| infinity | ogasawara / apw: kernel iz broke on armhf. | 01:22 |
|---|---|---|
| infinity | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/3.5.0-17.26/+build/3876916 | 01:22 |
| === henrix_ is now known as henrix | ||
| === henrix is now known as henrix_ | ||
| === henrix_ is now known as henrix | ||
| * apw is looking into the -17 quantal armhf build failure | 11:18 | |
| * henrix -> lunch | 12:15 | |
| === doko__ is now known as doko | ||
| jussi | apw: ping? | 12:31 |
| apw | oing | 12:32 |
| ogasawara | apw: I seemed to have missed what our build failure was for armhf | 12:33 |
| ogasawara | apw: looks like the build was restarted though | 12:34 |
| apw | ogasawara, the error was essentiall the compiler trynig to read the file with the first 3 lines missing | 12:34 |
| apw | ogasawara, it worked just fine on armel with the same config, so we put it back to see if it is transient | 12:35 |
| apw | ogasawara, if it is we should cry | 12:35 |
| ogasawara | apw: first 3 lines missing?!?! that doesn't sound good. | 12:35 |
| apw | no, its first error was about the @ in the copyright messages | 12:36 |
| ogasawara | apw: very odd | 12:36 |
| apw | ogasawara, worrying is the word i am using | 12:37 |
| ogasawara | apw: indeed, worrying is a better word | 12:38 |
| smb | ogasawara, Just to get some feeling, when would you plan a next upload to the quantal kernel? | 12:45 |
| ogasawara | smb: in a perfect world, not until after we release. we obviously know that's never the case. | 12:45 |
| ogasawara | smb: so I suspect upon the next critical bug fix, whenever that may be. | 12:46 |
| smb | Then I hope for the imperfect world and that I get more feedback on my latest test kernel for 1021471 | 12:46 |
| smb | bug 1021471 | 12:46 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1021471 in linux "clone() hang when creating new network namespace (dmesg show unregister_netdevice: waiting for lo to become free. Usage count = 2)" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1021471 | 12:46 |
| rtg | that one prolly counts as critical | 12:47 |
| ogasawara | smb: I think that itself would be the critical bug we're looking for | 12:47 |
| ogasawara | smb: and I suspect, the release team would allow an upload to fix that between now and next friday | 12:47 |
| smb | :) Ok, then I need to get feedback aspish. I think the last iteration step at least looks minimal invasive and works on the testcase | 12:48 |
| ogasawara | apw: do you remember how far into the armhf build it failed? just curious if we've made it past the trigger for the previous failure. | 12:49 |
| ppisati | ogasawara: smb: i think i've a commit for master too | 12:51 |
| ogasawara | ppisati: ack | 12:51 |
| ppisati | apw: last week we had a compiler failure on O armel, build was restarted and the failure disappeared | 12:52 |
| ppisati | apw: you should prod infinity | 12:52 |
| apw | i am sure he will say buildds are like that | 12:56 |
| apw | ogasawara, 41 minutes in | 12:57 |
| ppisati | apw: do we have a dmesg of that builder? | 13:02 |
| apw | ppisati, not that i know of | 13:03 |
| bjf | skaet: still looking for verification of bug 1033568. i'd hate to have to revert it. | 13:11 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1033568 in linux "ACER aspire S3 track pad doesn't work with 12.04, backport needed from 12.10" [Medium,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1033568 | 13:11 |
| xnox | bjf: well, the worst case? it didn't work before and still doesn't? | 13:21 |
| rbasak | robher: where can I find the commit that you mention in https://bugs.launchpad.net/eilt/+bug/1061070/comments/11 please? I want to cherry-pick it for a test on 3.2. | 13:31 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1061070 in linux "Reboot sometimes fails on highbank" [Medium,Confirmed] | 13:31 |
| robher | rbasak: ubuntu-quantal branch on our kernel tree or ikepanhc's kernel tree. | 13:33 |
| ikepanhc | rbasak: the patch in quantal-proposed (Ubuntu-3.5.0-17.26) | 13:35 |
| ikepanhc | rbasak: robher: http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=ubuntu/ubuntu-quantal.git;a=commit;h=4743004fad90f0078073222342c62557bdd5d6b7 | 13:37 |
| rbasak | ikepanhc: thank you! I was looking for it by commit hash thinking that it was the hash in that repo. I guess not :) | 13:38 |
| ikepanhc | hash is not stable until it get into mainline... sometimes I need to grep the git log to find out, especially for CVE patches | 13:39 |
| bjf | xnox, that's not the worst case. if it's not verified it gets reverted. | 13:40 |
| rbasak | I understand. I just thought it was the hash of the entry in some repo I could get to | 13:40 |
| robher | rbasak: sorry, I should have been more specific. | 13:41 |
| robher | ikepanhc: when will it land in quantal? | 13:42 |
| ikepanhc | apw: do we have plan to land quantal-17.26 before quantal release? | 13:43 |
| apw | ikepanhc, i would expect it to be copied over once it has built yes | 13:43 |
| xnox | bjf: ok. I thought if a revert happens -> new upload -> everything needs to be retested. | 13:43 |
| xnox | bjf: but I am not familiar with kernel procedures to be honest. | 13:44 |
| bjf | xnox, nah, we're not that bad | 13:44 |
| ikepanhc | apw: thanks | 13:44 |
| xnox | bjf: I had to retest everything after a revert in mdadm sru =( | 13:44 |
| ikepanhc | robher: very soon I believe | 13:44 |
| bjf | xnox, and honestly, before it's reverted we will look at it again to see if it's so trivial that we'll let it pass | 13:44 |
| bjf | xnox, but if it is verifed, we don't have to do the review and it just sails through so that's what we prefer and why i nag (plus i like to nag) | 13:45 |
| henrix | bjf: for this specific bug, there are 3 (not so trivial) commits | 13:47 |
| bjf | henrix, ouch | 13:47 |
| rbasak | 4743004 | 13:48 |
| rbasak | oops | 13:48 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| * ppisati goes out to buy some stuff | 16:03 | |
| rtg | ogasawara, looks like armhf is building correctly this time | 16:07 |
| ogasawara | rtg: indeed, appears to have gotten much farther than the initial build | 16:07 |
| ogasawara | rtg: which is good, but also concerning as to why the first build failed | 16:08 |
| rtg | ogasawara, ghost in the machine | 16:08 |
| ogasawara | rtg: I'm trying to wrap my brain around how the first build failure would even happen where the compiler just overlooks the initial lines in a file | 16:10 |
| ogasawara | I'm guessing some level of corruption? | 16:10 |
| rtg | ogasawara, its more likely that the source package wasn't delivered correctly. | 16:10 |
| apw | ogasawara, i think we have had cases where throwing the builds back at the wall until the stick is a normal approach | 16:27 |
| apw | ogasawara, it oculd be a compiler bug with something unitialised, or just bust h/w | 16:27 |
| apw | ogasawara, not that we should not be crapping selves over it of course | 16:28 |
| ogasawara | apw: indeed, it's definitely not the first time we're kicked a rebuild and "it worked". But I would say I have never seen this type of failure before. | 16:29 |
| apw | ogasawara, i was an oddy indeed | 16:41 |
| Daviey | apw: rebuild worked! | 17:04 |
| apw | Daviey, that a worry and no mistake | 17:05 |
| Daviey | I should have just given it back last night, in retrospect. | 17:05 |
| apw | meh, it should be very rare that giving it back helps | 17:05 |
| Daviey | apw: clearly you don't have the racey unit tests we have to put up with in userspace. | 17:06 |
| apw | heh no, but this died compliling a simple file, in the first lines | 17:06 |
| * rtg gets a whopping 50KiB/s from github | 17:11 | |
| rtg | sconklin, are you working on bug #987566 ? | 17:34 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 987566 in linux-armadaxp "CVE-2012-2119" [Low,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/987566 | 17:34 |
| sconklin | rtg: why yes I am, right now. | 17:35 |
| rtg | sconklin, ok, I'll leave you to it. | 17:35 |
| sconklin | I should have lied. It's not straightforward :-) | 17:35 |
| rtg | sconklin, this is the macvtap bug, right ? | 17:36 |
| sconklin | yes | 17:36 |
| sconklin | I'm just looking at Oneiric now | 17:36 |
| rtg | sconklin, it would be helpfull if you'd set those bugs to 'inprogress' and assign them so I don't replicate what you're doing. | 17:38 |
| sconklin | ack | 17:38 |
| * rtg -> lunch | 17:41 | |
| apw | sconklin, CVE-2012-2390 on oneiric is actually fixed already, its an attibution error. i have just shoved the annotation in and it is rebuilding | 17:43 |
| ubot2 | apw: Memory leak in mm/hugetlb.c in the Linux kernel before 3.4.2 allows local users to cause a denial of service (memory consumption or system crash) via invalid MAP_HUGETLB mmap operations. (http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2012-2390) | 17:43 |
| sconklin | apw: ack | 17:45 |
| === henrix is now known as henrix_ | ||
| === henrix_ is now known as henrix | ||
| skaet | henrix, bjf - 1033568, has been validated to work fine. Thanks henrix, bjf, jsalisbury :D | 18:30 |
| bjf | skaet, thanks | 18:31 |
| henrix | skaet: ack, thanks! | 18:31 |
| * henrix -> EOD | 18:43 | |
| === henrix is now known as henrix_ | ||
| sconklin | apw: you here? | 18:45 |
| apw | sconklin, yep | 18:49 |
| sconklin | when I set correct break-fix lines in a CVEs tracker file, do I also have to set not-affected for the appropriate releases, or will that happen automagically? | 18:50 |
| apw | if you add break-fix: and push them then the next run at :20 will update the tracker and you will get needes/pending etc | 18:51 |
| sconklin | remind me to buy you a beer at UDS | 18:51 |
| sconklin | the CVE matrix is looking pretty good | 18:52 |
| apw | yeah we did pretty well zapping the ones which were old and actually closed | 19:07 |
| apw | there are a few i think still which are closed and not right but jj is sorting those in theory when he gets time | 19:07 |
| bjf | apw, if we could get rid of those natty columns we'd look *really* good | 19:32 |
| apw | bjf, they will go away RSN when we go EOL, what 3 weeks? | 19:48 |
| === Nafallo is now known as ubot2 | ||
| === ubot2 is now known as Nafallo | ||
| bjf | apw, yup | 20:02 |
| * ogasawara lunch | 20:15 | |
| * rtg -> EOD | 20:36 | |
| cyphermox | fyi; https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/992639 | 21:28 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 992639 in linux "Regression: 12.04 update breaks support for Internet Sticks (3G modems): Nokia CS-15, Nokia cs-17 and perhaps many others" [High,Confirmed] | 21:28 |
| cyphermox | re: delay_use for usb_storage. | 21:29 |
| jjohansen | bjf: Was there a bug filed for the apparmor regression test failure I was looking at? | 22:03 |
| bjf | jjohansen: yes | 22:04 |
| * jjohansen has been looking back through his logs and has only found Bug #1057623 | 22:04 | |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1057623 in ubuntu-kernel-tests "test_apparmor failures on armhf-omap4" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1057623 | 22:04 |
| bjf | jjohansen: that looks like one, but i think i filed one as well | 22:04 |
| bjf | looking | 22:05 |
| sbeattie | yeah, but that's a different failure, due to PAGE_SIZE not being defined. | 22:05 |
| * sbeattie is not sure what that's about. | 22:05 | |
| bjf | jjohansen: bug 1050430 | 22:10 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1050430 in apparmor "QRT regression test failure on quantal" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1050430 | 22:10 |
| sbeattie | bjf: thanks | 22:11 |
| jjohansen | bjf: thanks | 22:14 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!