| jbicha | what about mawk? it's a dependency of ubuntu-minimal | 00:00 |
|---|---|---|
| darkxst | no mawk was not installed | 00:00 |
| jbicha | you don't have ubuntu-minimal? | 00:00 |
| darkxst | I must have, otherwise system would be completely broken | 00:04 |
| darkxst | hmm just tried again, and it got it this time | 00:10 |
| smartboyhw | hi jbicha | 13:28 |
| jbicha | smartboyhw: howdy | 13:37 |
| smartboyhw | jbicha: Beta coming in 4 days for UGR? | 13:37 |
| jbicha | um yeah, something like that | 13:45 |
| smartboyhw | :) | 13:45 |
| darkxst | jbicha, I see you found Bug 1007123 (I just marked all those dupes) | 22:06 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1007123 in gdm (Ubuntu) "package gdm 3.0.4-0ubuntu15 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 128" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1007123 | 22:06 |
| darkxst | what is the correct thing to do here? it seems that prerm does not stop gdm (since it would kill the current Xsession, I believe) | 22:06 |
| darkxst | then postrm fails since it can't remove the user | 22:07 |
| darkxst | ^gdm user | 22:07 |
| darkxst | can you defer postrm somehow? | 22:07 |
| jbicha | yeah, I'm subscribed to gdm bugs so I get friendly emails when bugs are touched :) | 22:09 |
| jbicha | actually uninstalling gdm does kill gdm which I think is rather rude as it can cause you to lose data if you weren't expecting it | 22:10 |
| jbicha | I think Debian manages to have gdm uninstall without errors, otherwise it would be an RC bug there so it's probably worth comparing the Debian packaging with Ubuntu's | 22:11 |
| darkxst | well the prerm and postrm files are more or less identical | 23:10 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!