[02:55] debfx: Can you go through and very the fixes you included with 4.8.5 for library file overwrite issues over the weekend, so 4.8.5 can go to -updates on Monday? [06:48] Hello [06:48] I want to change default clock format to jalali calendar . [06:48] How can do this ? [07:37] ScottK: I don't think I can verify bugs when I'm the uploader [08:07] mah454: iff one installs with a language/locale that is supposed to happen automatically [08:08] if this is not the case the setting would be in systemsettings' locale configuration [08:16] * shadeslayer tickles apachelogger [08:17] * apachelogger leaves :P [08:18] aw, don't be like that now [08:22] apachelogger: i need change it for all new users [08:23] chnage default calendar format to jalali for all new users [08:23] how can do this ? [09:34] this script is true ? clock.calendarType("jalali"); [09:35] I want add this to DefaultLayout.js in KDE templates ... [09:37] ::qt-bugs:: [1051194] package libqtcore4 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: nicht vollständig gelesen ... @ https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1051194 (by bssmusic) [09:37] Launchpad bug 1051194 in qt4-x11 (Ubuntu) "package libqtcore4 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: nicht vollständig gelesen in Pufferkopie für Backend dpkg-deb während »./usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQtCore.so.4.8.1«" [Undecided,New] [10:14] mah454: /usr/share/kubuntu-default-settings/kde4-profile/default/share/apps/plasma-desktop/init/00-defaultLayout.js [10:14] read that [10:14] shadeslayer: I want change default calendar for all users to Jalali [10:15] How can do this ? [10:15] should be doable using plasma desktop scripting [10:15] read the file I just pointed out [10:15] then create something like 01-my-defaults.js [10:20] KDE 4.9.1 packages in staging : https://launchpad.net/~kubuntu-ppa/+archive/staging [10:20] My upgrade from ninjas went fine last night, so let me know if you have issues [10:22] KDE 4.9 stored in kubuntu-update repository ? [10:23] nope, I've put it in staging atm [10:24] I'll copy it this evening [10:24] ( to kubuntu backports ) [11:13] shadeslayer: calendar has nothing to do with plasma [11:14] apachelogger: I thought he was talking about the plasma widget calendar [11:14] that also obeys klocale I should hope [11:15] mah454: echo $LANG [11:15] apachelogger: en_US.UTF-8 [11:16] is that intended? [11:25] great, now I don't see the painting delay from yesterday in ubiquity anymore [11:25] hooray -.- [11:29] dpkg-source: info: applying bypass-braindead-buildsystem [11:29] rofl [11:31] shadeslayer: When you wrote that the KDE SC 4.9.1 packages are in staging, does that mean you would like somebody to test applying them? I just installed a 10.4.1 virtualized image just in case. [11:31] mparillo: yus :) [11:31] mparillo: see https://launchpad.net/~kubuntu-ppa/+archive/staging [11:33] so I need to add a new repository to Muon? [11:33] temporarily, yes [11:36] I was going to add under Other Software ppa:kubuntu-ppa/staging [11:36] But it asks for something like deb http://... [11:37] mparillo: use : deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/kubuntu-ppa/staging/ubuntu precise main [11:37] So, I use: [11:37] deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/kubuntu-ppa/staging/ubuntu precise main [11:37] ? [11:37] yep [11:37] I just do add-apt-repository via command line [11:37] that's the easiest way [11:39] So, now I have done it, and Muon shows a TON of Not Installed packages. [11:39] aye, mark all of them for a upgrade [11:39] hm, software-properties *should* support ppa: syntax - or that simply isn't implemented in the KDE one (which sounds likely) [11:39] also, please make sure you disable the PPA again after installing the packages [11:40] ^ that's why I said temporarily ;) [11:40] ah right :) [11:40] Hmm, there is not the normal mark for upgrades checkbox. [11:40] check for updates first [11:40] Hiyas all [11:41] hi BluesKaj [11:41] hey yofel [11:43] mparillo: yofel ppa:kubuntu-ppa/ppa worked for me [11:45] hm, someone forgot to take calligra out of the ISO's - with wallpapers and libreoffice added we've hit the size limit [12:01] Shadeslayer: Hmmm, it did not say re-start required, but I will try anyway. [12:05] wut [12:05] why would you restart :P [12:10] no xnox :( [12:12] shadeslayer: After a re-bot of my VM, opening Dolphin, about KDE, I get: KDE - Be Free! [12:12] Platform Version 4.9.1 [12:12] I call that a successful test case execution! [12:13] s /re-bot/re-boot/ [12:14] :D [12:14] alright then, I'll copy it to backports [12:15] mparillo: fwiw you can just relogin to get the new KDE [12:15] no need to reboot [12:16] mparillo: I believe you have a release announcement ready somewhere? [12:20] alrighty, debs copied [12:26] !find stylerc [12:26] Package/file stylerc does not exist in quantal [12:34] shadeslayer: I do. It is written, but not published. I do not know if Riddell has reviewed it yet. [12:35] mparillo: please add the information about backported packages as wel [12:35] *well [12:45] shadeslayer: I published the news item. It is the lead news item on http://www.kubuntu.org/ [12:46] awesome :D [13:09] anyone can update a news item: http://www.kubuntu.org/news/kde-plasma-workspaces-applications-and-platform-491 <- the link to "KDE SC 4.9.1" has an extraneous double-quote one the end of the link === rdieter_laptop is now known as rdieter [13:25] tsimpson: sec [13:25] debfx: You can. [13:25] The only thing you can't do if you're the uploader is approve/accept the upload. [13:26] (which only affects SRU team members) [13:27] tsimpson: fixed [13:28] thanks [13:35] ScottK: that seems a bit pointless to me since uploading should already imply that it's tested by the one who prepared the package [13:36] Right, but you would have tested before the upload. The goal is to test the actual packages in the archive in case something went astray. [13:36] We're relying on the fact that the SRU team reviews the diff for each upload. [13:37] For hardware specific stuff we might want more testing, but for something simple like thses, I think it's fine. [13:39] It would be nice if someone could verify the fixes for phonon-backend-gstreamer too. [13:48] ok, I hope I got all file overwrite bugs [13:56] ScottK, which fixes for phonon-backend-gstreamer ...I've been using the vlc backend [13:58] oh actually [13:59] tsdgeos may want to verify one of them [13:59] BluesKaj: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/phonon-backend-gstreamer/+bug/1028903/comments/1 [13:59] Launchpad bug 1028903 in phonon-backend-gstreamer (Ubuntu) "SRU Phonon GStreamer 4.6.2 to 12.04" [High,New] [14:02] ok , thanks apachelogger [14:23] hi folks, looks like there's a minor packaging error with today's 12.04 kubuntu-backports kde update - the kopete package refuses to install due to a conflict with kopete-gcall over /usr/bin/googletalk-call. removing the kopete-gcall package and reinstalling kopete seems to fix things [14:27] tsimpson shadeslayer sorry about that extra double quote. Innacuarate copying and pasting, I bet. [14:28] mparillo: np [16:18] shadeslayer: Is the kopete-gcall issue Sentynel mentioned from your update? [16:18] debfx: Thanks. [16:18] huh? where? [16:19] hm [16:19] * shadeslayer looks [16:20] kopete-gcall is a really old package apparently, and should have been long gone [16:20] aye [16:21] I can't find it in precise :) [16:21] http://pastebin.com/AHgzTaRK here's the exact error [16:21] I did a clean install on my system and ugprade from whaterver was on 12.04.1 to 4.9.1 .. no issues [16:21] 4:4.6.2-0ubuntu1 [16:21] gosh [16:22] yeah, I dunno how the heck that was still there [16:22] shadeslayer: If it's an old package, just add conflicts/breaks. [16:22] ScottK: yeah, that's what I was thinking [16:22] Obviously if you don't have the old package installed, you won't get the error. [16:22] yep ... [16:24] ScottK: should I also add it to quantal packages? [16:24] It went away after 4.6. [16:24] So we should add it in precise and leave quantal alone. [16:24] alright [16:24] Sentynel: Would you please file a bug. [16:25] shadeslayer: Would you please prepare an update to the pending 4.8.5 SRU for kdenetworking that fixes it and upload it. I can accept it then. [16:25] ScottK: sure [16:25] give me a couple of minutes .... [16:25] Thanks. Ping me when it's uploaded. [16:29] ScottK: sure, where? [16:29] bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kdenetworking [16:30] Or not [16:31] it's kdenetwork [16:32] Yeah [16:32] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kdenetwork [16:33] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kdenetwork/+bug/1051333 [16:33] Launchpad bug 1051333 in kdenetwork (Ubuntu) "Kopete 4.9.1-0ubuntu1~ubuntu12.04.1~ppa2 package install fails with old kopete-gcall package installed" [Undecided,New] === yofel_ is now known as yofel [16:39] shadeslayer: ^^^ [16:39] aye, I'll get to it right after dinner [16:42] I updated where it was targeted and assigned it to you. [16:42] Thanks. [16:59] ScottK: uploaded [16:59] shadeslayer: Thanks. [17:01] Sentynel: thanks for pointing that out :) [17:03] no worries [17:53] Hi, is it possible to disable the check "scanning for Btrfs filesystems" at bootup ? it's very slow and I have not btrfs partitions... [17:54] bambee: set check pass to 0 in fstab [17:54] as of quantal fsck.btrfs is a noop at boot [17:55] strange :\ [17:55] which release are you on? [17:55] I use the development branch [17:55] so quantal [17:55] and it's up to date [17:55] hm... it shouldn't be slow there... [17:56] use the fstab setting then [17:57] yofel: the boot takes... 45s - 1 min... and "scanning for btrfs filesystems" takes... 30s... [17:58] hm [17:58] wait [17:58] on precise the boot was really fast [17:58] not sure why the *scan* would take so long unless you have a weird disk setup. #btrfs might know something [17:59] sorry, have to go now, bbl [18:01] np [18:01] thanks for your help [18:20] shadeslayer: The last version of kopete-gcall in the archive was 4:4.6.2-0ubuntu1, so your versioning is incorrect. Since we want the package removed, just drop the version and re-upload. [18:21] k [18:32] shadeslayer: Thanks. [18:32] Looking [18:34] Shouldn't that be Conflicts/Replaces? [18:35] you said Conflicts/Breaks earlier ;) [18:37] Though since we declare Conflicts, I believe dpkg will first remove kopete-gcall [18:37] which in turn will allow kopete to be unpacked without issues [18:37] Please don't assume I know what I'm talking about. [18:37] In the good old days (pre-Breaks) it would have been Conflicts/Replaces. [18:38] :) [18:38] I think this is one of the situations where you still want Conflicts. [18:38] Since you want the package to go away entirely. [18:38] Aye [18:39] ScottK: long day ? :P [18:39] Sorry for the confusion. [18:39] Long week. Day will be a lot longer before it's done. [18:39] ah .. :) [18:43] ScottK: uh, rejected again? [18:43] Didn't we decide it was wrong? [18:44] Because you made the mistake of listening to me. [18:44] wait, I believe Conflicts removes kopete-gcall, so why the need to add Replaces? [18:45] since the package will have been already removed, there's no file that kopete will be conflicting with [18:45] No. [18:46] Conflicts just says they can't both be installed at the same time. [18:46] It's the Replaces that tells dpkg to resolve the conflict by removing kopete-gcall. [18:46] ahhhh [18:46] A bare conflicts will just cause one package to fail to install/upgrade. [18:46] * shadeslayer read the docs incorrectly [18:48] gosh :P [18:49] uploaded again [18:51] * ScottK looks again. [18:54] shadeslayer: Accepted. Thanks. [18:54] wohoo [18:54] shadeslayer: Don't forget to fix your PPA packages too. [18:54] * shadeslayer goes back to splitting his sources [18:54] ScottK: already uploading [18:54] Great. [18:59] bonsoir [19:00] ohai Riddell [19:00] what's new? [19:01] Riddell: The fixed LibreOffice is building, so I went ahead and uploaded the new kubuntu-meta that reflects the seed changes from the KC meeting. [19:01] Last night's images were insanely large because (I think) they had both LO and all of Calligra on them. [19:02] I may have powerpc hardware soon, so I might be able to start testing that. Not sure for Beta 2, but almost certainly before release. [19:06] trying to figure out why plasma doesn't read the proper configs that I set :P [19:07] ScottK: you're getting an old mac? or some obscure new thing? [19:07] Old Mac. [19:08] Circa 2005. [19:59] shadeslayer: The KDE SCE 4.9.1 PPA for 10.4.x does *NOT* upgrade rekonq, right? I am still at rekonq [19:59] Version 0.9.1. That is working as designed? [19:59] yep [19:59] s/10.4/12.04/ [19:59] mparillo: You did something wrong... Try s/you/me/ or tell me "help sed" [19:59] should not upgrade rekonq [19:59] however I see 1.0 in backports [20:00] but that is a separate additon, right? [20:00] mparillo: http://paste.kde.org/549614/ [20:00] nope [20:05] mparillo: rekonq isn't part of KDE SC [20:05] it's released separately [20:10] TY both. I seem to have lost muon entirely. [20:21] I re-installed muon, and added ppa:kubuntu-ppa/backports to my Software Sources > Other Software, but it says rekonq is installed, and no change is requested. I added Pre-Released updates to Kubuntu Updates tab, but it still said no change is requested. [20:29] mparillo: what makes you think it's not installed? [20:31] Oh, rekonq is installed, but I am wondering how to upgrade it. [20:31] to which version? precise has 1.0 in backports from what I see [20:34] mercy I say [20:34] Exactly. I have gotten used to the new version in the 12.10 beta and was wondering how to get it on 12.04. [20:35] ah, that'll need a backport first [20:36] So I added ppa:kubuntu-ppa/backports to my muon. === jtechidna is now known as JontheEchidna [20:41] mparillo: nobody has done a backport [20:41] oh [20:44] mparillo: nobody has done a backport [20:47] Fine by me. I was getting ready to go back to the daily 12.10 build anyway. I just loaded 12.04.1 because I thought shadeslayer might have liked a quick test of KDE SC 4.9.1 on 12.04.1 [20:55] Wow, the daily images is over a GB. Does it have both LO and Calligra? I saw something about LO menus [21:03] mparillo: yes I think that'll be why [22:02] night === jtechidna is now known as JontheEchidna