[00:20] <TheLordOfTime> anyone here know how to make a git server to hold git repositories on a local server installation?\
[00:21] <sarnold> TheLordOfTime: is 'gitolite' what you're looking for?
[00:23] <TheLordOfTime> perhaps
[00:23] <TheLordOfTime> i've never set up a git server before, so... *shrugs*
[00:24] <sarnold> there's also git-daemon(1) .. hrm.
[00:28] <TheLordOfTime> hmm...
[00:29] <TheLordOfTime> help.ubuntu.com for git refers to a package removed from precise and later
[00:29] <TheLordOfTime> o.O
[00:29] <sarnold> was that gitosis? :)
[00:29] <TheLordOfTime> mhm
[00:31] <TheLordOfTime> i assume gitolite replaced it?
[00:33] <sarnold> I think so; at least, apt-cache search gitosis brings up gitolite. (Which is how I re-found it now, since I"m still not used to the name gitolite yet. :)
[00:34] <TheLordOfTime> perhaps i should follow the gitolite guide for setup/deployment? http://sitaramc.github.com/gitolite/qi.html
[00:34] <TheLordOfTime> !gitolite
[00:34] <TheLordOfTime> NO FACOITDS?
[00:35] <TheLordOfTime> figures
[00:40] <TheLordOfTime> i assume gitolite's package comes with some predefault setups, or at least asks you for things along the way for setup?
[00:41] <sarnold> one hopes the package has a reasonable debconf interface
[00:42] <TheLordOfTime> we can only hope
[00:42] <TheLordOfTime> but first, KERNEL UPGRADE
[00:42] <TheLordOfTime> WHAT FUN!
[00:42] <TheLordOfTime> >.>
[00:42] <sarnold> WHEE!
[00:42]  * TheLordOfTime picks up a sword and throws it at the repository server for being slow
[00:43] <andol> TheLordOfTime: Does it help?
[00:43] <TheLordOfTime> no.  but its definitely a way to get out the rage :P
[00:49] <TheLordOfTime> nnnope it has no debconf interface
[00:49] <TheLordOfTime> so it fails to install
[00:49] <TheLordOfTime> THAT'S A PACKAGE FAIL!
[00:49]  * TheLordOfTime condemns whoever packaged it to /dev/null for eternity
[00:52] <sarnold> nownow, they did save you the trouble of finding the upstream, selecting compilation defaults (if any), installing all the build-deps, and compiling it yourself.. :D
[00:54]  * TheLordOfTime glares at sarnold
[00:54] <sarnold> hehe
[00:54] <TheLordOfTime> i'm not sure whether you're looking to be the one to file the bug, or whether  you're just trying to be annoying
[00:55] <sarnold> more a mixture of helpful/annoying than outright annoying. :)
[00:55] <TheLordOfTime> there's a way to fix that
[00:55]  * TheLordOfTime grabs the electrified stick
[00:55] <sarnold> hehe
[00:55] <Tohuw> How can I obtain the files necessary to PXE boot Ubuntu 12.10?
[00:56] <TheLordOfTime> sarnold, oh i found a bug
[00:56] <TheLordOfTime> perhaps with apt-get, perhaps not
[00:56] <TheLordOfTime> sarnold, it has a debconf interface, but it doesn't run.   unless you do dpkg-reconfigure
[00:57] <TheLordOfTime> it doesn't run during apt-get install
[00:57] <sarnold> TheLordOfTime: I think that's configurable somewhere...
[00:57] <TheLordOfTime> it should be default :/
[00:58] <TheLordOfTime> meh,i'll fix it later
[01:00] <sarnold> TheLordOfTime: sudo dpkg-reconfigure debconf
[01:00] <sarnold> depending upon what priority you pick, that'll determine whether or not you're prompted for questions
[04:39] <TheLordOfTime> well regardless, the gitolite package is either incomplete or broken
[04:39] <TheLordOfTime> you can't clone the admin repo
[04:39] <TheLordOfTime> and you cant do things even if you follow its instructions
[04:39] <TheLordOfTime> so apparently, i'm going to have to go get  version 3 of gitolite
[04:39] <TheLordOfTime> (which isnt in precise, nor in quantal, or R)
[14:00] <drag0nius> what is preferred way to store iptables between sessions?
[15:25] <patdk-lap> drag0nz, what do you mean, between sessions?
[15:34] <stiv2k> samba is always a pain to setup :(
[20:38] <phizes> Hi, I'm setting up nfs with kerberos as per https://help.ubuntu.com/community/NFSv4Howto on Ubuntu 12.04, but does anyone have any documentation on how to mount the nfs share in Windows 7, and map windows users to Linux users?
[20:39] <phizes> I know it's more of a Windows question but not sure where to turn to find an answer, and so far windows documentation has been horrible to work with :-/
[20:41] <RoyK> phizes: idmapd and winbind should do it (IIRC)
[20:41] <RoyK> perhaps winbind isn't needed in a kerberos environment, but a bit unsure there
[20:41] <RoyK> idmapd works well, though
[20:42] <phizes> RoyK: Thank you, I will follow up on that
[20:43] <RoyK> I've used idmapd with openindiana for serving data over zfs/cifs (not samba), but I'm unsure about nfs+kerberos support on windows
[20:43] <RoyK> better use samba for windows connectivity - it'll probably save you a headache or two...
[20:48] <phizes> Afaik Windows 7 Ultimate has support for nfs and kerberos, it's mentioned in Windows documentation, but I can't find an example of how it is used, Samba is causing me problems currently for a few reasons, related to file permissions and somehow it's smb shares seem to be slow, Windows sharing files to another windows machine seems to be slower than Linux to Linux with nfs, so I was hoping to dodge a bullet or two and allow Windows users to
[20:49] <phizes> changing file permissions over a samba share seems to set ACL permissions which I have no idea how to deal with
[20:49] <tedski> in my experience, smb outperforms nfs with minimal tuning
[20:52] <phizes> tedski: large or small files? throughput wise or latency wise?
[20:54] <tedski> large and small files... throughput
[20:55] <tedski> i've never had latency issues on either, so i've never collected data
[20:59] <phizes> I'm mainly bothered by the latency issue, I mean it's not terrible, but nfs shares are definitely snappier on linux than the same directory through smb, on both linux and windows, though it may just be because I had set it up poorly, also we have a lot of power cuts and no UPS so I tend to skip anything which increases the chance of data loss in the case of a crash or outright power loss
[20:59] <RoyK> phizes: I'm not sure if samba supports windows' ACLs
[21:00] <RoyK> phizes: the reason I want to encourage samba over NFS, is that Windows usually sucks badly on non-windows protocols
[21:01] <phizes> RoyK: Naw, if a windows user changes the permissions of a file from the windows pc, the file in linux shows up as having an ACL associated to it, which I have nfi on how to edit
[21:01] <tedski> that's weird... i haven't seen that in my experiences
[21:01] <phizes> :S
[21:02] <tedski> i also wouldn't have any idea how to edit it
[21:02] <tedski> i know, i know, i'm not very helpful :/
[21:03] <phizes> RoyK: True, but the ability to edit unix file permissions from the
[21:03] <phizes> windows gui would be hoighly prized by my brother
[21:04] <tedski> you can do that
[21:04] <tedski> right click, properties, security
[21:05] <tedski> and you'll see the windows equiv of owner/group/all
[21:05] <phizes> tedski: over smb? because that is exactly what is creating the ACL which are a problem for me in linux
[21:06] <tedski> yes, over smb... i'm assumign you have it configured to allow the ACLs you are seeing
[21:07] <phizes> tedski: I really couldn't find how to stop them from being created, and the samba config is stock for the most part
[21:08] <tedski> would you mind sanitizing and pastebin'ing your conf?
[21:08] <tedski> i'd be happy to take a look for you
[21:09] <phizes> kk, will do, though I'm sure it will be an embarrassing experience for myself :)
[21:10] <tedski> meh
[21:10] <tedski> we've all been new to everything at one point
[21:10] <tedski> and we've all written sloppy configs
[21:18] <phizes> tedski: http://pastebin.com/YceQwtKd Haven't touched it for a while, but it caused much pain last time so I was going to try out for nfs this time
[21:21] <tedski> phizes: and what are the mounting options for /some/shareX
[21:23] <phizes> It's exst4 if it matters, and 'defaults', as per how Ubuntu set's up the drive on install
[21:23] <phizes> they are different folders on the same drive
[21:24] <phizes> I got tired of trying to work out hoew much space to partition stuff into a long time ago so now just go with guided and no lvm on install
[21:26] <phizes> I think I just reealised I shouldn't be using admin users, as this, I think causes smb to fork as root, where is probably half my pain comes from