[15:24] <slackguru> I believe I have evidence of a bug but I still have not refined my research. Is this the place to discuss it?
[15:29] <roadmr> slackguru: yes, but perhaps you should file a bug report first
[15:29] <roadmr> slackguru: bug reports are a good place for a conversation with triagers
[15:30] <pedro_> hey folks
[15:40] <hggdh> buen dia pedro_
[15:40] <hggdh> (or whatever it is in your weird language...)
[15:41] <roadmr> hahaha
[15:41] <hggdh> :-)
[15:43] <pedro_> hggdh: hahah! yeha yeah we speak Portuguese now
[15:43] <pedro_> that's what you refer as weird language right? ;-)
[15:44] <pedro_> hola roadmr
[15:44] <roadmr> hola :)
[16:20] <hggdh> pedro_: portuguese is NOT a weird language. Spanish is -- a badly spoken Portuguese, with a even weirder accent
[16:21] <hggdh> remember, the language started in Portugal, then spread to the tiny rest of the Iberic area
[16:22] <micahg> buenos dias en espanol
[17:13] <Ursinha> hggdh, lol, that's mean
[17:13] <Ursinha> :P
[17:14] <hggdh> Ursinha: yeah!
[17:14] <Ursinha> I like spanish, I'm just too incompetent to speak it
[17:15] <hggdh> well, sort of same here...
[21:27] <tomreyn> hi
[21:28] <tomreyn> i'm taking issue with how the "toda" person is treating this memory corruption here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator-weather/+bug/743541
[21:28] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 743541 in indicator-weather "indicator-weather crashed with SIGSEGV in dbusmenu_menuitem_build_variant()" [Medium,Confirmed]
[21:29] <tomreyn> it's clear to me that this is a bug, but s/he downgraded it, first confirmed -> opinion, then to 'incomplete'
[21:30] <tomreyn> this is the second time in a week this person is doing that to an obvious bug.
[21:30] <tomreyn> am i missing a common procedure/policy here?
[21:31] <tomreyn> i'm just trying to rule out that i'm blaming someone for something which is entirely normal.
[21:32] <micahg> tomreyn: no, looks like someone hit the JS selector by accident
[21:33] <tomreyn> twice in a week, on the same project?
[21:33] <tomreyn> could be, it just seems unlikely
[21:33] <micahg> all too common unfortunately
[21:34] <tomreyn> okay, so, that means it should be reverted then?
[21:34] <micahg> it can be
[21:35] <micahg> that's teh upstream task though which we (bugsquad) don't directly influence
[21:35] <tomreyn> if this happens more regularly, doesn't his mean some bug reports just get lost, basically? maybe there should be a level of confirmation then.
[21:39] <tomreyn> micahg: i'm trying to understand now which of the projects listed as affected the changes were applied to. the note below comment 28 does not seem to discuss that, it only lists how the status was changed. Is there another way to tell?
[21:41] <tomreyn> oh looks like hggdh2 fixed it just now.
[21:41] <tomreyn> thanks hggdh
[21:42] <hggdh> tomreyn: yes, I did. But this can happen. A status change like that should have been together with a comment on why
[21:42] <tomreyn> yes, that's what i was thinking.
[21:43] <tomreyn> thanks for your good work, everyone.