| === chronossc is now known as chronos | ||
| infinity | bjf: Did Andy muck something up with https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-lowlatency/+bug/1068866 or is there a reason the bot hasn't set the promote-to-proposed task as confirmed by now? | 09:12 |
|---|---|---|
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1068866 in linux-lowlatency "linux-lowlatency: 3.5.0-18.18 -proposed tracker" [Medium,In progress] | 09:12 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| wmp | hello, i want to use 3.6.2 kernel, but on this kenrel i have wrong resolution and i havent wifi. What i should doing to have wifi and good resolution? | 10:03 |
| bjf | infinity, shankbot doesn't like it, i'm debugging | 15:00 |
| bjf | infinity, i have fixed it enough that it set the promote-to-proposed task | 15:16 |
| infinity | bjf: Out of curiosity, was it something Andy (or I) screwed up, or was the bot just broken? | 15:18 |
| bjf | infinity, it was the bot | 15:18 |
| infinity | bjf: Kay, good to know. | 15:18 |
| bjf | infinity, for some reason, it is a "new" package that we are tracking | 15:18 |
| bjf | infinity, was andy doing tracking bugs for previous versions ? | 15:18 |
| infinity | Nope, this was the first time it got a derivative tracking bug. | 15:19 |
| infinity | Andy's only been doing uploads since quantal opened, which didn't have tracking bugs into it went stable, of course. | 15:19 |
| bjf | infinity, ok, there is that plus work done to support raring | 15:19 |
| bjf | infinity, we don't "officially" support that package do we? | 15:20 |
| infinity | Nope. | 15:20 |
| infinity | Just has tracking bugs for convenience. | 15:20 |
| infinity | We could probably cut the QA tasks on it down to just one quick smoketest. | 15:20 |
| infinity | Cause it's identical to the mainline, except for two patches, so really, we just want to know it installs/boots/reboots, and it's good enough. | 15:20 |
| bjf | infinity, so we _do_ want QA to test it (at least boot test it) ? | 15:21 |
| infinity | Yeah, probably that would be the Verification-testing task, the others (Cert and regression) could be auto-set to Invalid. | 15:22 |
| infinity | And security sign-off. | 15:22 |
| bjf | that seems close to being "supported" | 15:22 |
| cafetiere | bjf yeah i did it to not confuse as it was in the ppa, if i used it wrong do educate me :) | 15:22 |
| infinity | bjf: Nah, all SRUs require verification, even when they're not "supported". | 15:22 |
| bjf | cafetiere, the bot just didn't have any knowledge of that package, your usage was just fine | 15:23 |
| infinity | bjf: But "verification" is a long way off from the rigorous kernel QA we do, which is entirely unnecessary for this package. | 15:23 |
| bjf | yes, but given the amount of work QA is doing, asking them to test non-supported packages seems like i'll be asking to get punched by pgraner | 15:24 |
| infinity | bjf: Oh, no, I'm not implying that Canonical QA would be doing the Verification-testing, just that someone needs to do a quick smoketest. For some value of $someone. | 15:24 |
| bjf | ok, so "someone" will smoketest it and set the verification task. and that "someone" won't be QA | 15:25 |
| jtaylor | just out of curiosity, why are transparent huge pages not enabled in ubuntu by default? | 15:25 |
| infinity | bjf: If they key off that task for their own workflow, best to auto-set it to invalid too, and we can just set a verification-needed tag on the bug for someone to do normal SRU verification. | 15:25 |
| cafetiere | I'd like to see it held until master paasses or not if we can do thats | 15:25 |
| infinity | cafetiere: I'd be doing that anyway. | 15:26 |
| bjf | cafetiere, i'll ask herton to think about that | 15:26 |
| cafetiere | shankbot might be able to help there | 15:26 |
| infinity | But certainly, it would be cool if the bot did it for me, so I don't have to think. ;) | 15:26 |
| bjf | sounds like UDS fodder | 15:26 |
| cafetiere | bjf add it to the uds beer adgenda perhals | 15:27 |
| bjf | cafetiere, wfm | 15:27 |
| bjf | cafetiere, doing so now | 15:27 |
| cafetiere | thanms typing is hard enough on here | 15:29 |
| bjf | ack | 15:29 |
| * infinity almost forgot to process linux-signed in NEW... | 15:29 | |
| bjf | cafetiere, added to the agenda | 15:30 |
| wmp | hello | 15:33 |
| wmp | i need to use kernel 3.6.2 in 12.10, how to do it? I test mainline kernel and all work, but i havent wifi and good resolution | 15:33 |
| infinity | Define "need". | 15:38 |
| cafetiere | the only 3.6 kernels packaged are the mainline ones | 15:38 |
| wmp | infinity: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1068340/comments/16 | 15:39 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1068340 in linux "I havent second thread" [Medium,Confirmed] | 15:39 |
| jtaylor | apt-get source linux-image* in quantal points to the precise git, not quantals | 19:33 |
| apw | jtaylor, hmmm | 20:08 |
| apw | jtaylor, will get it fixed | 20:09 |
| jtaylor | thx | 20:11 |
| jtaylor | do you happen do know why transparent huge pages are not enabled by default in quantals kernel? | 20:12 |
| apw | jtaylor, hmmm nope, i thought they were on in P, so i'd expect they remain on | 20:39 |
| jtaylor | according to http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/configs/ they were never on | 20:40 |
| jtaylor | (only via madvise) | 20:41 |
| apw | hmmm actually, perhaps they were on, and then in P there might have been VM corruption issues, and off it went ... smb might remember | 20:41 |
| apw | jtaylor, | 21:15 |
| apw | jtaylor, http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1069204 <-- fix applied | 21:15 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1069204 in linux (Ubuntu Quantal) "[quantal] Vcs-git: points to precise" [Medium,Fix committed] | 21:15 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!