[07:40] <linocisco> hi all
[07:41] <segv> ello
[07:41] <linocisco> I am sure everybody is aware of attack on Godaddy's website . Ubuntu site is backed by Godaddy. I am wondering how much it affected on ubuntu site.
[07:42] <segv> No clue, which attack?
[07:42] <linocisco> segv, DDOS
[07:42] <segv> The recent attack that they played off?
[07:42] <segv> as a router misconfig?
[07:42] <smw> linocisco, the service went down, but they claim it was not a DDOS
[07:42] <linocisco> segv, yes. by Annoymous
[07:43] <smw> linocisco, they claim it was their problem
[07:43] <linocisco> smw, how long was which service down?
[07:43] <smw> Hours
[07:43] <smw> not sure how long
[07:44] <segv> yeah
[07:44] <segv> most of the day
[07:44] <segv> standard PST work hours 9-5+ a few
[07:44] <smw> yep
[07:44] <smw> pissed me off to no end
[07:44] <linocisco> smw, it is the problem of Godaddy, but ubuntu is authenticated through it. I am wondering if hackers could penatrate
[07:44] <smw> had me running in circles
[07:45] <smw> not really...
[07:45] <segv> linocisco: if it was down, they weren't penetrating much haha
[07:45] <smw> linocisco, the took it down... that is sort of the opposite ;-)
[07:52] <linocisco> smw, so ubuntu website was down for a couple of hours?
[07:59] <shauno> where are you getting the impression they're 'backed' by godaddy?
[08:37] <apw> Daviey, hey is it expected that after installing kvm and virt-manager, you need to reboot to make it work
[08:40]  * ogra_ wouldnt see a reason for this 
[08:41] <ogra_> (but i cant remember if i actually had to when i installed that setup)
[08:45] <jpds> apw: Your user needs to be in libvirtd.
[08:47] <apw> jpds, yeah i started virtmanager with that in my group, ie. i logged out and in and it did not help
[08:47] <jpds> apw: Hmm, works for me...
[08:47] <apw> worked not for me
[08:49] <AdvoWork> Hi all, after some advice please. Production server so in use all of the time, whats the best way of applying/installing updates, i would assume check these first, see if anything jumps out as a problem,and then just install? I dont want to install and have problems
[08:59] <Daviey> apw: sort of.. you need to be added to a group.. so loging out and in should be enough
[08:59] <Daviey> ah, read follow up
[08:59] <Daviey> so no, shouldn't be required
[08:59] <apw> Daviey, it wasn't ... and after trying to restart everything related i gave up and rebooted, which fixed
[10:05] <lordievader> Good morning
[10:52] <jamespage> SpamapS, pls can you ping me re ceph upload when you start
[11:05] <jamespage> Daviey, having thought about it more I don't think that switch for python-ceph makes sense
[11:06] <jamespage> it will be a delta we always have to maintain ontop of Debian
[11:21] <Daviey> jamespage: yeah.. I agree.  I don't see why it was raised.. Where was it mentioned?
[11:22] <jamespage> Daviey, irc when discussing which bits go to main
[11:26] <jamespage> Daviey, I need to discuss with SpamapS as I think some of his additional changes relate to the upstart integration
[11:27] <jamespage> which is still considered 'beta' so we don't ship the upstart configurations to support it.
[11:30] <Daviey> jamespage: should i be accepting SpamapS's change or wait?
[11:31] <jamespage> Daviey, hold of for the time being please...
[11:34] <Daviey> okie
[12:40] <zul> good morning
[12:42] <jdstrand> jamespage: hi! on bug 1055416, you said that 1.466.2 is fixed, but upstream lists 1.466.2.1 as fixed
[12:42] <jamespage> jdstrand, thats for the Cloudbees enterprise distro
[12:42] <jamespage> " LTS users should upgrade to 1.466.2"
[12:42] <jdstrand> oh, I see
[12:42] <jamespage> is the one applicable in quantal
[12:42] <jdstrand> LTS users should upgrade to 1.466.2
[12:42] <jdstrand> ok, thanks
[12:43] <jamespage> jdstrand, I spent 30 mins trying to ID the commits but upstream are not that open about security fixes....
[12:43] <jdstrand> jamespage: fwiw, it looks like they have a cloudbees with 1.424.6.11
[12:43] <jdstrand> :\
[12:44] <jamespage> jdstrand, the cloudbees distros build on the open-source LTS releases
[12:44] <jamespage> I have todo the same but blind....
[12:44] <jamespage> jdstrand, I've ping the upstream project lead for guidance and how to discuss
[12:45] <jamespage> going forwards...
[12:45] <jdstrand> jamespage: right, I just ment that precise has 1.424.6. maybe if it was possible to diff 1.424.6 and 1.424.6.11...
[12:45] <jamespage> jdstrand, no source code for  1.424.6.11
[12:45] <jdstrand> ah. hrmm
[12:46] <jamespage> *almost* what I said when the bug report was raised in Debian...
[12:46] <AdvoWork> how would i go about rename all symbolic links, im trying to change from S to K. I can see I can do sudo update-rc.d whatever stop, but it needs an NN, but i dont know this
[12:52] <smb> jamespage, Do you know who else might still be knowledgable with the orchestra/cobbler scripts? I just tried an ubuntu-cobbler-import of quantal and there seems to be an issue with the md5 signing.
[12:53] <jamespage> hmm
[12:53] <jamespage> smb, roaksoax maybe - if its the script from the cobbler package?
[12:54] <smb> jamespage, yes it is... actuall cobber-ubuntu-import...
[12:54] <smb> roaksoax, ^ Would you know what could cause this
[12:55] <smb> failed to verify MD5SUMS via /usr/share/keyrings/ubuntu-archive-keyring.gpg (http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/quantal/main/installer-amd64/current/images/MD5SUMS)
[12:55] <jamespage> smb, ah - actually that might be todo with the archive signing key changing - see ubuntu-devel ML
[12:56] <smb> jamespage, Well yes, I suspected it could be related. Maybe a piece forgotten
[12:56] <jamespage> smb, is this on a 12.04 system?
[12:56] <smb> yes
[12:57] <smb> And that keyring only has the 1K key on it
[12:59] <smb> Hm, maybe I should ask that cjwatson
[13:07] <lordievader> Good afternoon
[13:08] <smb> jamespage, Ok, manually adding the new keys works for now
[13:08] <jamespage> smb, good oh
[13:10] <Daviey> smb: did you see my follow up?
[13:11] <irv> how to restart networking daemon in ubuntu server 12.04 ?
[13:11] <smb> Daviey, Which follow up on what?
[13:12] <irv> nm, got it, sudo /etc/init.d/networking restart
[13:12] <smb> Daviey, jamespage There will be a SRU for the keyring in 12.04
[13:12] <jamespage> yep
[13:13] <Daviey> smb: that was what i question on ubuntu-devel...
[13:14] <Daviey> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2012-September/035910.html
[13:48] <SpamapS> jamespage: awake
[13:48] <SpamapS> jamespage: since its been a weekend since I did the ceph upload on Friday.. can you summarize for me what changes I had from the ones you did?
[13:49] <jamespage> SpamapS, hey - so minor confusion on my part this morning - the one place I did not look for you ceph upload was the unapproved queue :-)
[13:49] <jamespage> SpamapS, np
[13:49] <SpamapS> jamespage: yeah I should have pushed it to lp:ubuntu/ceph
[13:49] <jamespage> SpamapS, so I had picked the new binary for installation - ceph-keys-prepare or whatever
[13:50] <SpamapS> jamespage: I thought I pulled that in to the ceph package based on upstream's debian dir.  I think.
[13:50] <jamespage> SpamapS, I did look at the additional entries for ceph.dirs, but decided not to take those changes as there are related to upstart support
[13:50] <jamespage> which we don't ship
[13:50] <jamespage> at least I think so
[13:51] <SpamapS> jamespage: why don't we ship that yet?
[13:51] <SpamapS> that seems.. a bit weird! ;)
[13:51] <ninjix> good morning, everyone
[13:52] <ninjix> looking for a Ubuntu sysad input on setting up UPS power management for my 12.04 host nodes.
[13:52] <jamespage> SpamapS, 'upstart: basic support for monitors, mds, radosgw; osd support still a work in progress.' - that was from 0.48 release notes
[13:52] <jamespage> as it was only partial I chose not to include it
[13:53] <ninjix> I familiar with NUT but was wondering what others are using.
[13:53] <jamespage> SpamapS, I see
[13:53] <jamespage> upstart: start everyone on a reboot
[13:53] <jamespage> upstart: always update the osd crush location on start if specified in the config
[13:53] <jamespage> in 0.48.2 release notes...
[13:54] <jamespage> SpamapS, I'm reluctant to switch to using upstart this late in the cycle
[13:56] <SpamapS> jamespage: I am worried about incompatibility between our packages and upstream's
[13:56] <SpamapS> jamespage: they didn't add upstart in 0.48.2 ... did we hold it back in 0.48 for some reason?
[13:58] <jamespage> SpamapS, I don't think compatibility is an issue
[14:05] <jamespage> SpamapS, found it " Likewise, the upstart support is still incomplete and not recommended; we will backport that functionality later if it turns out to be non-disruptive." 0.48 release notes
[14:06] <jamespage> knew I had read that somewhere
[14:09] <jamespage> SpamapS, I'll ask upstream
[15:07] <jamespage> zul, updating my panda to see if the radosgw issue has gone away...
[15:08] <zul> jamespage: was there suppose to be two radosgw processes?
[15:08] <jamespage> zul, I don't think so
[15:08] <zul> jamespage: okies
[15:10] <zul> hallyn: ping when you are around
[15:14] <hallyn> zul: 'sup?
[15:15] <zul> hallyn: have you seen soren's patches for qemu-kvm?
[15:17] <hallyn> zul: the ones for precise, to fix the bridging network issues?
[15:17] <hallyn> or a set he wrote himself?
[15:17] <hallyn> if former, yes, if latter, no
[15:18] <zul> hallyn: the one in the ubuntu-virt ppa
[15:21] <hallyn> zul: yeah.  we're waiting for confirmation that it solves the named bug.
[15:21] <zul> hallyn: i saw at least one confirmation this morning :)
[15:22] <hallyn> zul: ah, excellent.  that's plenty then.  want to push it to precise-proposed?  :)
[15:22] <zul> sure! :)
[15:24] <hallyn> zul: that was one of the biggest migraine-inducing bugs in awhile
[15:24] <zul> hallyn: yeah i know
[15:27] <aboSamoor> Hi, I have an ubuntu server with 145 TiB in three md arrays with RAID6 implmented, when we use NFS we get a memory leak, any recent bug or similar issues appeared recently?
[15:29] <jamespage> zul, nope - still get it "*** glibc detected *** /usr/bin/radosgw: free(): invalid pointer: 0xb66f9df4 ***
[15:29] <jamespage> "
[15:29] <zul> jamespage: meh..
[15:31] <AdvoWork> would time stop an rsync, ie: time rsync -azx --stats --progress -numeric-ids --bwlimit=500 /mnt/test/ /mnt/test2  it says "DRY RUN" at the end?
[15:36] <hallyn> zul: i'm nto quite sure what we put down as 'test case' for the SRU justification in that one
[15:36] <zul> hallyn: what about the netcat
[15:36] <hallyn> i guess.  just not many ppl can actually reproduce it.  i never could
[17:26] <iqualfragile> allright: i have several accounts saved into an ldap-directory, and i can log into my clients using that credentials
[17:28] <iqualfragile> now i want kerberos to use the accounts including the passwords in the directory as principials and the clients to automaticly mount the users home-directroy from the server using kerberos-authed nfs (i allready got the automounting part)
[17:29] <iqualfragile> can someone point me to a bit of documentation? i could not find any
[17:34] <adam_g> hallyn: ping
[17:38] <hallyn> adam_g: .
[17:39] <adam_g> hallyn: any thoughts on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1035172 ? this is the issue that was blocking me from testing your libvirt last week on quantal. seems 'vhost=on' by default is the culprit
[17:41] <hallyn> adam_g: i'll look at it and get back to you (break for lunch)
[17:42] <adam_g> hallyn: cool
[17:55] <adam_g> zul: is there a bug for that keystone upgrade thing?
[17:55] <zul> adam_g: not yet
[17:56] <adam_g> zul: how did you hit that? with what config were you trying to upgrade? just the default, or something modified?
[17:57] <zul> adam_g: https://github.com/StackGeek/openstackgeek
[17:58] <adam_g> zul: ?
[17:58] <zul> adam_g: just a bunch of scripts that does an openstack install for you
[17:58] <b0ot> Does anyone have a suggestion for any sort of distributed messaging/email system. I'm looking for something where all the servers are replicating all the data across the network. Where users can talk with one another based on something like username/ip and then if they try to send a message and the user isn't available they recieve the message when they get online
[18:04] <mwynne> not sure if it does messaging but for open source email you could look at Zimbra
[18:04] <mwynne> I used the email server and really liked it.
[18:04] <zul> adam_g: ok the database stuff for me is clearly not working for me
[18:05] <zul> adam_g: meaning im doing something non-standard
[18:06] <adam_g> zul: file a bug with the openstack geek squad? :)
[18:06] <zul> adam_g: yeah :p
[18:07] <adam_g> zul: keystone upgrade with an unpopulated database and default configs seems to work fine, FWIW
[18:10] <hallyn> adam_g: well jinkeys, the email thread you list is from 2010.  and there was no followup?  they were ignored?
[18:11] <adam_g> hallyn: didn't really follow the thread entirely, but it got me looking in the right place. vhost=on by default breaks DHCP without the required iptables rules
[18:11] <adam_g> vhost=on by default seems to be new to quantal (libvirt, i assume)
[18:12] <hallyn> adam_g: yes, there was a bug about something like that before.
[18:12] <hallyn> adam_g: don't we now add that rule for virbr0?
[18:12] <adam_g> hallyn: maybe. have not checked for that, actually. if thats the case, perhaps we can get it added to the rules nova sets up for its instances (it doesn't use virbr0)
[18:14] <adam_g> hallyn: ya, looks like it: -A POSTROUTING -o virbr0 -p udp -m udp --dport 68 -j CHECKSUM --checksum-fill
[18:15] <adam_g> hallyn: is that rule something specific to our packaging or standard libvirt practice now?
[18:15] <hallyn> adam_g: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/1029430
[18:16] <adam_g> hallyn: ah! thanks
[18:16] <hallyn> adam_g: i think libvirt does it for all of its networks
[18:16] <hallyn> adam_g: i assume nova manually creatis its own bridge?
[18:18] <adam_g> hallyn: yes, and goes about managing its own set of iptables rules per-guest/security group
[18:18] <adam_g> hallyn: gonna tag that as a nova bug as well
[18:19] <hallyn> adam_g: maybe mark it as a dup of 1029430
[18:19] <hallyn> maybe not
[18:53] <stgraber> hallyn: can you push 0222-debian-dhcp3-package to your git tree?
[18:54] <njin> balloons, this isn't working for me: Test-case dash/lens-preview-music
[18:54] <njin> ops, wrong chan
[19:00] <hallyn> stgraber: ok
[19:02] <hallyn> stgraber: but i see it's in lxc/lxc.  any reason why i shouldn't just clone that over?
[19:03] <hallyn> stgraber: well, pushed just that one for now
[19:11] <stgraber> hallyn: commit message is a bit confusing, will do a tiny bit of editing when pulling ;)
[19:11] <hallyn> stgraber: thanks
[19:11] <hallyn> i'm a bit scatterbrained.  too many open tasks
[19:12] <hallyn> stgraber: do you happen to know if anyone actually runs/tests the powerpc iso's?
[19:12] <hallyn> wondering if what i'm seeing is a bug in my qemu-system-ppc, or in the openbios blob, or in the ubuntu powerpc iso
[19:12] <stgraber> hallyn: some lubuntu folks are. The others usually suffer by lack of testers.
[19:13] <hallyn> stgraber: ok, thanks.  i'll try to drop by and ask them
[19:14] <stgraber> hallyn: looking on the tracker, the lubuntu desktop image was booting on the 24th, though with quite badly broken desktop apparently
[19:15] <hallyn> stgraber: i was trying the alternate installer.  sounds like that's just untested :)  will try server and then lubuntu
[19:17] <stgraber> hallyn: change applied to staging
[19:21] <gabrtv> it's been about a week and i'm still seeing intermittent issues with the EC2 repository mirrors
[19:21] <gabrtv> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12438946/e-unable-to-locate-package-git-ubuntu-on-ec2/12571429#12571429
[19:22] <gabrtv> apt-get install git gives: E: Unable to locate package git
[19:22] <gabrtv> apt-get update, try again.. maybe it works, maybe not..
[19:22] <sarnold> have you found one or another mirror that works better than others?
[19:24] <gabrtv> sarnold: https://gist.github.com/7448ce4edf141b22643f
[19:25] <zul> adam_g: ping for cinder you dont have to specify the -z cinder anymore
[19:26] <sarnold> gabrtv: amazing. The second apt-get update downloads _more_ data than the first run!
[19:31] <gabrtv> looks to me like http://us-east-1.ec2.archive.ubuntu.com works, and http://archive.ubuntu.com is busted
[19:31] <gabrtv> but not 100% on that
[19:31] <gabrtv> also, not sure how apt chooses which mirror to use.. the errors are pretty random.. sometimes works on attempt 1, other times attempt 2 or 3
[19:32] <gabrtv> sarnold: something's badly awry w/ those mirrors.. i'm surprised i'm the only one who's noticed!
[19:32] <gabrtv> it's us-east-1 after all ;)
[19:33] <sarnold> gabrtv: agreed that something seems strange there. I generally dislike hard-coding specific servers though...
[19:34] <gabrtv> smoser: saw your name as working on some of the EC2 mirrors, any thoughts?
[19:35] <smoser> gabrtv, can you pastebin an error ?
[19:35] <gabrtv> smoser: https://gist.github.com/7448ce4edf141b22643f
[19:36] <gabrtv> corresponding shell at: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12438946/e-unable-to-locate-package-git-ubuntu-on-ec2/12571429#12571429
[19:39] <smoser> gabrtv, it would seem maybe your stderr went un-captured ?
[19:39] <gabrtv> yeah the exec environ is tty-less, over ssh
[19:39] <smoser> ie, the output doesn't give any hints
[19:40] <gabrtv> the point is that looping over apt-get update will eventually let me install `git`
[19:41] <gabrtv> sorry the formatting isn't more clear
[19:41] <gabrtv> btw - this is us-east-1, if that wasn't clear
[19:48] <smoser> gabrtv, right. i understood the problem.
[19:48] <smoser> but you've not captured output that would help me figure out why
[19:49] <gabrtv> let me see if i can get better log output
[19:52] <hallyn> zul: weird, every time i try to make a change to bug 997978 (to mark the non-qemu-kvm bugs invalid) it times out
[19:52] <zul> wanna me try?
[19:52] <zul> times out for me
[19:53] <stgraber> hallyn: let me try some magic
[19:56] <stgraber> hallyn: ok, even the API times out. Trying another way of killing those bug tasks.
[19:57] <stgraber> hallyn: gone
[19:57] <three18ti> how do I add swap space to ubuntu-server?  I'm trying to follow the instrictions here: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/SwapFaq, but when I run dd it just creates a file that size...  should I replace /mnt/swap with the actual device that is to be swap?  (/dev/vdb in this case)
[19:57] <hallyn> stgraber: thanks!
[19:57] <stgraber> (marking invalid didn't work, but removing them completely did)
[19:58] <utlemming> smoser: here
[19:58] <hallyn> stgraber: from the api, or you could do it from the web interface?
[19:59] <stgraber> hallyn: I can remove tasks from the web interface. Not sure if that's something that's restricted to release-team/project-owners though
[19:59] <stgraber> hallyn: basically, if you can remove a task, you'll see a minus sign next to the package name (in a red circle). Click on that will remove the task completely
[20:05] <gabrtv> smoser: looks like the problem is a race condition w/ cloud-init.. archive.ubuntu.com doesn't have the `git` package, but the mirror does!
[20:06] <hallyn> stgraber: yeah i don't see that
[20:06] <hallyn> zul: i've just added sru description to bug 997978.  Did you push the ppa pkg to precise-proposed yet?
[20:06] <smoser> gabrtv, that doesn't make sense.
[20:06] <smoser> the mirror is a mirror :)
[20:07] <zul> hallyn: not yet...i didnt know you want me to
[20:07] <smoser> gabrtv, utlemming might be able to help you some more.
[20:07] <smoser> utlemming, gabrtv is having potential issue with the mirrors on ec2
[20:08] <utlemming> garbrtv, smoser: what's going on?
[20:08] <gabrtv> smoser: appreciate it
[20:08] <smoser> https://gist.github.com/7448ce4edf141b22643f and http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12438946/e-unable-to-locate-package-git-ubuntu-on-ec2/12571429#12571429
[20:08] <hallyn> zul: sorry, thought you had said you were going to.  i'll do it then, no worries.
[20:08] <soren> I can do, too, if you want.
[20:08] <zul> hallyn: cool
[20:09] <gabrtv> utlemming: the gist output is from an automated SSH exec.. it starts off using the archive.ubuntu.com repositories, in which it can't find `git`.. and then switches to the ec2 mirror repo (presumably due to cloud-init completing).. after which it can find the package
[20:09] <hallyn> soren: please go ahead
[20:09] <soren> hallyn: Will do.
[20:10] <hallyn> drat i don't have the rights to push the sync'd augeas
[20:11] <utlemming> garbtv: this is most unusual...but I wonder.....give me a couple of minutes
[20:12] <hallyn> zul: can you sponsor http://people.canonical.com/~serge/augeas-sync/augeas_0.10.0-1fakesync1.dsc ?
[20:12] <zul> hallyn:  i suppose so
[20:12] <hallyn> zul: thanks!
[20:12] <hallyn> i would think augeas should be in the server upload set...
[20:12] <zul> hallyn:  404 on the tarball though
[20:13] <hallyn> grimace
[20:14] <hallyn> zul: oh.  on the .orig.  bc we're keeping the ubuntu one
[20:14] <zul> yeah
[20:15] <hallyn> zul: yeah so i kept it out of there to make sure i didn't copy the wrong one :)  (since it's in the archive).  but i just pushed it, pls retry dget
[20:15] <zul> curl: (22) The requested URL returned error: 404 Not Found
[20:15] <zul> i think you need to update your changes
[20:18] <hallyn> zul: got it.  silly me.  re-pushed.  i can now dget+extract
[20:19] <utlemming> grabtv: can you put your script into apt debug mode for me?
[20:22] <zul> hallyn: uploaded
[20:22] <hallyn> zul: thanks!
[20:22] <hallyn> sorry about the mess
[20:23] <gabrtv> utlemming: is there a cmdline switch?
[20:24] <utlemming> grabtv: try -o "Debug::Acquire::Http=True"
[20:24] <gabrtv> sure thing
[20:34] <gabrtv> utlemming: here ya go http://pastebin.com/z34Bgz8v .. was able to reproduce the same race condition.. check out line 1027
[20:34] <gabrtv> sorry, 1017
[20:41] <Daviey> SpamapS: hey, did you disucss ceph with jamespage earlier?
[20:53] <SpamapS> Daviey: we did
[20:53] <SpamapS> Daviey: I think either upload is fine. Mine was just adding a few dirs that are not 100% necessary
[20:55] <Daviey> SpamapS: i dropped Jamespage's.. just waiting on your nod to accept yours.
[20:55] <Daviey> I assume i should progress?
[20:56] <SpamapS> Daviey: yes please! :)
[20:57] <Daviey> SpamapS: accepted
[21:01] <uvirtbot`> New bug: #1046432 in quantum (universe) "FFE for quantum" [High,Won't fix] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1046432
[21:12] <SpamapS> 50 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 2 not upgraded.
[21:12] <SpamapS> Need to get 46.0 MB of archives.
[21:12] <SpamapS> need.. new.. cloud..images...
[21:19] <gabrtv> utlemming: not sure if you got my message before…  http://pastebin.com/z34Bgz8v .. was able to reproduce the same race condition.. check out line 1017
[21:26] <uvirtbot`> New bug: #978127 in cloud-init "incorrect time on node causes failed oauth" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/978127
[21:32] <utlemming> gabrtv: sorry, about that....on the phone...looking
[21:32] <utlemming> garbtv: can you send me your script
[21:33] <gabrtv> utlemming: http://pastebin.com/JKewkpbF ..
[21:33] <gabrtv> to reproduce the error on EC2 you'll have to run it before cloud-init finishes
[23:32] <TDJACR_> Does anyone know of a good socks 5 proxy with UDP support?
[23:39] <adam_g> SpamapS: ping
[23:39] <SpamapS> adam_g: pong, talk quickly, must go in 6 minutes
[23:41] <adam_g> SpamapS: just wondering about that  openvswitch 1.4.0-1ubuntu1.3 upload thats still sitting in queue for precise-proposed. is there something blocking it?
[23:42] <SpamapS> adam_g: mostly just the release/SRU teams being busy w/ othe rthings
[23:42] <adam_g> SpamapS: yea, figured as much.
[23:42] <SpamapS> adam_g: I only did 1 SRU last week .. many others were similarly distracted
[23:42] <SpamapS> adam_g: and w/ quantal getting closer....
[23:43] <SpamapS> tough to put much energy into the smoldering embers of 12.04 when quantal is approaching 3-alarms ;)
[23:43] <adam_g> yup