xnox | cjwatson: partman-auto, the reuse recipe is giving me a fizzy fit. It can't mount the partition in read-only mode, because recovery required on readonly filesystem but white access unavailable, cannot proceed. | 10:05 |
---|---|---|
xnox | option one: remove the guards to blockdev --setro/--setrw | 10:06 |
xnox | option two: use os-prober instead of manually hacking up installation detection | 10:06 |
cjwatson | Consider using grub-mount if it's available | 10:06 |
cjwatson | True guaranteed read-only mount | 10:07 |
xnox | ok, let me try that. thanks. | 10:07 |
cjwatson | os-prober switched to that when available a while back, so you could compare with its code | 10:07 |
cjwatson | (So we need it to work regardless) | 10:07 |
xnox | it's bug 1050562 and bug 1056571 | 10:07 |
ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1050562 in ubiquity "Upgrading Ubuntu 12.04.1 from iso isn't given as an option" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1050562 | 10:07 |
ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1056571 in ubiquity "Missing "reinstall" option when installing same version of Ubuntu" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1056571 | 10:07 |
cjwatson | Ah | 10:07 |
cjwatson | Makes sense | 10:07 |
xnox | whichever way I look at it, os-prober is superior to 15reuse recipe semantics. | 10:14 |
cjwatson | Performance might be an issue; os-prober + linux-boot-prober can be fairly slow | 10:18 |
cjwatson | And it's very noisy in logs | 10:18 |
xnox | =( true | 10:18 |
cjwatson | I think if it were me I'd reimplement just the small bit you need | 10:18 |
xnox | and we really don't want to run os-prober twice | 10:19 |
cjwatson | Indeed | 10:19 |
xnox | hmmm.... reuse yet I am still asked user setup | 11:08 |
xnox | and lang and keyboard | 11:08 |
psivaa | We are seeing bug 1058047 in our automated/manual testing, | 11:13 |
ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1058047 in ubiquity "No desktop shortcut, oem-config, oem-config-gtk in oem installation" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1058047 | 11:13 |
psivaa | in the process of attaching logs now, | 11:14 |
cjwatson | psivaa: amd64? | 11:21 |
psivaa | cjwatson, yes | 11:21 |
cjwatson | psivaa: yeah, don't bother, the dailies broke today | 11:21 |
cjwatson | it'll be sorted out soon | 11:22 |
psivaa | cjwatson, ok, thanks, i hear due to version mismatches? | 11:22 |
cjwatson | I'm not totally sure right now | 11:23 |
cjwatson | I mean, yes, there's clearly a mismatch in the archive, but the new amd64 build should have been published a little while back | 11:24 |
cjwatson | So I'm trying to make sure that this is just some kind of "ordinary" lag rather than a publisher bug | 11:24 |
psivaa | cjwatson, ack | 11:25 |
cjwatson | ah, possibly just slightly unfortunate timing | 11:26 |
* cjwatson pokes the archive reports, being impatient | 11:27 | |
cjwatson | yeah, there we go, it's just armhf struggling now | 11:28 |
cjwatson | I'll do a new daily build | 11:29 |
cjwatson | ev: another wubi commit for you when you get a moment (r272) | 11:50 |
ev | will do after lunch | 11:50 |
xnox | ev: ubiquity will allow upgrading "devel release -> final" & "reinstall final" correctly now | 13:27 |
ev | did it not before? | 13:28 |
xnox | not the first bit, because it couldn't compare "Ubuntu quantal" with "Ubuntu 12.10" | 13:28 |
xnox | ev: and because partman-auto was a bit broken it wasn't offering any upgrade options during quantal.... not sure if precise CDs do. | 13:29 |
xnox | there is no manual - install (upgrade) test | 13:29 |
xnox | with cd | 13:29 |
ev | nice | 13:30 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!