[11:06] I might have to get a new hero in life https://github.com/RedTuna/breadability/commits/master [11:14] why? because the old heroes taste awesome on a bed of sushi rice with a hint of wasabee and soy? [11:17] note: have not read actual link. :) [11:17] well look at the link [11:26] Wow, nice. [11:35] yea, I'll have to test that out but was on my todo list [12:16] My Thinkpad T420 came [12:16] Good stuff so far [12:19] whoa of the morning http://paste.mitechie.com/show/818/ [12:19] brousch: welcome to the brotherhood! [12:19] I used Thinkpads from 2002 - 2008 [12:19] oh, well welcome back to the brotherhood [12:21] Thanks! [12:21] 1600x900 is nice [12:22] bittorrent for deployments? Interesting [12:22] I would not have considered that an option [12:23] Makes sense for them, though. THey have lots of peers and a butt-ton of data to get through [12:23] geez [12:26] oooh, 4 cores in this i5 [12:26] yea, I remember back when they compiled their whole app into a 1GB and rsync'd [12:26] moving to bittorrent is kind of cool [12:28] so man, I'm feeling all open sourcy today. A guy is working on py3'ing breadability and I'm going out to lansing to meet a bookie fanboi from Germany this weekend. [12:29] rick_h_: Ah, right. That'll be sweet. [12:29] btw: the Chrome Extension needs reauth when moving between versions [12:29] I noticed that at work and home. None of my stuff would work. [12:29] snap-l: between versinos of the extension? [12:30] Between Chrome 22 and prior [12:30] snap-l: so setting up the options data? [12:30] But where will Py3 breadability be run? [12:30] brousch: on my laptop to start soon. I've got to upgrade to 12.10 [12:31] with 3.3 out I really want to start getting stuff over [12:31] I mean no webhosts have py3 support [12:31] and it'll be time to undertake...bookie for py3 [12:31] Are the changes he made backward compatible with 2.7? [12:31] meh, I run all my own servers [12:31] snap-l: I don't know yet. I've got to look over it. Just caught the changes in my rss feed this morning [12:31] Because I like the except as e syntax [12:31] I thought it was on heroku [12:32] brousch: well it also runs on heroku I guess in the readable app [13:12] snap-l: blizzard has been using bittorrent for deployments for years. [13:13] i just learned of this last year with starcraft2 updates. [13:15] jrwren_: Iknew they were using it for updates, but wasn't aware of a datacenter using it [13:15] but it makes perfect sense in retrospect. [13:17] http://www.amazon.com/AudioQuest-DragonFly-Asynchronous-Digital-Audio-Converter/dp/B00882U782 [13:17] Saw this in BBC Music. Looks mildly interesting, though I'm not sure it's all that "awesome" running through a 3.5" jack. [13:18] cool that bittorrent works for htem. [13:18] at some point i wonder if they will out scale that and go to multicast [13:18] $254?!?!?!? wtf. [13:19] jrwren_: Audiophile: One who pays money to listen to their music more carefully than the casual listener. [13:19] DAC's aren't cheap [13:20] dac's are DIRT cheap [13:20] not good ones [13:20] Good DACs are more expensive [13:20] I was looking at them a while ago for podcast stuff [13:20] but yeah, we're talking $, not $$$ [13:20] i'm glad my ears aren't that good. [13:21] althought, i have heard bad dac before, was listening to flac adn comparing to CD. it should have sounded same, but the flac sounded terrible. it was the soundcard. :( [13:22] What I love is Neil Young's crusade to get more people to listen to lossless audio [13:22] but he goes off the rails by using something that isn't FLAC. [13:23] jrwren_: There's a big difference between CD player sound and CDRom sound [13:24] it wasn't cdrom [13:24] what does he use? shorten? shorten is nice too [13:24] It was something I'd not heard of before [13:24] apple lossless?:) [13:24] but it's 24 / 96 [13:25] meh [13:25] Pno [13:25] pono [13:25] yea, pono stuff [13:26] Sorry, 192 / 24 [13:27] I can see this being another backdoor DRM bullshit system [13:28] oh come on, all the record labels are on board to resell you all your digital music again [13:29] Why not use FLAC, which already has name recognition as being superior audio [13:29] But hey, Pono. Rhymes with Bono. [13:29] because pono is the same sampling/etc of the studio [13:29] that's supposedly the goal with it [13:29] And FLAC can do that. [13:30] http://people.xiph.org/~xiphmont/demo/neil-young.html [13:41] snap-l++ [13:41] "Of course you can trust your ears. It's brains that are gullible. I don't mean that flippantly; as human beings, we're all wired that way. [13:53] Yeah, I've done A/B compares on remastered versions of albums. I'm as gullible as the rest at times. :) [14:58] Time to check the couch cushions: http://www.jagsreport.com/2012/10/goldman-sachs-lowers-alcatel-lucent-to-conviction-sell-alu/ [15:03] why? they are a worthless company. [15:04] everything of value is long sold, all IP is sold and any employees worth anything are long gone. [15:04] that company should have died a long time ago [15:04] http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2012/10/02/this-just-in-upgrades-and-downgrades.aspx [15:04] jrwren_: Yeah, we could buy it with pocket change [15:04] then sue everyone with the patents [15:04] PROFIT [15:05] even at $1/share it is still 2B Market cap :( [15:05] they don't have patents, they sold them all already. [15:05] To who? I thought they still had 'em. [15:05] pretty sure to nearly everyone. [15:06] unsure about the alcatel IP, but lucent IP was sold AFAIK [15:07] you may be right though. [15:07] I think they licensed, but I could be wrong [15:07] Lucent spun off a lot of IP when they spun off Avaya [15:08] same with Agere [15:08] Oh yeah, they've been hemoraging [15:08] but that was 10 yrs ago [15:08] so the aquisitions over the last 10 yrs might be good. [15:08] lightRadio looks promising. [15:09] Yeah, but they're betting the company on it [15:09] and unfortunately the telecoms have frozen spending [15:09] yup [15:10] google should buy 'em :) [15:10] They could definitely afford 'em [15:11] 18B in revenue, 6B in debt [15:11] but at least they are profitable [15:11] whoa... why is ALU so undervalued? [15:11] the fundametals looks reasonable. [15:11] .56 of book!!! [15:12] .13/$1 for sales. [15:12] cash burn [15:12] CRAZY [15:12] they're bleeding it [15:12] That was the mantra the whole time I was there [15:13] that was long ago wasn' tit? [15:13] http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2012/10/02/is-alcatel-lucent-destined-for-greatness.aspx [15:13] Not that long ago. Left at the end of last year. [15:13] ah. [15:14] well, just based on the numbrers, good mgmt could turn that ship around. [15:14] God, Flash is a real piece of shit in Google Plus [15:14] flash is ALWAYS a real piece of shit. [15:14] google plus is a piece of shit for using it. [15:14] It's even worse now [15:14] but google plus works well without flash [15:21] Yeah, I just disabled Flash (push to play) [16:22] greg-g: Are you familiar with ARMA? [17:14] brousch: I'm going to guess not since I'm not recognizing the acronym [17:15] Assoc of Records Management PRos [17:15] Sounded like library stuff to me [17:20] brousch: ah, well, I went to school with people who are no doubt a member of that association [17:20] brousch: but, I steered clear of Archives and Records Management [18:25] huh, getting some weird packet loss with the new router [18:25] (no, openwrt isn't installed on it yet) [21:11] http://imgur.com/E16Ea <- Oh Microsoft [21:15] wait,k you mean there is another shell than Windows? I thought they were completely original in all they do? [22:23] wow, offlineimap sure has deteriorated in quality since John Goerzen stopped maintaining it