[00:00] <wgrant> I think +activity is the one Launchpad page that doesn't use your configured timezone
[00:00] <exarkun> Thanks.
[00:00] <wgrant> Bug #412963 is relevant here
[02:30] <Timothy_Gu> I have a PPA, but I have some questions about versioning. Do I have to use 1.0-0ppa1 or 1.0-0~ppa1?
[05:05] <MTecknology> so... I've been having an issue and I think I see the issue now... apparently ppa.launchpad.net has no ipv6 addy? :(
[14:34] <shadeslayer> hi, is there a way to query the launchpad API for the build status based on just the build id?
[14:38] <dobey> shadeslayer: a recipe build, or a package build?
[14:38] <shadeslayer> dobey: package build
[14:39] <dobey> shadeslayer: it seems you can for distribution packages, but i am not sure about PPA packages
[14:39] <dobey> https://launchpad.net/+apidoc/1.0.html#build
[14:40] <dobey> oh, but you need the distribution name and source package name, as well as the id
[14:41] <PN1> Hi, i opened a new ppa and i have a build error about gstreamer-sdk-dev. anyone know how to add it to build-depends?
[14:42] <shadeslayer> yeah
[14:43] <shadeslayer> PN1: check debian/control
[14:43] <shadeslayer> also, #ubuntu-packaging would be the right place
[14:43] <shadeslayer> if no one answers there, #ubuntu-motu :)
[14:43] <PN1> i did and the Build-Depends line look like this: Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 8.0.0), gstreamer-sdk-dev
[14:43] <shadeslayer> and?
[14:44] <PN1> but i get an error: gstreamer-sdk-dev: missing
[14:44] <PN1> gstreamer-sdk-dev: does not exist
[14:44] <dobey> gstreamer-sdk-dev isn't a package
[14:44] <PN1> in the log file at my PPA
[14:44] <dobey> and #ubuntu-packaging is the right channel to ask for packaging help
[14:45] <dobey> PN1: you can't depend on things that don't exist
[14:45] <shadeslayer> ^
[14:45] <dobey> shadeslayer: i'm not sure what source_ids are exactly, but getBuildSummariesForSourceIds() on an archive object *might* do what you want
[14:46] <shadeslayer> dobey: well .. I'm thinking of writing something that notifies me when my builds complete
[14:46] <shadeslayer> and I assumed that the build id would be a unique identifier that I could use to query lp
[14:46] <dobey> shadeslayer: well, how are you getting the build id?
[14:47] <shadeslayer> manually from the user
[14:47] <dobey> oh
[14:48] <shadeslayer> and the idea is specifically for PPA's because I have to keep refreshing build pages to check if the build completed or not
[14:49] <shadeslayer> didn't even think of supporting archive builds atm
[14:49] <shadeslayer> I guess a reasonable way to do it would be to monitor the entire PPA
[14:55] <shadeslayer> hm
[14:55] <dobey> shadeslayer: well i think a PPA is an "archive" object in the lp api
[14:55] <shadeslayer> right
[14:55] <shadeslayer> and I can check build pages uniquely like this : https://launchpad.net/builders/+build/3910669
[14:55] <dobey> you just need the source id
[14:55] <dobey> which /may/ be the same as the build id you're talking about
[15:07] <shadeslayer> dobey: http://paste.kde.org/572228/raw/ does it nicely
[15:09] <dobey> shadeslayer: right; that'll give you everything currently building; if that's more what you wanted, than specific build ids, we could probably work out a nice little notifier script and shove it in lp:lptools if you'd like
[15:09] <shadeslayer> kinda
[15:09] <shadeslayer> this will have to do at the moment
[15:10] <shadeslayer> the developer specifies the PPA where he uploaded things, and I poll for Needs Building/Currently Building
[15:11] <shadeslayer> then you show a notification as soon as the build fails
[15:11] <shadeslayer> or succeeds for that matter
[17:56] <chrisccoulson> hmm, i'm getting this when trying to upload to a PPA:
[17:56] <chrisccoulson> Uploading firefox_17.0~b2+build1.orig.tar.bz2: 550 Requested action not taken: internal server error
[18:00] <chrisccoulson> ok, i can't download anything from ppa.launchpad.net either
[18:01] <chrisccoulson> well, not at any reasonable speed....
[18:12] <dobey> chrisccoulson: i have the same problem uploading to a ppa with a much smaller package even :-/
[18:13] <chrisccoulson> dobey, oh, i'm glad it's not just me then :)
[18:44] <shadeslayer> chrisccoulson: likewise here as wel
[18:44] <shadeslayer> trying to upload a 2 MB package
[18:44] <shadeslayer> uploading was *really* slow
[18:44] <shadeslayer> and then craps out :P
[19:01] <czajkowski> chrisccoulson: dobey shadeslayer asing elsehwere to see
[19:01] <shadeslayer> thx
[19:01] <czajkowski> np
[19:05] <czajkowski> chrisccoulson: dobey shadeslayer there was a little bigh higher than average load, but it's all normal now
[19:06] <shadeslayer> cool :)
[19:06]  * shadeslayer tries again
[19:06] <dobey> ah
[19:07] <shadeslayer> well ... upload speed is still crap, but let's see
[19:08] <LordOfTime> upload speed could be your end, just saying.
[19:08] <shadeslayer> right
[19:09]  * shadeslayer tries via VPS
[19:10] <shadeslayer>   Uploading kdevplatform_1.4.0.orig.tar.bz2: 550 Requested action not taken: internal server error
[19:10] <shadeslayer> N
[19:11] <shadeslayer> so still not fixed for me ( uploading via VPS )
[19:11] <LordOfTime> o.O
[19:11] <LordOfTime> ppa upload processor issue?
[19:11] <chrisccoulson> yeah, it's being investigated at the moment
[19:11]  * shadeslayer will wait
[19:28] <TheLordOfTime> any idea why an OpenID auth system would 403 on launchpad, even though they offer that as an auth option on a given site?
[20:37] <joey> sinzui: how often does the flag-expired-memberships script run? I thought it ran nightly with a 14 notice window. I ask because I think I should be getting expiry notices.
[20:38] <joey> and I'm not
[20:38] <sinzui> nightly is correct
[20:38] <joey> I might need to give it another day. I just realized today is 14 days
[20:39] <joey> so maybe I'll get something tonight
[21:28] <jelmer> hmm, my uploads to precise-proposed - despite an email confirming the upload - seem to be disappearing
[21:30] <zooko> Folks: this page doesn't have what I want to do which is "register my bug tracker or update the settings of my bug tracker in launchpad's worldview". https://help.launchpad.net/Bugs
[21:37] <zooko> Okay, I posted that as a question: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/211504
[21:53] <maxb> zooko: This may be what you want: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/bugtrackers/
[22:20] <terceiro> just got this in an email:
[22:20] <terceiro> Your message to <launchpad> was automatically rejected:
[22:20] <terceiro> Not enough disk space
[22:20] <terceiro> where should I report this?
[22:22] <wgrant> terceiro: When was that?
[22:22] <shadeslayer> dobey: wrote a script to keep polling the buildstate in a thread, but it's almost as if the build object doesn't get updated once a build is done
[22:23] <wgrant> jelmer: Is that still a problem?
[22:23] <MTecknology> ppa.launchpad.net has no ipv6 address... how am I supposed to add ppa repos to ipv6-only servers?
[22:24] <wgrant> MTecknology: You're not.
[22:24] <wgrant> Not yet.
[22:24] <jelmer> wgrant: is it a known issue?
[22:24] <wgrant> jelmer: No
[22:24] <MTecknology> :(
[22:25] <terceiro> wgrant: right now; original message sent at Wed, 17 Oct 2012 21:02:30, returned message at Wed, 17 Oct 2012 21:02:51 (all times UTC)
[22:25] <MTecknology> so I have to download the .debs to one system then upload from that system, and just keep watch of updates?
[22:25] <terceiro> wgrant: want message-ids?
[22:25] <terceiro> or headers?
[22:25] <wgrant> MTecknology: Pretty much
[22:26] <wgrant> MTecknology: Or proxy through an IPv4-capable host
[22:26] <MTecknology> I don't have any system that I could use for that..
[22:26] <MTecknology> hrm..... maybe one.....
[22:27] <wgrant> terceiro: There was an issue a couple of hours ago. Is it still happening?
[22:27] <wgrant> jelmer: Where exactly is it not showing up?
[22:28] <terceiro> wgrant: it was just this one message AFAICT
[22:28] <terceiro> can I just bounce it back?
[22:28] <wgrant> terceiro: That's what I'd try
[22:28] <wgrant> The issue wasn't around for long, and is resolved
[22:28] <wgrant> jelmer: I see a samba upload from you in Unapproved.
[22:28] <terceiro> wgrant: all right, thanks
[22:28] <wgrant> samba4, sorry
[22:28] <jelmer> wgrant: the build email claims that it is waiting for approval and provides a link https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/precise/+source/samba4/4.0.0~alpha18.dfsg1-4ubuntu3
[22:28] <jelmer> but that link gives me a 404 page
[22:29] <wgrant> jelmer: Right, it's waiting for approval
[22:29] <wgrant> An archive admins must approve all post-release uploads
[22:29] <jelmer> ah, now I see it in the unapproved queue too
[22:29] <wgrant> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/precise/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=
[22:29] <wgrant> Yeah
[22:30] <jelmer> it's just very confusing that it does provide that link in the email despite not yet being available.
[22:30] <jelmer> wgrant: thanks
[22:32]  * jelmer looks for a relevant bugreport
[22:33] <jelmer> bug 115078 seems related