[06:35] good morning === ante_ is now known as ivoks === glebihan_ is now known as glebihan [12:06] bdrung, do you think we could get another ubuntu-packaging-guide uploaded? [12:08] dholbach: yes [12:08] awesome [12:08] I just added an article which I feel could be interesting [12:09] once we have it uploaded, I can take care of a backport to precise [12:16] thanks a lot bdrung [12:19] dholbach: before uploading: in 2.3.2 there is an missing closing bracket [12:20] dholbach: the structure of the following sentence is a bit weird: "While this test is very small and basic, it tests quite a number of core components on a system, so is very important to have as it might uncover a big number of problems." [12:21] bdrung, hum, what is 2.3.2? [12:21] dholbach: "The actual tests" [12:21] aha [12:21] let me see [12:23] bdrung, thanks a lot - fixed [12:23] bdrung, hang on, just got another suggeston from jibel [12:24] done [12:24] dholbach: btw, do you want to become a maintainer of that package in Debian? [12:25] hm, I have never really dealt with uploading packages to Debian [12:26] dholbach: being maintainer != doing an upload [12:26] still, I'm not sure I should be doing it [12:26] dholbach: you are listed in Uploaders and in the changelog stanza, but you still need a sponsor to do the actual upload [12:27] being a maintainer is more about having the responsibility [12:28] I'm really happy to take care of it in Ubuntu - but I'm not sure I want to be maintainer of it in Debian - I deal with almost everything else around the packaging guide already and I don't even have a Debian system to try things on [12:29] dholbach: i doubt that this package could have debian only bugs [12:29] dholbach: the grammar seems wrong in the new sentence "Also will [...]" [12:30] hum [12:30] where's the subject? [12:30] I'm not sure [12:31] "packages in Debian" is the subject of the sentence [12:32] Also packages in Debian with a testsuite header will be automatically added when they are synced to Ubuntu. [12:32] sound more English to me [12:32] ^ native speakers :) [12:32] Better but not quite [12:32] Packages in Debian with a testsuite header will also be automatically added when they are synced to Ubuntu. [12:33] Seems better to me [12:33] great, thank you [12:33] (You could alternatively say "Also, ...", but that reads a bit clumsily to me.) [12:33] Puts the stress in a slightly different place I suppose. [12:34] updated :) [12:36] dholbach: thanks. i am doing the upload now. [12:37] excellent [12:47] Hi [12:48] i've a litlle question on packaging. When you have a java software, do you create a shell for launh the software, because you must write "java -jar archive.jar" [13:18] I answered spartan-11510 on #ubuntu-devel. (It's best not to crosspost questions, generally.) [13:18] (Or at least say that you've done so.) [13:19] Okay i'll remember for the next time :) and thank's a lot for your answer === Marce_ is now known as Marce === fabo_ is now known as fabo === ikonia_ is now known as ikonia [16:15] hello :) [16:15] I've a source package (im-switch) and I want to create a patch for it [16:16] but the problem is it doesn't have a patch system [16:16] when I run the command edit-patch my-patch [16:17] I get this output No patchsystem detected, cannot create new patch (no dpatch/quilt/cdbs?) [16:17] It's a native package; it doesn't and shouldn't have a patch system. Just edit the source code directly. [16:17] you mean using the bzr branching/ [16:17] ? [16:18] I've already made a branch with the fix I want [16:18] https://code.launchpad.net/~m-alaa8/ubuntu/quantal/im-switch/fix-for-621204 [16:19] MohamedAlaa98_: I think that needs a UIFe (I thought I commented on that) [16:20] * micahg guesses he thought about commenting on that [16:20] I don't care whether it involves bzr or not. My point is that you just edit the files directly rather than creating a patch file. [16:21] sorry for lag [16:21] did I miss something? [16:21] 17:20 I don't care whether it involves bzr or not. My point is that you just edit the files directly rather than creating a patch file. [16:22] [11:19] MohamedAlaa98_: I think that needs a UIFe (I thought I commented on that) [16:22] [11:19] * micahg guesses he thought about commenting on that [16:22] https://code.launchpad.net/~m-alaa8/ubuntu/quantal/im-switch/fix-for-621204 [16:25] MohamedAlaa98: you forgot a hash mark before the bug number (LP: 621204) [16:26] Launchpad bug 621204 in im-switch (Ubuntu) "Typo in error string" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/621204 [16:30] MohamedAlaa98: and please also submit the change to Debian ;) [16:30] there is a submittodebian tool in ubuntu-dev-tools [16:31] tumbleweed: micahg: bdrung: Who's organising the UDS KSP then? ;-) [16:31] sorry the irc client disconnects, what did I miss? [16:32] mitya57: how? [16:33] Laney: good thinking [16:33] MohamedAlaa98: simply run submittodebian [16:33] MohamedAlaa98: http://developer.ubuntu.com/packaging/html/fixing-a-bug-example.html#getting-the-fix-included [16:33] ok [17:59] tinymux ftbs confuses me [18:00] it declares an own stpcpy which apparently conflicts with the one in string.h [18:00] but the one in string.h should not be enabled by default [18:01] its not enabled on the command line or config.h [18:02] hm found it some autoconf.h defines gnu source [18:03] wait GNU_SOURCE should also not enable it ... [18:33] how to fill out the bug template for an sru fixing two bugs? [18:33] fill out the template in both bugs or just one? [18:39] jtaylor: template in both debdiff on one === l3on_ is now known as l3on === Ursinha_ is now known as Ursinha