[00:37] <darkxst> jbicha, I can't reproduce that bug on 3.5.92.1, but I did find another bug ;)
[00:38] <jbicha> I thought I still hit the bug when I tried a couple days ago
[00:38] <jbicha> uninstall actually worked; it just gave an error
[00:39] <darkxst> did you get the dm chooser question?
[00:41] <jbicha> if you only have 0 or 1 dm installed, there's no need for it to show the question
[00:45] <darkxst> yeh and then is subsequently fails because of this
[00:45] <darkxst> db_unregister shared/default-x-display-manager || true
[00:45] <darkxst> which should just be
[00:46] <darkxst> db_unregister shared/default-x-display-manager
[00:46] <darkxst> (in gdm.prerm)
[00:52] <jbicha> could you explain why that's wrong? I get confused with boolean logic
[00:53] <jbicha> because if it's wrong, you need to report it to GNOME
[00:53] <jbicha> oops, to Debian
[01:18] <darkxst> well I not entirely sure, the '|| true' is actually supposed to make it always have a return value of 1
[01:18] <darkxst> however for some reason, its also stopping the question from being unregistered
[01:23] <darkxst>  well I not entirely sure, the '|| true' is actually supposed to make it always have a return value of 1
[01:23] <darkxst>  however for some reason, its also stopping the question from being unregistered
[14:32] <everaldo> morning!
[14:32] <aditya_> hello..
[14:32] <aditya_> i m an indian... so for me its evning.!! :-P
[14:32] <aditya_> Can u help me plzz...
[14:33] <smartboyhw> hi
[14:34] <everaldo> hehe
[14:35] <aditya_> nd...my problem is very silly actually...cn ayone help me???
[14:35] <jbicha> !ask
[14:38] <aditya_> i have gnome shell nd evn in ubuntu i had the same problem dat ma facebook page in both firefox nd chromium doesnt uploads... i mean i takes a lot of time nd have to refresh it a hundred times... whil other sites like youtube nd google nd ol opens in a blink at the same time in a tab...bt y ders a problem only wid fb... i cant understand
[14:39] <aditya_> plzz help me out..!!
[14:40] <jbicha> it's harder to read when you don't spell out words completely...
[14:40]  * smartboyhw can't understand the language sorry
[14:40] <aditya_> i am sorry... let me rewrite it..
[14:41] <jbicha> but no, we don't really troubleshoot Facebook or Firefox or Chromium or Unity here
[14:42] <aditya_> i am a newbie... so can u tell me in which channel i should ask
[14:42] <everaldo> jbicha, hey, I have patches for ubuntu-gnome-default-settings and ubuntu-gnome-meta. Do I need to propose branch for merging directly on lp:ubuntu/ubuntu-gnome-default-settings or somewhere else?
[14:42] <jbicha> you could try #ubuntu but it could just be a problem with your web connection or maybe with Facebook's servers
[14:43] <jbicha> everaldo: I've been swamped with finishing up ubuntu-docs for the freeze tomorrow so I haven't had a chance to look
[14:46] <jbicha> but sure, you could propose a merge there, I intend to take a look Tuesday night
[14:58] <everaldo> jbicha, nice, is lp:ubuntu/ubuntu-gnome-default-settings the right place?
[15:00] <jbicha> yes
[15:05] <everaldo> now I am thinking about work on syslinux
[15:05] <everaldo> jbicha, is there a list of "things to be done"?
[15:07] <jbicha> the ReleaseNotes is the only list I've got
[15:07] <jbicha> that and fixing bugs :)
[15:10] <smartboyhw> lol
[15:28] <jbicha> everaldo: the metapackage works differently
[15:28] <jbicha> first we need to update https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-gnome-dev/ubuntu-seeds/ubuntu-gnome.quantal
[15:29] <jbicha> then we run ./update in https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-gnome-dev/+junk/ubuntu-gnome-meta
[15:52] <everaldo> jbicha, do I need to do it or you?
[15:52] <everaldo> let me check how package works
[15:53] <everaldo> ah, I see
[16:47] <everaldo> jbicha, can't propose merge for ubuntu-gnome.quantal, the option don't appears in Launchpad, maybe because I used +junk in my branch
[16:47] <everaldo> jbicha, is there another way to propose a merge?
[22:05] <darkxst> jbicha, did you find out about login.defs?
[22:06] <jbicha> no I forgot to ask until late in the day, I'll do that tomorrow though
[22:07] <darkxst> ok
[22:07] <darkxst> btw should I file a debian bug for the gdm packaging issues?
[22:07] <darkxst> although I believe neither issue would exist in debian currently
[22:08] <jbicha> why wouldn't it exist there?
[22:08] <darkxst> they have older packages
[22:08] <jbicha> it's not a gdm 3.6 bug, is it?
[22:09] <darkxst> no
[22:09] <darkxst> first one could be a debconf bug i suppose (dm chooser)
[22:09] <darkxst> second one is due to lightdm (atleast as packaged on ubuntu), no longer has a daemon_name key
[22:10] <darkxst> debian lightdm package does have daemon_name, but its still at 1.2
[22:17] <jbicha> is that a lightdm bug too? like I said yesterday, you understand the problem better than I do
[22:23] <darkxst> lightdm has a slightly modified prerm script
[22:23] <darkxst> #1 they have remove the '|| true'
[22:25] <darkxst> #2 obviously won't exist for lightdm, however in postint, they use `which lightdm`, rather than getting the key from debconf
[22:27] <darkxst> are there debian packages for gdm 3.5 somewhere?
[22:42] <Wilson2B> Running 12.04 , and somehow the refresh graphics got mucked with.. not sure if it's a video driver or what. the background disappears until I move a window around. even menu items dont show up.. have to move cursor over them a few times to see under neath.
[22:52] <darkxst> jbicha, the dm chooser bug does happen also with debian debconf package, but I still don't know if that is a bug or just a change in debconf
[22:54] <jbicha> you can go ahead and report it, you could also ask in #debian-gnome on OFTC but earlier in the day is better for that
[22:56] <darkxst> lol, that is when I sleep!
[22:56] <jbicha> Debian hasn't really started packaging GNOME 3.6 yet; it wouldn't make it into Wheezy anyway so it's a pretty low priority for now
[22:57] <darkxst> I could just patch the debian package?
[22:57] <darkxst> err ubuntu
[22:58] <jbicha> well I'd like a second opinion, which we could get if anyone responds to the bug report
[23:03] <darkxst> it would basically be just copying a block of script across from lightdm
[23:03] <darkxst> (which it seems is what KDM has done also)
[23:04] <darkxst> for the daemon_name issue
[23:05] <jbicha> or just file a Ubuntu bug and patch & maybe I'll have robert_ancell look at it
[23:14] <darkxst> ok