[01:29] <tobias_> hi everyone, i'd need some help with selecting the relevant logs for a bug report. System cannot boot into graphical UI after distupgrade. I think it has to do with: Sep 28 18:09:21 edubuntu gnome-session[2074]: WARNING: Session 'ubuntu' runnable check failed: Exited with code 1
[01:29] <tobias_> Sep 28 18:09:21 edubuntu gnome-session[2074]: WARNING: Unable to find default provider 'unity-2d-panel' of required provider 'panel'
[01:29] <tobias_> Sep 28 18:09:21 edubuntu gnome-session[2074]: WARNING: Unable to find default provider 'unity-2d-shell' of required provider 'shell'"
[01:30] <tobias_> help would be appreciated! :)
=== JanC_ is now known as JanC
[21:19] <Logan_> Can somebody please make Bug 1055807 public?
[21:22] <jtaylor> done
[21:23] <Logan_> jtaylor: Thanks, as always. :)
=== Guest18360 is now known as YDdraigGoch
[22:33] <rickero1> Hello everybody, I'm translating the package ubuntu-manual into french. I encounter some mistakes in the English version. Do anybody have an Idea where to fill a bug for it? The manual is here: https://translations.launchpad.net/ubuntu-manual
[22:33] <Logan_> I have a question about bug triaging. I understand that Debian marks all bugs as "Fix Released" in version +rm when a package is removed from Debian. What is the appropriate triaging procedure for bugs in packages in Ubuntu that were deleted from the latest development version?
[22:34] <Logan_> rickero1: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-manual/+filebug (most likely)
[22:35] <rickero1> Logan_: So simple? I cannot believe it :-)
[22:36] <Logan_> rickero1: Yup. :)
[22:37] <rickero1> Logan_: thanks... will try / have a good evening or night
[22:37] <Logan_> You too, thanks!
[22:37] <Logan_> jtaylor: Any input on my question above?
[22:38] <Logan_> Or hggdh, maybe?
[22:39] <penguin42> hmm I don't see a canned message in Bugs/Responses about that
[22:46] <Logan_> I know. :(
[22:46] <Logan_> I mean, I guess packages can still qualify for an SRU even if they don't exist in the development version...
[22:46] <Logan_> It's an interesting issue.
[22:49] <penguin42> Logan_: I'd assume it'll get auto-closed eventually when no supported versions exist any more, I'd certainly add a note saying it's been deleted out of the latest one, but I don't know what the right thing to do if you wanted to change the status was
[22:50] <Logan_> They don't get closed automatically on Launchpad, though.
[22:50] <Logan_> Only on Debian's bts.
[22:50] <penguin42> Logan_: I think stuff does get closed if it's been reported on version x and x  goes out of support?
[22:51] <penguin42> I can't remember what exactly the behaviour was but I'm sure I've seen it in the past
[22:51] <Logan_> I haven't witnessed that on Launchpad. I've seen bugs for packages that don't have anything in repositories anymore, and they're still marked as New.
[22:53]  * penguin42 has been reporting bugs for a long time
[23:47] <hggdh> the bugs are still maintained open on all supported releases