[14:41] <cjohnston> mhall119: need thoughts
[14:41] <cjohnston> things have changed with the web team and they arent able to give more time any time soon to the scheduleeeeeee
[14:41] <cjohnston> as much as I hate to, I say leave the schedule as is
[14:42] <steveedwards> mhall119, cjohnston: Sorry guys. Our priorities have changed somewhat, and I'm conscious that you guys need to make a decision soon.
[14:43] <steveedwards> mhall119: I was saying to cjohnston: we can either a) attempt to implement the prototype as stands, or b) wait until after UDS and implement a revised version.
[14:44] <steveedwards> mhall119: Depends on whether the prototype as stands is a considerable improvement, or whether it's worth delaying until the next UDS so we can revise it some more.
[14:44] <steveedwards> cjohnston, mhall119: Of course, someone can take what we've done and run with it...
[14:45] <cjohnston> my opinion is if the prototype was more along the lines of the other proposal, it may be something we could work with more easily.. but as it stands, I'm not sure that it would be an improvement, unless we only implemented it for certain things
[14:45] <steveedwards> cjohnston: Consistency is the key for me. One schedule to rule them all.
[14:46] <cjohnston> ya
[14:48] <steveedwards> cjohnston: Could we make it known that plans are afoot at UDS? Maybe show the prototype to some key people and gather opinion?
[14:48] <steveedwards> cjohnston: Then at least folks know that we're on it.
[14:48] <cjohnston> are you going to be there?
[14:48] <steveedwards> cjohnston: Not this time.
[14:48] <steveedwards> cjohnston: Peter will be though.
[14:49] <steveedwards> cjohnston: If you need an official demo.
[14:49] <cjohnston> outside of gathering UX feedback, I don't know how much help it would be, but I'm not qualified to do that ;-)
[14:50] <steveedwards> cjohnston: ;)
[14:50] <steveedwards> cjohnston: I know it's a hot topic. I just wondered if it would help if people knew we had been looking at it.
[14:51] <cjohnston> i'm not even sure, outside of Rick, Jono, and maybe other managers who it would be useful to show to, unless gathering feedback for changes, in which case anyone may be good
[14:54] <steveedwards> cjohnston: Let's say I did have some time to work on the schedules (which probably isn't true). When would be the last date for delivery?
[14:54] <steveedwards> cjohnston: Like, weeks or days?
[14:55] <cjohnston> well... /me leaves for a cruise on october 13... and wont be back until 2 days before he leaves for uds... so I'd say Oct 1 to give two weeks of fixes/tweaks/etc
[14:56] <steveedwards> cjohnston: Right. Let me see if I can squeeze in the changes you requested this week. If I can't, or if I do but there's more you guys need, we'll postpone the integration until the next UDS. Does that work for you?
[14:56] <cjohnston> sure
[14:57] <steveedwards> cjohnston: I can't promise anything, but I'll try my best.
[14:57] <cjohnston> ok.. thanks
[14:57] <steveedwards> cjohnston: No problem.
[14:57] <mhall119> thanks steveedwards
[14:57] <cjohnston> look who woke up
[14:58] <cjohnston> lol
[14:58] <steveedwards> mhall119: No worries.
[14:58] <steveedwards> mhall119: :)
[17:27] <aaas> can you help me decide between: 1) serving 10 30k images 2) 15 database calls with user-side javascript image rendering?