| darkxst | jbicha, I suppose this is probably a bit much for an SRU? https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=683060#c71 | 00:11 |
|---|---|---|
| ubot5 | Gnome bug 683060 in lock-screen "Impossible to unlock screen if not using GDM" [Major,Resolved: fixed] | 00:11 |
| darkxst | I suppose we could get away with just the shell patch however | 00:12 |
| darkxst | this is the ubuntu bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1064354 | 00:13 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1064354 in gnome-shell (Ubuntu) "When running lightDM user locking doesnt work" [Undecided,Confirmed] | 00:13 |
| darkxst | jbicha, http://paste.ubuntu.com/1288183/, would this be more suitable for SRU (only patches gnome-shell, rather than 3 packages!) | 00:56 |
| darkxst | ricotz, is this ok for an SRU? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1064354 (this is my first attempt at one) | 06:26 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1064354 in gnome-shell (Ubuntu) "When running lightDM user locking doesnt work" [Undecided,Confirmed] | 06:26 |
| ricotz | darkxst, i guess you tested it, but the solution doesnt look that good though | 06:42 |
| darkxst | ricotz, yes I tested, and that was halfline's suggestion | 06:43 |
| ricotz | darkxst, wouldn't it be better to let dbus spawn the service | 06:44 |
| darkxst | the problem is its only needed for shell on lightdm | 06:45 |
| ricotz | meaning changing the flags to have the gnome-screensaver autostarted some lines later | 06:45 |
| darkxst | halfline said that wouldnt work | 06:46 |
| ricotz | why? | 06:46 |
| darkxst | http://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-screensaver/commit/?id=3365eec74643773d8d5aa92901b39bdc9496e19b | 06:47 |
| darkxst | <darkxst> is it safe to remove the DO_NOT_AUTO_START flag? | 06:47 |
| darkxst | <halfline> won't help | 06:47 |
| darkxst | <halfline> since http://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-screensaver/commit/?id=3365eec74643773d8d5aa92901b39bdc9496e19b | 06:48 |
| ricotz | dpkg -S org.gnome.ScreenSaver.service | 06:50 |
| ricotz | gnome-screensaver: /usr/share/dbus-1/services/org.gnome.ScreenSaver.service | 06:50 |
| ricotz | it is still there though | 06:51 |
| ricotz | darkxst, 05_dbus_service.patch is adding it back in | 06:53 |
| ricotz | * debian/patches/05_dbus_service.patch: | 06:53 |
| ricotz | - restore the dbus service that upstream dropped | 06:53 |
| ricotz | in 3.2.0-1ubuntu1 | 06:53 |
| ricotz | so if this is going to an ubuntu patch for gnome-shell then the relying on dbus seems better | 06:55 |
| ricotz | or should your patch go upstream? | 06:55 |
| darkxst | yeh my patch will go upstream | 06:58 |
| ricotz | darkxst, ok, you probably want to follow this https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide/PatchSystems#Patch_Tagging_Guidelines | 07:07 |
| ricotz | to clean up the patch header | 07:07 |
| ricotz | http://bugzilla-attachments.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=226790 | 07:10 |
| ricotz | keep the blank line in the imports and add a blank line after the spawn | 07:10 |
| ricotz | http://paste.debian.net/plain/201741 | 07:11 |
| darkxst | add them to the upstream patch header or both | 07:11 |
| ricotz | i noticed the proposed patch after it, which includes a bug reference | 07:12 |
| ricotz | so using the "git format-patch" is fine too | 07:13 |
| darkxst | oh ok, although sometimes they don't apply cleanly to ubuntu version | 07:18 |
| ricotz | using the git patches directly is the best way imo since it includes all needed information | 07:20 |
| ricotz | fixing fuzz if needed is easy enough | 07:20 |
| darkxst | ok, so I updated the debdiff to use the git patch | 07:25 |
| ricotz | darkxst, ok | 07:26 |
| ricotz | no need to use UNRELEASED here | 07:27 |
| ricotz | use quantal-proposed | 07:27 |
| ricotz | gnome-shell (3.6.1-0ubuntu1.1) quantal-proposed; urgency=low | 07:27 |
| darkxst | 1.1 or 2? | 07:27 |
| ricotz | i would go with 1.1 | 07:28 |
| ricotz | which is the preferred policy irc | 07:28 |
| darkxst | a policy which seems to change depending on packages ;) | 07:32 |
| darkxst | anyway updated | 07:32 |
| ricotz | good | 07:35 |
| darkxst | well that or jbicha has just been tweaking my changelogs with out saying anything. | 07:37 |
| darkxst | ricotz, anyway thanks for you help | 07:38 |
| darkxst | I don't suppose you can upload it for me? | 07:41 |
| darkxst | anyway dinner time here... | 07:49 |
| ricotz | sorry, i can't upload it | 09:38 |
| darkxst | ricotz, np, will get jbicha onto it when he wakes up | 09:58 |
| everaldo | looks like we have a problem to burn to USB | 11:08 |
| * everaldo investigating | 11:08 | |
| everaldo | btw, http://www.webupd8.org/2012/10/prefer-gnome-shell-download-ubuntu.html | 11:08 |
| L3mce | Hello... This is the UGR channel? | 13:37 |
| L3mce | I am fairly adept at creating debian based install isos. I had read that there were difficulties and would like to know if I can help. | 13:38 |
| jbicha | https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-gnome-dev/+junk/iso-build-script | 13:40 |
| jbicha | L3mce: I believe our script basically does what it needs to but there's likely still room for improvement | 13:41 |
| L3mce | I can make it jibe with Startup Disk Creator if it is not currently. | 13:41 |
| L3mce | I just heard about the project this morning, so I am still catching up to where you are. | 13:41 |
| jbicha | ah, I think the Startup Disk Creator problems are because Startup Disk Creator is broken in Quantal | 13:42 |
| jbicha | it works fine in Precise though | 13:42 |
| L3mce | Oh, great... | 13:42 |
| L3mce | Ok then... I will just go at bugs. | 13:43 |
| * L3mce is a dev for linuxmce | 13:43 | |
| jbicha | it did take me a few months to figure out how building an iso worked which meant that this release cycle was a bit short but it worked out ok | 13:45 |
| L3mce | Well I will load it up and see how we both go at it. If there are any things you want it doing that it is not, let me know. Otherwise I will just look. | 13:48 |
| jbicha | well for instance when I published yesterday I had to manually copy the filesytem.manifest and create the torrent | 13:52 |
| jbicha | those 2 steps should be easy to add to the script | 13:52 |
| L3mce | Yours is very lean and mean. Ours is a bit of a monster as we pre-install most of the system... but we are an appliance, not a distro... so we have a lot of plumbing to install before people stick their grubby fingers in it. | 13:59 |
| L3mce | nice job :) /me was really hoping he could help more there... | 14:02 |
| jbicha | yeah, we're trying to do all the configuration stuff & patching in Ubuntu itself | 14:02 |
| jbicha | well I didn't write the original script and I'm not the only one that's been maintaining it | 14:02 |
| L3mce | after we do a build we create a dd image with our needs http://svn.linuxmce.org/trac.cgi/browser/people/posde/image.sh and then create the iso after shoving a lot of stuff around http://svn.linuxmce.org/trac.cgi/browser/people/l3mce/lmcemaster.sh | 14:07 |
| L3mce | we are also using the mirrors scheme, because it just seemed easiest. eg deb mirror://mirrors.ubuntu.com/mirrors.txt $DISTRO main restricted universe multiverset deb mirror://mirrors.ubuntu.com/mirrors.txt $DISTRO main restricted universe multiverse | 14:09 |
| L3mce | sorry for the double tap there. | 14:10 |
| jbicha | ah ok, we just piggy back off ubiquity (Ubuntu's installer) which handles that for us | 14:11 |
| jbicha | logging off for a bit | 14:12 |
| L3mce | we use a central core and pxe boot everything else, so this way when folks install it is 90% there, and we just detect and install for GPUs etc, and the diskless stuff is allready packaged and plug n play... | 14:12 |
| L3mce | ok... will look more where I can help. have a good one. | 14:12 |
| smartboyhw | jbicha, congrats on the final release of UGR 12.10 ! | 15:10 |
| TheLordOfTime | so is UGR official in 12.10? | 17:14 |
| TheLordOfTime | i.e. is it an official derivative :P | 17:14 |
| jbicha | TheLordOfTime: no | 17:16 |
| TheLordOfTime | when's that happening :p | 17:16 |
| TheLordOfTime | ... damn... i broke it... | 17:16 |
| * TheLordOfTime goes to fix php5 again | 17:17 | |
| jbicha | well we have to ask first | 17:18 |
| jbicha | https://wiki.ubuntu.com/RecognizedFlavors | 17:18 |
| jbicha | darkxst: VBox 4.2.2 supports xorg 1.13, now we just have to figure out how to backport that to quantal | 18:28 |
| darkxst | jbicha, so we probably need to update the entire vbox packages, but quantal is still on 4.1.x | 19:30 |
| darkxst | so probably a major update | 19:30 |
| darkxst | jbicha, can you upload this? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1064354 | 19:32 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1064354 in gnome-shell (Ubuntu) "When running lightDM user locking doesnt work" [Undecided,Confirmed] | 19:32 |
| jbicha | uh, that will be fun, FFe https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FreezeExceptionProcess | 19:32 |
| jbicha | (for a new major version of vbox I mean) | 19:32 |
| jbicha | darkxst: yes but I won't get to it today | 19:35 |
| darkxst | ok thats fine | 19:35 |
| darkxst | have you had any trouble with current vbox on Q (apart from the guest additions) | 19:37 |
| jbicha | I've actually been using virt-manager these days | 19:43 |
| jbicha | I got tired of the vbox bugs and wanted to experience the virt-manager bugs instead :) | 19:43 |
| darkxst | lol, I gave up on vbox several years ago | 19:45 |
| darkxst | but when I did still use it, I was always running the packages of vbox repo | 19:55 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!