[08:38] <didrocks> sil2100: compiz deb test results getting there? :)
[08:48] <sil2100> didrocks: I can create a testing doc for the relevant bits in a moment, but since the ABI bump MRQ didn't yet get inside, my testing would be performed on just rebuilt unity without the bump ;)
[08:48] <sil2100> If that's fine with you
[08:50] <didrocks> sil2100: no, it's not
[08:50] <didrocks> sil2100: if people upgrade only compiz, it will be broken
[08:50] <didrocks> sil2100: nothing was done since yesterday evening to discuss? who is leading the discussion to get them accepting the change?
[08:51] <sil2100> didrocks: I know, but the compiz rendering tests are not affected by not having an ABI bump, right?
[08:51] <sil2100> didrocks: they're accepting it
[08:51] <sil2100> didrocks: I had a discussion and they agreed to make an exception this one more last time
[08:51] <didrocks> sil2100: ok, so please bzr merge your commit
[08:52] <didrocks> and get a package out and results tests for EOD so that we can upload on Monday morning :)
[08:54] <sil2100> didrocks: aye aye!
[09:35] <sil2100> didrocks: we found one issue with the new compiz crashing the g-c-c keyboard shortcut settings and Mirv is trying to fix that right now, we'll keep you updated!
[09:36] <didrocks> sil2100: thanks! (saw the MR)
[09:36] <didrocks> sil2100: btw, also, please ensure that the keys are still transitionned
[09:36] <didrocks> sil2100: I saw you removed more .integrated key transition that the one we had in the past
[09:37] <didrocks> so maybe look closely to the ones you remove
[09:37] <didrocks> and also, ensure that there is a transition file for the duplicated one with the right default
[09:37] <didrocks> (like launching a terminal)
[09:38] <sil2100> Mirv: ^
[09:40] <Mirv> didrocks: they're not in compiz anymore at all, should compiz still migrate them or should it be gnome-settings-daemon instead?
[09:40] <didrocks> Mirv: all of those were removed? (the 6?)
[09:40] <didrocks> Mirv: I thought only 2 were duplicated
[09:42] <Mirv> didrocks: 5, and all, yes, terminal + screenshot * 2 + panel-run-dialog/main-menu
[09:43] <Mirv> this was the sam's commit http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~compiz-team/compiz/0.9.9/revision/3393
[09:43] <didrocks> Mirv: waow, I was thinking it was more restricted :)
[09:44] <didrocks> Mirv: ok, so just ensure that g-s-d provides the right defaults I guess
[09:44] <didrocks> Mirv: and that we have a migration script on the system for them
[09:44] <didrocks> Mirv: I think the terminal + screenshot ones are important
[09:44] <didrocks> not sure about panel*
[09:45] <Mirv> didrocks: ok, it does (tested in guest ession), filing a bug against g-s-d about missing migration
[09:46] <didrocks> Mirv: ok, great!
[12:29] <G__81> Hi i am facing an irritating problem. I have filed a bug . I would like to know if anyone else is facing the same problem and would really appreciate if a solution is provided for the same. The Bug ID is #1039347
[12:32] <popey> bug 1039347
[13:17] <didrocks> davidcalle: salut!
[13:17] <davidcalle> Salut didrocks
[13:17] <didrocks> ça va? :)
[13:17] <davidcalle> didrocks, bien, toi?
[13:18] <didrocks> bien bien, c'est vendredi! :)
[13:18] <davidcalle> didrocks, ;)
[13:18] <didrocks> davidcalle: I think you missed one MR, (but my fault, I didn't linked it to the bug): https://code.launchpad.net/~didrocks/unity-scope-video-remote/add-conditional-activation/+merge/126391
[13:19] <davidcalle> didrocks, don't you prefer a global merge from the current "trunk" in use to this one when the work on it is done for the release?
[13:20] <didrocks> davidcalle: sorry, what do you mean about global merge?
[13:20] <davidcalle> didrocks, merging lp:unity-lens-videos/remote-videos-scope-trunk into this one.
[13:20] <didrocks> ah ;)
[13:21] <didrocks> well, the way you prefer :)
[13:21] <didrocks> davidcalle: do you think you have the time for preparing the release today?
[13:22] <davidcalle> didrocks, the maintainer is PS, I can't make releases on it anymore.
[13:23] <davidcalle> didrocks, and they don't want me in the PS lp teamp :'(
[13:23] <didrocks> davidcalle: will do them, just ping me once everything is ready :)
[13:23] <davidcalle> didrocks, sure ;)
[13:27] <G__81> can some one help me with this bug ?
[13:27] <G__81> the problem i am facing is really frustrating. I have filed a bug and the ID Is 1039347
[13:27] <G__81> i reproduced the problem even few minutes back
[13:28] <G__81> is there a solution for it ?
[13:28] <G__81> if no at least a solution for 12.10 would be appreciated
[13:30] <popey> bug 1039347
[13:30] <popey> hmm
[13:31] <popey> ahh that one, yeah, known issue with nvidia
[13:31] <G__81> its a 64 bit installation and i face this with both the OSS and the nvidia drivers too
[13:31] <G__81> is is sane enough to then start using nouveau drivers?
[13:33] <G__81> infact its not thumbnail When i select the application by pressing alt+tab i see white screen instead of the application. Its not actually in thumbnail alone. The complete app does not get redrawn
[13:45] <G__81> popey, if its a nvidia problem why is that Unity alone shows up this problem and not the other DEs, KDE/xfce etc ?
[13:46] <popey> well, when I say "known issue with nvidia" I'm not saying the problem is nvidias fault, just that it is known to only manifest itself on nvidia machines
[13:47] <G__81> oh ok so is it something confined to unity then ?
[13:51] <popey> G__81, compiz
[14:04] <davidcalle> mhr3, heya, do you have more things in mind for the remote videos scope or is it ok for a release?
[14:04] <mhr3> davidcalle, we need release now, other fixes will have to wait :)
[14:06] <davidcalle> mhr3, ok then, let's put a number on it :)
[14:07] <mhr3> :)
[14:11] <davidcalle> mhr3, by the way, if you can warn other people you know who commit on it: I'm moving it to its own lp space : https://code.launchpad.net/unity-scope-video-remote, the previous release was done on it, without trunk being there
[14:16] <mhr3> davidcalle, i wonder if lp can be setup to just mirror the branch for the time being
[14:17] <davidcalle> mhr3, I'm not sure, I wanted to wait, but moving it makes it much more convenient for releasing.
[14:20] <mhr3> davidcalle, how about considering the branch in lp:unity-lens-videos as stable branch for Q, and R stuff can go in the new project?
[14:20] <davidcalle> mhr3, but if you see it as an issue, it can wait of course :)
[14:20] <didrocks> davidcalle: I think you told that after seeing the two mhr3 MR :)
[14:20] <mhr3> lol
[14:20] <davidcalle> didrocks, :)
[14:21] <mhr3> my python is rusty :)
[14:21] <mhr3> not knowing properly what the operators do :P
[14:24] <davidcalle> Anyway, the code is in both places, in the same state. I'm assigning the bugs to unity-scope-video-remote new milestone, for the sake of having them linked to a release number.
[14:28] <davidcalle> I'll mirror it manually before release if others are needed for Q. Then we move completely on it for R.
[14:28] <davidcalle> mhr3, didrocks? ^^^
[14:29] <didrocks> sounds good to me :)
[14:29] <mhr3> +1
[14:32] <davidcalle> didrocks, two releases for you then : unity-scope-video-remote 0.3.9 and unity-lens-photos 0.8 (bugs : http://paste.ubuntu.com/1247523 ) Thanks :)
[14:33] <didrocks> davidcalle: thanks! I'll do unity-lens-videos
[14:33] <didrocks> davidcalle: is mhr3's merge in it?
[14:35] <davidcalle> didrocks, the merge was on remote videos. There is one merge from me on it, from two days ago, that's it.
[14:35] <didrocks> but we don't want that in the remote videos?
[14:35] <didrocks> mhr3: ? ^
[14:35]  * didrocks is confused
[14:35] <mhr3> didrocks, we do
[14:35] <mhr3> didrocks, both were bug fixes
[14:35] <didrocks> shouldn't it be in 0.3.9?
[14:36] <didrocks> davidcalle: ^
[14:36] <davidcalle> 0.3.9 is only the scope. Which has mhr3 merge on it.
[14:36] <davidcalle> didrocks, ^
[14:38] <davidcalle> mhr3, you had a merge on the lens too?
[14:39] <didrocks> davidcalle: did you push the latest commit for unity-scope-video-remote then? I see rev 55 here
[14:39] <didrocks> davidcalle: and it doesn't contain mhr3's fix
[14:40] <mhr3> didrocks, it's a copy of the file, not cherrypick of the rev, afaict
[14:41] <didrocks> ah indeed
[14:41] <davidcalle> didrocks, it does, I bzr merged unity-lens-videos/remote-videos-scope-trunk into unity-scope-video-remote
[14:41] <didrocks> I find "fresh the at least once every 30" :)
[14:41] <didrocks> davidcalle: a small tag on rev 55 please? :)
[14:41] <didrocks> so that we know where we are at
[14:43] <davidcalle> didrocks, done, I've also written in red on my screen "DON'T FORGET TO BZR TAG" :)
[14:43] <didrocks> davidcalle: thanks :)
[14:44] <didrocks> davidcalle: I'm syncing lp:unity-video-lens/unity-scope-video-remote with it
[22:23] <mhr3> eh, with 6.0 i'm getting crash when i enter spread and mouse over where the close button should be (but isn't)
[22:23] <mhr3> http://paste.ubuntu.com/1248449/
[22:23] <mhr3> bschaefer, if you're familiar with that code ^^ ;)
[22:24]  * bschaefer looks
[22:25] <mhr3> otherwise, Trevinho ^ :)
[22:25] <bschaefer> mhr3, not that familiar but I can dig into it, if Trevinho isn't around
[22:25] <mhr3> i doubt anyone is around :)
[22:26] <bschaefer> mhr3, haha, yeeah it gets lonely on fridays for me
[22:26] <mhr3> oh wait, this wasn't 6.0, this was trunk
[22:26] <bschaefer> mhr3, ill try to re produce the crash, if I can i should be able to fix it
[22:26] <mhr3> try, crashes everytime here :)
[22:26] <bschaefer> mhr3, ill see if I can reproduce it, Have a good weekend :)
[22:27] <bschaefer> i just did and din't get it ;(
[22:27] <mhr3> thanks, you too
[22:27] <bschaefer> thanks!
[22:27] <mhr3> hmm, maybe i'm missing an asset, cause i dont see the close button
[22:27] <bschaefer> maybe the wrong nux?
[22:27] <bschaefer> abi?
[22:27] <mhr3> also, trunk compiz
[22:28] <bschaefer> mhr3, alright ill give trunk nux/unity/compiz a try
[22:28] <mhr3> but yea, maybe it's abi
[22:28] <mhr3> this being null... not nice
[22:29] <mhr3> anyway i'm really out now
[22:29] <bschaefer> il try really hard to reproduce it :)
[22:29] <bschaefer> have a good one!
[22:29] <bschaefer> (one being the weekend)
[22:29] <mhr3> you too, cu
[22:30] <bschaefer> byes!