[07:04] <dholbach> good morning
[07:16] <iulian> Morning dholbach.
[07:18] <dholbach> hi iulian
[07:29] <geser> Hi dholbach and iulian
[07:30] <Rhonda> Oh.  "Click the button below to redeem your bundle on the Ubuntu Software Center."
[07:31] <Rhonda> Did canonical pay to have that special place on humblebundle, or does canonical gain anything from it when I click there?
[07:32] <lifeless> I *think* they pay Canonical as a distributor, same as they pay steam.
[07:40] <iulian> Morning geser.
[09:49] <dholbach> hey tumbleweed, could it be that the sponsorship miner is unhappy right now?
[09:49] <dholbach> also... how are you doing?
[09:50] <tumbleweed> heh, hi
[09:50]  * tumbleweed has been far too busy, but am around
[09:50] <tumbleweed> this morning, spelunking xkcd, looking for waldo http://corelli.tumbleweed.org.za/stefanor/xkcd-1110.html
[09:51] <dholbach> don't! click! link!
[09:58] <Laney> haha
[09:58] <Laney> "busy"
[10:03] <Rhonda> wtf
[10:09] <xnox> Rhonda: today's xkcd, but extended UI
[10:10] <Rhonda> … I am aware, but thanks.
[10:12] <Rhonda> … why do I have to think about "deeper underground" by jamiroquai suddenly.
[10:35] <Rhonda> tumbleweed: Did you figure out the tile_name names and download all the images already? ;)
[11:34] <tumbleweed> Rhonda: no, I just modifyied the XKCD page to render full screen, and accept key presses
[11:35] <tumbleweed> if you like wasting RAM, try http://iclub.site40.net/xkcd.html (not for the feint hearted)
[11:40] <Rhonda> key pressed?
[11:44] <Rhonda> tumbleweed: That's cheating. :)
[11:51]  * xnox ponders where is downloadable complete image..... I want to make a print
[11:52] <tumbleweed> xnox: it's sparse
[12:53] <tumbleweed> dholbach: the DSAs are looking at it (expired SSL cert)
[13:29] <dholbach> tumbleweed, perfect
[13:54] <obounaim> Hi, I'm interested in becoming a maintainer of a Python package do I have to be a Python expert to do that?
[13:54] <tumbleweed> no
[13:56] <obounaim> ok thanks
[13:56] <obounaim> does anybody interested in helping me?
[13:58] <tumbleweed> !ask|obounaim
[14:18] <ockham> anyone care to do bug #1052882 ?
[15:22] <ockham> ^ FFe, please, anyone? (#1052882)
[15:48] <c_korn> hello, how can I check which repositorie's gpg key is not installed?
[16:09] <obounaim> Hi, I'm trying to fix a small bug in ubuntu using bzr branch, when I run bzr branch ubuntu:python-z3c.formui I get bzr: ERROR: Not a branch: "bzr+ssh://bazaar.launchpad.net/+branch/ubuntu/python-z3c.formui/"
[16:10] <tumbleweed> obounaim: that's the name of a binary package
[16:10] <tumbleweed> it's built from the source package z3c.formui
[16:12] <obounaim> tumbleweed: thanks it's working now.
[16:13] <obounaim> but how can I figure out this by my self?
[16:13] <tumbleweed> $ apt-cache show python-z3c.formui | grep Source
[16:15] <obounaim> ok thanks
[16:21] <c_korn> hello, I have a question regarding debian/watch files. I want to scan for "frostwire-(\d[\d\.]+)\.noarch\.tar\.(?:gz|bz2|xz)" files in these directories. the highest version number here is 5.4.0 http://main1.frostwire.com/frostwire/ but this directory does not contain a noarch.tar.gz file. how can I tell uscan that the highest version number is the directory which has a noarch.tar.gz file in it?
[16:22] <c_korn> oh, this is my current debian/watch file http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=i7bDhLGp
[16:23] <c_korn> looks like uscan automatically takes the directory with the highest version number and then continues scanning for the tarball in this directory http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=CEhj1crd
[16:29] <arand> c_korn: Hmm, I might be wrong, but can't you just use a catch-all match for the folder instead?
[16:29] <tumbleweed> c_korn: I don't think you can
[16:32] <obounaim> "bzr pd -- -S" fails to build the z3c.formui
[16:32] <c_korn> hum, I think I have to write some sort of redirector
[16:42] <obounaim> how to quickly install all the dependencies of package from debian/changelog?
[16:45] <c_korn> obounaim: the build dependencies are in debian/control. and I use this command: sudo mk-build-deps -i -r
[16:45] <obounaim> c_korn: thanks
[16:51] <obounaim> bzr bd -- -S fails
[16:51] <obounaim> dh clean --with pydeb --with python2
[16:51] <obounaim> dh: unable to load addon pydeb: Can't locate Debian/Debhelper/Sequence/pydeb.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /etc/perl /usr/local/lib/perl/5.14.2 /usr/local/share/perl/5.14.2 /usr/lib/perl5 /usr/share/perl5 /usr/lib/perl/5.14 /usr/share/perl/5.14 /usr/local/lib/site_perl .) at (eval 3) line 2.
[16:51] <obounaim> BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at (eval 3) line 2.
[17:32] <micahg> obounaim: sudo mk-build-deps -i -r (build deps are required for clean)
[17:33] <obounaim> Can anybody review my merge proposal.
[17:33] <obounaim> micahg: thanks.
[17:35] <obounaim> Can anybody review my merge proposal.
[17:37] <micahg> obounaim: cross posting is generally frowned upon, why would you ask someone to look at your proposal before you're sure it works?
[17:38] <obounaim> michag: I have just add a home of the project.
[19:29] <obounaim> bzr lp-propose fails: "bzr: ERROR: Source and target branches must be different." what is going on?
[19:31] <micahg> obounaim: you should propose your changes to the development series (in this case quantal), precise updates need to meet https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates criteria
[19:40] <obounaim> micahg: how to do that
[19:41] <micahg> lp:ubuntu/package instead of lp:ubuntu/precise/package
[20:08] <alo21> hi. Do you think this package is a sync-worth (http://changelog.debian.net/eblook) ?
[20:09] <micahg> hardening can be a good thing, the typo also might be important depending on what it is
[20:10] <jtaylor> adding hardening should not require release team ack?
[20:13] <micahg> well, it depends, some hardening used to be a no-op on Ubuntu, not sure what the current state is and what this package specifically uses
[20:20] <ockham> *nagnag* FFe, please, anyone? (#1052882) ^
[20:22] <tumbleweed> ockham: Please don't nag about FFes like that one
[20:22] <tumbleweed> it's only a few hours old, for a start
[20:23] <tumbleweed> but, as I *was* just looking at it: I'd kind of like a better argument than "it's new a new release that came out since FF"
[20:24] <Laney> and "runs under 12.04" (twice) isn't very convincing :-)
[20:46] <ajmitch> Laney: looks like that lp change has been deployed
[20:46] <Laney> SWEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEET
[20:48] <ajmitch> at least justing by the revision number & deployment report, just in time for the archive to freeze again :)
[20:48] <ajmitch> s/justing/judging/
[20:48]  * ajmitch needs coffee
[20:48] <micahg> well, do we care if the main archive is frozen for backports?
[20:49] <ajmitch> micahg: the code did allow uploads then
[20:49] <micahg> ajmitch: and backports is always frozen anyways, right?
[20:49] <micahg> * i.e. everything to NEW or UNAPPROVED
[20:49] <ajmitch> micahg: pocket always unapproved != distroseries being frozen
[20:50] <micahg> right
[20:50] <ajmitch> I got laney to test uploading to quantal-backports on dogfood, it should probably work on production now
[20:51] <ajmitch> now we need the other bits like the rebackporter bot to spit out a report of what needs updated
[23:51] <highvoltage> hey guys
[23:51] <ajmitch> hi highvoltage