[00:05] <ScottK> shadeslayer: Sure.
[00:09] <ScottK> shadeslayer: No reason to send that one to proposed.
[00:10] <shadeslayer> oh .. ok
[00:10] <ScottK> Uploaded with quantal instead of quantal-proposed.
[00:10] <shadeslayer> I thought we were in pre release freeze, and all uploads go to -proposed
[00:10] <ScottK> No, still just ones that can break the archive with skew.
[00:11] <shadeslayer> ah
[00:11] <ScottK> The whole archive is frozen, so everything hits unapproved anyway.
[00:11] <ScottK> So the 4.9.2 update as a whole goes to -proposed.
[00:11] <shadeslayer> right, and then copy over to main archive to prevent skew
[00:15] <shadeslayer> kdegames is still building with fix
[00:17] <ScottK> Great.
[00:17] <ScottK> Nothing else appears to have failed so far.
[00:19] <shadeslayer> so it seems that kdegames has dropped the top level README and instead there's a README for every game
[00:19] <shadeslayer> and mostly useless tbh
[00:20] <ScottK> bugfix only FTW.
[00:20] <ScottK> Don't worry about shipping the per game README's then.
[00:20] <shadeslayer> yeah
[00:21] <ScottK> It's an artifact of them moving to git and splitting.
[00:21] <shadeslayer> *nod*
[00:23] <shadeslayer> ScottK: kdegames uploaded
[00:23] <ScottK> Great.
[00:23]  * shadeslayer sync's bzr branches
[00:29] <shadeslayer> ScottK: branches syncd
[00:29] <shadeslayer> sync'd even
[00:29] <shadeslayer> we don't maintain a branch for taglib do we?
[00:31] <shadeslayer> ( doesn't look like it
[00:32] <shadeslayer> )
[00:48] <ScottK> kdegames and taglib are in.
[00:48] <ScottK> Thanks shadeslayer .
[00:49] <shadeslayer> np
[01:08] <shadeslayer> ScottK: http://paste.kde.org/561392/ < something is wrong with 4.8.5 on armhf precise
[01:09] <shadeslayer> oddly it doesn't pick up kde-window-manager-gles 4:4.8.5-0ubuntu0.1
[01:09] <shadeslayer> http://paste.kde.org/561398/
[01:32] <JontheEchidna> :s http://i.imgur.com/xWdOr.png
[01:33] <JontheEchidna> apachelogger: any ideas on^?
[01:34] <JontheEchidna> everything started to slow down to to swap usage
[01:37] <JontheEchidna> ooh, symptom, when I run dragon and then close it, a window playing the file from the beginning again shows (with no UI elements other than the video) and then closes
[02:24] <ScottK> shadeslayer: You're installing a package from -updates with -updates disabled.  Won't work.
[07:22] <konqui> Will quantal release with 4.9.2 or 4.9.1? 
[07:32] <tsdgeos> i just got kmix 4.9.2 in my quantal installation
[07:35] <konqui> tsdgeos: does kmix 4.9.2 even exist? About kmix says 4.2 here
[07:36] <tsdgeos> ...
[07:36] <tsdgeos> kmix from 4.9.2
[07:37] <konqui> Ah ok got that too kmix i386 4:4.9.2-0ubuntu1
[09:03] <debfx> shadeslayer: kde-baseapps shouldn't build-depend on kdelibs5-data, instead the include file need to be moved to the proper package
[09:04] <Riddell> I just noticed that :(
[09:04]  * debfx wonders if it's safe to assume that no one uses q-proposed
[09:05] <Riddell> I did fix it but I must have failed to push the fix and it ended up in the final build for the archive
[09:06] <Riddell> same for the change to kdegames
[09:06] <konqui> Will quantal release with 4.92? or 4.9.1?
[09:07] <Riddell> depends if I keep making mistakes or not
[09:07] <konqui> lol
[09:09] <konqui> So if it does release with 4.9.2, will klook be automatically added to Kubuntu or will users who want that have to install a seperate package.
[09:11] <konqui> My bad, seems like that is not yet implemented and still marked as "todo"
[09:12] <Riddell> I've forgotten what klook is
[09:12] <Riddell> what is it?
[09:12] <konqui> Dolphin previews, for files 
[09:12] <konqui> A bit like the one in OS X
[09:18] <Riddell> I don't get it, I don't use OS X and dolphin already has previews
[09:19] <konqui> Riddell: http://www.koryavov.net/2012/03/klook-new-utility-for-kde-and-rosa.html
[09:20]  * konqui doesn't use OS X either 
[09:24] <Riddell> seems a lot like gwenview
[10:02] <konqui> Riddell: Not really, all it does it give you a large popup to view content right from dolphin quickly on pressing space, so you can quickly play video, scroll through a pdf, image etc
[10:03] <konqui> Quite handy as you don't have to waste time opening okular etc when you just want to view the file
[10:30] <Riddell> oh he left before I could ask him to package it
[10:30] <Riddell> groovy precise packages work
[10:52] <Riddell> oh foo am I doing something wrong or is launchpad when copying? http://paste.kde.org/561542/
[11:04] <Riddell> hmm something on my computer that doesn't want to work
[11:14] <Riddell> uh oh launchpad is e-mailing me OOPSes I wonder if I should worry
[11:17] <davmor2> Riddell: You should Always worry ;)
[11:25] <smartboyhw> Hi guys
[11:26] <Riddell> hola chico
[11:26] <smartboyhw> Riddell, er Kubuntu is the only flavour with under 89% completion of blueprint:P
[11:26] <Riddell> oh interesting, notifications appear on the PPA web page for the errors
[11:26] <Riddell> smartboyhw: tidying up blueprints has been on my todo list for ages and yet to get to the top
[11:27] <smartboyhw> Riddell, ooh:P 
[11:27]  * smartboyhw thinks every flavor has done it already:P
[11:32] <Riddell> smartboyhw: actually i think lots will be the dozens of spec items littlegirl put in to docs for her to keep track of things before she had to leave
[11:34] <smartboyhw> ooh
[11:34] <smartboyhw> Riddell, leave?
[11:34] <Riddell> she had some real life issue
[11:35] <smartboyhw> gee who is replacing him the Riddell ?:P
[11:36] <smartboyhw> *her:P
[11:38] <smartboyhw> Omit the *the* please
[11:39] <smartboyhw> Riddell, question edited:P Gee who is replacing her Riddell?:P
[13:04] <xnox> somebody help me with bug 1060893
[13:07] <yofel_> xnox: seems like an issue in the subvolume handling of the btrfs setup, nothing kubuntu specific
[13:07] <xnox> yofel: true. and on debian/ubuntu you can only have one btrfs pull and only @ as the boot/root volume.
[13:10] <ScottK> Any objections to making the changes that mgraesslin asked for?
[13:11] <BluesKaj> Hiyas all
[13:15] <Riddell> ScottK: I excpect not but let me read it over properly
[13:15] <ScottK> OK.  Thanks.
[13:15] <ScottK> I think they're all in the line of "this won't work".
[13:19] <ScottK> I have a package prepared assuming you agree and he writes back that I didn't screw it up.
[13:21] <Riddell> ScottK: did you look at what the virtual desktop issue would need?
[13:21] <ScottK> I don't think it needs anything.
[13:22] <ScottK> If you set things to one desktop the pager just becomes invisible.
[13:22] <Riddell> but that needs set somewhere presumably
[13:23] <Riddell> it makes sense to only have one virtual desktop if you use activities instead, but I've never worked out how or why I'd use activities
[13:23] <ScottK> Me neither.
[13:23] <ScottK> OTOH, I always forget about desktops too.
[13:23] <ScottK> Isn't this enough:
[13:23] <ScottK> -[Desktops]
[13:23] <ScottK> -Number=2
[13:24] <ScottK> This is the time to be bold I guess and be 14.04 I think we'll all be using activities, so we may as well take the plunge.
[13:24] <Riddell> yep, I'd say go for it
[13:39] <Riddell> xnox: that seems a bit random
[13:40] <ScottK> OK.  I'm going to wait for mgraesslin's reply.
[13:40] <xnox> Riddell: which bit? the bug? the deficiencies of btrfs in debian/ubuntu? me panicking? all of the above? (delete as appropriate)
[13:44] <Riddell> xnox: the bug is, it doesn't help that it's not written in a way I fully understand, where are there strange @ directories going etc
[13:45] <Riddell> mparillo: 4.9.2 working on 12.04 for me, fancy putting a news item on the website?
[13:45] <yofel> Riddell: in case you don't know. @ is the name of the root subvolume if you install on btrfs. The partitioner automatically creates a subvolume for / (@) and /home (@home)
[13:46] <Riddell> mm, maybe I should try btrfs one day
[13:46] <xnox> Riddell: only if you don't care about your data
[13:46] <yofel> do it on kernel >= 3.5, It's ~usable these days. Still many ENOSPC issues though :/
[14:01] <BluesKaj> is btrfs going to be used by linux , replacing ext eventually ?
[14:02] <Riddell> no idea, you'd need to ask some linux developers
[14:02] <xnox> BluesKaj: btrfs is one of the filesystems that linux kernel supports. currently ubuntu decided to continue using ext4 as default.
[14:03] <xnox> BluesKaj: btrfs is not aimed to be a direct continuation of ext file system family, but rather yet another competitor.
[14:07] <BluesKaj> well , if btrfs auto sets / and /home partitions , that would be a a good thing I suppose , but what other advantage does it offer over ext , xnox  ?
[14:08] <xnox> BluesKaj: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Btrfs
[14:08] <xnox> COW, checksummings, snapshots, RAID levels, etc.
[14:29] <ScottK> Looks like i386/amd64/powerpc are done for 4.9.2.
[14:29] <Riddell> yes, just installed it fine
[14:30] <Riddell> ScottK: how do we get it moved to release?  I realise I don't actually know
[14:31] <ScottK> Riddell: sru-release in archive tools.
[14:32] <Riddell> that seems easy
[14:34] <Riddell> for asdf in `cat /home/jr/src/kubuntu-automation/kubuntu-automation/kdesc-packages-quantal.txt`; do echo ${asdf}; ./sru-release -r quantal ${asdf}; done
[14:34] <Riddell> that should keep it busy
[14:34] <ScottK> Yes.
[14:35] <ScottK> We need to wait for the builds to finish though.
[14:35] <ScottK> I don't know what horrors happen if you copy a package that's not built yet so that some binaries exist in -release and others will later appear in -proposed.
[14:37] <Riddell> oops
[14:37] <Riddell> we'll find out now
[14:37] <ScottK> Sigh.
[14:38] <ScottK> Hopefully they get -release build records and it's all good.
[14:39] <Riddell> ScottK: on the question of owncloud, Blizzz says 3.0 is unmaintained so I don't see us getting a patch for the issues in 12.04, so I'm still thinking delete it and put an update in -backports is the best thing we can do
[14:40] <ScottK> Maybe SRU it so that people who have it installed already don't get left out?
[14:41] <ScottK> We'd need special permission.
[14:41] <Riddell> yeah that would seem like needing beurocracy, a tech board exception presumably
[14:44] <ScottK> Removing it doesn't help users that already have it installed.
[14:45] <Riddell> backports the first step anyway, I'll do that
[14:49] <ScottK> As long as it's tested to at least run.
[14:54] <ScottK> Riddell: The early package copy should be non-world ending.  You'll just need to copy the ones that weren't finished again once they are, so keep a list.
[14:57] <Riddell> gotcha
[14:58] <ScottK> If for some reason the recopy doesn't work, then we can panic (in theory is should, but untested)
[15:02] <soee> are there any wallpaper changes in 4.9.2 ?
[15:03] <Riddell> http://www.kubuntu.org/news/kde-sc-4.9.2
[15:04] <Riddell> soee: nope
[15:05] <Riddell> mparillo: beat you :) http://www.kubuntu.org/news/kde-sc-4.9.2
[15:06] <mparillo> Riddell: Well, at least you did not have to edit my draft!
[15:06] <ScottK> Riddell: k-d-s changes in queue per mgraesslin (he verified on the list).  Please accept.
[15:06] <BluesKaj> the ppa doesn't connect
[15:07]  * Riddell waits for launchpad to make the diff
[15:07] <kubotu> ::workspace-bugs:: [1060986] kwin_opengl_test crashed with SIGSEGV in r600_bind_blend_state_internal() @ https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1060986 (by Dimiter "Arruor" Nikov)
[15:07] <BluesKaj> Cannot access PPA (https://launchpad.net/api/1.0/~kubuntu-ppa/+archive/backports.)
[15:09] <Riddell> BluesKaj: what are you trying to do?
[15:10] <BluesKaj> Riddell, odd , it's comnnecting now 
[15:10] <Riddell> just launchpad then
[15:11] <mparillo> shadeslayer: https://wiki.kubuntu.org/Kubuntu/Get Involved/WhoWeAre I am last, Riddell is first and the I pre-populated some table rows sorted by IRC handles. I will try to do some updates, but I am afraid for this to really work, people need to update their own data.
[15:13] <mparillo> Hmm, I guess spaces are not good things to have in URLs. The Wiki handles them, but not the freenode web IRC interface.
[15:13] <smartboyhw> Wow that page is really new:P
[15:16] <tsimpson> spaces must be escaped: https://wiki.kubuntu.org/Kubuntu/Get%20Involved/WhoWeAre
[15:17] <Riddell> mparillo: yeah best to have no spaces 
[15:18] <ScottK> +1 on no spaces
[15:18] <tsimpson> this is why we have CamelCase in wikis
[15:18] <mparillo> That's what I get for cloning: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Lubuntu/Get%20Involved/WhoWeAre
[15:18] <mparillo> I will switch to camel case. Good for an ancient PERL hacker anyway.
[15:18] <ScottK> Riddell: k-d-s has a diff now.
[15:19]  * Riddell accepts
[15:19] <ScottK> Note that mgraesslin's name is fine in a proper utf-8 locale (as one finds in debian/changelog).  The weirdness is just the LP diff.
[15:19] <ScottK> Thanks.
[15:20] <BluesKaj> 404 error , failed to fetch kubuntu backports ..no access to 4.9.2 here
[15:28]  * ScottK checks "keep upstream happy" off his list for today.
[15:29] <Riddell> thanks ScottK :)
[15:34] <mparillo> Camel Case: https://wiki.kubuntu.org/Kubuntu/GetInvolved/WhoWeAre
[15:41] <ScottK> xnox: Do you consider yourself a Kubuntu person?
[15:41] <Riddell> we might have some persuasion to do for that to happen :)
[15:41] <xnox> ScottK: in what sense?
[15:42] <ScottK> xnox: In the sense that mparillo put you on ^^^ wiki page and do you want that?
[15:43] <xnox> ScottK: meh =)
[15:43] <xnox> ScottK: see https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1055866/comments/2  I was tempted to end it with "Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu, Lubuntu, Ubuntu Studio, Mythbuntu Developer"
[15:44] <xnox> ScottK: due to convenient core-dev team inclusion in official derivatives ;-)
[15:44]  * xnox oh edubuntu as well =)
[15:45] <BluesKaj> Riddell, are the backports actaully accessable , or is kde still being uploaded ?
[15:45] <Riddell> BluesKaj: installed and worked good for me
[15:45] <ScottK> BluesKaj: Look on the web site.  It's there.  I think you need to talk to #launchpad about why it's not working.
[15:46] <xnox> ScottK: I am not a spokesperson for kubuntu project, and will not reply personal email aiming to get a quote by "Kubuntu developer"
[15:46] <xnox> listing me on the wiki page is fine =) but I'd only be interested in low-level stuff or installer =)
[15:46] <ScottK> xnox: One small point: Kubuntu is not an Ubuntu derivative.  It's a different flavor produced by the Ubuntu project.  Derivatives are things like Mint.
[15:47] <ScottK> OK.  
[15:47] <ScottK> Can you edit yourself then?
[15:48] <BluesKaj> ScottK, I looked at the website , but it has no special ppa other than the backports ...maybe a server change is order here
[15:48] <xnox> ScottK: ok, sorry for the confusing terms. I refer to "official derivatives" (flavours that is) and "unofficial derivatives" (mint, hannah montana linux etc.)
[15:49] <ScottK> xnox: No such thing as official derivatives.
[15:49] <ScottK> There are flavors and there are derivatives.
[15:49] <ScottK> Mint is a derivative, Kubuntu, etc are not.
[15:52] <xnox> ichtux linux was/is a meta package in ubuntu archive (hence a flavour?!) but it was integrated enough to be build on the same infrastructure e.g. cdimage & iso-tracker.
[15:52] <xnox> official: published on cdimage.u.c. the rest is upcomming, obsolete, or unofficial to me =))))
[15:53]  * xnox should not be a spokes person. see how politically incorrect I am =)
[15:53] <BluesKaj> ok Riddell I assumed the 12.10 backport would be loaded as well , not the case 
[15:54] <ScottK> xnox: No.  Itchthux was never a flavor.  We never built ISOs for it.
[15:54] <ScottK> Sabily is similar.
[15:54] <ScottK> (former Muslim Edition)
[15:54] <ScottK> So you can't install them from the official archive.
[15:54] <xnox> but they did cd's themselves. hmm... ok, i see now.
[15:54] <ScottK> Yep.
[15:54] <mparillo> ScottK, xnox: I just grabbed some IRC handles I see frequently to have a starting point for the table. One edit could be to delete the entire row. 
[15:55] <ScottK> They are, I think, most properly Ubuntu remixes.
[15:55]  * xnox /0\
[15:55] <ScottK> I know the language is annoying, but I think it's important to get it right.
[15:56] <ScottK> The different terms imply different relationships with the Ubuntu project.
[15:56] <xnox> well for trademarks and stuff.....
[15:56] <xnox> it's not like we get enough problems with licensing alone.
[16:00] <ScottK> Well it can get fun.
[16:00] <yofel> mparillo: did you just delete the page? seems to be gone
[16:01] <yofel> hm, back, edit conflict -.-
[16:01] <mparillo> I did not.
[16:01] <ScottK> One of the blockers for getting the (now) Sabilly meta packages into the archive was that none of the developers would sign the Ubuntu CoC because (at the time) it claimed sabdfl was infallible.  The claim was made in jest, but it conflicted with the religious views of the developers, so they wouldn't sign it.
[16:02] <ScottK> xnox: You have no idea the fun some of this stuff entails.
[16:04] <mparillo> yofel: It looks like ScottK fixed his time zone and added Packaging, Management as his areas of expertise. Maybe the wiki software locked the page during his edits?
[16:04] <yofel> I didn't see an edit warning when I edited it, after I saved the page was gone. Now it's back though
[16:05] <xnox> ScottK: ok.
[16:09] <Riddell> bah, turns out owncloud backports isn't just a straight recompile
[17:19] <Riddell> shadeslayer: the sticker printer you used in Bangalore, any similar ones near your home?
[18:23] <shadeslayer> Riddell: spacetime's father owns a shop that could probably print them
[18:23] <shadeslayer> I mean, Rishab Arora, you might have met him at Akademy :)(
[18:42] <BluesKaj> ok , 4.9.2 working well on 12.04 and 12.10 
[19:19] <kubotu> ::workspace-bugs:: [1017709] package kdm (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed pre-removal sc... @ https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017709 (by jjinco33)
[19:51] <kubotu> ::qt-bugs:: [1041945] "multiple errors leading to this one" @ https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1041945 (by Christopher Horan)
[20:07] <micahg> someone want to take care of Bug #1061187 
[20:09] <shadeslayer> micahg: needs rebuild?
[20:10] <micahg> yeah, should be a no change rebuild (keep in mind same version in oneiric/precise when versioning)
[20:11] <shadeslayer> I don't think I have upload rights, unless it's in the kubuntu package set
[20:11] <shadeslayer> which iirc it isn't
[20:11] <micahg> meh, I can just do it later then
[20:11] <micahg> unless someone else (MOTU/core-dev) grabs it
[20:11] <shadeslayer> yah
[20:12] <vHanda> shadeslayer: one sec
[20:13] <vHanda> shadeslayer: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=307388
[20:13] <vHanda> please include both the patches
[20:13] <shadeslayer> ok cool
[20:14] <shadeslayer> vHanda: anything else?
[20:14] <vHanda> nope. that's it
[20:14] <shadeslayer> Riddell: ScottK ^ We should get that in before rolling 4.9.2 out
[20:14] <ScottK> Too late.
[20:14]  * shadeslayer can do it tomorrow if no one else want's to do it today
[20:14] <shadeslayer> oh, did you copy to updates?
[20:14] <ScottK> Please get it uploaded ASAP so I can review.
[20:14] <ScottK> Yes.  Riddell did.
[20:15] <shadeslayer> ah ok, I have a kde4libs patch as well, fixes samba support
[20:15] <shadeslayer> this http://commits.kde.org/kdelibs/8e9bfe11f54e3fa5000a86773b21bdcdcff44bd5
[20:16] <shadeslayer> ok, let me reboot
[20:17]  * ScottK is busy trying to sort out with upstream having PyKDE4 for 4.10 buildable on Quantal when the time comes.
[20:22] <micahg> debfx: I must be missing something, why is qtwebkit being  built during the qt4-x11 build?
[20:23] <debfx> micahg: to avoid a build-dependency cycle between qt4-x11 and qtwebkit. qt assistant (which is part of qt4-x11) links against qtwebkit.
[20:24] <micahg> debfx: that seems silly, especially if qtwebkit and the copy in qt4-x11 are out of sync
[20:26] <micahg> well, the dep cycle makes sense, but is frustrating
[20:26]  * micahg wishes upstreams wouldn't couple stuff so tightly
[20:26] <debfx> of course it's silly, at least qt5 is properly modularized
[20:27] <debfx> binary compatibility isn't an issue in practice as qtwebkit is in a low maintenance mode
[20:27] <micahg> but IMHO, it should only be enabled for the bootstrap release, once there's an ABI compatible qtwebkit, it should be turned off IMHO
[20:28] <micahg> otherwise you risk binary incompatibility with the qtwebkit in the archive (unless it's statically linked)
[20:29] <debfx> that would only be an issue if qtwebkit added functions or classes and qt assistant would use those
[20:29] <debfx> both is very unlikely
[20:30] <micahg> yes, in addition though, it wastes lots of build time each time building qtwebkit (and makes arm* painfully long)
[20:31] <micahg> anyways, qt5 in R? :)
[20:32] <shadeslayer> sounds like we have a volunteer to do Qt 5 packaging
[20:32] <shadeslayer> :P
[20:33] <debfx> that's why I proposed disabling qtwebkit on arm (leading to a feature loss in qt assistant on arm)
[20:33] <debfx> I'd prefer Qt 5 in Debian first
[20:37] <ScottK> Qt 5 won't affect us much until we have a KDE ported to use it.
[20:39] <debfx> It affects us if we want to provide a nice environment for developers
[20:40] <ScottK> Sure.
[20:51] <ScottK> Riddell: I think we need to teach sru-release about binary packages.
[20:52] <kubotu> ::qt-bugs:: [744812] FontConfig/Qt stack choke on Ubuntu Medium font meta-data (No medium in Inkscape and too bo... @ https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/744812 (by Francois Thirioux)
[20:52] <kubotu> ::qt-bugs:: [1057578] Vulnerable against "CRIME" attack @ https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1057578 (by Felix Geyer)
[20:54] <shadeslayer> ScottK: can I just upload to quantal instead of quantal-proposed?
[20:59] <shadeslayer> ScottK: uploaded nepomu-core to quantal
[21:01] <JontheEchidna> I did upload debian's packaging for qt5 qt-base to -experimental. (There's still a lot of Qt5 still to go though)
[21:01] <JontheEchidna> the -dev packages between 4 and 5 are totally in conflict though
[21:01] <JontheEchidna> but you can run some of the demos from the -demos package
[21:02] <shadeslayer> ah shoot
[21:02] <shadeslayer> ScottK: can you unapprove nepomuk, I think I might have uploaded with -sa
[21:06] <shadeslayer> ScottK: kde4libs uploaded as well
[21:51] <Riddell> JontheEchidna: upstream are talking about changing qt5 so the -dev stuff doesn't conflict
[21:51] <Riddell> but in the mean time that's just what happens
[21:53] <shadeslayer> well ... uh ... I have to go in a couple of minutes, so could someone please approve kde4libs and nepomuk-core ( the second one I just uploaded )
[21:53] <Riddell> can do
[21:54] <shadeslayer> awesome
[21:54] <shadeslayer> Riddell: oh and what about the stickers that you were talking a about?
[21:56] <Riddell> shadeslayer: I'd just like to get some for UDS and was wondering if there was an easy and cheap way to do so
[21:56] <shadeslayer> sure, how many, and do you have a design?
[21:58] <shadeslayer> and your budget as well :)
[21:58] <Riddell> shadeslayer: lots, something like this I'm thinking starsky.19inch.net/~jr/tmp/output.pdf
[21:59] <Riddell> budget is whatever we can convince the kubuntu council to pay
[21:59] <shadeslayer> heh :D
[22:00] <shadeslayer> oh btw there was this guy on G+, maybe we can ask him if we can design a sticker for us?
[22:01] <Riddell> shadeslayer: reject  nepomuk-core from 1 hours ago?
[22:02] <shadeslayer> Riddell: yes
[22:02] <shadeslayer> accidentally did a upload with source -.-
[22:02] <ScottK> shadeslayer: nepomuk - approve or unapprove?
[22:02] <shadeslayer> reject the old one, accept the new one
[22:02] <ScottK> shadeslayer: To quantal is fine.  
[22:02] <shadeslayer> ScottK: figured as much :)
[22:03] <Riddell> accepts done
[22:03] <shadeslayer> :D
[22:03] <Riddell> ScottK: beat you
[22:03] <shadeslayer> thanks
[22:03] <ScottK> Riddell: Only because I'm busy with wgrant trying to figure out how to untangle your package copying mess...
[22:04] <shadeslayer> Riddell: lots=500 ?
[22:06]  * Riddell hides from ScottK in shame
[22:06] <Riddell> shadeslayer: yeah
[22:07] <shadeslayer> alright, will talk to Rishab and figure out how much it'll cost
[22:09] <Riddell> thanks