via command line | 11:37 |
shadeslayer | that's the easiest way | 11:37 |
mparillo | So, now I have done it, and Muon shows a TON of Not Installed packages. | 11:39 |
shadeslayer | aye, mark all of them for a upgrade | 11:39 |
yofel | hm, software-properties *should* support ppa: syntax - or that simply isn't implemented in the KDE one (which sounds likely) | 11:39 |
yofel | also, please make sure you disable the PPA again after installing the packages | 11:39 |
shadeslayer | ^ that's why I said temporarily ;) | 11:40 |
yofel | ah right :) | 11:40 |
mparillo | Hmm, there is not the normal mark for upgrades checkbox. | 11:40 |
yofel | check for updates first | 11:40 |
BluesKaj | Hiyas all | 11:40 |
yofel | hi BluesKaj | 11:41 |
BluesKaj | hey yofel | 11:41 |
shadeslayer | mparillo: yofel ppa:kubuntu-ppa/ppa worked for me | 11:43 |
yofel | hm, someone forgot to take calligra out of the ISO's - with wallpapers and libreoffice added we've hit the size limit | 11:45 |
mparillo | Shadeslayer: Hmmm, it did not say re-start required, but I will try anyway. | 12:01 |
shadeslayer | wut | 12:05 |
shadeslayer | why would you restart :P | 12:05 |
apachelogger | no xnox :( | 12:10 |
mparillo | shadeslayer: After a re-bot of my VM, opening Dolphin, about KDE, I get: KDE - Be Free! | 12:12 |
mparillo | Platform Version 4.9.1 | 12:12 |
mparillo | I call that a successful test case execution! | 12:12 |
mparillo | s /re-bot/re-boot/ | 12:13 |
shadeslayer | :D | 12:14 |
shadeslayer | alright then, I'll copy it to backports | 12:14 |
shadeslayer | mparillo: fwiw you can just relogin to get the new KDE | 12:15 |
shadeslayer | no need to reboot | 12:15 |
shadeslayer | mparillo: I believe you have a release announcement ready somewhere? | 12:16 |
shadeslayer | alrighty, debs copied | 12:20 |
shadeslayer | !find stylerc | 12:26 |
ubottu | Package/file stylerc does not exist in quantal | 12:26 |
mparillo | shadeslayer: I do. It is written, but not published. I do not know if Riddell has reviewed it yet. | 12:34 |
shadeslayer | mparillo: please add the information about backported packages as wel | 12:35 |
shadeslayer | *well | 12:35 |
mparillo | shadeslayer: I published the news item. It is the lead news item on http://www.kubuntu.org/ | 12:45 |
shadeslayer | awesome :D | 12:46 |
tsimpson | anyone can update a news item: http://www.kubuntu.org/news/kde-plasma-workspaces-applications-and-platform-491 <- the link to "KDE SC 4.9.1" has an extraneous double-quote one the end of the link | 13:09 |
=== rdieter_laptop is now known as rdieter | ||
shadeslayer | tsimpson: sec | 13:25 |
ScottK | debfx: You can. | 13:25 |
ScottK | The only thing you can't do if you're the uploader is approve/accept the upload. | 13:25 |
ScottK | (which only affects SRU team members) | 13:26 |
shadeslayer | tsimpson: fixed | 13:27 |
tsimpson | thanks | 13:28 |
debfx | ScottK: that seems a bit pointless to me since uploading should already imply that it's tested by the one who prepared the package | 13:35 |
ScottK | Right, but you would have tested before the upload. The goal is to test the actual packages in the archive in case something went astray. | 13:36 |
ScottK | We're relying on the fact that the SRU team reviews the diff for each upload. | 13:36 |
ScottK | For hardware specific stuff we might want more testing, but for something simple like thses, I think it's fine. | 13:37 |
ScottK | It would be nice if someone could verify the fixes for phonon-backend-gstreamer too. | 13:39 |
debfx | ok, I hope I got all file overwrite bugs | 13:48 |
BluesKaj | ScottK, which fixes for phonon-backend-gstreamer ...I've been using the vlc backend | 13:56 |
apachelogger | oh actually | 13:58 |
apachelogger | tsdgeos may want to verify one of them | 13:59 |
apachelogger | BluesKaj: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/phonon-backend-gstreamer/+bug/1028903/comments/1 | 13:59 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 1028903 in phonon-backend-gstreamer (Ubuntu) "SRU Phonon GStreamer 4.6.2 to 12.04" [High,New] | 13:59 |
BluesKaj | ok , thanks apachelogger | 14:02 |
Sentynel | hi folks, looks like there's a minor packaging error with today's 12.04 kubuntu-backports kde update - the kopete package refuses to install due to a conflict with kopete-gcall over /usr/bin/googletalk-call. removing the kopete-gcall package and reinstalling kopete seems to fix things | 14:23 |
mparillo | tsimpson shadeslayer sorry about that extra double quote. Innacuarate copying and pasting, I bet. | 14:27 |
shadeslayer | mparillo: np | 14:28 |
ScottK | shadeslayer: Is the kopete-gcall issue Sentynel mentioned from your update? | 16:18 |
ScottK | debfx: Thanks. | 16:18 |
shadeslayer | huh? where? | 16:18 |
shadeslayer | hm | 16:19 |
* shadeslayer looks | 16:19 | |
Sentynel | kopete-gcall is a really old package apparently, and should have been long gone | 16:20 |
shadeslayer | aye | 16:20 |
shadeslayer | I can't find it in precise :) | 16:21 |
Sentynel | http://pastebin.com/AHgzTaRK here's the exact error | 16:21 |
shadeslayer | I did a clean install on my system and ugprade from whaterver was on 12.04.1 to 4.9.1 .. no issues | 16:21 |
shadeslayer | 4:4.6.2-0ubuntu1 | 16:21 |
shadeslayer | gosh | 16:21 |
Sentynel | yeah, I dunno how the heck that was still there | 16:22 |
ScottK | shadeslayer: If it's an old package, just add conflicts/breaks. | 16:22 |
shadeslayer | ScottK: yeah, that's what I was thinking | 16:22 |
ScottK | Obviously if you don't have the old package installed, you won't get the error. | 16:22 |
shadeslayer | yep ... | 16:22 |
shadeslayer | ScottK: should I also add it to quantal packages? | 16:24 |
ScottK | It went away after 4.6. | 16:24 |
ScottK | So we should add it in precise and leave quantal alone. | 16:24 |
shadeslayer | alright | 16:24 |
ScottK | Sentynel: Would you please file a bug. | 16:24 |
ScottK | shadeslayer: Would you please prepare an update to the pending 4.8.5 SRU for kdenetworking that fixes it and upload it. I can accept it then. | 16:25 |
shadeslayer | ScottK: sure | 16:25 |
shadeslayer | give me a couple of minutes .... | 16:25 |
ScottK | Thanks. Ping me when it's uploaded. | 16:25 |
Sentynel | ScottK: sure, where? | 16:29 |
ScottK | bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kdenetworking | 16:29 |
ScottK | Or not | 16:30 |
Sentynel | it's kdenetwork | 16:31 |
ScottK | Yeah | 16:32 |
ScottK | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kdenetwork | 16:32 |
Sentynel | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kdenetwork/+bug/1051333 | 16:33 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 1051333 in kdenetwork (Ubuntu) "Kopete 4.9.1-0ubuntu1~ubuntu12.04.1~ppa2 package install fails with old kopete-gcall package installed" [Undecided,New] | 16:33 |
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
ScottK | shadeslayer: ^^^ | 16:39 |
shadeslayer | aye, I'll get to it right after dinner | 16:39 |
ScottK | I updated where it was targeted and assigned it to you. | 16:42 |
ScottK | Thanks. | 16:42 |
shadeslayer | ScottK: uploaded | 16:59 |
ScottK | shadeslayer: Thanks. | 16:59 |
shadeslayer | Sentynel: thanks for pointing that out :) | 17:01 |
Sentynel | no worries | 17:03 |
bambee | Hi, is it possible to disable the check "scanning for Btrfs filesystems" at bootup ? it's very slow and I have not btrfs partitions... | 17:53 |
yofel | bambee: set check pass to 0 in fstab | 17:54 |
yofel | as of quantal fsck.btrfs is a noop at boot | 17:54 |
bambee | strange :\ | 17:55 |
yofel | which release are you on? | 17:55 |
bambee | I use the development branch | 17:55 |
bambee | so quantal | 17:55 |
bambee | and it's up to date | 17:55 |
yofel | hm... it shouldn't be slow there... | 17:55 |
yofel | use the fstab setting then | 17:56 |
bambee | yofel: the boot takes... 45s - 1 min... and "scanning for btrfs filesystems" takes... 30s... | 17:57 |
yofel | hm | 17:58 |
yofel | wait | 17:58 |
bambee | on precise the boot was really fast | 17:58 |
yofel | not sure why the *scan* would take so long unless you have a weird disk setup. #btrfs might know something | 17:58 |
yofel | sorry, have to go now, bbl | 17:59 |
bambee | np | 18:01 |
bambee | thanks for your help | 18:01 |
ScottK | shadeslayer: The last version of kopete-gcall in the archive was 4:4.6.2-0ubuntu1, so your versioning is incorrect. Since we want the package removed, just drop the version and re-upload. | 18:20 |
shadeslayer | k | 18:21 |
ScottK | shadeslayer: Thanks. | 18:32 |
ScottK | Looking | 18:32 |
ScottK | Shouldn't that be Conflicts/Replaces? | 18:34 |
shadeslayer | you said Conflicts/Breaks earlier ;) | 18:35 |
shadeslayer | Though since we declare Conflicts, I believe dpkg will first remove kopete-gcall | 18:37 |
shadeslayer | which in turn will allow kopete to be unpacked without issues | 18:37 |
ScottK | Please don't assume I know what I'm talking about. | 18:37 |
ScottK | In the good old days (pre-Breaks) it would have been Conflicts/Replaces. | 18:37 |
shadeslayer | :) | 18:38 |
ScottK | I think this is one of the situations where you still want Conflicts. | 18:38 |
ScottK | Since you want the package to go away entirely. | 18:38 |
shadeslayer | Aye | 18:38 |
shadeslayer | ScottK: long day ? :P | 18:39 |
ScottK | Sorry for the confusion. | 18:39 |
ScottK | Long week. Day will be a lot longer before it's done. | 18:39 |
shadeslayer | ah .. :) | 18:39 |
shadeslayer | ScottK: uh, rejected again? | 18:43 |
ScottK | Didn't we decide it was wrong? | 18:43 |
ScottK | Because you made the mistake of listening to me. | 18:44 |
shadeslayer | wait, I believe Conflicts removes kopete-gcall, so why the need to add Replaces? | 18:44 |
shadeslayer | since the package will have been already removed, there's no file that kopete will be conflicting with | 18:45 |
ScottK | No. | 18:45 |
ScottK | Conflicts just says they can't both be installed at the same time. | 18:46 |
ScottK | It's the Replaces that tells dpkg to resolve the conflict by removing kopete-gcall. | 18:46 |
shadeslayer | ahhhh | 18:46 |
ScottK | A bare conflicts will just cause one package to fail to install/upgrade. | 18:46 |
* shadeslayer read the docs incorrectly | 18:46 | |
shadeslayer | gosh :P | 18:48 |
shadeslayer | uploaded again | 18:49 |
* ScottK looks again. | 18:51 | |
ScottK | shadeslayer: Accepted. Thanks. | 18:54 |
shadeslayer | wohoo | 18:54 |
ScottK | shadeslayer: Don't forget to fix your PPA packages too. | 18:54 |
* shadeslayer goes back to splitting his sources | 18:54 | |
shadeslayer | ScottK: already uploading | 18:54 |
ScottK | Great. | 18:54 |
Riddell | bonsoir | 18:59 |
shadeslayer | ohai Riddell | 19:00 |
Riddell | what's new? | 19:00 |
ScottK | Riddell: The fixed LibreOffice is building, so I went ahead and uploaded the new kubuntu-meta that reflects the seed changes from the KC meeting. | 19:01 |
ScottK | Last night's images were insanely large because (I think) they had both LO and all of Calligra on them. | 19:01 |
ScottK | I may have powerpc hardware soon, so I might be able to start testing that. Not sure for Beta 2, but almost certainly before release. | 19:02 |
shadeslayer | trying to figure out why plasma doesn't read the proper configs that I set :P | 19:06 |
Riddell | ScottK: you're getting an old mac? or some obscure new thing? | 19:07 |
ScottK | Old Mac. | 19:07 |
ScottK | Circa 2005. | 19:08 |
mparillo | shadeslayer: The KDE SCE 4.9.1 PPA for 10.4.x does *NOT* upgrade rekonq, right? I am still at rekonq | 19:59 |
mparillo | Version 0.9.1. That is working as designed? | 19:59 |
shadeslayer | yep | 19:59 |
mparillo | s/10.4/12.04/ | 19:59 |
kubotu | mparillo: You did something wrong... Try s/you/me/ or tell me "help sed" | 19:59 |
shadeslayer | should not upgrade rekonq | 19:59 |
shadeslayer | however I see 1.0 in backports | 19:59 |
mparillo | but that is a separate additon, right? | 20:00 |
shadeslayer | mparillo: http://paste.kde.org/549614/ | 20:00 |
shadeslayer | nope | 20:00 |
Riddell | mparillo: rekonq isn't part of KDE SC | 20:05 |
Riddell | it's released separately | 20:05 |
mparillo | TY both. I seem to have lost muon entirely. | 20:10 |
mparillo | I re-installed muon, and added ppa:kubuntu-ppa/backports to my Software Sources > Other Software, but it says rekonq is installed, and no change is requested. I added Pre-Released updates to Kubuntu Updates tab, but it still said no change is requested. | 20:21 |
Riddell | mparillo: what makes you think it's not installed? | 20:29 |
mparillo | Oh, rekonq is installed, but I am wondering how to upgrade it. | 20:31 |
yofel | to which version? precise has 1.0 in backports from what I see | 20:31 |
apachelogger | mercy I say | 20:34 |
mparillo | Exactly. I have gotten used to the new version in the 12.10 beta and was wondering how to get it on 12.04. | 20:34 |
yofel | ah, that'll need a backport first | 20:35 |
mparillo | So I added ppa:kubuntu-ppa/backports to my muon. | 20:36 |
=== jtechidna is now known as JontheEchidna | ||
Riddell | mparillo: nobody has done a backport | 20:41 |
Riddell | oh | 20:41 |
Riddell | mparillo: nobody has done a backport | 20:44 |
mparillo | Fine by me. I was getting ready to go back to the daily 12.10 build anyway. I just loaded 12.04.1 because I thought shadeslayer might have liked a quick test of KDE SC 4.9.1 on 12.04.1 | 20:47 |
mparillo | Wow, the daily images is over a GB. Does it have both LO and Calligra? I saw something about LO menus | 20:55 |
Riddell | mparillo: yes I think that'll be why | 21:03 |
shadeslayer | night | 22:02 |
=== jtechidna is now known as JontheEchidna |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!