[07:03] <dholbach> good morning
[07:09] <geser> good morning dholbach
[07:09] <dholbach> hey geser
[09:03] <iulian> Gooood morning Mr dholbach and Mr geser.
[09:03] <dholbach> hey hey iulian :)
[10:15] <bdrung> tumbleweed: should we drop natty in the udt PPA?
[10:18] <tumbleweed> yeah
[10:36] <bdrung> tumbleweed: the other problem: oneiric should not have a higher version of  distro-info* than precise
[10:36] <tumbleweed> bdrung: in the PPA?
[10:36] <bdrung> tumbleweed: yes. the oneiric ppa version is higher than the archive precise version
[10:37] <tumbleweed> you're right. But I'd kind of prefer to leave it as is
[10:37] <tumbleweed> at least oneiric will go away in 6 months...
[10:38] <bdrung> tumbleweed: but then people upgrade from the ppa to precise will have a problem
[10:39] <tumbleweed> and then we're committed to maintaing distro-info in that PPA for the life of precise
[10:39]  * tumbleweed prefers a little brokenness for people who can probably fix it themselves
[10:41] <bdrung> tumbleweed: other solution: remove the distro-info* package in the ppa and backport the versions from precise
[10:41] <bdrung> then the users have to downgrade the package now instead of later
[10:41] <tumbleweed> presumably the damage is already done. I mean, which Ubuntu developers are still running oeniric
[10:42] <bdrung> tumbleweed: you :p
[10:42] <tumbleweed> naah, I run sid :)
[10:42] <bdrung> tumbleweed: not sid + experimental?
[10:42] <tumbleweed> yes, that. And, in fact, wheezy right here, now
[14:34] <dholbach> bdrung, funktioniert super für mich
[14:35] <jpds> Verstehe.
[14:35] <dholbach> is http://developer.ubuntu.com/packaging/html/ broken for anyone? (for me it works)
[14:35] <Laney> broken how?
[14:35] <Laney> can't see any problems
[14:38] <dholbach> bdrung mentioned that the page didn't load for him
[14:39] <bdrung> firefox tells me "Fehler: Netzwerk-Zeitüberschreitung"
[14:39] <Laney> ah, alles gut hier
[14:40] <bdrung> every other page loads without problems
[14:40] <dholbach> bdrung, do any other developer.u.c pages load for you?
[14:44] <mitya57> funktioniert bei mir
[14:51] <dholbach> wow, lots of German speakers here
[14:51] <dholbach> I have to tell seb128, he'll like that ;-)
[14:52] <bdrung> dholbach: you know that Germany have the second most DDs?
[14:52] <dholbach> yeah, I read it somewhere before :)
[14:53]  * mitya57 started learning German last week, so please don't count me :)
[14:53] <bdrung> mitya57: your phrase was correct :)
[14:53] <dholbach> wow
[14:54] <dholbach> yes, good work - if you learn that fast you should be perfect by the weekend :)
[14:55] <mitya57> dholbach: the word "funktioniert" was copied from your phrase, I would never invent such a word myself :))
[14:55] <dholbach> .-)
[14:55] <dholbach> :-)
[14:57] <cjwatson> funktionieren was always one of those words I thought couldn't possibly be right despite the evidence - sounds too Latin for German :-)
[15:00] <bdrung> cjwatson: 1/3 of the German words are derived from Latin
[15:01] <cjwatson> yeah, I know that really
[15:02] <cjwatson> just wrong intuition
[15:02] <cjwatson> I think I'm mostly sceptical of -ieren words because they always seemed like easy ways out in terms of bothering to learn vocabulary :-)
[18:53] <c_korn> hello, I don't know if this is the correct channel to ask. but has anyone seen such a python import error before? http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=ZWSEygaj
[18:53] <jtaylor> which distribition?
[18:54] <c_korn> ubuntu 12.10 amd64
[18:55] <c_korn> well this output was from 12.04 amd64 actually
[18:55] <c_korn> but on 12.10 amd64 it is similar http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=BSnVsJt1
[18:58] <jtaylor> why is it loading python3.2 from python2?
[19:02] <c_korn> hum, good question
[19:02] <jtaylor> jngl is no package?
[19:03] <c_korn> it is a package I have built
[19:04] <c_korn> this is the sconstruct file of the package: http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=ffVANsw3
[19:04] <jtaylor> LIBS=Split("python2.7 boost_python-py32")) looks wrong
[19:05] <c_korn> I applied this patch to make it link against python2.7 http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=8F4B8kVA
[19:07] <c_korn> should it better link against python3 ?
[19:09] <jtaylor> is it a python3 package?
[19:10] <c_korn> hum, I don't think so
[19:11] <jtaylor> you could try just chaning boost to the 2.7 version
[19:11] <c_korn> but as I see the problem does not occur when building the library with boost_python-py27
[19:13] <c_korn> thanks, jtaylor
[20:59] <effiejayx> hello all, I am wondering what I might be doing wrong when packaging this python library. I have separated the package into a core library and an application with a gtk interface
[21:00] <effiejayx> the python gtk gui is not able to import the library, http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/1301158/
[21:00] <effiejayx> but if I start a console session I am able to do the import
[21:04] <jtaylor> the console session looks like a relative import
[21:06] <jtaylor>  /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/libturpial/api/protocols/oauth.py really exists?
[21:22] <effiejayx> jtaylor, it dies not
[21:22] <effiejayx> does not
[21:22] <jtaylor> well thats a problem
[21:22] <effiejayx> ok
[21:23] <effiejayx> I remember now
[21:23] <effiejayx> it is erased via debian/rules to use python-oauth
[21:23] <effiejayx> from the repos
[21:24] <effiejayx> but the import still points to the old one, might need to patch
[21:24] <jtaylor> then you need to patch the import to use the correct path
[21:24] <effiejayx> okj
[21:24] <effiejayx> thanks jtaylor