[03:30] <walterrr> Hi, is anyone around who can confirm what I think is a bug?  Should be quick.
[04:09] <walterrr> maybe later, bye
[17:21] <njin> hallo fellows, is possible to make public bug 1062007 . thanks in advance
[17:30] <jtaylor> done
[21:00] <dlentz> anyone familiar with SRU's care to look this over for me? bug 1060813
[21:00] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1060813 in youtube-dl "[SRU, precise] Current version (2012.02.27) doesn't work anymore" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1060813
[21:01] <dlentz> is simply saying, "newer upstream version needed" sufficient or do i have to literally create a patch?
[21:02] <jtaylor> you could request a backport from quantal
[21:02] <jtaylor> that is the usual route for new versions
[21:02] <jtaylor> but in this case it might make sense to backport the thing to precise-updates
[21:02] <micahg> well, I was wondering if youtube-dl should have an MRE since the old versions just don't work
[21:03] <jtaylor> mre?
[21:03] <micahg> !mre | jtaylor
[21:03] <ubot2> Factoid 'mre' not found
[21:03] <micahg> gah
[21:03] <jtaylor> :)
[21:03] <micahg> microreleaseexception
[21:03] <micahg> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates/MicroReleaseExceptions
[21:03] <jtaylor> that makes sense
[21:04] <jtaylor> though I'd prefer to remove it :) it will just break again in a mont
[21:04] <micahg> jtaylor: well, with an MRE, we can just keep updating (but someone has to be interested)
[21:05] <dlentz> i doubt a project as small (and legally questionable) as youtube-dl will qualify for MRE
[21:06] <jtaylor> how does one go about getting an mre?
[21:06] <micahg> proposal to tech board
[21:06] <jtaylor> in my experience subscribing -sru does seldom get an anwser
[21:07] <dlentz> maybe i should just package the new version in a PPA
[21:07] <micahg> but I'mnot sure if Debian is considering releasing with it or not: http://packages.qa.debian.org/y/youtube-dl.html
[21:07] <jtaylor> there is a second youtube downloader in the archive
[21:07] <jtaylor> which is broken even in quantal
[21:08] <jtaylor> minitube
[21:08] <jtaylor> thats gone from debian
[21:08] <dlentz> jtaylor, that's what i was afraid of (seldom answer)
[21:10] <micahg> personally, I think these things should just live in backports and devel
[21:11] <dlentz> precise is an lts though, so i'm going to attempt packaging it in my mediahacks ppa
[21:11]  * dlentz fires up VM
[21:12] <micahg> dlentz: just request  a backport once it gets in quantal (whichever version you want)
[21:12] <dlentz> micahg, you think that's a better bet?
[21:13] <micahg> dlentz: well, backports is enabled by default in precise, so it'll show up in software center for people (this is pretty off topic at this point and should probably move to -motu)
[21:14] <dlentz> micahg, thanks for the help and redirection
[21:36] <dlentz> well, could we at least mark bug 1060813 as triaged/high?
[21:36] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1060813 in youtube-dl "[SRU, precise] Current version (2012.02.27) doesn't work anymore" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1060813
[21:36] <dlentz> pretty please with sprinkles on top?
[21:37] <jtaylor> it won't make much difference
[21:37] <dlentz> it will help me feel good
[21:38] <dlentz> :P
[21:38] <micahg> dlentz: done
[21:38] <dlentz> thanks
[21:39] <micahg> dlentz: now someone needs to get a package into the sponsorship queue :)
[21:39] <micahg> subscribing SRU is worthless unless you're not sure they'd approve an update and need advise, they review in queue now
[21:39] <micahg> (well, worthless until it's uploaded)
[21:40] <dlentz> ah, that's not in the wiki
[21:40] <jtaylor> yes the wiki is a bit misleading in respect of subscribing -sru
[21:41] <micahg> it should say it after upload now
[21:41] <micahg> oh, hrm, yeah, it's wrong
[21:41] <micahg> I thought I fixed that
[21:42] <jtaylor> is subscribing even required? aren't they working over the upload queue?
[21:42] <micahg> yeah, I did, but I think people got upset, so I reverted