[01:53] <darkxst> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=686834
[01:54] <darkxst> though I would ping upstream to see what they think of the idea
[02:02] <darkxst> jbicha, just out of interest, do you think I would qualify for ubuntu membership?
[02:08] <TheLordOfTime> darkxst, i'm an ubuntu member, i could help gauge thaqt
[02:08] <TheLordOfTime> darkxst, what's your LP page?
[02:09] <TheLordOfTime> and what're your contributions thus far?
[02:10] <darkxst> TheLordOfTime, https://launchpad.net/~darkxst
[02:10] <TheLordOfTime> and also, what're your contributions thus far?
[02:11] <TheLordOfTime> ah, you recently joined bugsquad :P
[02:11] <darkxst> fix quite a bunch of bugs relating to ubuntu gnome
[02:11] <darkxst> gdm, gnome-shell, casper and a few other random ones
[02:11] <TheLordOfTime> any other contributions?
[02:11] <TheLordOfTime> :P
[02:12] <darkxst> and if it counts gnome-shell extensions
[02:12] <darkxst> and some upstream bugfixes as well
[02:13]  * TheLordOfTime greps through the lp profile
[02:15] <TheLordOfTime> well, your bugs work is significant :p
[02:15] <TheLordOfTime> i can't speak to the upstream aspect. :P
[02:15] <TheLordOfTime> my contribs that got me my membership were mainly support work on ask ubuntu, but i don't see a reason your membership would be rejected
[02:16] <TheLordOfTime> and you've been here quite a while :P
[02:16] <TheLordOfTime> you'd get my support from the bugs side of things
[02:16] <TheLordOfTime> there's not much in terms of what you have to do to get membership other than be an active member of the community with sustained contributions
[02:16] <TheLordOfTime> in some way shape or form
[02:17] <everaldo> what is a ubuntu membership?
[02:18] <darkxst> everaldo, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Membership
[02:20] <darkxst> TheLordOfTime, would you provide a testimonial for me, (once I fill out my wiki page?)
[02:20] <TheLordOfTime> fill out your wiki page and then we'll talk :P
[02:20]  * TheLordOfTime has his own focus atm, creating his wiki page for Per-Package Upload Rights for NGINX
[02:21] <TheLordOfTime> that, and rebuilding TrekWeb's site :P
[02:22] <everaldo> darkxst, nice, I think that you deserves  membership
[02:23] <darkxst> TheLordOfTime, ok thanks, will get back to you then!
[02:23] <darkxst> everaldo, thanks, might hit you up a testimonial as well, when I am ready!
[02:25] <everaldo> darkxst, I am not a member :(
[02:26] <everaldo> but if it helps, I can provide a testimonial
[02:29] <TheLordOfTime> everaldo, you should see my wiki page, a few people who gave me testimonials arent exactly members
[02:29] <everaldo> then count with me :)
[02:38] <jbicha> darkxst: there's actually 2 ways to become a member, there's also becoming a Ubuntu Contributing Developer
[02:38] <jbicha> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopers#ContribDev
[02:39] <jbicha> it doesn't provide any upload rights but you'd be judged based on your development contributions (i.e. packaging & bugfixes)
[02:41] <jbicha> I don't know if that would be better in your case
[02:41] <darkxst> jbicha, yeh right, certainly don't expect to get upload rights yet
[02:41] <darkxst> but I guess most of the stuff I have been doing is definately dev stuff
[02:41] <jbicha> "sustained" is generally interpreted as 6 months of activity
[02:42] <darkxst> but can that include upstream gnome stuff?
[02:44] <jbicha> while upstream contributions are generally encouraged as the right thing to do, it's a bit unclear whether that can substitute for working in Ubuntu
[02:44] <jbicha> I think several board members want to see "significant and sustained" for Ubuntu
[02:50] <everaldo> hehe, just added some small changes to iso-build script and now if we define PROXY=something
[02:50] <everaldo> it really speed up all process, including debootstrap
[02:51] <everaldo> just installed apt-cacher-ng and then
[02:51] <everaldo> PROXY=http://localhost:3142 ./livecd-script.sh customize amd64 ./ubuntu-12.10-desktop-amd64.iso
[02:53] <darkxst> jbicha, so do you think I should apply or wait a bit more, I guess a lot of my work over the last year was upstream/extensions prior to the birth of UGR
[02:54] <darkxst> but I have been around for 5 years reporting and trying to fix bugs
[02:55] <jbicha> based on https://launchpad.net/~darkxst/+related-software alone it looks like you should wait a few more months for Contributing Developer, but you may be ready for regular membership though
[02:56] <jbicha> you can also read through the IRC meeting logs to get an idea of which applicants are successful
[02:57] <darkxst> lol, thats because gdm took so much *fixing*
[02:57] <darkxst> something like ~15 bugs for gdm alone ...
[02:58] <jbicha> fixing *Ubuntu* bugs upstream definitely counts, you just have to explain that to the board members
[03:04] <darkxst> hmm I just mean that page would likely have had more packages on it, if gdm hadn't been so broken ;)
[03:05] <jbicha> I was speaking about the time aspect, not the quantity or quality
[03:07] <darkxst> ah ok
[03:17] <TheLordOfTime> jbicha, know anything about what is considered for PPU rights after an applicant applies?
[03:17] <TheLordOfTime> i.e. what they look for :P
[03:21] <jbicha> TheLordOfTime: I don't know as I haven't gone through that process, I have MOTU & ubuntu-desktop rights but the Desktop Team has its own procedure (basically an email and like 3 +1s) instead of PPU
[03:51] <TheLordOfTime> jbicha, i asked about PPU because there's a few (different) packages i'm applying for, none which are directly under Desktop Team governance.  It was a general question, was all.
[03:51] <TheLordOfTime> not targetted for any speceific niche
[12:54] <Noteirak> hello
[12:55] <smartboyhw> Hello
[12:55] <Noteirak> I've encountered some issues, and after finding nothing on google and in the bug tracker, I was hoping to find something here ,hopefully :)
[12:56] <Noteirak> the first is that I do not have any search provider in the shell, when I type some text. I've tried to add a google.xml in /usr/share/gnome-shell/search-providers & open-search-providers, restart, but no luck
[12:57] <Noteirak> also, in dconf, there are no key reloated to the search providers in org.gnome.shell ...
[12:57] <Noteirak> so, am I missing something (i was a new install from ISO downloaded today, Ubuntu Gnome Remix 12.10) or is it a bug?
[13:00] <Noteirak> anyone who can help with this here? :)
[13:11] <smartboyhw> Noteirak, ask jbicha again maybe:P
[13:11] <Noteirak> oh ok, sure
[13:12] <Noteirak> jbicha, do you have a minute? I am having some issue (possibly a bug) and I wanted a quick check if I am not missing anything
[13:12] <Noteirak> if it is fine, I'll copy/paste what I wrote already
[13:14] <Noteirak> I do not have any search provider in the shell, when I type some text. I've tried to add a google.xml in /usr/share/gnome-shell/search-providers & open-search-providers, restart, but no luck
[13:14] <Noteirak> also, in dconf, there are no key reloated to the search providers in org.gnome.shell ... so, am I missing something (i was a new install from ISO downloaded today, Ubuntu Gnome Remix 12.10) or is it a bug?
[13:25] <jbicha> I don't know
[13:26] <jbicha> but nautilus 3.6 ships /usr/share/gnome-shell/search-providers/nautilus-search-provider.ini & /usr/lib/nautilus/nautilus-shell-search-provider
[13:27] <jbicha> you can try to figure out what Contacts & Documents do for their search providers
[13:27] <jbicha> but the Google/Wikipedia/opensearch provider support code may have been removed
[13:34] <smartboyhw> Wow jbicha you have LTS releases for GNOME Remix! (aka 12.10.1) awesome!
[13:35] <jbicha> smartboyhw: how else would you distinguish the respin from the original release?
[13:35] <smartboyhw> jbicha, er 12.10.0.1:P
[13:36] <jbicha> maybe but I don't think the version number is a big deal; hopefully we won't ever have to do it again :)
[13:36] <smartboyhw> :)
[13:36] <Noteirak> sorry, was on the phone
[13:36] <Noteirak> so
[13:37] <smartboyhw> jbicha, found something interesting: Is the i386 torrent link in the release notes correct? I still saw 12.10 instead of 12.10.1
[13:37] <Noteirak> i'll try nautilus then
[13:37] <jbicha> smartboyhw: yes, there was no need to respin i386 since the bug was that efi didn't work and efi is only supported on amd64
[13:37] <smartboyhw> jbicha, ah:D
[14:14] <Noteirak> jbicha: I'm looking with nautilus, but it is an .ini which links to another application or script or whatever I guess
[14:14] <Noteirak> but there is no xml, like the google.xml that is there
[14:15] <Noteirak> I've created a google.xml but it's not taken into account
[14:15] <Noteirak> so i guess the code was removed to support that :s
[14:17] <Noteirak> do you know, by any luck, who I should ask to have a definite answer on if it has been removed or not?
[14:22] <jbicha> Noteirak: you could ask in #gnome-shell on irc.gnome.org or you can search the git history
[14:22] <jbicha> http://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-shell/commit/d?id=ef4231b9c0160a5
[14:22] <jbicha> http://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-shell/commit/?id=ef4231b9c0160a5
[14:23] <Noteirak> god, they removed it then :(
[14:23] <Noteirak> oh no
[14:23] <Noteirak> they just made it so it would launch directly
[14:23] <Noteirak> or am I understanding it wrong?
[14:25] <Noteirak> because if it is supposed to start google directly if I just type it in and then enter, then it simply doesn't work :D or it's not replicated in the distro I guess
[14:27] <jbicha> Noteirak: no there is no Google search included now; someone would have to write the extension or search provider for that
[14:29] <Noteirak> :( doom
[14:29] <Noteirak> ok thank you very much for your help
[14:29] <Noteirak> and for the link to the git :) that will be useful
[17:44] <Fitzz> Wasn't the 12.04 the first realease?
[17:47] <jbicha> Fitzz: not for this specific project, there was a UGR in 2011 and more recently there was a Ubuntu GNOME Shell Remix
[17:48] <Fitzz> Is this still the main hq web site: http://ubuntu-gs-remix.sourceforge.net/p/home/ ?
[17:50] <jbicha> no, that's for the Ubuntu GNOME Shell Remix (which has been discontinued); this is the Ubuntu GNOME Remix
[17:50] <jbicha> the names are confusing which is part of why I don't like the current name
[17:50] <Fitzz> Ah, ok that explanes alot.
[17:50] <Fitzz> Thanks  :)
[20:37] <lapion> is there any way to get extensions for gnome-classic to work ?
[20:37] <jbicha> lapion: define "extensions"
[20:38] <lapion> well right now the panel(s) are unmutable
[20:39] <lapion> and I usually have (under gnome2) at the very least diskmount and cpu setting extension active
[20:39] <lapion> and I in general like to add more panels and do with them as I please..
[20:39] <trism> lapion: alt+right click to edit the panel (or maybe alt+super+right click if using compiz)
[20:40] <lapion> hmm thanks.. trism
[20:42] <lapion> now I am willing to go over to quantal quetzal
[20:43] <lapion> however, I need to cross upgrade to gnome-ubuntu....
[20:43] <lapion> any advice/hints ?
[20:44] <darkxst> lapion, read the release notes
[20:44] <lapion> cross-grading
[20:44] <lapion> from ubuntu to gnome-buntu
[20:45] <darkxst> upgrade to Q first, and apply changes in release notes
[20:45] <darkxst> you can't directly dist-upgrade to ubuntu gnome
[20:46]  * lapion thinks he will try porting the system disk to virtualbox first ;-)
[20:48]  * lapion will maybe simply copy the root to another partition and try..
[20:52]  * lapion thinks he should rely more on tar then go blindfolded into this..
[22:50] <darkxst> jbicha_, we need to sync telepathy-logger from debian
[22:50] <darkxst> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/telepathy-logger/+bug/1049210
[22:55] <jbicha_> darkxst: 0.4.0-2 fixes that bug?
[22:56] <darkxst> yes, it does, specifically this patch 0002-log-manager-Fix-annotations-on-get_filtered_events.patch
[22:57] <jbicha_> ok, we can't do a straight sync since we need to have a LP bug in the debian/changelog for SRU verification
[22:58] <darkxst> ah right
[22:58] <jbicha_> I think you'd want to just add a changelog entry for 0.4.0-2~ubuntu12.04.1 saying that it's a no-change backport with the LP bug #
[23:00] <jbicha_> and then if you were building the source package for upload to Ubuntu, you'd want to add -v0.4.0-1 to get both your changelog entry & Debian's in the .changes file
[23:00] <jbicha_> debuild -S -v0.4.0-1
[23:02] <jbicha_> but since you're not uploading you don't need that information yet
[23:10] <darkxst> jbicha_, does this look right? https://code.launchpad.net/~darkxst/telepathy-logger/lp1049210
[23:12] <jbicha_> yeah that should be good
[23:14] <darkxst> jbicha_, and then do I open merge request or attach debdiff?
[23:16] <jbicha_> darkxst: either is fine
[23:36] <darkxst> jbicha_, ok, all done https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1049210