[00:22] infinity: reviewing [00:24] Yep, clearly fine, accepted [04:46] infinity: ^ :-) === henrix_ is now known as henrix === henrix is now known as henrix_ [13:18] Laney: hmm, so I copied emacs24 to quantal seeing that it had built, and then noticed that it has an uninstallable in quantal-proposed, whoops [13:19] Laney: looking at it, I see there's an emacs binary package clash between emacs23 and emacs24, which we need to fix (there's a "failed to upload" for emacs23/i386 as a result) [13:19] Laney: Rob Browning has uploaded emacs-defaults in Debian to deal with this, which is a sane fix [13:19] Laney: but do we want to take its default of emacs23, or switch to emacs24? [13:20] oh, haha, I think this answers the question [13:20] Package: emacs [13:20] Source: emacs24 [13:20] Version: 24.1+1-2ubuntu1 [13:20] Depends: emacs23 | emacs23-lucid | emacs23-nox [13:20] bizarre but that's fairly clearly 23 - I'll sync in emacs-defaults then once I've dealt with the corresponding changes to emacs23 and emacs24 [13:29] Laney: ^- if you could review those plus the emacs24 which should appear shortly, that would be great [14:14] as requested i have pushed a lowlatency respin to match linux master ... === yofel_ is now known as yofel [15:33] cjwatson: hmm, wasn't there an emacs23 in -proposed which dropped the 'emacs' package? [15:51] (moving forward is also reasonable too, of course) [16:30] hmm, I think i installed the right packages for the webapps stuff but clicking Amazon or U1MusicStore just opens my normal Firefox, not the chromeless thing [16:33] except that I get a second Amazon icon or second U1Music icon in my launcher if that page is open in Firefox :( [16:33] & in alt-tab [16:38] jbicha: where have you got your packages from? [16:38] Laney: https://launchpad.net/~mterry/+archive/ppa [16:39] hmm [16:39] I should have tried it yesterday when he was still around, I just didn't think that things would still be broken [16:41] not sure I'm afraid [16:41] you could try fishing everything out of the queues [16:41] Laney: no, it was just a security fix; that was the version that failed to upload [16:41] Laney: the same security fix was the other non-trivial change in Debian, so really no reason not to merge, I thought [16:41] cjwatson: I'm referring to https://launchpadlibrarian.net/116855995/emacs23_23.4%2B1-3ubuntu3_23.4%2B1-3ubuntu4.diff.gz [16:42] oh, err, I didn't see that [16:43] I think my change is better because reducing delta :) [16:43] haha [16:43] it is. The issue was being bothered to do it, but you were, so yay [16:44] And I do think we should switch to emacs-defaults - less error-prone design [16:48] if someone can NEW -defaults then I'll accept both emacsen [16:48] gosh, my house is rather cold this afternoon [16:49] * tumbleweed is sitting next to a fire (but then it *is* winter here, although beautifully sunny too) [16:50] where are my Serious Socks? [16:56] beer. beer helps. [17:21] "Serious Socks" haha. :) [17:22] * iulian likes his fluffy pink socks. [17:33] Laney: Maybe I should just NEW my own sync, if nobody else is around? [17:33] I don't know how ruley the rule is [17:33] It essentially amounts to unapproved processing in the case of a sync, and if I'm proxying that for you *shrug* [17:33] realistically it's a sync, so it'd be waved through anyway [17:34] Quite [17:34] And it's -proposed [17:34] Done [17:37] ta [18:12] when do you guys expect a beta2 image? [18:13] monday is when they will start being 'candidates' [18:14] what are you after? :-) [18:17] need to do a fresh install, just curious if I should wait for a b2 image or go with b1 and upgrade [18:17] guess I will go with the latter [18:17] :) [18:18] you might as well use a daily image [20:48] Once things are all green in http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/pending-sru.html , what triggers the move from -proposed to -updates? [20:49] e.g. unity + unity2d + nux :D [20:49] it's manual [20:49] ah [20:49] Who do I need to buy beer for? [20:49] someone on the SRU team [20:49] ok, ta [20:50] np [20:50] * popey cuddles up to ScottK [20:50] that famous unity lover [20:50] :D [21:18] heh [22:32] the phantom reviewer [22:32] Laney: who can upload into backports? [22:33] Laney: to the point of it landing in new/unapproved at least? [22:33] technically the same as the main archive [22:33] but you should not, it is for backporters only [22:33] Laney: so for bug 999771 [22:33] Launchpad bug 999771 in myunity "myunity incorrectly parses lsb-release" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/999771 [22:34] Laney: I added precise backports, and then I should probably also target precise but not quantal. [22:34] the distro task isn't relevant for backports [22:35] but you probably want to SRU it too [22:35] Laney: yeah cause sru+backport need the fix. [22:36] Laney: I'm not a phantom! [22:36] Not my fault LP still has no audit trail on the queues. :P [22:38] * infinity kicks off yet another clang build and goes away again. [22:49] yay, webapps [22:50] yay Amazon Search Results! [22:50] :D [22:51] * xnox actually likes them! [22:51] xnox: have you bought a dishwasher yet? [22:51] jbicha: nope [22:52] xnox: Well they dont bother me but -offtopic is getting flooded by people unhappy about this [22:52] =/ [23:00] oh dear, why did I even peak in there. [23:01] :) [23:04] highvoltage: someone had a script earlier that was saying "Ad sponsored by Amazon" [23:04] =/