[00:00] <phillw> skaet: I only know one MOTU, that being Julien,
[00:01] <infinity> Getting someone else to sponsor Julien's package withouth him expressly saying it's ready for the archive isn't a good plan.
[00:01] <infinity> And if he's around to say it's ready, he can upload it himself.
[00:01] <infinity> skaet: dpkg --configure -a?
[00:01] <skaet> so it sounds like we'll need to wait until he's online again then
[00:01] <phillw> infinity: http://pastebin.com/emtpgLDF
[00:01] <infinity> skaet: (minus the ?)
[00:02] <infinity> phillw: None of that says exactly what he plans to upload, you're making assumptions that the PPA version is his final cut for the archive.
[00:03] <infinity> phillw: Respond to his email and ask him to either (a) upload, or (b) give a pointer to the exact bits he wants sponsored if he can't upload himself right now.
[00:03] <skaet> infinity,  update-notifier-common,  flashplugin-installer,  update-notifier ubuntu-desktop show errors
[00:03] <infinity> (I'd certainly prefer (a))
[00:05] <skaet> infinity, paste.ubuntu.com/1270270
[00:09] <infinity> skaet: Your update-notifier is out of date.
[00:09] <infinity> skaet: That's bug #1003100, already fixed.
[00:09] <ubot5> Launchpad bug 1003100 in update-notifier (Ubuntu Quantal) "package-data-downloader: KeyError: 'paquetes'" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1003100
[00:10] <skaet> infinity thanks.   ok,  I'll +1 it rather than starting a new one off.
[00:11] <infinity> skaet: Nothing to +1, just upgrade to a newer update-notifier. :P
[00:13] <skaet> infinity, was marking it as affects me too.
[00:30] <skaet> infinity,  manual apt-get install of update-notifier sorted it.    System updated to latest and updated to current now.
[01:46] <balloons> skaet, there was a bug with a broken package for a bit today
[01:46] <balloons> looks like they pointed it out to you
[01:57] <skaet> balloons,  yeah, added a note to the bug in case others stumble accross it.
[02:05] <silverarrow> hi
[02:05] <silverarrow> is anyone here?
[02:05] <silverarrow> how do I add lines to modprobe.d
[02:06] <silverarrow> I get "permission denied
=== mmrazik is now known as mmrazik|lunch
[09:56] <dholbach> hello my testing friends
[09:56] <dholbach> hey pitti
[09:56]  * pitti hugs dholbach
[09:57] <dholbach> :)
[09:57]  * dholbach hugs pitti and jibel
[09:58]  * jibel hugs dholbach back :)
[10:13] <dholbach> pitti, I was just going through the wiki of automated testing bits and wondered if maybe at least for the autopkgtest stuff they would be good in the Ubuntu Packaging Guide?
[10:14] <dholbach> what do you think?
[10:22] <pitti> dholbach: right, at least mentioning some links there would be good
[10:22] <dholbach> yes, working on it
[10:22] <pitti> like, to the spec, to the jenkins results, and to the example wiki page
[10:22]  * pitti hugs dholbach
[10:23] <dholbach> I'll just put in there what I understood up until now and I'll let you review it :)
=== mmrazik|lunch is now known as mmrazik
[11:19] <dholbach> pitti, if you have a bit of time and could take a look at https://code.launchpad.net/~dholbach/ubuntu-packaging-guide/autopkgtest/+merge/128905 that'd be awesome
[11:19] <dholbach> I think it shouldn't  take too long to review
[11:21] <dholbach> (if you want to review it in the HTML form, you can branch it, run 'make html' and open _build/html/auto-pkg-test.html in your browser)
[11:25] <dholbach> ^ of course I'm happy about any other eyeballs on the article too :)
[11:48] <pitti> dholbach: back from lunch, looking
[11:49] <dholbach> yeehaw
[11:55] <pitti> dholbach: I followed up in the MP with a correction and a suggestion
[11:55]  * pitti hugs dholbach, danke!
[11:55] <dholbach> fantastico
[11:56] <dholbach> pitti, haha, I'm an idiot
[11:56]  * pitti disagrees
[11:56] <dholbach> pitti, the integration of upstream tests was in the ubiquity package
[11:56] <dholbach> haha
[11:56] <dholbach> nevermind
[11:56] <dholbach> I'll fix it
[11:56] <pitti> danke!
[12:02] <dholbach> pitti, updated
[12:03] <dholbach> pitti, if you're happy with it now - I'll see that we get it into the archive asap, etc
[12:04] <pitti> dholbach: LGTM, +1'ed on the MP
[12:04] <dholbach> perfect
[12:22] <jibel> dholbach, maybe you could write explicitly that packages in debian with a testsuite header will be added automatically when they are synced to Ubuntu.
[12:23] <dholbach> ah yes
[12:23] <dholbach> good point
[12:24] <dholbach> done
=== _salem is now known as salem_
[12:25] <jibel> danke schön dholbach
[12:26] <dholbach> merci beaucoup à toi :)
=== mmrazik is now known as mmrazik|otp
=== mmrazik|otp is now known as mmrazik
=== mmrazik is now known as mmrazik|afk
=== mmrazik|afk is now known as mmrazik
[14:34] <dholbach> balloons, maybe you can have a look over http://developer.ubuntu.com/packaging/html/auto-pkg-test.html as well? just to see if it makes sense?
[14:35] <balloons> sure -- I'll even give it a whirl
[14:38] <dholbach> sweet
[14:41] <phillw> sorry for missing the meeting, was out shopping with my Mum!
[14:42] <smartboyhw> phillw, LOL
[14:42] <smartboyhw> phillw, nothing much
[14:44] <dholbach> balloons, I think that should give us a nice start for automated testing activities :)
[14:44] <smartboyhw> yeah yeah yeah
[14:45] <balloons> dholbach, I guess just ping you on grammar errors?
[14:45] <dholbach> balloons, sure, please do
[14:45] <dholbach> balloons, I'm happy to make whatever corrections you'd like to see
[14:46] <elfy> balloons: can I install an arm that works now - or do you want it left nor working ?
[14:46] <balloons> howdy elfy
[14:46] <balloons> I saw your mail and was wondering what you meant
[14:46] <elfy> hi
[14:46] <balloons> dholbach, "Also will packages in Debian with a testsuite header be automatically added when they are synced to Ubuntu."
[14:46] <balloons> last sentence needs fixing
[14:46] <balloons> elfy, so basically it didn't work?
[14:46] <dholbach> balloons, it's fixed in r175 already
[14:46] <dholbach> :)
[14:47] <elfy> well - as it is it is dead kaput fubar black and stays that way - I can leave it like that if someone has some wicked way to see what's wrong with it
[14:47] <elfy> or I can just carry on with a new daily balloons
[14:47] <balloons> the upgrade finished, it simply didn't work yes?
[14:48] <elfy> the upgrade was fine then reboot got nothing at all
[14:48] <elfy> no no no
[14:49] <balloons> ok, I think I got what your saying
[14:49] <elfy> I rebooted after the upgrade and it was fine - then I got that compiz apport - reported that - was really slow and unresponsive
[14:49] <elfy> then rebooted it again and it is now dead
[14:49] <balloons> if you wish, dd off the sdcard content
[14:49] <elfy> wut
[14:49] <balloons> and go back to a daily.
[14:49] <elfy> aah okey doke - thanks
[14:49] <balloons> when you write the new image
[14:50] <balloons> dd if=/dev/sdd of=/elfysmessupinstal.img ;_)
[14:50] <elfy> balloons: ok - then it's here if someone wants it
[14:51] <dholbach> balloons, apart from the grammar it looks good to you?
[14:52] <balloons> elfy, exactly. I will take the results back and see if anything further is wished to be done
[14:52] <elfy> ok
[14:52] <balloons> I'm more interested in making sure the final image works, as are you I'm sure ;-)
[14:52] <elfy> yea
[14:54] <balloons> we could just make cjohnston do it
[14:54] <smartboyhw> Good timing
[15:00] <elfy> balloons: ok - got them here now if anyone wants
[15:00] <balloons> ty elfy
[15:00] <balloons> I'll let you return your ARM board to a land of happiness again now :-)
[15:01] <elfy> thanks :)
[15:20] <silverarrow> does anyone know where alsamixer channel has gone?
[15:20] <silverarrow> It looks like there used to be one on freenode
[15:21] <silverarrow> never mind, there is alsa channel
[15:30] <balloons> bye smartboyhw
[16:12]  * balloons is trying fglrx
[16:12] <balloons> I've been putting off trying it due to breakages this cycle
=== mmrazik is now known as mmrazik|otp
[16:18] <balloons> reboot success!
[16:22] <balloons> xnox, you about?
[16:24] <xnox> balloons: yeah.
[16:24] <xnox> balloons: what's up =)
=== mmrazik|otp is now known as mmrazik
[16:25] <balloons> xnox, hey.. just thought I'd let you know I put the code up on lp from the demo
[16:25] <balloons> lp:~nskaggs/+junk/perfuncted
[16:25] <xnox> balloons: ;-)
[16:50] <elfy> balloons: that's better - it works now ;)
[16:50] <balloons> elfy, excellent
[16:51] <elfy> got that odd line at the top - but that's a known bug - responds fairlw well
[16:53] <balloons> yes, the line
[16:55] <elfy> why does the installer only create <400Mb of swap though I wonder
[16:56] <balloons> I believe it's a percentage of the disk space
[16:57] <elfy> ok
[16:57] <elfy> add some myself anyway :)
[16:58] <balloons> xnox can correct me if I'm wrong
[17:01] <xnox> elfy: it's a sliding factor between max ram size and other partitions having higher priority to take more levels and some minimum level....
[17:01] <elfy> ok - thanks xnox
[17:02] <xnox> which gives you 32 GB swap, if you server happens to have 32GB of ram =/ which kind of sucks on EC2/cloud/beefy servers.....
[17:02] <xnox> too much in one place, too little in another....
[17:04] <elfy> I'd love 32Gb of swap and the ram on this pandaboard :)
[17:06] <leadsled> Hello, got a question about Lubuntu alternate install
[17:11] <balloons> leadsled, ask away
[17:14] <kanliot> hi balloons
[17:14] <kanliot> sup
[17:14] <balloons> kanliot, hello
[17:14] <leadsled> balloons  the lubuntu alternate install image has been problematic on 10-8-2012, 10-9-2012 is todays image going to better?
[17:17] <kanliot> leadsled, what issue did you have?  is it in launchpad?
[17:21] <leadsled> kanliot,  debian installer issues hangs and install issues
[17:24] <kanliot> well since ubuntu dropped the alternate, i suppose all that is professionally tested is the 12.10 alternete server install
[17:24] <kanliot> that means the community
[17:27] <kanliot> please don't mistake my statement as an high-handed attitude leadsled
[17:31] <leadsled> kanliot, so I should file a bug against the debian installer?
[17:33] <kanliot> yup debian-installer
[17:33] <balloons> leadsled, yes, what kanliot said is correct
[17:33] <balloons> do you get a working install or no?
[17:35] <leadsled> balloons, I got a working install on alternate (entire-disk) but took 2 tries on each day
[17:36] <kanliot> i wonder if it's the new grub stuff
[17:38] <leadsled> balloons, (alternate install encryption) it would reboot nothing then a manual reboot I could enter the passphrase
[17:39] <balloons> quite odd
[17:40] <balloons> but yes, at this point, please make sure the lubuntu folks know of the issue. So the first reboot didn't boot into anything?
[17:41] <leadsled> balloons, yes nothing
[17:49] <cjohnston> wait.. what balloons ?
[17:52] <balloons> cjohnston, lol
[17:52] <balloons> just say yes
[17:52] <cjohnston> no
[17:52] <balloons> leadsled, so did grub load?
[17:52] <cjohnston> hey balloons... Who is your boss?
[17:53] <leadsled> balloons,  yes
[17:54] <balloons> why the infamous cjohnston of course
[17:54] <cjohnston> Well.. we all know that.. but being serious
[17:54] <balloons> leadsled, ok so after grubm what happened? you select ubuntu and it did what?
[17:55] <balloons> sat and wait for the disk to load
[17:55] <balloons> or for you to unencrypt (but didn't prompt)
[17:55] <balloons> cjohnston, jono is my boss
[17:56] <cjohnston> balloons: you may want to change your blueprints to reflect that then so that it stays that way
[17:56] <leadsled> balloons, I am try lubuntu AI again to refresh my memory, thanks
[17:57] <balloons> cjohnston, lol -- eh?
[17:57]  * balloons goes looking
[17:57] <cjohnston> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/qa-r-testing-campaign
[17:57] <balloons> nice
[17:57] <balloons> I blame lp!
[17:57] <cjohnston> I blame balloons!
[17:58] <balloons> jono is taken by someone else in lp?
[17:58] <cjohnston> if you type the right username it works just fine
[17:58] <balloons> blasphemy!
[17:58] <cjohnston> always has been
[17:58] <balloons> done.. ty cjohnston
[17:59] <cjohnston> ;-)
[17:59] <cjohnston> I got some entertainment out of it atleast
[18:01] <kanliot> hah.  i am winning.  software-updater broke my grub installation. fixed it in less than 2 minutes
[18:03] <kanliot> but do i file the broken grub binary against grub-common or grub2-common or grub-pc?  can anyone guess?
[18:08] <kanliot> bug 1055173
[18:08] <ubot5> Error: Launchpad bug 1055173 could not be found
[18:08] <kanliot> bug 1065173
[18:08] <balloons> ubot wins kanliot
[18:08] <ubot5> Launchpad bug 1065173 in grub2 (Ubuntu) "boot to grub-recovery after software updater updates grub binary on 12.10" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1065173
[18:08] <balloons> haha
[18:08] <kanliot> not funny
[18:08] <kanliot> :)
[18:11] <kanliot> balloons how is phill doin
[18:12] <kanliot> he seemd a little under assault last time i chatted w/ him
[18:15] <balloons> yea..
[18:15] <balloons> he's feeling the end of cycle madness
[18:15] <kanliot> lol
[18:15] <kanliot> rofl
=== cwayne is now known as cwayne-brb
=== cwayne-brb is now known as cwayne
[19:43] <balloons> mmm.. pizza
=== salem_ is now known as _salem
=== Ursinha_ is now known as Ursinha