[00:49] jcastro_: should I remove the link to the marathon page from the main page menu? [07:56] aloha [09:29] 35 [09:29] grr [10:48] See everyone in a week [17:32] cjohnston: hey, could you please mark this as high priority? https://bugs.launchpad.net/summit/+bug/1066345 [17:32] Launchpad bug 1066345 in summit "Clicking on star should add me to session" [Undecided,Confirmed] [17:32] or is it wishlist? [17:53] bkerensa: http://news.slashdot.org/story/12/10/13/145217/stallman-on-unity-dash-canonical-will-have-to-give-users-data-to-governments [18:16] the story that keeps on giving [18:16] more to come too, when someone digs into the checkbox that supposedly turns off internet searches in the dash [18:28] Sounds like an old man trying to stay relevant by attaching himself to a controversial topic to me. [18:28] oh, stallman, sure [18:29] I have yet to read any positive comment from him about anything [18:29] in fact if Stallman hates it I suspect that will make a lot of people perfectly fine about the whole thing [18:29] ^ [18:29] best endorsement yet [18:29] In that case, keep on flapping your gums old man. [18:29] I have my problems with it. But this is not one of them. [18:30] he is doing his usual trick of being right, badly. [18:30] As soon as we added the ability to turn it off and it was told that at release time we'd switch to https, I was okay with it. [18:30] yeah, only the turn it off part is bogus [18:30] aww [18:31] well, not bogus in that it does turn that lens off [18:31] but the checkbox does not do what the checkbox says it does [18:31] heh, did they pace up to get the checkbox in becuause of UI freeze? [18:31] and are working on the functionality now? [18:32] not sure [18:32] worst case we'd have to add an entry into /etc/hosts [18:33] that's okay ;) [18:33] That checkbox disables package usage data being sent back to Canonical doesn't it? [18:33] err, no [18:33] the checkbox says [18:33] Not sure which checkbox we are talking about then [18:33] When searching in the dash: include online search results [18:34] and as far as I know what it actually does is turn off just the shopping lens (or the scope) [18:34] ah [18:35] any other third party lenses you may have that include online search results are free to read your searches and populate the dash and do evil stuff with your queries [18:35] I would prefer Canonical just make it opt in instead of opt out. Well if the lens is disabled with that box, sounds ok to me. [18:36] Well, the idea is to get revenue from the referrals. [18:37] which is fine, and I got a lovely little camera found through the lens [18:37] Which is fine by me, but I think we should have the choice to give and not the choice to not give. [18:38] IdleOne: On the personal belief standpoint, I'm with you. [18:38] But thinking practically, from the canonical standpoint, I'd want it turned on by default. [18:38] That way, more users are going to bring referral income. [18:39] nigelb: Sure as a business man I understand that also [18:39] I probably take a rather odd view, I would rather it was on by default and not disablable with a button that doesn't do what it says [18:39] AlanBell: it partially does what it says, it maybe needs to be more clear on exactly what that is. [18:40] but there should be a control at some point to whitelist scopes to get global search change events [18:40] and lenses shouldn't be able to set visible to false and hide from the lens bar [18:41] JoseeAntonioR: it isnt a bug, or a wishlist, its a feature that already exists [18:41] AlanBell: So, have you played with MITM? [18:42] cjohnston: well, at least not for me [18:42] AlanBell: http://mitmproxy.org/ [18:42] JoseeAntonioR: if you click on the star it doesn't take you to a page to mark yourself attending? [18:42] ooh that is scary and useful nigelb [18:43] cjohnston: that's the point, it should just mark you, and if you're *very* interested, then you should update it [18:43] AlanBell: I thought of this when people keep saying HTTPS is secure by default. (For example oauth 2.0 specs) [18:44] ehh.. ok, if I reread it, it does say that, it just didn't come across well.. [18:44] its wishlist and wont be done before uds [18:44] unless someone else does it [18:44] I may do it if I find where the star properties are [18:45] daily.html [18:45] by_*.html [18:46] ok [18:48] * cjohnston is gone for a week [18:49] cjohnston: before you go, what is called when someone marks him/herself as attending? [18:52] mhall119: ^ ? [19:00] JoseeAntonioR: "Attending" [19:02] mhall119: but is a function in a script or anywhere else called? [20:39] JoseeAntonioR: what do you mean? [20:40] mhall119: when a person marks him/herself as attending and clicks save, is there a function I can call for that? [20:42] in the code? [20:42] yep [20:42] there's a view function that the form is sent to, I don't recall the name of it [20:42] so I can fix bug 1066345 asap [20:42] Launchpad bug 1066345 in summit "Clicking on star should add me to session" [Wishlist,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1066345 [20:43] erm, let me check [20:43] ah, to make it ajax-y you'll need to do an HTTP POST using the data from the form [20:44] and the form is {{ form.as_template }}, right? [20:45] you'll need to check the actual HTML it produces [20:45] to see what fields and field names you need to send [20:46] yeah, checking my local instance atm [20:46] well, not-so local [20:52] the tricky part is going to be getting around the CSRF token [20:52] you might need to make a new view to handle the ajax calls [20:54] huh?! [20:58] mhall119: any idea on how to fix http://summit.joseeantonior.com:8000/uds-r/2012-10-29/ ? [20:59] JoseeAntonioR: manage.py migrate [20:59] we added a new field recently [20:59] oh [21:21] I think it's participation=ATTENDING [21:26] that's the model field and value, yes === vibhav is now known as Guest52174