phillw | infinity: yeah, a glass of wine / beer & a chillax with sleep will do everyone good :) | 00:36 |
---|---|---|
xnox | phillw: I dislike encouragements of alcohol consumption. | 01:05 |
phillw | so do I.. but I dislike encouragements of respinning the world ~ 24 hours before a release... we can't win them all :P | 01:07 |
xnox | phillw: not the world, just a couple of images. | 01:09 |
ScottK | So I accept two and then I upload two ... | 04:08 |
SpamapS | ScottK: the neverending SRUqueuee.... it goes on and on and on | 05:11 |
ScottK | You could help that by accepting my postfix SRUs ... | 05:11 |
ScottK | :-) | 05:12 |
* micahg is reminded he promised to sponsor another SRU | 05:12 | |
SpamapS | ScottK: I will do an aggressive SRU run if I can find time next week. Otherwise, the queue will likely get nice and long until post UDS | 05:14 |
ScottK | Here I am trying to show your server users how responsive the system is to issues ... | 05:14 |
* micahg is trying to keep backports chugging along | 05:17 | |
lamont | 2 | 05:24 |
lamont | meh | 05:24 |
obounaim | Good morning | 06:20 |
=== tkamppeter_ is now known as tkamppeter | ||
=== henrix_ is now known as henrix | ||
infinity | cjwatson: So, we don't really have anything to upload just yet, but are we ready for me to inject chroots? | 08:34 |
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
=== mmrazik is now known as mmrazik|lunch | ||
cjwatson | infinity: Yeah, please do - I think doko has some bits | 09:44 |
infinity | cjwatson: Doing. | 09:44 |
infinity | cjwatson: Alright, should be done. I should throw a base-files at it to test it. | 09:49 |
infinity | cjwatson: Oh, lolz, also your efi bits got dumped in raring/unapproved by IFP. | 09:51 |
infinity | cjwatson: I guess that makes sense, since we've already seen that with copies. | 09:51 |
cjwatson | infinity: Yeah, actually by the first publisher run | 09:54 |
cjwatson | infinity: We almost explodificated the world by not following NewReleaseCycleProcess and stopping the publisher before setting raring to FROZEN | 09:54 |
infinity | cjwatson: Yeah, I caught that in scrollback. Sorry about that, didn't think about the consequences. | 09:55 |
cjwatson | (Also, that stuff landing in unapproved is another symptom of the "UEFI copies within same archive shouldn't require re-approval" bug.) | 09:55 |
cjwatson | (Which I should probably file and fix.) | 09:55 |
infinity | cjwatson: Right, that's what I assumed. | 09:56 |
* cjwatson files bug 1068558 for that | 10:19 | |
ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1068558 in launchpad "UEFI copies within same archive shouldn't require re-approval" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1068558 | 10:19 |
babyface_ | a lot of chinese user are complaining for this issue, can anybody take care of it? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/language-selector/+bug/1043031 | 10:23 |
ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1043031 in language-selector "fontconfig-voodoo is not included in language-selector-common" [Undecided,Confirmed] | 10:23 |
* cjwatson requests translations opening (NRCP step 16) | 10:28 | |
cjwatson | babyface_: fontconfig-voodoo was intentionally removed because (I'm told) fontconfig itself should automatically take care of it | 10:28 |
cjwatson | As I said in that bug | 10:29 |
cjwatson | babyface_: If it's not doing the right thing, ask the desktop team | 10:29 |
cjwatson | It's not a matter for the release team | 10:29 |
babyface_ | cjwatson, ack. thanks. | 10:29 |
cjwatson | And, you know, I asked on that bug for more information nearly a month ago and then there was radio silence until an hour ago ... | 10:30 |
cjwatson | (Not that I'm even on the desktop team) | 10:30 |
babyface_ | cjwatson, sorry for that. I will verify it, and talk to desktop team if needed. thanks. | 10:33 |
=== mmrazik|lunch is now known as mmrazik | ||
cjwatson | updated britney for raring (NRCP #17) | 10:43 |
cjwatson | updated merge-o-matic for raring (NRCP #18) | 10:44 |
cjwatson | hmm, MoM seems to have stopped again, better investigate that ... | 10:45 |
cjwatson | I wonder how the Debian jikespg maintainer managed to upload something with a different .orig.tar.gz! | 10:47 |
cjwatson | oh well, MoM hopefully unstuck | 10:48 |
=== doko_ is now known as doko | ||
doko | can I copy my gcc-4.7 stuff? | 10:51 |
cjwatson | err, apparently I may have been economical with the truth when I said the publisher was back on. It is now ... | 10:52 |
cjwatson | doko: go ahead | 10:52 |
cjwatson | (feel free to accept your own; raring is only frozen to ensure that only the toolchain goes in, not because we need to control anything | 11:07 |
cjwatson | ) | 11:07 |
=== henrix is now known as henrix_ | ||
=== henrix_ is now known as henrix | ||
rtg | now that the release carnage is somewhat abated, can I get an AA to NEW linux-lts-quantal and linux-meta-lts-quantal in the Precise queue ? | 13:23 |
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
infinity | rtg: I'll get there shortly. | 14:33 |
infinity | rtg: After I eat my lunch. ;) | 14:33 |
rtg | infinity, thanks. no rush, just wanted to make sure they didn't get forgotten. | 14:34 |
TheLordOfTime | was 2d unity removed from Q? | 14:49 |
ScottK | TheLordOfTime: #ubuntu-desktop | 14:52 |
tumbleweed | (and, yes) | 14:52 |
bdmurray | Being the "new guy" on the SRU team - when does the team take charge of the quantal proposed queue? | 15:22 |
ScottK | At release. | 15:22 |
ScottK | At least that's when I quit caring when I wasn't on both teams .... | 15:24 |
infinity | bdmurray: What ScottK said, with a logical tautology of "stuff in -proposed is an SRU when it's an SRU" which is, yes, after release. | 15:33 |
cjwatson | So, britney is actually not looking hopelessly terrible | 16:09 |
cjwatson | I have it able to run over a hypothetical natty-proposed -> natty, and it takes maybe five minutes or so in all and produces output that looks pretty plausible | 16:09 |
cjwatson | Now, I still need to write something that takes its output and turns it into an Archive.copyPackages call (or maybe actually a load of individual Archive.copyPackage calls, since we probably want to be quite careful about versions) | 16:11 |
cjwatson | I'll think about that parenthesis a bit | 16:11 |
cjwatson | Also my changes to the Debian code are currently fairly brutal and disorganised | 16:11 |
cjwatson | But this is looking promising for having it able to work by sometime next week | 16:12 |
infinity | We want to be careful about versions, we also want to be careful about getting it in one transaction, or we just lollerskated away half the reason to use britney. | 16:12 |
cjwatson | Well | 16:12 |
cjwatson | The perfect shouldn't be the enemy of the good here | 16:12 |
cjwatson | Archive.copyPackages doesn't give any kind of transactional assurance | 16:12 |
infinity | True, but getting half in before a publisher run, and half after will create half an hour of messy. | 16:12 |
cjwatson | It just creates lots of jobs | 16:12 |
cjwatson | Right, but no worse in general that it would've been without britney | 16:13 |
infinity | True, true. | 16:13 |
infinity | Maybe it needs an XXX: FIXME on it, then. :P | 16:13 |
cjwatson | It would certainly be nice to be able to copy everything in a giant transaction | 16:13 |
cjwatson | But I suspect that attempting to do that right now would make LP explode | 16:14 |
cjwatson | Perhaps instead of processing the heidi output (a full dump of what the target suite ought to look like) I should process the update_output text | 16:14 |
cjwatson | That would tend to result in a series of incrementally sane changes | 16:14 |
infinity | Well, even a publisher "transaction"... Though, after carefully removing everything that hack lock contentions with the publisher, intentionally adding one seems bad. | 16:15 |
cjwatson | Not perfect in cases of loops, but it would optimise | 16:15 |
infinity | s/hack/had/ | 16:15 |
cjwatson | I think this approach would be a pretty good first cut, and we can talk with LP folks about how we might come up with safer interfaces | 16:16 |
* infinity nods. | 16:17 | |
cjwatson | The number of copies involved will tend to be limited by buildd performance, so we shouldn't be DoSing the PCJ queue in the same way that auto-sync does (or did, before I made manual copies take precedence) | 16:17 |
infinity | I agree that half an hour of potential installability oopses probably isn't world ending. | 16:17 |
cjwatson | Well, the way I'd put it is reducing the probability of such events from very high to rather low. | 16:18 |
cjwatson | As opposed to zero. | 16:18 |
infinity | Though, the contention that it's "not worse than before" may not be entirely true, cause if we have a snag all moving at once, those would have previously snagged one at a time based on build-deps. Maybe. | 16:18 |
* infinity shrugs. | 16:18 | |
infinity | We'll see. | 16:18 |
cjwatson | There may be individual situations that get worse; my contention is that it will be on average significantly better, even without transactionality :) | 16:18 |
infinity | Yes, on average, it should be an improvement. We're in raging agreement. | 16:19 |
cjwatson | Excellent. | 16:19 |
bdmurray | if I do the sru verification of bug 1068389 is that sufficient to get it out soon or should it see more testing? | 16:35 |
ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1068389 in ubuntu-release-upgrader "P->Q - do-release-upgrade crashed with UnicodeEncodeError: 'ascii' codec can't encode character u'\xbb' in position 1: ordinal not in range(128) in DistUpgrade/DistUpgradeViewText.py", line 143, in showInPager" [Critical,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1068389 | 16:35 |
cjwatson | Hmm, perhaps I want an equivalent of Archive.copyPackage that uses the MASS_SYNC copy policy | 16:44 |
cjwatson | Because I want version control, but I also want to avoid lots of mail spam | 16:44 |
cjwatson | OTOH ... maybe what I want is "send mail as if this had been a direct upload to the release pocket" | 16:45 |
cjwatson | maybe this needs to be a new copy policy | 16:45 |
infinity | bdmurray: Given the nature of the bug, if it's tested to be an improvement, go ahead and release it, IMO. | 16:45 |
cjwatson | oh, notify() has its own auto-sync handling, I think | 16:46 |
infinity | cjwatson: "Send a mail as if this had been a direct upload..." is what we do currently on pocket copies, isn't it? | 16:46 |
cjwatson | Bet it doesn't work for copies | 16:46 |
cjwatson | infinity: Except for the ways in which it differs | 16:46 |
infinity | cjwatson: Heh. | 16:46 |
cjwatson | I'll need to check in more detail, but I believe that: (a) it sometimes has different recipients; (b) it will notify about auto-syncs | 16:47 |
cjwatson | I might be wrong about (b) | 16:47 |
cjwatson | Actually, it might work if I pretend that all the copies are sponsored for katie | 16:50 |
cjwatson | This isn't a hacky system at all | 16:50 |
infinity | Wait, we still special-case katie? | 16:51 |
cjwatson | Oh yes | 16:51 |
infinity | There aren't enough palms for my face. | 16:51 |
cjwatson | auto-syncs are all sponsored for katie | 16:51 |
cjwatson | It's what makes them not send giant amounts of mail | 16:51 |
infinity | Well, yeah, I knew there was a hack in play, I just didn't realise it was still that. | 16:52 |
cjwatson | It inhibits upload notifications and translation import error notifications; I think those are its only purposes | 16:52 |
cjwatson | Hm, I'll need different output from britney anyway to get hold of the exact versions | 17:17 |
=== henrix is now known as henrix_ | ||
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
bdmurray | slangasek: I'd like to add ubuntu-release-upgrader to -updates early | 20:40 |
bdmurray | slangasek: see bug 1068389 | 20:40 |
ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1068389 in ubuntu-release-upgrader "P->Q - do-release-upgrade crashed with UnicodeEncodeError: 'ascii' codec can't encode character u'\xbb' in position 1: ordinal not in range(128) in DistUpgrade/DistUpgradeViewText.py", line 143, in showInPager" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1068389 | 20:40 |
slangasek | bdmurray: while it doesn't seem terribly urgent to me (affected users can always either restart the upgrader and not ask for details, or wait for the fix before upgrading), I also don't think we'll get much further feedback on it by letting it cook in -proposed, so ack | 20:43 |
bdmurray | slangasek: it does leave your sources.list at quantal instead of precise | 20:43 |
slangasek | ah | 20:44 |
slangasek | bdmurray: urgency explained - so double ack :) | 20:44 |
slangasek | bdmurray: maybe that program should be wrapped in a generic exception handler to roll things back on crash? | 20:45 |
slangasek | (roll back && reraise) | 20:45 |
slangasek | unrelated to the current SRU obviously | 20:45 |
bdmurray | do you know how long it'll take for the dist-upgrader in -updates to show up? | 20:53 |
slangasek | assuming that's done automatically by the publisher, should be ~30 minutes | 20:54 |
stgraber | ^ marked quantal as released, archived all the quantal and 12.04.1 milestones, added raring daily and kept precise daily | 22:12 |
stgraber | so the tracker should be ready for the first raring daily builds | 22:12 |
* stgraber adds a work item to make it easier to access archived series | 22:15 | |
slangasek | raring is quickly achieving semantic satiation for me | 22:29 |
slangasek | I think future release codenames should be chosen to guard against this | 22:29 |
ScottK | I think future code names should be announced before final freeze so we can make the tools aware. | 22:30 |
slangasek | that too | 22:31 |
infinity | I think when we run out of alphabet, our next naming scheme should be "reusing the codenames of other distributions", just to confuse people. | 22:34 |
infinity | And then see how long it takes for someone to make a crack about woody beefy miracles. | 22:35 |
stgraber | that or continue with utf-8 and see how many tools and other websites we can get to crash | 22:35 |
infinity | I don't know any animals or adjectives that start with ☭ | 22:36 |
infinity | In Communist Russia, release codenames blog about you? | 22:37 |
slangasek | ☭-cell-anemic ☭head shark | 22:37 |
slangasek | obvs | 22:37 |
xnox | infinity: slangasek: wait... is that not a little head and beak of a bird possibly dove?! | 22:42 |
ScottK | There's a reason we switched to version numbering from version names in backports revisions ... | 22:42 |
ScottK | As long as the calendar moves forward we've got several decades to figure out the next plan. | 22:42 |
slangasek | xnox: yes, isn't that the Latvian official bird? | 22:42 |
skaet | thanks stgraber | 22:42 |
xnox | slangasek: yes, it is. They taught us that in school. Strangely all the history text books were published in 1992. | 22:42 |
* skaet has moved hopefully all the quantal ref's to raring in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ArchiveAdministration | 22:42 | |
infinity | Not sure that was necessary. They were examples that used to date all the way back to... Forever ago. | 22:42 |
skaet | infinity, its a step in the process (was a link to raring-changes that needed updating, rest cosmetic, I agree). | 22:57 |
ScottK | ^^^ is already an accepted SRU in quantal, so just to make sure it's not forgotten ... | 23:46 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!