gooslap | Hi, is anyone online? | 02:38 |
---|---|---|
Sysi | ssds work and should keep working for years even without any tweaking, it's world of choices you have problems with :) | 07:19 |
xnox | bug 1059083 not sure if this is lightdm problem or xubuntu specific. | 07:54 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 1059083 in ubiquity ""Log in automatically" choice does not work." [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1059083 | 07:54 |
xnox | are you using lightdm?! | 07:54 |
* xnox is out of touch | 07:54 | |
ochosi | yup, we are | 07:54 |
xnox | lightdm it is. | 07:54 |
ochosi | suprising that this doesn't work, shouldn't it simply do the same thing in ubuntu and xubuntu? | 07:55 |
astraljava | I suppose we had some settings for that, maybe something broke. | 07:55 |
Sysi | I think that worked for me.. | 07:56 |
xnox | considering that my lightdm login is "funny" with massive spinning circles, I would not be surprised if it was lightdm regression.... or change of api..... or something like that. | 07:56 |
ochosi | xnox: does this affect ubuntu as well? | 07:57 |
Sysi | I used amd64 | 07:57 |
xnox | ochosi: no clue. Haven't tested yet. Just going through my bug mail. | 07:57 |
knome | g'day | 12:03 |
elfy | hi knome | 12:04 |
knome | hello elfy | 12:04 |
* elfy needs to get his around this qa thing - got somewhere simple for him to start? | 12:04 | |
knome | astraljava is quite a simple person... | 12:05 |
elfy | :) | 12:05 |
knome | what is it what you are specifically wondering about? | 12:05 |
elfy | that'll be 2 of us then | 12:05 |
elfy | what it is I'm supposed to be doing :D | 12:05 |
knome | heh, ok so: | 12:06 |
knome | first of all, make sure you announce mailing lists when we have milestone releases coming up | 12:06 |
elfy | yep | 12:07 |
knome | the second one is to attend the weekly QA meeting | 12:07 |
knome | i got to say i have no idea what time that is... | 12:07 |
knome | but astraljava will tell you | 12:07 |
elfy | ok - I can find out - I talk to balloons anyway | 12:07 |
knome | looks like it's wednesdays 14UTC | 12:08 |
knome | and if there's something specific to report, report it back to us | 12:08 |
elfy | right - not too onerous then :) | 12:08 |
knome | no, not really | 12:09 |
knome | then there's this one thing | 12:09 |
knome | that we still need to get fixed | 12:09 |
knome | the weekly reports to the release team | 12:09 |
knome | i'm ok to do that, but that implies that people should really update the team reports | 12:10 |
elfy | ok | 12:10 |
knome | https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/2012-August/001846.html | 12:10 |
knome | that's our last weekly mail, sent in august :P | 12:10 |
knome | but those are the things that we need to report | 12:11 |
knome | if you have ideas how we can make this reporting more effective.. | 12:11 |
elfy | I'll have a think knome - so at present - people tell you and then you report to release team? | 12:12 |
* smartboyhw finds that the "not-sending-the-release-mail" isn | 12:13 | |
knome | elfy, well, no... | 12:13 |
smartboyhw | that serious for Xubuntu, Ubuntu Studio's problem is bigger:P | 12:13 |
knome | elfy, people doesn't tell me, and when we've sent the mail, the person who sent it finds out what has been done himself | 12:13 |
knome | elfy, astraljava has been sending those mails mostly | 12:13 |
elfy | ok | 12:13 |
knome | elfy, our last "team report", which would be *really useful* for this, is from 2011 | 12:14 |
knome | https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Xubuntu/TeamReports/ | 12:14 |
smartboyhw | knome: Wow that is long | 12:14 |
* smartboyhw thinks the last "team report" for Studio is about 4 years ago:P | 12:15 | |
elfy | knome: ok - I'll have a think about that then | 12:15 |
knome | elfy, i was thinking if something @IRC would work... | 12:16 |
elfy | yep probably - so the kind of thing that needs reporting is stuff that gets mentioned in meetings and from bugs etc | 12:17 |
elfy | I'll talk to astraljava | 12:18 |
smartboyhw | elfy, this might be useful | 12:18 |
smartboyhw | https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReleaseTeam/Meeting/Agenda/TeamTemplate | 12:18 |
elfy | ty | 12:18 |
knome | yep, that's the template | 12:19 |
knome | elfy, anyway, don't geel *obliged* to do it if you don't want to :) | 12:19 |
smartboyhw | elfy, you are luckier than me that knome got the testcases rewritten before you become QA contact, I have to do the tiring job:P | 12:20 |
elfy | oh - I'm happy to do it knome - I'd not have said I would if I didn't want to :) | 12:20 |
knome | elfy, ok, thanks :) | 12:20 |
elfy | welcome :) | 12:21 |
smartboyhw | :) | 12:22 |
elfy | knome: got my new machine - didn't need to worry about uefi etc - just moved the drives, turned it on and carried on as normal | 12:22 |
knome | hihi, good | 12:22 |
knome | laptop/desktop? | 12:22 |
* smartboyhw thinks UEFI is a bunch of **** developed by Microsoft who clearly does not know what is F/OSS | 12:23 | |
elfy | desktop - hate laptops - always end up with cramp from the touchpad things lol | 12:23 |
elfy | was a barebones thing - no drives no OS | 12:23 |
* smartboyhw is using a laptop to do EVERYTHING including testing:P | 12:23 | |
knome | they have their pros and cons | 12:23 |
elfy | yep | 12:24 |
astraljava | What does elfy need to talk to me about? | 13:22 |
smartboyhw | astraljava, how to be a QA contact person:P | 13:22 |
knome | astraljava, qa meetings, probably sending mails to release team | 13:23 |
astraljava | knome: Aren't you sending those emails? | 13:23 |
* smartboyhw now sends mails to release team after getting scott's permission:P | 13:24 | |
astraljava | But that's over on Studio's side. | 13:25 |
knome | astraljava, well, i should be sending, but seriously talking, we should get stuff in order before anybody can send those reliably | 13:25 |
knome | astraljava, i'm talking about team reporting | 13:25 |
astraljava | Hmm... yet another email template, then? | 13:26 |
knome | no, not anything like that | 13:26 |
knome | internal reporting | 13:26 |
knome | the one who sends the mail to release team should know what people have been up to | 13:26 |
knome | and shouldn't really do the detective work | 13:27 |
astraljava | Err... well, have fun trying to keep all that in mind. | 13:28 |
astraljava | They expect to have a list of bugs being worked on, for instance. Can you keep those numbers all in your head? | 13:28 |
knome | well exactly. | 13:28 |
knome | no, i can't | 13:28 |
astraljava | There you go then. :) | 13:28 |
astraljava | That's why my inbox exploded, cause I wanted to keep all bug mail during the week, until report was sent. | 13:29 |
knome | there should be a better way to track those bugs and items | 13:29 |
astraljava | Also, [release]-changes ML was damn easy to pick the changed packages from, too. | 13:30 |
knome | hmm? | 13:30 |
astraljava | If you come up with any, by all means. | 13:30 |
knome | i'm thinking the reporting could be tied to the work items tracking | 13:30 |
knome | because we need to do that anyway, and i can see how we benefit from that | 13:30 |
knome | if a work item is INPROGRESS, the team works on it, aight? | 13:31 |
astraljava | Not all bugs directly relate to a work item on blueprints. | 13:31 |
knome | that's true, but they should all be linked to the blueprints | 13:31 |
knome | and if their status isn't fix committed/fix released, they are still worked on, unless they are new/triaged or so, when they're still... new | 13:32 |
astraljava | I'm not at all sure you'd want to include all bugs to blueprints. | 13:32 |
astraljava | I know I wouldn't. | 13:32 |
astraljava | But you're... strange. | 13:32 |
knome | why wouldn't you link all bugs you are workig on that contribute towards a blueprint? | 13:32 |
knome | +n | 13:32 |
astraljava | Well I suppose then you'd have an obligatory "Improve QA" blueprint for every release. | 13:33 |
knome | not a problem: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/other-r-xubuntu-bugs | 13:34 |
astraljava | Ok. Somebody has to update that blueprint throughout the release, then, to make sure that every new bug gets added. | 13:34 |
astraljava | Volunteers? | 13:34 |
astraljava | Oh, I know. | 13:34 |
astraljava | ELFY! | 13:34 |
knome | i mean, creating and maintaining one more blueprint isn't too bad, if that means we'll get the team reports done | 13:34 |
knome | :P | 13:34 |
knome | no, i don't mean *any new bug in xubuntu* | 13:34 |
knome | because we don't need to track bugs we aren't working on | 13:35 |
astraljava | Those are the bugs I meant when I said I wouldn't want all bugs into blueprints. | 13:35 |
knome | if somebody starts looking at a bug, or is working on it, link it then | 13:35 |
astraljava | Oh. | 13:35 |
astraljava | Fine. | 13:35 |
knome | oh. yeah, i don't want them in blueprints too | 13:35 |
knome | s/too/either/ | 13:35 |
astraljava | Ok. You know how Lionel will feel about this change in the process, right? :) | 13:36 |
knome | since we only need to report those we are working on, it's not too hard to track them under blueprints | 13:36 |
knome | yes, i know, but i've been managing the blueprints anyway | 13:36 |
knome | and i don't think it's a huge burden | 13:36 |
knome | if you have time to look at the bug, or work with it, maybe you will have time to link it, or tell somebody to do that | 13:37 |
astraljava | When you're battling 140+ bugs a release... | 13:37 |
knome | we haven't been reporting those bugs to the release team before | 13:37 |
knome | and i'm not sure what the policy should be on what is reported | 13:37 |
astraljava | I did, for a brief period of time, anyway. :) | 13:37 |
knome | yeah, thanks for that | 13:38 |
knome | but the list per mail wasn't >10 | 13:38 |
knome | maybe i/we should talk with skaet | 13:38 |
astraljava | But I think I was pretty much alone in that. Don't think many teams shared that hobby with me. | 13:38 |
smartboyhw | Hey elgy astraljava is here | 13:38 |
knome | "why do we have to report these, since you can simply look at our work items tracker" | 13:39 |
smartboyhw | *oops hey elfy | 13:39 |
knome | if a bug isn't worth mentioning in a blueprint, why would it be worth mentioning in the mail to release team? | 13:39 |
knome | i mean, i can't see these *not* walking hand in hand | 13:39 |
astraljava | Oh it would totally eliminate the need to do that, if they _were_ actually tracked somewhere. | 13:39 |
astraljava | Currently _this was_ the tracking process. | 13:40 |
astraljava | ...or _is_, rather. | 13:40 |
astraljava | But then we're not really categorizing our bugs, either. | 13:40 |
astraljava | I'm pretty sure the release team is actually interested about release blocker bugs anyway. | 13:41 |
knome | +only | 13:41 |
* smartboyhw is sucking in all those contents:P | 13:41 | |
astraljava | But since our work flow was lacking in this department (too?), it was clearer for me to report them all. | 13:41 |
knome | but, don't you agree that these two procedures are just duplicating each other? | 13:41 |
astraljava | Yea, I just said so a few lines above. :) | 13:42 |
knome | yep, so that one is sorted out | 13:42 |
astraljava | ACK | 13:42 |
knome | meh, "what was done engineering wise" | 13:42 |
smartboyhw | :P | 13:42 |
knome | i think that's the worst question ever | 13:42 |
smartboyhw | knome: +1 | 13:42 |
knome | what does that "engineering" mean really? | 13:42 |
smartboyhw | Dunno. Maybe some new features? | 13:43 |
* smartboyhw suggests going to #ubuntu-release to ask that question:P | 13:43 | |
smartboyhw | Oops;P | 13:43 |
astraljava | knome: That was easy, pick up the new uploaded packages from -changes. | 13:45 |
astraljava | No one ever complained about that method. | 13:45 |
astraljava | It's actually stuff that matters, too. Versioning of packages in the archives. | 13:45 |
astraljava | Not so much of Xubuntu's packages, of course, as not many (anyone?) depend on them. | 13:46 |
astraljava | But still, from the release-team-POV, it's useful information. | 13:46 |
astraljava | And for us, it's usually a no-brainer. Just pick the ones where uploader is either Lionel or Micah. :) | 13:47 |
smartboyhw | lol | 13:47 |
astraljava | Of course Micah uploads other packages when acting as a PP. | 13:47 |
astraljava | But you get the idea. | 13:48 |
knome | yeah. | 13:52 |
knome | so, there's the "what did you do?" and "what bugs did you work on?" which are sorted | 13:53 |
knome | now, what's about to land blah is trivial too, once you have those done | 13:53 |
knome | and the dependencies/blocking/concerns too | 13:53 |
astraljava | Yep, most often that was a "N/A" for us. | 13:53 |
* elfy wonders if this conversation is about what I was being told earlier | 13:53 | |
knome | elfy, yeah, we're talking about the mails to the release team | 13:54 |
elfy | if it is - I missed the beginning :p | 13:54 |
smartboyhw | elfy: Yes:P | 13:54 |
knome | elfy, i'll paste you | 13:54 |
elfy | thanks knome | 13:54 |
knome | elfy, http://paste.ubuntu.com/1253911/ | 13:55 |
elfy | ta | 13:58 |
knome | np | 13:59 |
philballew | Anyone wanna run a xubuntu session in open week in a little less then a month? | 17:19 |
=== philballew_ is now known as philballew | ||
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
ailo_ | I'm having a bit of problem with editing the menu. Added a submenu, more or less like here http://wiki.xfce.org/howto/customize-menu#create_sub-menus. And looking at other edits, I can't see what's different with mine. The problem I'm having.. | 21:04 |
ailo_ | The submenu is named after its parent, instead of <Name>Myname</Name> | 21:05 |
ailo_ | To clarify, the submenu is displaying its parents name in the actual menu, while in the file, I'm using a custom name with <Name>Myname</Name> | 21:06 |
ailo_ | If I use <Layout>.., and inside it <Menuname>, using the custom menu name, I still see the parents name displayed | 21:06 |
ailo_ | Well, I've realized the <Directory> needs to exist somewhere | 21:20 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!