[08:29] someone around ? :) [08:31] gdm seems to be marked as autoremovable [08:31] even if gnome-shell is installed [08:31] which shouldn't be the case :) [10:38] hi [10:38] anyone here for help [10:39] ? === Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan [13:38] everything in good shape for a precise/quantal upgrade? [13:42] hmm. update-manager -d doesnt offer me upgrade [13:43] anyone knows? [13:44] works for me [13:44] mitya57: precise? [13:44] asac: yes, right now I'm on precise :) [13:44] did you do an apt-get update? [13:45] yeah [13:45] did that [13:45] i am all up to date on precise [13:45] but update-manager -d doesnt offer me the button that i used to know [13:45] intersting [13:45] does "sudo do-release-upgrade -d" work? [13:46] i found it [13:46] so in settings there are options "inform me of all new releases", "inform me of LTS releases" "never inform me" [13:46] i had LTS selected as i installed this machine with precise in first place [13:46] (i changed nothing) [13:46] changing it to "inform me of all releases" made the -d flag work :_) [13:47] ah, that's in "inform me of LTS releases" by default for those who install LTS :) [13:47] pitti: ^^ ... not sure who is the update-manager gurut nowadays... maybe show him the above 10 lines [13:47] right. but i wouldn't expect it to disable the -d [13:47] anyway [13:47] found and will give it a try :) [13:48] wish me luck [13:48] byebye [13:48] good luck :) [13:53] asac: that's mentioned at the top of the quantal release notes [13:55] -d will still work to get you the next LTS before LTS.1 when the next LTS is advertised to everyone running the previous LTS [14:17] howdy [14:51] somebody could check the missing depend on gdm in gnome-shell ? :) [14:53] dupondje: I uploaded a fix within about an hour of the bug getting filed yesterday, but we're in beta freeze so it needs to be manually accepted [14:54] allright :) [15:02] jbicha: gotcha [15:02] so now i have a problem with compiz looping on CPU [15:14] Hello Guys :) [15:14] I want to join GNOME3 Team in launchpad [15:16] anyone? [15:20] MohamedAlaa98: which team in particular do you want to join and why? [15:22] Gnome3 team [15:23] who packages gnome3 extra apps for ubuntu [15:24] jibcha: https://launchpad.net/~gnome3-team [15:24] jbicha: https://launchpad.net/~gnome3-team [15:26] ok, that team is basically for the GNOME3 PPA but you don't have to be a member of that team to contribute [15:27] just submit merge proposals to the gnome3 or ubuntu-desktop branches [15:27] do good work like that for a while and then you can apply to join that team [15:28] I want to contribute in packaging [15:31] I don't want to contibute in that way [15:33] I don't understand what you mean; we need to see good work from you (merge proposals or patches) before we can give you commit access [15:34] ok, got it [15:34] jbicha: thank you :) [17:13] jbicha, yo, just saw your webapps bug [17:14] jbicha, I'm updating my PPA right now with the latest things I pushed to -proposed [17:14] jbicha, I forgot to sync the PPA yesterday [17:19] mterry: ah, thanks [17:19] jbicha, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libunity-webapps/+bug/1054658/comments/2 [17:19] Launchpad bug 1054658 in libunity-webapps "Failed to open webapp application path dir /usr/share/ubuntu/unity-webapps/userscripts:" [Undecided,New] [17:21] I rebuilt libunity-webapps from proposed & was about to post an update about the disappearing amazon launcher [17:21] jbicha, any bugs that I didn't mention I think are unknown [17:21] it looks like the disappearaing amazon launcher is intentional if you run [17:22] gsettings get com.canonical.Unity.Launcher favorites [17:22] you mean it gets dropped from gsettings? [17:22] it still seems crazy, http://paste.ubuntu.com/1220930/ [17:23] oh maybe that's not intentional, but a side effect [17:23] looks normal? [17:24] I have to jet, but will check back this evening [17:24] is UbuntuOneMusiconeubuntucom.desktop supposed to be different than ubuntu-amazon-default.desktop [17:24] it uses xdg-open instead of unity-webapps-runner [17:24] jbicha, you mean different naming scheme? [17:24] oh yeah [17:25] I asked about that too [17:25] yes [17:25] Because amazon looks up local url to us [17:25] e [17:25] so it needs special logic [17:25] whereas the store is just a url [17:25] this entire feature seems crazy to me [17:25] jbicha, agreed [17:25] jbicha, half part crack, half part magic [17:25] probably ought to do its searches over https at least [17:25] got to go === m_conley_away is now known as m_conley === m_conley is now known as m_conley_away