[00:49] <JoseeAntonioR> jcastro_: should I remove the link to the marathon page from the main page menu?
[07:56] <czajkowski> aloha
[09:29] <nigelb> 35
[09:29] <nigelb> grr
[10:48] <cjohnston> See everyone in a week
[17:32] <JoseeAntonioR> cjohnston: hey, could you please mark this as high priority? https://bugs.launchpad.net/summit/+bug/1066345
[17:32] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1066345 in summit "Clicking on star should add me to session" [Undecided,Confirmed]
[17:32] <JoseeAntonioR> or is it wishlist?
[17:53] <daker> bkerensa: http://news.slashdot.org/story/12/10/13/145217/stallman-on-unity-dash-canonical-will-have-to-give-users-data-to-governments
[18:16] <AlanBell> the story that keeps on giving
[18:16] <AlanBell> more to come too, when someone digs into the checkbox that supposedly turns off internet searches in the dash
[18:28] <IdleOne> Sounds like an old man trying to stay relevant by attaching himself to a controversial topic to me.
[18:28] <AlanBell> oh, stallman, sure
[18:29] <IdleOne> I have yet to read any positive comment from him about anything
[18:29] <AlanBell> in fact if Stallman hates it I suspect that will make a lot of people perfectly fine about the whole thing
[18:29] <nigelb> ^
[18:29] <AlanBell> best endorsement yet
[18:29] <IdleOne> In that case, keep on flapping your gums old man.
[18:29] <nigelb> I have my problems with it. But this is not one of them.
[18:30] <AlanBell> he is doing his usual trick of being right, badly.
[18:30] <nigelb> As soon as we added the ability to turn it off and it was told that at release time we'd switch to https, I was okay with it.
[18:30] <AlanBell> yeah, only the turn it off part is bogus
[18:30] <nigelb> aww
[18:31] <AlanBell> well, not bogus in that it does turn that lens off
[18:31] <AlanBell> but the checkbox does not do what the checkbox says it does
[18:31] <nigelb> heh, did they pace up to get the checkbox in becuause of UI freeze?
[18:31] <nigelb> and are working on the functionality now?
[18:32] <AlanBell> not sure
[18:32] <nigelb> worst case we'd have to add an entry into /etc/hosts
[18:33] <nigelb> that's okay ;)
[18:33] <IdleOne> That checkbox disables package usage data being sent back to Canonical doesn't it?
[18:33] <AlanBell> err, no
[18:33] <AlanBell> the checkbox says
[18:33] <IdleOne> Not sure which checkbox we are talking about then
[18:33] <AlanBell> When searching in the dash: include online search results
[18:34] <AlanBell> and as far as I know what it actually does is turn off just the shopping lens (or the scope)
[18:34] <nigelb> ah
[18:35] <AlanBell> any other third party lenses you may have that include online search results are free to read your searches and populate the dash and do evil stuff with your queries
[18:35] <IdleOne> I would prefer Canonical just make it opt in instead of opt out. Well if the lens is disabled with that box, sounds ok to me.
[18:36] <nigelb> Well, the idea is to get revenue from the referrals.
[18:37] <AlanBell> which is fine, and I got a lovely little camera found through the lens
[18:37] <IdleOne> Which is fine by me, but I think we should have the choice to give and not the choice to not give.
[18:38] <nigelb> IdleOne: On the personal belief standpoint, I'm with you.
[18:38] <nigelb> But thinking practically, from the canonical standpoint, I'd want it turned on by default.
[18:38] <nigelb> That way, more users are going to bring referral income.
[18:39] <IdleOne> nigelb: Sure as a business man I understand that also
[18:39] <AlanBell> I probably take a rather odd view, I would rather it was on by default and not disablable with a button that doesn't do what it says
[18:39] <IdleOne> AlanBell: it partially does what it says, it maybe needs to be more clear on exactly what that is.
[18:40] <AlanBell> but there should be a control at some point to whitelist scopes to get global search change events
[18:40] <AlanBell> and lenses shouldn't be able to set visible to false and hide from the lens bar
[18:41] <cjohnston> JoseeAntonioR: it isnt a bug, or a wishlist, its a feature that already exists
[18:41] <nigelb> AlanBell: So, have you played with MITM?
[18:42] <JoseeAntonioR> cjohnston: well, at least not for me
[18:42] <nigelb> AlanBell: http://mitmproxy.org/
[18:42] <cjohnston> JoseeAntonioR: if you click on the star it doesn't take you to a page to mark yourself attending?
[18:42] <AlanBell> ooh that is scary and useful nigelb
[18:43] <JoseeAntonioR> cjohnston: that's the point, it should just mark you, and if you're *very* interested, then you should update it
[18:43] <nigelb> AlanBell: I thought of this when people keep saying HTTPS is secure by default. (For example oauth 2.0 specs)
[18:44] <cjohnston> ehh.. ok, if I reread it, it does say that, it just didn't come across well..
[18:44] <cjohnston> its wishlist and wont be done before uds
[18:44] <cjohnston> unless someone else does it
[18:44] <JoseeAntonioR> I may do it if I find where the star properties are
[18:45] <cjohnston> daily.html
[18:45] <cjohnston> by_*.html
[18:46] <JoseeAntonioR> ok
[18:48]  * cjohnston is gone for a week
[18:49] <JoseeAntonioR> cjohnston: before you go, what is called when someone marks him/herself as attending?
[18:52] <JoseeAntonioR> mhall119: ^ ?
[19:00] <mhall119> JoseeAntonioR: "Attending"
[19:02] <JoseeAntonioR> mhall119: but is a function in a script or anywhere else called?
[20:39] <mhall119> JoseeAntonioR: what do you mean?
[20:40] <JoseeAntonioR> mhall119: when a person marks him/herself as attending and clicks save, is there a function I can call for that?
[20:42] <mhall119> in the code?
[20:42] <JoseeAntonioR> yep
[20:42] <mhall119> there's a view function that the form is sent to, I don't recall the name of it
[20:42] <JoseeAntonioR> so I can fix bug 1066345 asap
[20:42] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1066345 in summit "Clicking on star should add me to session" [Wishlist,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1066345
[20:43] <JoseeAntonioR> erm, let me check
[20:43] <mhall119> ah, to make it ajax-y you'll need to do an HTTP POST using the data from the form
[20:44] <JoseeAntonioR> and the form is {{ form.as_template }}, right?
[20:45] <mhall119> you'll need to check the actual HTML it produces
[20:45] <mhall119> to see what fields and field names you need to send
[20:46] <JoseeAntonioR> yeah, checking my local instance atm
[20:46] <JoseeAntonioR> well, not-so local
[20:52] <mhall119> the tricky part is going to be getting around the CSRF token
[20:52] <mhall119> you might need to make a new view to handle the ajax calls
[20:54] <JoseeAntonioR> huh?!
[20:58] <JoseeAntonioR> mhall119: any idea on how to fix http://summit.joseeantonior.com:8000/uds-r/2012-10-29/ ?
[20:59] <mhall119> JoseeAntonioR: manage.py migrate
[20:59] <mhall119> we added a new field recently
[20:59] <JoseeAntonioR> oh
[21:21] <JoseeAntonioR> I think it's participation=ATTENDING
[21:26] <mhall119> that's the model field and value, yes