=== morphis|away is now known as morphis === morphis is now known as morphis|away === bschaefer_ is now known as bschaefer [09:55] om26er: Time for some testing of fixes ? [09:55] Hi :), btw [09:59] duflu, smspillaz: Hi :) Got 3 branches ready for review... [10:01] 1. https://code.launchpad.net/~mc-return/compiz/compiz.merge-fix1009999-shiftswitcher-ignores-setting-show-window-title/+merge/131148 [10:01] 2. https://code.launchpad.net/~mc-return/compiz/compiz.merge-fix1068503-scaleaddon-solid-window-highlight/+merge/131049 [10:02] 3. https://code.launchpad.net/~mc-return/compiz/compiz.merge-fix1070233-fix1070297-fix1070301-Resizeinfo/+merge/130994 [10:02] If anyone has time to look at those, it would be appreciated 8-) [10:03] didrocks, sil2100: Papercuts ^^ [10:04] MCR1: I have no interest on those plugins TBH (and won't have the time for testing them properly ;)) [10:04] MCR1: I think you will need to find another victim ;) [10:08] no sil2100 [10:21] xnox, bug 1065935 - do you still get this? [10:21] Launchpad bug 1065935 in compiz (Ubuntu) "compiz eats 90% CPU time most of the time, more than kvm to run VMs" [Critical,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1065935 [10:22] popey: right if I trigger it, I will need to reboot to get my cpu back. I will test it again in a moment, after this current build finishes. [10:22] xnox, thanks, do leave a comment [10:22] I am quite certain it's a duplicate of the other cpu bug. [10:39] JohnLea, i need to show you a behavioural bug in 12.04.. where/when can I show this to you? [10:40] popey; I've got back to back meetings until 17:15 today, so how about 17:20? [10:41] ok [10:41] popey; re. where, let's just find an empty room [10:41] I'll just show you on my laptop, it will take 2 seconds [10:41] or i can just y'know describe it to you :) [10:43] \o/ Would be nice to have design opinion on that one === _salem is now known as salem_ === morphis|away is now known as morphis === yofel_ is now known as yofel [15:38] Just curious, but does anyone know if ubuntu 12.10 will be receiving compiz 0.9.9? [15:51] Dougie187: no, ubuntu 12.10 will get updates from the 0.9.8 branch, while the 0.9.9 is being developed for 13.04 [15:51] so 0.9.8 = stable (as is 0.9.7), 0.9.9 = development [15:56] didrocks: Here's the pending merge request. https://code.launchpad.net/~amith/unity/unity-reset-fix/+merge/130828 [16:02] phanimahesh: quick look and seems awesome! [16:03] phanimahesh: at UDS and not really available for the next 2 weeks [16:03] phanimahesh: I think we'll need automated tests though to approve it ;) [16:05] oh. the tests are also available. I'll get them included. :) [16:05] didrocks: As you do not like my Compiz plug-in fixes I have here one affecting every multimonitor user ;) [16:06] didrocks: https://code.launchpad.net/~mc-return/compiz/compiz.merge-fix1068173-grid-does-not-follow-preview/+merge/131227 [16:06] though using unit tests with unity running is a bit tricky. [16:07] bschaefer: Hi :) Maybe you have time for this... ^^ [16:08] bschaefer: I could even provide a compiled version of the plug-in for easy testing... [16:20] didrocks: I couldn't figure out how exactly to write unittests for the patched version as is. I have a successfully running suite of tests but that involves too many changes. Reloading unity means I need to wait for unity to be killed to proceed. Any ideas on what can be done? [16:32] Mirv: so what about the patches that get pushed into 0.9.9 regarding nvidia drivers and poor performance in 12.10? [16:33] @all: As everyone likes videos I've prepared 2: One before the fix: [16:33] https://bugs.launchpad.net/compiz/+bug/1068173/+attachment/3402754/+files/Grid-does-not-always-follow-the-preview.webm [16:33] Ubuntu bug 1068173 in Compiz "[Multimonitor] [Grid] plug-in: The window snapping does not follow the preview, but uses the display the mousepointer is on when the mousebutton gets released" [Undecided,In progress] [16:33] and afterwards: [16:33] https://bugs.launchpad.net/compiz/+bug/1068173/+attachment/3411964/+files/Grid-preview-always-follows-the-mousepointer-now.webm [18:27] Dougie187: backports are possible, and the usual way stuff gets done - first fix in trunk, then evaluate if it's backportable === morphis is now known as morphis|away [20:10] Mirv: Ok thanks. I was mostly curious because compiz/unity runs really terribly for me right now. And there are bug reports linking to milestones that say it should be fixed in 0.9.9. So I'm wondering if/when I'll be able to use that mostly. :P === salem_ is now known as _salem