| === jtechidna is now known as JontheEchidna | ||
| === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
| dholbach | good morning | 07:03 |
|---|---|---|
| geser | good morning dholbach | 07:09 |
| dholbach | hey geser | 07:09 |
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
| === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
| === bencer is now known as heidita2 | ||
| === heidita2 is now known as bencer | ||
| iulian | Gooood morning Mr dholbach and Mr geser. | 09:03 |
| dholbach | hey hey iulian :) | 09:03 |
| === quadrispro_ is now known as quadrispro | ||
| bdrung | tumbleweed: should we drop natty in the udt PPA? | 10:15 |
| tumbleweed | yeah | 10:18 |
| bdrung | tumbleweed: the other problem: oneiric should not have a higher version of distro-info* than precise | 10:36 |
| tumbleweed | bdrung: in the PPA? | 10:36 |
| bdrung | tumbleweed: yes. the oneiric ppa version is higher than the archive precise version | 10:36 |
| tumbleweed | you're right. But I'd kind of prefer to leave it as is | 10:37 |
| tumbleweed | at least oneiric will go away in 6 months... | 10:37 |
| bdrung | tumbleweed: but then people upgrade from the ppa to precise will have a problem | 10:38 |
| tumbleweed | and then we're committed to maintaing distro-info in that PPA for the life of precise | 10:39 |
| * tumbleweed prefers a little brokenness for people who can probably fix it themselves | 10:39 | |
| bdrung | tumbleweed: other solution: remove the distro-info* package in the ppa and backport the versions from precise | 10:41 |
| bdrung | then the users have to downgrade the package now instead of later | 10:41 |
| tumbleweed | presumably the damage is already done. I mean, which Ubuntu developers are still running oeniric | 10:41 |
| bdrung | tumbleweed: you :p | 10:42 |
| tumbleweed | naah, I run sid :) | 10:42 |
| bdrung | tumbleweed: not sid + experimental? | 10:42 |
| tumbleweed | yes, that. And, in fact, wheezy right here, now | 10:42 |
| === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
| === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
| === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
| dholbach | bdrung, funktioniert super für mich | 14:34 |
| jpds | Verstehe. | 14:35 |
| dholbach | is http://developer.ubuntu.com/packaging/html/ broken for anyone? (for me it works) | 14:35 |
| Laney | broken how? | 14:35 |
| Laney | can't see any problems | 14:35 |
| dholbach | bdrung mentioned that the page didn't load for him | 14:38 |
| bdrung | firefox tells me "Fehler: Netzwerk-Zeitüberschreitung" | 14:39 |
| Laney | ah, alles gut hier | 14:39 |
| bdrung | every other page loads without problems | 14:40 |
| dholbach | bdrung, do any other developer.u.c pages load for you? | 14:40 |
| mitya57 | funktioniert bei mir | 14:44 |
| === e11bits_ is now known as e11bits | ||
| dholbach | wow, lots of German speakers here | 14:51 |
| dholbach | I have to tell seb128, he'll like that ;-) | 14:51 |
| bdrung | dholbach: you know that Germany have the second most DDs? | 14:52 |
| dholbach | yeah, I read it somewhere before :) | 14:52 |
| * mitya57 started learning German last week, so please don't count me :) | 14:53 | |
| bdrung | mitya57: your phrase was correct :) | 14:53 |
| dholbach | wow | 14:53 |
| dholbach | yes, good work - if you learn that fast you should be perfect by the weekend :) | 14:54 |
| mitya57 | dholbach: the word "funktioniert" was copied from your phrase, I would never invent such a word myself :)) | 14:55 |
| dholbach | .-) | 14:55 |
| dholbach | :-) | 14:55 |
| cjwatson | funktionieren was always one of those words I thought couldn't possibly be right despite the evidence - sounds too Latin for German :-) | 14:57 |
| bdrung | cjwatson: 1/3 of the German words are derived from Latin | 15:00 |
| cjwatson | yeah, I know that really | 15:01 |
| cjwatson | just wrong intuition | 15:02 |
| cjwatson | I think I'm mostly sceptical of -ieren words because they always seemed like easy ways out in terms of bothering to learn vocabulary :-) | 15:02 |
| === Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan | ||
| === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
| === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
| c_korn | hello, I don't know if this is the correct channel to ask. but has anyone seen such a python import error before? http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=ZWSEygaj | 18:53 |
| jtaylor | which distribition? | 18:53 |
| c_korn | ubuntu 12.10 amd64 | 18:54 |
| c_korn | well this output was from 12.04 amd64 actually | 18:55 |
| c_korn | but on 12.10 amd64 it is similar http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=BSnVsJt1 | 18:55 |
| jtaylor | why is it loading python3.2 from python2? | 18:58 |
| c_korn | hum, good question | 19:02 |
| jtaylor | jngl is no package? | 19:02 |
| c_korn | it is a package I have built | 19:03 |
| c_korn | this is the sconstruct file of the package: http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=ffVANsw3 | 19:04 |
| jtaylor | LIBS=Split("python2.7 boost_python-py32")) looks wrong | 19:04 |
| c_korn | I applied this patch to make it link against python2.7 http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=8F4B8kVA | 19:05 |
| c_korn | should it better link against python3 ? | 19:07 |
| jtaylor | is it a python3 package? | 19:09 |
| c_korn | hum, I don't think so | 19:10 |
| jtaylor | you could try just chaning boost to the 2.7 version | 19:11 |
| c_korn | but as I see the problem does not occur when building the library with boost_python-py27 | 19:11 |
| c_korn | thanks, jtaylor | 19:13 |
| === dpm_ is now known as dpm | ||
| === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
| effiejayx | hello all, I am wondering what I might be doing wrong when packaging this python library. I have separated the package into a core library and an application with a gtk interface | 20:59 |
| effiejayx | the python gtk gui is not able to import the library, http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/1301158/ | 21:00 |
| effiejayx | but if I start a console session I am able to do the import | 21:00 |
| jtaylor | the console session looks like a relative import | 21:04 |
| jtaylor | /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/libturpial/api/protocols/oauth.py really exists? | 21:06 |
| effiejayx | jtaylor, it dies not | 21:22 |
| effiejayx | does not | 21:22 |
| jtaylor | well thats a problem | 21:22 |
| effiejayx | ok | 21:22 |
| effiejayx | I remember now | 21:23 |
| effiejayx | it is erased via debian/rules to use python-oauth | 21:23 |
| effiejayx | from the repos | 21:23 |
| effiejayx | but the import still points to the old one, might need to patch | 21:24 |
| jtaylor | then you need to patch the import to use the correct path | 21:24 |
| effiejayx | okj | 21:24 |
| effiejayx | thanks jtaylor | 21:24 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!