bizzle_ | so it says the storm strengthened to 85 mph | 00:08 |
---|---|---|
bizzle_ | but it was 90 earlier | 00:08 |
bizzle_ | ?makes a lot of sense | 00:08 |
bizzle_ | oops wrong window | 00:08 |
=== Sv is now known as discopig | ||
=== zz_chihchun is now known as chihchun | ||
square | howdy | 07:14 |
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
ppisati | janimo: ping | 08:18 |
ppisati | janimo: where's the git tree for the nexus7 kernel? are you mantining it, right? | 08:18 |
ppisati | *mintining | 08:18 |
ppisati | argh | 08:19 |
ppisati | ... | 08:19 |
lilstevie | ppisati, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Nexus7/SourceCode | 08:23 |
ppisati | lilstevie: cool, thanks | 08:23 |
lilstevie | np | 08:26 |
janimo | ppisati, we should shortlyh decide at UDS where to place it so it can be comaintained | 08:28 |
ppisati | janimo: ack, iirc there was a session about it | 08:28 |
janimo | ppisati, right. Looking for something specific or just checking it out? | 08:29 |
janimo | I have a few more power related commits that are not yet pushed out | 08:29 |
ppisati | janimo: just checking it out | 08:29 |
janimo | ok | 08:29 |
lilstevie | janimo, I was just looking briefly at what you have done, what else does the battery driver have that it can export | 08:30 |
janimo | lilstevie, I just received a patch yesterday about that. I'll push it out shortly | 08:32 |
lilstevie | ok cool, the few patches I have tried to get them exposed with the tf101/tf201 just break the driver :( | 08:36 |
=== chihchun is now known as zz_chihchun | ||
=== morphis|away is now known as morphis | ||
=== morphis is now known as morphis|away | ||
=== morphis|away is now known as morphis | ||
=== satellit_ is now known as satellit_e | ||
=== satellit_e is now known as satellit_ | ||
=== morphis is now known as morphis|away | ||
=== morphis|away is now known as morphis | ||
achiang | ogra_: ping, your presence is requested | 11:06 |
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
=== txwikinger2 is now known as txwikinger | ||
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
steev | is it possible to install a softfloat compiler on precise (on arm)? to build e.g. a kernel? | 19:57 |
steev | armhf* | 19:57 |
xranby_ac100 | steev: basically you pass -mfloat-abi=softfp to gcc when building your kernel | 20:01 |
xranby_ac100 | export CFLAGS="-mfloat-abi=softfp" | 20:01 |
xranby_ac100 | export CXXFLAGS="-mfloat-abi=softfp" | 20:01 |
xranby_ac100 | shoudl do it | 20:01 |
infinity | xranby_ac100: Uhm. The kernel doesn't need any such thing done. | 20:05 |
xranby_ac100 | infinity: you are right .. | 20:05 |
infinity | steev: Compiling kernels should Just Work, regardless. | 20:05 |
xranby_ac100 | steev: the kernel interface is the same for softfloat and hardfloat (the kernel do not use any userspace system librarys) | 20:06 |
steev | yeah, you're right, except there's a minor issue with the 4.6 compiler and hardfloat, so i'd prefer to tell it to use softfloat, or use a softfloat compiler | 20:19 |
steev | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52445 | 20:19 |
ubot2 | gcc.gnu.org bug 52445 in tree-optimization "[4.6 Regression] conditional store replacement causes segfault in generated code" [Normal,Assigned] | 20:19 |
xranby_ac100 | infinity: btw.. are you at uds right now? | 20:23 |
infinity | xranby_ac100: Aye. | 20:23 |
xranby_ac100 | in the testcase writing seminar? | 20:23 |
infinity | xranby_ac100: Nope. | 20:24 |
xranby_ac100 | ok well see you around.. i am at the testcase hackatron right now | 20:24 |
infinity | steev: Hrm. That bug doesn't seem to imply it's HF-only (or even ARM-only). We can definitely look at backporting the fix to precise, though. | 20:27 |
steev | infinity: you're right, i was going from experience with gentoo which has the issue only with hf compiler (4.6.3) | 20:28 |
steev | i have a bug open on the gentoo end, but sadly, i can't seem to build a debian package of the kernel on my gentoo box | 20:29 |
infinity | steev: doko's got a precise SRU for gcc-4.6 pending, I'll ask him to add this backport. Can you file a launchpad bug for reference? | 20:31 |
steev | infinity: i would prefer not to - launchpad loves to spam me with bugmails. i still get mails from a bug that was opened in 2005 | 20:31 |
infinity | Unsubscribe from it, if it's still getting comments? | 20:32 |
infinity | steev: Anyhow, you could also just build your kernels with gcc-4.7 in a quantal chroot, they'll install just fine on precise. | 20:33 |
GrueMaster | If you are the filer, you can't unsubscribe. I've tried. | 20:33 |
infinity | GrueMaster: Oh, fair point. | 20:33 |
steev | infinity: heh, actually, it's for maverick | 20:33 |
* infinity filters all his bug mail anyway, so doesn't really notice or care. | 20:33 | |
steev | but yeah, the arm box doesn't really have enough space to add a quantal chroot | 20:33 |
infinity | steev: I'll poke doko later about adding PR52445 to his precise SRU. We'll need someone to open a bug for tracking/validating it, though. :/ | 20:34 |
* steev points at GrueMaster | 20:34 | |
steev | i'll be more than willing to test it, but no, i'm sorry but i refuse to use launchpad | 20:35 |
infinity | steev: Do you know which driver(s) get miscompiled? The upstream bug is vague. | 20:35 |
GrueMaster | My only real complaint is that a lot of the bugs I filed got ignored until I was no longer doing arm work. Then suddently there appeared to be fixes for me to test, but they were reverted because I no longer do testing. | 20:39 |
steev | off the top of my head the flexcan driver, but if you search gcc 4.6.3 miscompiling arm-linux | 20:40 |
steev | there's a long thread on lakml | 20:40 |
steev | GrueMaster: ditto, except i'm still doing arm - and more specifically, bugs were filed with patches that were ignored until irrelevant | 20:40 |
steev | and by irrelevant, i mean we're no longer using that software because we've forked it because we couldn't wait for the fixes to be added | 20:41 |
GrueMaster | Yep. | 20:41 |
steev | it's not a whole lot, but when you appear to not maintain the software, users and developers really develop a distate | 20:41 |
steev | and no offense, but if i've already done the work, and provided a patch, i don't really see why i should also have to pay canonical to get it applied | 20:43 |
infinity | steev: Who's asking you to pay to get pathes applied? | 20:43 |
infinity | Or patches. | 20:43 |
steev | no one, directly | 20:44 |
infinity | I realise it's frustrating to not have every bug addressed, but hyperbole doesn't help. | 20:44 |
infinity | (For the record, of all the bugs I've fixed over the years in Ubuntu, exactly one of them was escalated from a paid customer, and it was a bug that I was working on upstream regardless) | 20:45 |
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
=== morphis is now known as morphis|away | ||
Hexxeh | how'd i add a window manager to the list show at the login screen? | 22:20 |
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!