[08:27] <Riddell> happy monday
[08:32] <Riddell> Quintasan_: you asked for your new flight dates?
[09:49] <Riddell> JontheEchidna: I can't believe amy died with Rory, I always said she'd do so much better with her life if she dumped him and went out with me
[09:54] <Riddell> Blizzz: I presume there's no patch to owncloud 3.0 for the various security issues?
[09:59] <Blizzz> Riddell: ownCloud 3 isn't supported any more
[10:01] <ovidiu-florin_> Hello,
[10:01] <ovidiu-florin_> I have a project and I need to develop in C++ an application to monitor CPU and memory usage of itself.
[10:01] <ovidiu-florin_> I would like to look over the source code of the Ksysguard application, but I can't seem to find it. Maybe I just don't know where to look.
[10:01] <ovidiu-florin_> On this page the code presented I think it's for the website: http://userbase.kde.org/index.php?title=KSysGuard&action=edit
[10:01] <ovidiu-florin_> Can anybody help me?
[10:12] <Riddell> ovidiu-florin_: apt-get source ksysguard
[10:14] <ovidiu-florin_> I'm guessing this was downloaded in ~/ ?
[10:14] <Riddell> ovidiu-florin_: into current directory
[10:15] <ovidiu-florin_> thank you
[10:19] <Riddell> good luck
[10:40] <vprints> Any progress with Precise https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1055967 ?
[10:40] <vprints> :)
[10:41] <xnox> vprints: it's commited to the branch but there was no upload yet.
[10:41] <xnox> vprints: plus even if we do a precise upload you would either have to manually update ubiquity or use precise-daily image as 12.04.2 is not due soon yet.
[10:44] <vprints> xnox: that is not a problem
[10:45] <vprints> i am from downstream, we generate our own isos :)
[10:45] <xnox> vprints: so... cherry pick the patch then.
[10:45] <vprints> but it would be good if the package would come from the official repo
[10:45] <xnox> vprints: as in you'd have no work to do ?! I see....
[10:46] <vprints> :D
[10:46] <xnox> that didn't convince me to do an upload now. I still have another bug to solve for precise.
[10:47] <vprints> I think i was just asking
[10:47] <vprints> and plitely
[10:47] <vprints> politely*
[10:47] <vprints> not demanding
[10:47] <xnox> well, I gave you the status update =) not happening soon as far as I can see. But there will be one for 12.04.2
[10:48] <vprints> Ok
[10:52] <Quintasan_> Riddell: Yes, I did. Awaiting response. Im also looking for a way to get to Berlin
[11:20] <Riddell> oh I remember the kubuntu automation script's issue, it stops when it has a problem building package like a patch that no longer applies and you have to start all over again
[11:20]  * Riddell doing 4.9.2
[11:21] <debfx> there is still the issue of all our branches not being in sync with the archive
[11:21] <debfx> so the script won't do anything
[11:25]  * tsdgeos shakes fist at clementine package
[11:26] <tsdgeos> apt-get source + apt-get builddep + dpkg-buildpackage → fail
[11:26] <tsdgeos> Riddell: be aware there might be a kde-workspace respin
[11:27] <Riddell> tsdgeos: yeah I read that
[11:27] <tsdgeos> oki
[11:27] <debfx> hm why is qt4-x11 in quantal-proposed?
[11:29] <apol> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kde-gtk-config/+bug/1058464 << anybody knows what changed?
[11:29] <apol> (on the gtk configs in quantal)
[11:31] <Riddell> hum
[11:32] <Riddell> I keep forgetting the details, if only gtk did things consistently
[11:32] <Riddell> but we switched from having it set somewhere in gtk2 and xsettings-kde trying to give the same thing to gtk3
[11:32] <Riddell> to your kcm and setting it somewhere else one for gtk2 and again for gtk 3
[11:39] <apol> Riddell: i haven't seen a patch in the kcm...
[11:41] <Riddell> apol: here's what it has http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/quantal/kde-gtk-config/quantal/files/head:/debian/patches/
[11:41] <apol> ......
[11:41] <apol> dude!
[11:42] <apol> Riddell: why aren't I aware of this?
[11:42] <Riddell> good question, I'm not sure
[11:43] <Riddell> I think partly it comes from debian and partly I blame my poor broken brain, sorry
[11:43] <apol> Riddell: kubuntu needs a no-patch policy against KDE
[11:46] <Riddell> we do, but an exception is that stuff from debian we tend to assume has already been handled properly, assuming you're looking at the mirgation-from-package-src\:kcm-gtk patch
[11:51] <apol> Riddell: ok, I'll get in touch with him
[11:52] <Riddell> apol: it is causing a problem?
[11:53] <apol> Riddell: well, for starters i'm not happy to see there's patches removing features and such > http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/quantal/kde-gtk-config/quantal/view/head:/debian/patches/kubuntu_01_no_gtk.diff
[11:54] <apol> also there are patches that won't work
[11:55] <Riddell> apol: hmm I seem to remember you saying at some point we could compile it without the gtk dependency
[11:56] <apol> yes definitely
[11:56] <apol> but the solution isn't a distro patch
[12:07] <apol> Riddell: do you know what's the default ~/.gtkrc-2.0 file in quantal?
[12:08] <yofel> apol: ~/.gtkrc-2.0
[12:10] <Riddell> /usr/share/kubuntu-default-settings/dot-gtkrc-2.0-kde4  it should be
[12:10] <Riddell> yes
[12:11] <Riddell> http://paste.kde.org/560540/
[12:13] <pkt> vprints: you could use https://github.com/squibbylinux/ubiquity.squibby.git
[12:14] <pkt> I 'm also from downstream and I have done the patching
[12:14] <pkt> it also has fixes for the other issues I reported
[12:14] <pkt> maybe the code is not so great but I hope it is too simple to mess it up :P
[12:14] <pkt> at least it is tested :)
[12:14] <apol> hm
[12:15] <apol> noted
[12:15] <apol> i'll have to review some stuff then...
[12:15] <pkt> apol: In general I think what is there is also upstream in branches
[12:15] <pkt> but feel free :)
[12:16] <apol> no i mean i'll have to look into the kcm again
[12:16] <pkt> oh sorry :)
[12:48] <vprints> pkt: great, thanks!
[12:49] <BluesKaj> Hey all
[12:51] <pkt> vprints: you are welcome
[12:52] <pkt> vprints: btw, which downstream are you from? Is it public?
[12:57] <vprints> estobuntu.org
[12:59] <pkt> cool :)
[13:01] <pkt> vprints: I 'm trying to do the same for Greek language :)
[13:01] <pkt> so hopefully we will be able to exchange ideas :)
[13:03] <vprints> good :)
[13:04] <vprints> you are using PPAs or Your own system for repos?
[14:14] <kubotu> ::qt-bugs:: [1059602] Default buttons for close, minimize and maximize do not show in dialog windows @ https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1059602 (by drMerry)
[15:41] <soee> so tomorrow kde 4.9.2 is released ?
[18:06] <Riddell> http://starsky.19inch.net/~jr/tmp/kubuntu-ppa-build-status.html
[18:18] <Riddell> hi sheytan
[18:19] <sheytan> Riddell: hey
[18:31] <debfx> that looks wrong: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~kubuntu-packagers/kubuntu-packaging/audiocd-kio/view/head:/debian/changelog
[18:31]  * yofel_ goes rebuilding 4.9.2
[18:32] <debfx> same in all the other packages
[18:32] <yofel_> o.O
[18:32] <sheytan> Riddell what's up? I'm only for a while ;)
[18:32]  * yofel_ won't rebuild 4.9.2 for now...
[18:32] <Riddell> debfx: it's a sign of how many times I had to run it before it would work :)
[18:32] <kubotu> ::qt-bugs:: [1028283] package libqt4-help 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.2 failed to install/upgrade: package libqt4-help is a... @ https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1028283 (by Isaac)
[18:32] <Riddell> I'll tidy it up
[18:33] <shadeslayer> haha
[18:33] <Riddell> sheytan: nothing in paticular, we got an image for the 12.10 release, you can see it on kubuntu.org and critique if you like
[18:33] <yofel_> Riddell: reupload things while you're at it. It seems like stuff was built with kdelibs 4.9.1, so the libs are names *.so.4.9.1 not 4.9.2
[18:33] <yofel_> *named
[18:33] <shadeslayer> Quintasan: ping
[18:34] <Riddell> yofel: mm yes that's more important, I failed to do the build-dep version updates which is my failure
[18:34] <yofel> well, the scripts should do that
[18:34]  * yofel -> dinner, bbiab
[18:35] <Riddell> kubuntu-initial-upload?  I don't think it does
[18:36] <shadeslayer> grep-dctrl and set are your friends :P
[18:36] <shadeslayer> s/set/sed
[18:36] <debfx> maybe we should reset the bzr branches with every release, would certainly make the history more readable than it is now
[18:36] <debfx> it does update the build-deps
[18:37] <Riddell> debfx: oh?  it doesn't seem to have done so
[18:37] <debfx> maybe you are using an old version?
[18:38] <debfx> (it would be a very good idea to update the tools before doing such packaging changes next time)
[18:39] <sheytan> Riddell i follow all the stuff in silent mode,  all good for now. Finally good software in default, still missing the KDE Web accounts, which is going to be cool, hope you fix lightDM theme the way i mocked it up, and hope for packageing kio-mtp just released :) That's it so far :D
[19:04] <Riddell> sheytan: afiestas says webaccounts isn't ready yet
[19:04] <Riddell> apachelogger has lightdm theme on his todo
[19:04] <sheytan> Riddell: thought that, but anyway, it will come with one of the KDE upgrades ;)
[19:35] <Peace-> hi there 
[19:36] <Peace-> i have bad feedback to report upgrading to 4.9.1 from 12,04
[19:36] <Peace-> plasma crashs a lots
[19:36] <Peace-> anyone knows this stuff ?
[19:36] <Peace-> or some else has the same issue?
[20:45] <shadeslayer> Peace-: works fine for me
[20:48] <BluesKaj> Peace-, I had to reinstall the nvidia-current driver after 4.9.1 
[20:57] <Peace-> i dunno alexzion was reporting an ultra unstable system 
[20:57] <Peace-> with 30 crash of plasma 
[20:57] <Peace-> hahah pooor guy
[22:05] <shadeslayer> Quintasan: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1852702 < have you seen that?
[22:49] <SteveRiley_> hiyall. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/parted/+bug/1059297
[22:50] <SteveRiley_> already fixed in KDE SVN, according to https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=307643
[22:59] <shadeslayer> SteveRiley_: too late in the cycle :(
[23:00] <SteveRiley_> yes, i figured that. just prodding, hoping for 13.04 :)
[23:00] <SteveRiley_> i wasn't sure if you guys saw the bug or not
[23:00] <shadeslayer> probably missed it
[23:01] <SteveRiley_> speaking of which... in cases like that, where there exists a ubuntu package but it's pretty much for us kubuntu guys, where's the better place to file?
[23:01] <SteveRiley_> against the package, or against kubuntu?
[23:01] <shadeslayer> what you need to do is to tag bugs with kubuntu and needs-packaging
[23:01] <SteveRiley_> ah, okie.
[23:01] <SteveRiley_> so much to learn
[23:01] <shadeslayer> against ubuntu, but if it concerns kubuntu, tag with kubuntu :)
[23:01] <shadeslayer> well ... against the package
[23:01] <SteveRiley_> got it
[23:02] <SteveRiley_> thanks for the tip
[23:02] <shadeslayer> np
[23:02] <shadeslayer> good god this source is completely busted
[23:02] <SteveRiley_> what source?
[23:02] <shadeslayer> has a top level src dir, but no CMakeLists.txt
[23:03] <shadeslayer> http://kde-apps.org/content/show.php?content=98808
[23:03] <SteveRiley_> oh, i thought maybe you were looking at partitionmanager
[23:03] <shadeslayer> nah :)
[23:13] <shadeslayer> !find qfile.h:
[23:13] <shadeslayer> !find qfile.h