[08:57] <xnox> Why, oh why do we have "Start Screen Saver" system cog item? When ubiquity explicitly inhibits screensaver....
[09:32] <jpds> Does anyone know why PXE will accept an IP from DHCP, but then d-i will refuse to take that IP again a few seconds later? http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/1282753/
[15:20] <antarus> cjwatson: fix *all* my bugs :)
[15:20] <cjwatson> meh what?
[15:20] <cjwatson> what did/didn't I fix?
[15:21] <antarus> I jsut see a ton of 'fixed by colin watson' in my launchpad mail ;p
[15:21] <cjwatson> oh, er, ok :)
[15:22] <antarus> most of the bugs I am subscribed to never get fixed, so thanks ;p
[15:22] <cjwatson> Sadly I'm not quite the top bug fixer in quantal
[15:22] <cjwatson> http://reports.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/bug-fixing/quantal-fixes-report.html
[15:23] <antarus> its ok, we don't run Quantal ;p
[15:24] <cjwatson> oh, precise?  bear in mind that I may well get incorrectly credited for bug fixes when I'm the person who often copies them from precise-proposed to precise-updates
[15:24] <cjwatson> one of these days I'll fix LP to credit that kind of thing more reasonably
[15:24] <antarus> hey for us, that is the most important step ;p
[15:27] <cjwatson> xnox: so, the inability to handle existing encrypted partitions at least in the manual partitioner *is* a regression from alternate
[15:27] <cjwatson> I wouldn't expect automatic partitioning / resizing / etc. to work
[15:27] <cjwatson> But it seems that you didn't know about this, so I left a comment on bug 1066480 with how it used to work
[15:27] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1066480 in ubiquity "12.10 installer don't show encrypted partitions" [Critical,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1066480
[15:29] <xnox> cjwatson: yeah. too late to find out. and we have no UI to show the dialog "enter password, or don't enter anything if you don't want to activate it".
[15:30] <cjwatson> Well, we have the strings
[15:30] <xnox> cjwatson: as a workaround, person can go into live session and double click on the drive & some desktop thing does bring up the screen.
[15:30] <xnox> cjwatson: ah. true the d-i strings ;-)
[15:30] <cjwatson> xnox: Hm, right
[15:30] <cjwatson> I'll test that and write up a release note
[15:31] <xnox> and hopefully partman will pick up the desktop mounted crypto drive.
[15:45] <cjwatson> xnox: If you do that you even get the reinstall option \o/
[15:45] <cjwatson> Also a rather curious /dev/mapper/luks-$(some uuid) device which probably ought to be filtered
[15:45] <cjwatson> But that can be ignored for the moment
[15:46] <cjwatson> Presumably fallout from whatever unity does to unlock such devices
[15:46] <xnox> cjwatson: \0/
[15:46]  * xnox still doesn't understand why the reinstall option is not selectable with the partman-auto in unapproved though...
[15:48] <cjwatson> Not RC if you can't sort it out before stgraber deals with his bug
[15:49] <xnox> cjwatson: /o\ it's not a bug, it's a feature...... my VM doesn't have internet.... (i was trying to speed up installs) and hence the reinstall option is inactive....
[15:49] <xnox>  582    def plugin_set_online_state(self, state):
[15:49] <xnox>  583        self.reuse_partition.set_sensitive(state)
[15:49] <cjwatson> *blink* that depends on internet?
[15:50] <cjwatson> what for?
[15:50] <stgraber> I guess it does because of apt-clone repack potentially needing internet to restore
[15:50] <cjwatson> oh, yeah, of course
[15:50] <cjwatson> ok, great, invalidate/delete that task then :)
[15:50] <cjwatson> or close it with the ubiquity source refresh if you prefer
[15:50] <xnox> yeah, but don't we have the warning "install is incomplete no internetz" for that....
[15:51] <cjwatson> there's the tickybox screen
[15:51] <xnox> cjwatson: yeah, I actually want to make update-changelog parses the included changelogs and appends bug numbers. Such that we know what ubiquity has / doesn't have.
[15:52] <xnox> sub-low priority....
[15:53] <cjwatson> :)
[16:26] <stgraber> xnox: is test_interface_translated passing for you? I just did a local run of the tests and it's failling because of "encryption_algorithm, crypto_iv_algorithm, partition_encryption_key_size"
[16:27] <xnox> stgraber: last upload I did, did pass everything.
[16:27] <xnox> stgraber: and those strings suppose to come from d-i.
[16:27] <xnox> stgraber: let me check.
[16:53] <xnox> stgraber: how are you building it? "$ bzr bd -r 5745 lp:ubiquity" passes for me. Note: that if you are doing "dirty" builds you might want to rm install-stamp
[16:54] <stgraber> xnox: I was just running tests/run directly
[16:54] <xnox> stgraber: well that doesn't mean that all templates were fectched and generated in the debian/ dir.
[16:54] <xnox> stgraber: as we import translations from partman-* and use them in ubiquity, so you kind of need them....
[16:55] <stgraber> right, a clean build seems to work, so it's just my usual dev/test environment that needs some tweaking
[16:56] <xnox> stgraber: unless I missed some piece of black magic to make it include partman-crypto translations somewhere for tests/run to pick up directly.
[16:56] <xnox> because it was "interesting" to get them included first time around.
[16:56] <stgraber> anyway, I have ubiquity ready for upload here, updated the included sources, test built and checked the diff
[16:56] <stgraber> so just waiting for apw and I'll commit that and dput the source package
[16:56] <xnox> stgraber: any new translations we can get? =)
[16:56] <cjwatson> awesome
[16:57]  * xnox will be off to volleyball training soon
[16:57] <cjwatson> I'll download a translation tarball now, but I'll be very conservative about applying them
[17:07] <stgraber> cjwatson: do you want me to wait for translations? I already pushed everything to the branch including the version tag, but I can uncommit if you want
[17:08] <cjwatson> stgraber: Wait a sec, I'm nearly ready
[17:08] <cjwatson> There are a few, not many
[17:09] <cjwatson> Tell me when you've uncommitted and I'll drop in the translations
[17:09] <stgraber> cjwatson: there you go
[17:11] <cjwatson> stgraber: Done
[17:12] <stgraber> ok, tagging, diffing and pushing