hjdQuestion about when to use the tag "patch": I guess this is mainly to tag bugs which have an attachment, but I assume diffs in comments would be ok (bug 811849). What about a link to a patch (bug 690625), or a comment on the changes, ie. not a diff (bug 709901)?17:58
ubot2Launchpad bug 811849 in ripit "ripit 3.8.0 bug and patch" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/81184917:59
ubot2Launchpad bug 690625 in driconf "driconf: DeprecationWarning with python 2.6" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/69062517:59
ubot2Launchpad bug 709901 in lirc ""PATCH" to enable lirc over network" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/70990117:59
penguin42hjd: I'd normally use it for anything that has a patch that looks like it intends to fix it18:02
penguin42hjd: Whether it's attached, in a comment or pointed to18:02
penguin42hjd: just as an indicator that someone has found a way to fix it18:02
penguin42hjd: Although not if it's a pointer to what caused the problem18:04
hjdpenguin42: Sounds reasonable.18:08
Logan_Can somebody please make Bug 1024533 public?18:25
* penguin42 looks18:31
penguin42Logan_: Done, didn't seem to be any strings visible in any of the attachments18:34
Logan_penguin42: Thanks. :)18:34
* penguin42 wonders if there is someone that should be subscribed to check things like bug 22853118:44
ubot2Launchpad bug 228531 in gaim-themes "Includes non-free images" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/22853118:44
penguin42bug 235539 is fun19:26
ubot2Launchpad bug 235539 in acpi "Laptop boots at Midnight, by itself." [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/23553919:26
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
pabelangerEvening, I filed bug 1057813 in the wrong location, can a bug marshal move it into Ubuntu Backports for lucid?23:09
ubot2Launchpad bug 1057813 in git-core "Lucid backport request: describe: Refresh the index when run with --dirty" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/105781323:09
pabelangerI've already attached the debdiff23:09
micahgpabelanger: is that a bug or a feature?23:14
micahgon the surface, looks SRUable23:15
penguin42can't you do 'also affects' and add it to Ubuntu Backports' ?23:15
=== Ursinha_ is now known as Ursinha
micahgpenguin42: that's pointless, it's either SRUable or backportable23:16
micahgand if backportable, better to backport the whole thing23:16
pabelangermicahg, Ya, it is a bug and other could benefit from it.  I can start a SRU if you like23:16
penguin42micahg: Sorry yes, I meant for his original request to move what it was against23:16
micahgpabelanger: that looks more appropriate23:16
pabelangermicahg, sure, let me do that instead23:17
penguin42hmm is the 'ecryptfs_sig' shown in the output of mount the actual key or something harmless?23:18
micahgpabelanger: thanks23:20
pabelangermicahg: No problem23:21
pabelangermicahg, are you able to target bug 1057813 for lucid?23:35
ubot2Launchpad bug 1057813 in git-core "Lucid backport request: describe: Refresh the index when run with --dirty" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/105781323:35
micahgpabelanger: sure23:35
pabelangerI'll update the title shortly23:35
pabelangermicahg, ty23:35
micahgpabelanger: is it in precise?23:35
micahgtask added23:36
pabelangermicahg, no, already fixed in precise23:36

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!