| mhall119 | jvrbanac: I was wondering where the method docs were being stores, I wonder why it's in retval | 03:43 |
|---|---|---|
| mhall119 | I suppose we need to figure out how to parse and linkify these gir doc strings | 03:44 |
| mhall119 | looking pretty good so far though | 03:44 |
| jvrbanac | Yeah. I don't know. I noticed that they were getting stored in the db. So I went searching for where they were getting stored in the model | 03:46 |
| jvrbanac | pdb to the rescue :D | 03:47 |
| mhall119 | heh, yeah, probably something funky about the GIR file spec | 03:49 |
| mhall119 | anyway, I pushed another revision for some added styling, plus breaking the methods table up based on defining class | 03:50 |
| jvrbanac | That is much better! My eyes thank you! | 03:51 |
| jvrbanac | Btw, was there a reason you set that template conditional to the string of "None" | 03:54 |
| mhall119 | yeah, some are hidden if I make it a string, others are hidden if it's the literal None, I'm not entirely sure why just yet | 03:56 |
| mhall119 | I suspect some of them actually have a value of "None" | 03:56 |
| jvrbanac | weird. I didn't noticed that, ok. | 03:57 |
| mhall119 | anyway, almost midnight here, I'll chat with you tomorrow | 03:57 |
| jvrbanac | Yep. Have a good one! | 03:58 |
| mhall119 | jvrbanac: gah, these Type records are gonna make everything difficult, they have no direct link to any Node records | 19:58 |
| jvrbanac | mhall119, You know, I was looking at that the whole model structure and it seemed like it could be cleaned up and simplified a bit. | 20:00 |
| jvrbanac | It could be because I'm pretty new to that code, but it seemed like it was more complicated then it needed to be | 20:01 |
| mhall119 | jvrbanac: I think that's how C/GObject do things that is making it overly complicated | 20:30 |
| jvrbanac | mhall119, yeah, oh well. So is there a reason why Type records don't have a direct link to the Nodes? It would seem important to link the two at some point. That way you could easily correlate the return types. | 20:50 |
| mhall119 | jvrbanac: I think it's because of the way C works | 20:50 |
| jvrbanac | lol ok | 20:50 |
| mhall119 | a Node has a Namespace, which has a version | 20:51 |
| mhall119 | so, PreviewAction is in Unity namespace, version 6.0 | 20:51 |
| mhall119 | but C doesn't really care where the Type is, so it says it's a PreviewAction type, and then it's up to the runtime to decice that PreviewAction is | 20:52 |
| jvrbanac | got it | 20:52 |
| mhall119 | could be PreviewAction in Unity 5, could be PreviewAction in Unity 6 | 20:52 |
| mhall119 | heck, it could be PreviewAction in FakeUnityLibrary 10.0 | 20:52 |
| mhall119 | so, future work is going to need to have smarter lookups than I have in there now | 20:53 |
| mhall119 | we'll need say "Find PreviewAction in the Ubuntu 12.04 platform definition" | 20:53 |
| mhall119 | and from there know to use Unity 5, not Unity 6 | 20:53 |
| mhall119 | as verbose and tedious as Java is to write, it cerainly made tooling easy | 20:54 |
| jvrbanac | true | 20:55 |
| jvrbanac | Brb... moving to a different meeting room :) | 20:56 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!