[00:06] akgraner: sure [00:06] akgraner: what do you need to know? [00:07] bkerensa, so...are in you in the news team channel - let's move this there since it's about creating an ebook version of UWN [00:07] ok [00:54] Can I get a RT? https://twitter.com/bkerensa/status/259457124705382401 [00:56] bkerensa: RT done [00:56] cprofitt: thx [00:56] I did some work with them a while back [18:46] mhall119: a small bug on summit http://summit.ubuntu.com/uds-r/attend_meeting/21213/ [18:46] "If you feel that your participation is required for this topic, please contact David Planella or David Planella, otherwise, please select one of the options above." [18:54] would a "if drafter = track lead then show track lead, else show drafter, track lead" work? [18:55] yes [18:56] let me check if I can do that [18:56] one sec [18:57] daker: thanks for spotting that [18:57] :) [18:57] daker: can you please report the bug? [18:58] sure one sec [19:01] mhall119: how can I get a blueprint ID? [19:03] plus, I'm getting an error here: http://summit.joseeantonior.com:8000/openid/login/?next=/ [19:04] bug #1069174 [19:04] Launchpad bug 1069174 in Summit "Display only the track lead if the he is also the drafter" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1069174 [19:12] JoseeAntonioR: we get them from the Launchpad import, it's part of the XML [19:22] JoseeAntonioR: bug #1050947 has been fixed [19:22] Launchpad bug 1050947 in Summit "Traceback from logging into Summit" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1050947 [19:40] mhall119: can you please review my MP? So I can just re-branch [19:57] daker: around? [19:58] sure [19:58] JoseeAntonioR: ^ [19:58] daker: do you think you can login at summit.joseeantonior.com and help me test in a sec? [19:59] JoseeAntonioR: logged [19:59] thanks [19:59] :) [20:00] daker: think you can create a meeting? [20:01] JoseeAntonioR: the Actions box is empty [20:01] ok, one sec [20:02] li.propose { [20:02] display: none; [20:02] } [20:03] what about now? [20:03] or give me a sec [20:04] JoseeAntonioR: http://summit.joseeantonior.com:8000/uds-r/meeting/3/meeting-test-by-daker/ [20:05] let's confirm [20:05] bkerensa: how active us the Oregon loco team IRC channel? [20:06] I have a friend up there trying Ubuntu for the first time, might need some tech support [20:07] ok, bug solved, let me push the branch [20:15] mhall119: done a MP to fix the bug daker just spotted [20:23] JoseeAntonioR: link? [20:24] https://code.launchpad.net/~joseeantonior/summit/1069174-fix/+merge/130682 [20:24] nvm, got it in email [20:25] JoseeAntonioR: should that use a double-equal? [20:25] erm, not sure about that [20:25] but it works with one equal [20:26] I can test that if you want [20:26] does it display both names when they are different? [20:26] yes, it does [20:27] http://summit.joseeantonior.com:8000/uds-r/attend_meeting/3/ and http://summit.joseeantonior.com:8000/uds-r/attend_meeting/1/ prove that [20:27] hmm, I can't see because it doesn't have me listed as attending [20:29] login and i'll take care of that in a sec [20:30] does it work now? [20:31] yup, looks good [20:31] approved [20:31] great, thanks [20:31] mhall119: drafter and approver are "Attendee" instance, right ? [20:32] right [20:32] but i don't see name attribute here https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~summit-hackers/summit/trunk/view/head:/summit/schedule/models/attendeemodel.py#L35 [20:33] hmm, well, in the admin page, when you see the atendee list, it displays user, email, first name, and last name [20:34] yes those are the User attributes [20:34] for me it will be : [20:35] {% if meeting.drafter.user.username = meeting.approver.user.username %} [20:35] right mhall119 ? [20:36] don't think so, as that would display "please contact daker or joseeantonior" instead of "please contact Adnane Belmadiaf or José Antonio Rey" [20:37] ah ok ok name attribute is there https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~summit-hackers/summit/trunk/view/head:/summit/schedule/models/attendeemodel.py#L134 [20:37] yep [20:38] so it's correct [20:47] JoseeAntonioR: you don't have to set bug to "Fixed commited", once someone approves you MP, tarmac which is a small bot we use will merge your code and mark the bug to "Fixed commited" automatically [20:47] oh, cool! [20:48] thanks [20:48] but tarmac needs you to fill the "commit message" in your MP [20:49] go https://code.launchpad.net/~joseeantonior/summit/1069174-fix/+merge/130682 and click "Set commit message" [20:49] yep, doing it now [20:50] done [20:50] tarmac runs every 30mins [20:51] great [20:52] Need a little help with signon code, but can't find any developers awake. Any advice? [20:52] brb [20:52] you mean SSO? [20:56] JoseeAntonioR: Not the ubuntu.com sso, but the ubuntu desktop sso, if you know what I mean. [21:04] doctormo-mou: Online Accounts? [21:05] doctormo-mou: what kind of help do you need? [21:05] mhall119: Got a new plugin and need to debug why it doesn't work with OAuth2, website prices two interfaces, draft10 and draft15 [21:05] provides* [21:08] I have no idea what you just said :( [21:08] are you trying to get an existing provider to connect? [21:08] or writing a new provider? [21:08] mhall119: write a new provider [21:09] I have the ./cc-credentials-application compiled, just need to switch on debugging somehow [21:09] I assume you have the API docs already then, that's really all the help I could have given [21:10] mhall119: I have only the Qt/Nokia docs. Are they the same? [21:16] mhall119: How would you enable debugging typically on a gnome app? [21:19] doctormo-mou: http://developer.ubuntu.com/resources/platform/api/12-10/ has 3 sets of docs [21:19] this may be different from the original Meego APIs [21:21] thanks for the link! [21:21] np [21:22] unfortunately I don't know of any written tutorials or explaning docs for these APIs yet [21:23] kenvandine might, I'll ask him on Monday [21:25] I think the key part is that I'm trying to make my provider (in vala) the same way as the existing ones are, made by mardy [21:26] But debugging... yikes, no information anywhere about how debugging works. If I didn't know better, I'd assume these developers got this code fully formed off a tree. [21:42] your developer never make mistakes, don't you know?