| tobias_ | hi everyone, i'd need some help with selecting the relevant logs for a bug report. System cannot boot into graphical UI after distupgrade. I think it has to do with: Sep 28 18:09:21 edubuntu gnome-session[2074]: WARNING: Session 'ubuntu' runnable check failed: Exited with code 1 | 01:29 |
|---|---|---|
| tobias_ | Sep 28 18:09:21 edubuntu gnome-session[2074]: WARNING: Unable to find default provider 'unity-2d-panel' of required provider 'panel' | 01:29 |
| tobias_ | Sep 28 18:09:21 edubuntu gnome-session[2074]: WARNING: Unable to find default provider 'unity-2d-shell' of required provider 'shell'" | 01:29 |
| tobias_ | help would be appreciated! :) | 01:30 |
| === JanC_ is now known as JanC | ||
| Logan_ | Can somebody please make Bug 1055807 public? | 21:19 |
| jtaylor | done | 21:22 |
| Logan_ | jtaylor: Thanks, as always. :) | 21:23 |
| === Guest18360 is now known as YDdraigGoch | ||
| rickero1 | Hello everybody, I'm translating the package ubuntu-manual into french. I encounter some mistakes in the English version. Do anybody have an Idea where to fill a bug for it? The manual is here: https://translations.launchpad.net/ubuntu-manual | 22:33 |
| Logan_ | I have a question about bug triaging. I understand that Debian marks all bugs as "Fix Released" in version +rm when a package is removed from Debian. What is the appropriate triaging procedure for bugs in packages in Ubuntu that were deleted from the latest development version? | 22:33 |
| Logan_ | rickero1: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-manual/+filebug (most likely) | 22:34 |
| rickero1 | Logan_: So simple? I cannot believe it :-) | 22:35 |
| Logan_ | rickero1: Yup. :) | 22:36 |
| rickero1 | Logan_: thanks... will try / have a good evening or night | 22:37 |
| Logan_ | You too, thanks! | 22:37 |
| Logan_ | jtaylor: Any input on my question above? | 22:37 |
| Logan_ | Or hggdh, maybe? | 22:38 |
| penguin42 | hmm I don't see a canned message in Bugs/Responses about that | 22:39 |
| Logan_ | I know. :( | 22:46 |
| Logan_ | I mean, I guess packages can still qualify for an SRU even if they don't exist in the development version... | 22:46 |
| Logan_ | It's an interesting issue. | 22:46 |
| penguin42 | Logan_: I'd assume it'll get auto-closed eventually when no supported versions exist any more, I'd certainly add a note saying it's been deleted out of the latest one, but I don't know what the right thing to do if you wanted to change the status was | 22:49 |
| Logan_ | They don't get closed automatically on Launchpad, though. | 22:50 |
| Logan_ | Only on Debian's bts. | 22:50 |
| penguin42 | Logan_: I think stuff does get closed if it's been reported on version x and x goes out of support? | 22:50 |
| penguin42 | I can't remember what exactly the behaviour was but I'm sure I've seen it in the past | 22:51 |
| Logan_ | I haven't witnessed that on Launchpad. I've seen bugs for packages that don't have anything in repositories anymore, and they're still marked as New. | 22:51 |
| * penguin42 has been reporting bugs for a long time | 22:53 | |
| hggdh | the bugs are still maintained open on all supported releases | 23:47 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!