=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk [03:48] RAOF: smuxi probably should've been versioned -0ubuntu1 since we're ahead of Debian [03:49] blame the debian maintainer, he's upstream & prepared the smuxi upload :) [03:49] Bah, you're right. I didn't check his versioning. [03:50] this is probably one case where you can get away with it [03:50] ajmitch: that's not the first Debian maintainer to do stuff like that :) [03:51] micahg: no, it's not, but at least there shouldn't be a conflicting .orig.tar.gz, just a misleading version [03:53] ajmitch: hopefully :-/, sometimes people get confused on which is the upstream version (see blueman) [03:53] ubuntu & debian branches are in the same git repository for smuxi, at least [03:54] that would be a plus :) [07:30] good morning === micahg_ is now known as micahg [07:53] Morning dholbach. [07:53] hey iulian === lifeless_ is now known as lifeless [09:55] haha [09:55] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/community-q-debian [10:27] everyone vote for bzr-builddeb https://dudle.inf.tu-dresden.de/Popularity_of_bzr-builddeb_and_dh-make/ === maxb_ is now known as Guest72551 [10:48] Laney: I am still intending to my action item there before UDS [10:48] Ubuntu: filled with good intentions... === micahg_ is now known as micahg === ricotz_ is now known as ricotz === micahg_ is now known as micahg === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha === RainCT_ is now known as RainCT === glebihan_ is now known as glebihan [18:14] YokoZar: poke about wine and gcc-4.5 :) [18:14] micahg: do you still want that done for Quantal? [18:14] if possible :) [18:14] If so I'll do it this weekend then, sure. [18:15] until Tuesday we can take it for sure, after that, depends [18:15] micahg: was the whole archive built without gcc-4.5 at this point? [18:16] YokoZar: well, wine is the only package with an explicit dependency left [18:16] micahg: I'm worried about binary packages that were built with an older GCC if we dont' ship that [18:16] it's buildable without it [18:17] the gcc libraries should be BC compatible [18:17] We don't currently use the binaries produced by the test archive rebuilds though [18:17] *backwards comaptible [18:17] Yes but that's not quite the same thing [18:17] if there was an ABI break with gcc, we'd probably hear about it pretty quickly [18:17] Like maybe a package builds with newer GCC but behaves differently. And our current binary was built with GCC-4.5 and then we remove GCC-4.5 from archive, so no one could build the current binary [18:18] yes, but in that case, most likely, the current binary wasn't built on this series [18:19] micahg: gcc-4.7 was made default right at the start of quantal dev then, yes? [18:19] yes [18:19] and 4.6 in precise === blackz_ is now known as blackz [19:39] astraljava: Hi :) You are a packager ? === hggdh is now known as hggdh_napping === yofel_ is now known as yofel === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away === hggdh_napping is now known as hggdh === Ursinha_ is now known as Ursinha