[06:49] <dholbach> good morning
[08:27] <cjwatson> jtaylor: nothing other than dpkg --compare-versions is guaranteed to actually get it right for package version numbers.  But perhaps 'sort -V' would help
[08:27] <cjwatson> $ (echo 2.10; echo 2.9) | sort -V | xargs
[08:27] <cjwatson> 2.9 2.10
[14:46] <dholbach> in 15 minutes we're going to do another ubuntu-dev hangout - anyone who wants to co-host? :)
[14:49] <coolbhavi> dholbach, count me in :)
[15:02] <dholbach> coolbhavi, ready? sent the invitation :)
[15:02] <coolbhavi> yep
[15:02] <coolbhavi> :)
[17:35] <jtaylor> is the test rebuild still running?
[17:35] <jtaylor> I'm surprised the number of failures is going up although we are fixing many ._.
[17:36] <cjwatson> Yes
[17:36] <cjwatson> It looks a day or so away from done on x86
[17:36] <cjwatson> Several days off on armhf
[17:37] <jtaylor> k, thanks for the sort -V hint, that looks useful
[19:21] <geser> any volunteer to take a look at merging zsnes?
[19:23] <jtaylor> hm I guess I could have a look
[19:23] <jtaylor> I wonder if its still broken with hardening flags
[19:23] <jtaylor> debian looks kind of invasive
[19:24] <jtaylor> do we need something from there besides the 4.7 fix?
[19:24] <geser> the version in quantal build-depends on ia32libs :( (ia32-libs : Depends: ia32-libs-multiarch but it is not installable)
[19:26] <jtaylor> but thats not fixed in debian?
[19:28] <geser> sort of: it's now i386-only
[19:29] <geser> but can be installed on amd64 due to multi-arch
[19:29] <jtaylor> -march=i486
[19:30] <jtaylor> in the log, is that ok for ubuntu?
[19:31] <jtaylor> honestly I think I would prefer to leave it failing for q
[19:31] <jtaylor> the merge is enormous and zsnes works fine as is
[19:31] <jtaylor> I don't want to break it 3 weeks before release
[19:32] <geser> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/test-rebuild-20120922/+build/3846866/+files/buildlog_ubuntu-quantal-amd64.zsnes_1.510-2.2ubuntu5_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz
[19:32] <geser> but I see that we don't have an amd64 build anyways (although the package is i386 and amd64)
[19:32] <geser> so we can probably ignore it for quantal
[19:34] <jtaylor> good that it gets decent attention in debian now
[22:13] <ScottK> tumbleweed, Laney , micahg (whoever else I forgot): Do we need a session on pre-release backports opening?  If only to sit down and declare it done.
[22:17] <tumbleweed> do we have policy to nail down, still?
[22:19] <ScottK> Dunno.
[22:19] <ajmitch> there's still some left-over work items from the last blueprint, do they need a session at all?
[22:20] <ScottK> ajmitch: Link me please?
[22:20] <highvoltage> ScottK: are you going to uds?
[22:20] <ScottK> highvoltage: Yes.
[22:20] <highvoltage> nice
[22:23] <ajmitch> ScottK: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/other-q-backports-bof
[23:18] <ScottK> ajmitch: thanks.