[09:47] <FloSoft> Hi, how can I cancel a build which is waiting for dependencies? (which can never be resolved -.-)
[15:20] <FloSoft> hmm are all lpia nodes offline? i dont get a "start in x minutes" :/
[15:47] <maxb> FloSoft:  Yes, lpia is more or less a dead architecture at this point, and it has zero full-time builders
[15:49] <FloSoft> maxb: hmm how to disable an automatic lpia build then?
[15:50] <FloSoft> or how to provide a buildserver *lol*
[15:57] <FloSoft> maxb: do you know how to provide a launchpad buildserver? I'm having some machines around I would allow to do that job?
[16:00] <maxb> FloSoft: You can prevent Launchpad from trying an lpia build at all by using 'Architecture: i386 amd64' in place of 'Architecture: any' in debian/control
[16:01] <maxb> There isn't any scope for lp buildds outside of Canonical's control
[16:01] <FloSoft> hmm my amd64 buildjob doesnt start too :/ hanging on "start in 8minutes" since hours :/
[16:02] <maxb> All of the amd64 PPA buildds seem to be busy with immense packages - libreoffice and firefox
[16:03] <FloSoft> yea so there's no way to provide a build-service for launchpad?
[16:04] <maxb> The security model doesn't allow for builders outside of a single authority's control
[16:05] <FloSoft> thats a pity that one cant provide i.e a signed/encrypted vm for that
[16:51] <lifeless> FloSoft: the problem is proving the integrity of things built in such an environment
[16:51] <lifeless> FloSoft: a hostile build machine could insert trojan code (e.g. by subverting ld)
[16:52] <lifeless> FloSoft: and running the entire vm encrypted would require homomorphic encryption, which AIUI is just about ready to implement + and -, not a full CPU :)
[19:16] <mrnuke> hi guys. I'm trying to import my new ssh key into launchpad and I keep getting the "Invalid public key" message
[19:17] <mrnuke> I'm just pasting the contents of ~/.ssh/id_rsa.pub
[19:34] <mrnuke> [SOLVED] it turns out I needed a comment at the end of the key.
[21:53] <sivang> hi all
[21:54] <sivang> can anybody please see why I can view this file? I've been using Launchpad as a safe store for my code, and I can't access this file http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~sivan/hubackup/hubackup--main/view/head:/HUBackup/backend/DeviceInfo.py
[21:54] <sivang> *can't
[21:54]  * sivang is trying to figure his old lp creds to log in and report a bug
[21:55]  * sivang tries to bzr clone
[21:57] <sivang> *can
[21:58] <ebergen> you're using launchpad for backups?
[21:58] <sivang> ebergen: well, not for backups. But for code repo, like github
[21:58] <sivang> it should come back right?
[21:59] <sivang> hmm
[21:59] <sivang> bzr: ERROR: Revision {[('DeviceInfo.py-20051228171301-e1fb836992441989', 'sivan@ubuntu-20060123134147-ed93162e34a1b9f7')]} not present in "KnitVersionedFiles(<bzrlib.knit._KndxIndex object at 0x21fd650>, <bzrlib.knit._KnitKeyAccess object at 0x21fd590>)".
[21:59] <sivang> I guess that's why I can't access it on lp's web interface
[21:59] <sivang> is lp down?
[21:59] <sivang> ebergen: I'll move it to github as soon as I can access the code again...:/
[22:00] <ebergen> my repo is just hanging
[22:00] <ebergen> could be my dns though
[22:00] <sivang> it's not my dns, for sure.
[22:00] <ebergen> I know yours isn't your dns
[22:01] <sivang> This is the only backup I had of my code
[22:01] <sivang> I guess lp support people are all asleep right now..
[22:01] <ebergen> you don't have a bzr branch locally?
[22:02] <ebergen> mine works http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~provenscaling-eric/maria/tivo/view/head:/sql/authors.h
[22:03] <sivang> ebergen: no, all my other stuff are stored on github, and this has bever failed me
[22:03] <sivang> *never
[22:08] <sivang> https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/1072482
[23:07] <fo0bar> hi, how can I add a comment to a bug with launchpadlib?
[23:09] <fo0bar> I figured it would be somewhere around bug.activity, but I can't figure it out and haven't found any useful examples
[23:11] <wgrant> fo0bar: bug.activity is just the history of the bug
[23:11] <wgrant> If you look at https://api.launchpad.net/+apidoc/devel.html#bug you'll see a newMessage method
[23:13] <fo0bar> wgrant: ahh, message.  so many synonyms.  thanks :)
[23:13] <wgrant> Yeah, comments are all called messages internally
[23:14] <fo0bar> interesting, and it even exposes a subject, which doesn't appear to be exposed in the web UI
[23:15] <fo0bar> err, setting the subject is not exposed in the web UI.  displaying it is.
[23:15] <wgrant> Right, you can't override that in the web UI, just via mail and API
[23:19] <fo0bar> wgrant: thanks again.  are you in copenhagen?  I asked that question initially and thought "wait, everyone who would answer that is probably asleep right now" :)
[23:19] <fo0bar> or at least turning down for the day
[23:21] <wgrant> Nah, a few of us are at home