| darkxst | jbicha, we are going to SRU gdm 3.6.1 right? | 04:47 |
|---|---|---|
| jbicha | yeah, but doing the SRU paperwork is a pain | 04:49 |
| darkxst | would it be easier to just backport the relevant patches? | 04:50 |
| jbicha | no, all SRUs need paperwork, I think 3.6.1 would be better | 04:51 |
| darkxst | oh... ray missed the autologin fixes ;( | 04:51 |
| jbicha | https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates | 04:51 |
| darkxst | yeh I have seen that, but it seems more targeted at single bug fixes... rather than updates... | 04:52 |
| jbicha | you're welcome to ask seb128 about it when he signs on | 04:53 |
| darkxst | ok, happy to try and take care of it (not that I have done a SRU yet) | 04:54 |
| jbicha | I'm going to bed but we'd be happy to sponsor package updates for you | 04:55 |
| jbicha | darkxst: oh, wait I guess there is a standing exception again for GNOME point releases | 05:15 |
| jbicha | https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates/MicroReleaseExceptions | 05:15 |
| jbicha | they still need tracking bugs but the paperwork should be easier | 05:16 |
| darkxst | jbicha, ok | 05:17 |
| darkxst | I will package it up later tonight | 05:18 |
| smartboyhw | everaldo, anxioiusly waiting for 12.10 Release of UGR eh? | 10:07 |
| everaldo | smartboyhw, well, a little | 10:30 |
| smartboyhw | :) | 10:30 |
| everaldo | smartboyhw, I am running 12.10 so for me it is ok | 10:30 |
| smartboyhw | :D | 10:30 |
| everaldo | but I want to see how it goes in the press | 10:30 |
| smartboyhw | everaldo, hopefully good:D | 10:30 |
| everaldo | btw, I am build a full article in portuguese with some screenshots | 10:31 |
| * smartboyhw is going to write in 2buntu.com again after it is final:D | 10:31 | |
| everaldo | smartboyhw, nice | 10:32 |
| smartboyhw | everaldo, I keep writing about it:D Half of my posts are about it | 10:32 |
| everaldo | to be honest I am thinking about what we can do for 13.04 | 10:33 |
| everaldo | just start to code in control-center, I hope found enougth time to integrate gnome-tweak-tool features in control-center | 10:34 |
| everaldo | two tools is too much :) | 10:34 |
| everaldo | smartboyhw, one question. What do you think about new Nautilus 3.6 ? | 10:34 |
| smartboyhw | everaldo, uh IDK | 10:35 |
| everaldo | IDK? | 10:38 |
| smartboyhw | I don't know;D | 10:38 |
| smartboyhw | :P | 10:38 |
| smartboyhw | everaldo, I think it is fine | 10:39 |
| everaldo | :) | 10:42 |
| everaldo | jbicha, I just build iso today (I do it every day) and it now have 950mb | 15:54 |
| everaldo | is it normal? | 15:54 |
| everaldo | the most notable change is squashfs that is now 910mb | 15:55 |
| jbicha | so how big was it yesterday? and what changed? | 15:59 |
| jbicha | did you use the latest from https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-gnome-dev/+junk/iso-build-script ? | 16:00 |
| everaldo | yes, yesterday it was 845 | 16:05 |
| everaldo | and I am using last script | 16:05 |
| everaldo | I just create another empty folder now and start again | 16:05 |
| everaldo | to see if everything is ok | 16:05 |
| jbicha | did the apt archive get cleaned? is there anything in /var/cache/apt/archives/ or /archives/ | 16:05 |
| everaldo | yes, theres lots of things in archives | 16:06 |
| jbicha | that's where the extra file size comes from | 16:06 |
| jbicha | (I mean in the build environment) | 16:06 |
| everaldo | I start a clean build again | 16:07 |
| everaldo | let us see if now it will be around 850mb | 16:07 |
| everaldo | jbicha, it is now 847mb | 17:22 |
| everaldo | so, it is ok | 17:22 |
| everaldo | looks like before build a new iso we need to always remove the work-amd64 and work-i386 folders | 17:23 |
| jbicha | oh yeah I always run ./livecd-script.sh clean i386 first | 17:36 |
| jbicha | darkxst: so we've got about an hour or so to do gdm 3.6.1 if we want to squeeze it in pre-release | 19:16 |
| jbicha | universe freeze is scheduled for 2100 utc | 19:17 |
| darkxst | jbicha, ok will do it now | 19:33 |
| jbicha | darkxst: I'm already on it, I wasn't sure if you'd be around | 19:39 |
| darkxst | jbicha, ah ok | 19:39 |
| jbicha | I grabbed your fix for bug 1055359 and I believe the gdmflexiserver fix is already included | 19:40 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1055359 in gdm (Ubuntu Quantal) "GDM package fails to uninstall if GDM not running" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1055359 | 19:40 |
| darkxst | yeh also drop ubuntu_user_switching patch | 19:40 |
| darkxst | maybe also revert this http://git.gnome.org/browse/gdm/commit/?h=gnome-3-6&id=11be852c46877ba882ef9759a4fcdb437fcaca9d | 19:43 |
| darkxst | although I am not sure what will happen, we dont have the user for that, so it will just fail to some extent | 19:44 |
| jbicha | bummer, the system menu indicator is still rather unreliable with gdm but at least user switching sort of works | 19:59 |
| jbicha | darkxst: since we don't ship gnome-initial-setup, I think that change is harmless | 20:00 |
| darkxst | jbicha, well the fast user switching can't work (i.e. clicking usernames in menu) | 20:01 |
| darkxst | that would require re-porting an ubuntu patch from 3.0 | 20:01 |
| jbicha | additionally, it seemed that while clicking Lock Screen worked the first time, trying to click Lock Screen again (or even Log Out or Suspend) didn't work | 20:03 |
| jbicha | the keyboard shortcuts (Ctrl+L or Ctrl+Alt+Del) still worked | 20:04 |
| jbicha | also I had to reboot after upgrading gdm, I'm not sure why except that gdm is a bit unstable | 20:06 |
| jbicha | but I figure that's another reason why we want to get the update in now before release | 20:06 |
| darkxst | probably related to this Bug #1064354 | 20:09 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1064354 in gnome-shell (Ubuntu) "When running lightDM user locking doesnt work" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1064354 | 20:09 |
| TheLordOfTime | erm, lightdm != gdm? | 20:10 |
| TheLordOfTime | just saying ;P | 20:10 |
| darkxst | oops! | 20:10 |
| TheLordOfTime | if i remember how jbicha explained the gnome remix variant, it uses gdm in place of lightdm | 20:13 |
| TheLordOfTime | because of things. | 20:13 |
| TheLordOfTime | so unless the bug is part of the shell itself and is desktop environment/manager independent... | 20:13 |
| darkxst | gnome-shell provides the screensaver interface now | 20:13 |
| darkxst | but gnome-classic uses the old gnome-screensaver | 20:14 |
| TheLordOfTime | true, but my comment was specific to lightdm vs. gdm | 20:15 |
| TheLordOfTime | (that bug refers to lightdm) | 20:15 |
| darkxst | yeh I know, I posted the wrong bug.... | 20:17 |
| TheLordOfTime | ;) | 20:17 |
| darkxst | indicator session must be getting stuch waiting for something | 20:18 |
| darkxst | lock does come up second time, after about 30secs | 20:18 |
| darkxst | i.e. 30secs after you click it | 20:19 |
| jbicha | oh, interesting, do you want to file the bug? | 20:21 |
| darkxst | jbicha, yeh will do | 20:21 |
| darkxst | not a gdm bug anyway, happens with lightdm as well | 20:50 |
| darkxst | even happens with lightdm and unity! | 20:51 |
| darkxst | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator-session/+bug/1067515 | 21:12 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1067515 in indicator-session (Ubuntu) "Locking from user menu fails second time" [Undecided,New] | 21:12 |
| darkxst | jbicha, I guess freeze is in place now? (might have a fix for the gmail issue) | 23:44 |
| jbicha | darkxst: yes, but SRUs are welcome :) (well technically the freeze email wasn't sent out but that's expected soon) | 23:46 |
| darkxst | jbicha, http://paste.ubuntu.com/1284144/ if you want to sneak it in | 23:54 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!