[00:11] jbicha, I suppose this is probably a bit much for an SRU? https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=683060#c71 [00:11] Gnome bug 683060 in lock-screen "Impossible to unlock screen if not using GDM" [Major,Resolved: fixed] [00:12] I suppose we could get away with just the shell patch however [00:13] this is the ubuntu bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1064354 [00:13] Ubuntu bug 1064354 in gnome-shell (Ubuntu) "When running lightDM user locking doesnt work" [Undecided,Confirmed] [00:56] jbicha, http://paste.ubuntu.com/1288183/, would this be more suitable for SRU (only patches gnome-shell, rather than 3 packages!) [06:26] ricotz, is this ok for an SRU? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1064354 (this is my first attempt at one) [06:26] Ubuntu bug 1064354 in gnome-shell (Ubuntu) "When running lightDM user locking doesnt work" [Undecided,Confirmed] [06:42] darkxst, i guess you tested it, but the solution doesnt look that good though [06:43] ricotz, yes I tested, and that was halfline's suggestion [06:44] darkxst, wouldn't it be better to let dbus spawn the service [06:45] the problem is its only needed for shell on lightdm [06:45] meaning changing the flags to have the gnome-screensaver autostarted some lines later [06:46] halfline said that wouldnt work [06:46] why? [06:47] http://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-screensaver/commit/?id=3365eec74643773d8d5aa92901b39bdc9496e19b [06:47] is it safe to remove the DO_NOT_AUTO_START flag? [06:47] won't help [06:48] <halfline> since http://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-screensaver/commit/?id=3365eec74643773d8d5aa92901b39bdc9496e19b [06:50] dpkg -S org.gnome.ScreenSaver.service [06:50] gnome-screensaver: /usr/share/dbus-1/services/org.gnome.ScreenSaver.service [06:51] it is still there though [06:53] darkxst, 05_dbus_service.patch is adding it back in [06:53] * debian/patches/05_dbus_service.patch: [06:53] - restore the dbus service that upstream dropped [06:53] in 3.2.0-1ubuntu1 [06:55] so if this is going to an ubuntu patch for gnome-shell then the relying on dbus seems better [06:55] or should your patch go upstream? [06:58] yeh my patch will go upstream [07:07] darkxst, ok, you probably want to follow this https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide/PatchSystems#Patch_Tagging_Guidelines [07:07] to clean up the patch header [07:10] http://bugzilla-attachments.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=226790 [07:10] keep the blank line in the imports and add a blank line after the spawn [07:11] http://paste.debian.net/plain/201741 [07:11] add them to the upstream patch header or both [07:12] i noticed the proposed patch after it, which includes a bug reference [07:13] so using the "git format-patch" is fine too [07:18] oh ok, although sometimes they don't apply cleanly to ubuntu version [07:20] using the git patches directly is the best way imo since it includes all needed information [07:20] fixing fuzz if needed is easy enough [07:25] ok, so I updated the debdiff to use the git patch [07:26] darkxst, ok [07:27] no need to use UNRELEASED here [07:27] use quantal-proposed [07:27] gnome-shell (3.6.1-0ubuntu1.1) quantal-proposed; urgency=low [07:27] 1.1 or 2? [07:28] i would go with 1.1 [07:28] which is the preferred policy irc [07:32] a policy which seems to change depending on packages ;) [07:32] anyway updated [07:35] good [07:37] well that or jbicha has just been tweaking my changelogs with out saying anything. [07:38] ricotz, anyway thanks for you help [07:41] I don't suppose you can upload it for me? [07:49] anyway dinner time here... [09:38] sorry, i can't upload it [09:58] ricotz, np, will get jbicha onto it when he wakes up [11:08] looks like we have a problem to burn to USB [11:08] * everaldo investigating [11:08] btw, http://www.webupd8.org/2012/10/prefer-gnome-shell-download-ubuntu.html [13:37] Hello... This is the UGR channel? [13:38] I am fairly adept at creating debian based install isos. I had read that there were difficulties and would like to know if I can help. [13:40] https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-gnome-dev/+junk/iso-build-script [13:41] L3mce: I believe our script basically does what it needs to but there's likely still room for improvement [13:41] I can make it jibe with Startup Disk Creator if it is not currently. [13:41] I just heard about the project this morning, so I am still catching up to where you are. [13:42] ah, I think the Startup Disk Creator problems are because Startup Disk Creator is broken in Quantal [13:42] it works fine in Precise though [13:42] Oh, great... [13:43] Ok then... I will just go at bugs. [13:43] * L3mce is a dev for linuxmce [13:45] it did take me a few months to figure out how building an iso worked which meant that this release cycle was a bit short but it worked out ok [13:48] Well I will load it up and see how we both go at it. If there are any things you want it doing that it is not, let me know. Otherwise I will just look. [13:52] well for instance when I published yesterday I had to manually copy the filesytem.manifest and create the torrent [13:52] those 2 steps should be easy to add to the script [13:59] Yours is very lean and mean. Ours is a bit of a monster as we pre-install most of the system... but we are an appliance, not a distro... so we have a lot of plumbing to install before people stick their grubby fingers in it. [14:02] nice job :) /me was really hoping he could help more there... [14:02] yeah, we're trying to do all the configuration stuff & patching in Ubuntu itself [14:02] well I didn't write the original script and I'm not the only one that's been maintaining it [14:07] after we do a build we create a dd image with our needs http://svn.linuxmce.org/trac.cgi/browser/people/posde/image.sh and then create the iso after shoving a lot of stuff around http://svn.linuxmce.org/trac.cgi/browser/people/l3mce/lmcemaster.sh [14:09] we are also using the mirrors scheme, because it just seemed easiest. eg deb mirror://mirrors.ubuntu.com/mirrors.txt $DISTRO main restricted universe multiverset deb mirror://mirrors.ubuntu.com/mirrors.txt $DISTRO main restricted universe multiverse [14:10] sorry for the double tap there. [14:11] ah ok, we just piggy back off ubiquity (Ubuntu's installer) which handles that for us [14:12] logging off for a bit [14:12] we use a central core and pxe boot everything else, so this way when folks install it is 90% there, and we just detect and install for GPUs etc, and the diskless stuff is allready packaged and plug n play... [14:12] ok... will look more where I can help. have a good one. [15:10] jbicha, congrats on the final release of UGR 12.10 ! [17:14] so is UGR official in 12.10? [17:14] i.e. is it an official derivative :P [17:16] TheLordOfTime: no [17:16] when's that happening :p [17:16] ... damn... i broke it... [17:17] * TheLordOfTime goes to fix php5 again [17:18] well we have to ask first [17:18] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/RecognizedFlavors [18:28] darkxst: VBox 4.2.2 supports xorg 1.13, now we just have to figure out how to backport that to quantal [19:30] jbicha, so we probably need to update the entire vbox packages, but quantal is still on 4.1.x [19:30] so probably a major update [19:32] jbicha, can you upload this? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1064354 [19:32] Ubuntu bug 1064354 in gnome-shell (Ubuntu) "When running lightDM user locking doesnt work" [Undecided,Confirmed] [19:32] uh, that will be fun, FFe https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FreezeExceptionProcess [19:32] (for a new major version of vbox I mean) [19:35] darkxst: yes but I won't get to it today [19:35] ok thats fine [19:37] have you had any trouble with current vbox on Q (apart from the guest additions) [19:43] I've actually been using virt-manager these days [19:43] I got tired of the vbox bugs and wanted to experience the virt-manager bugs instead :) [19:45] lol, I gave up on vbox several years ago [19:55] but when I did still use it, I was always running the packages of vbox repo