[02:59] <hyperair> hmm this is weird. i can't seem to upgrade from precise to quantal due to unmet dependencies
[03:00] <hyperair> oh crap, i forgot i pinned quantal to prio 1
[07:47] <apw> ;b 9
[08:33] <tkamppeter> OdyX, Debian bug 690982 is easy to fix, you only nedd to upload the current GIT og the CUPS package to Debian, the fix is already contained there and tested under Ubuntu.
[08:39] <OdyX> tkamppeter: aww well. I can't upload 1.6 to Wheezy. You mean the patched backend/usb-libusb.c ?
[11:10] <geser> is there something wrong with publishing currently? the latest python3-defaults from raring is missing on archive.u.c but LP says it's published
[11:15] <mitya57> geser: http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/p/python3-defaults/python3-defaults_3.2.3-5ubuntu2.dsc
[11:15] <mitya57> it's not missing
[11:19] <geser> hmm, apt-get complained about a 404 for fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/p/python3-defaults/python3_3.2.3-5ubuntu2_all.deb
[11:19] <geser> but I checked it a couple minutes ago and didn't see it (now it's there)
[11:19] <geser> I wonder what happened in the last 5 minutes
[11:22] <geser> looks like one of the archive.u.c mirrors isn't up-to-date
[11:22] <geser> because I forced reload that listing in FF again, but this time I don't see -5ubuntu2 anymore
[11:24] <geser> http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/ doesn't list raring for me either
[11:27] <geser> looks like only 91.189.92.176 it affected (out of sync)
[11:59] <xnox> geser: aren't we meant to be "pre-release frozen" and publisher not pushing stuff out for raring yet? /me is not sure at all.
[12:02] <geser> xnox: in that case the published Packages files shouldn't mention it either, but it looks like 1 of 6 archive.u.c mirrors was out of sync (didn't have raring at all)
[12:02] <xnox> sigh
[12:03] <geser> at it probably also affect quantal-updates if you got the package list from a different mirror than it tries to fetch the debs later
[12:04] <geser> (3 days out of sync)
[14:54] <psusi> what is up with the livecd no longer fitting on a cd?  I thought the plan was to turn the dvd image into a ~1 gb image meant for usb sticks, not enlarge the desktop image?
[15:40] <infinity> psusi: We decided to give up on shiny spinning things at the last UDS.
[15:41] <infinity> psusi: At least, for Ubuntu images.  Many flavours have tried to stay CD-sized.
[15:43] <infinity> psusi: For serial installers (ie: people who seem to install more often than they actually use their computer), writing images to USB sticks is way more convenient anyway, and for one-off folks who need shiny spinning things, if you have a newish computer with a CD burner, it's probably also a DVD burner, so that works out.
[15:43] <infinity> psusi: (And for people doing bulk installs and other such things, it shouldn't affect them at all, cause they probably all use netboot, or should do)
[18:51] <cjwatson> xnox: in general, if the publisher weren't running for a given series, it would be impossible to prepare it for general opening in any meaningful way ...
[22:59] <xnox> cjwatson: ack. Maybe I should read up about https://dev.launchpad.net/Soyuz