[16:19] <xanscale> i have a segmentation fault opening file roller, is a ubuntu bug or gnomebuntu bug?
[16:20] <xanscale> on 32 bit, and not in 64 bit
[16:22] <jbicha> xanscale: that may be fixed in 3.6.1.1-0ubuntu1 which is currently in -proposed for a few more days
[16:22] <xanscale> so just waiting, thz
[16:23] <jbicha> you can give it a try if you like https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed
[16:23] <jbicha> the testing bug for it is bug 1069443
[16:23] <xanscale> ok try it
[16:26] <xanscale> jbicha anyway thz for gnomebuntu
[16:27] <ricotz> jbicha, hi
[16:32] <jbicha> ricotz: hi
[16:33] <ricotz> jbicha, did you see my question yesterday?
[16:33] <ricotz> about making libsecret multiarched
[16:33] <jbicha> ricotz: yes, you were asking if I wanted to do it?
[16:33] <ricotz> i saw i worked on it
[16:34] <ricotz> and it is pretty much needed while gvfs is linking against it
[16:34] <jbicha> oh I misunderstood you, do you have a link to it then?
[16:34] <ricotz> oh sorry
[16:34] <ricotz> i saw *you* worked on it
[16:35] <jbicha> ok, well it'll probably be a few days before I take a look at it
[16:35] <jbicha> I tried multiarching libzapojit earlier but it didn't seem to work
[16:36] <ricotz> shouldnt be hard to do
[16:37] <xanscale> I read the discussion on the integration of not gnome software, how did it go? i prefer vanilla gnome version
[16:37] <ricotz> jbicha, i will try to find some time for it, and will push it to a ppa if soo
[16:38] <jbicha> xanscale: which discussion?
[16:38] <xanscale> in maling list
[16:39] <xanscale> (jbicha i can confirm that file-roller now works)
[16:41] <jbicha> xanscale: cool, I'll mark the bug verification-done and it should be released in normal updates by next week
[16:41] <jbicha> xanscale: did you have a more specific question about gnome?
[16:54] <xanscale> jbicha nothing specific, just that in my ubuntu gnome must remain vanilla, also is expected to become more lightweight in its default installation
[17:01] <xanscale> I'm doing a selection of packages reduced compared to the current one, how do I submit it?
[17:07] <jbicha> xanscale: you can open a bug against ubuntu-gnome-desktop
[17:07] <jbicha> or bring it up for discussion on the mailing list
[17:07] <ricotz> jbicha, alright here it is http://people.ubuntu.com/~ricotz/raring/libsecret-multiarch
[17:08] <ricotz> jbicha, it is already compat 9 so just the annotations were missing
[17:08] <xanscale> jbicha ok
[17:10] <jbicha> ricotz: if you can get sjoerd to sponsor that, we could just sync from Debian
[17:12] <ricotz> jbicha, hmm, please upload it to unbreak the archive
[17:16] <jbicha> ricotz: does anything need to be rebuilt against libsecret? why doesn't it break quantal? and do you have more information about what's broken?
[17:18] <jbicha> I can sponsor it for you; I just don't understand why we need to fix it right now
[17:30] <ricotz> jbicha, it doesnt break quantal, it breaks raring, while it makes a multiarch installation gvfs impossible
[17:31] <ricotz> so i am hoping you can upload it to solve this issue
[17:32] <jbicha> and how important is a multiarch gvfs?
[17:32] <ricotz> and there is no rebuild needed
[17:32] <jbicha> I'm just seeing if I should upload now or we can wait another day or two for Debian
[17:33] <ricotz> it is needed for wine, ia32-lib meta package
[17:34] <ricotz> so pushing this now would be nice
[17:34] <ricotz> jbicha, or shall i ping didrocks about it?
[17:36] <ricotz> bbl
[17:38] <jbicha> ricotz: ok, I can do it, just a second
[17:41] <jbicha> ricotz: oh, libsecret is not in the desktop set, you'll have to try didrocks or someone else then :(
[17:52] <ricotz> jbicha, ok, will do
[18:58] <darkxst> jbicha, are you able to upload the telepathy-logger update?
[19:00] <darkxst> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/telepathy-logger/+bug/1049210
[19:20] <jbicha> darkxst: I can do that tonight, I just synced it for raring now
[19:20] <darkxst> jbicha, ok cool
[20:02] <darkxst> what was the outcome from the gnome session? I suppose they will stick with 3.6?
[21:11] <jbicha> darkxst: yeah, basically; but the GNOME3 PPA or similar can package 3.7 and we can make some specific decisions later
[21:11] <jbicha> for instance, we might take GTK 3.8 but it's too early to tell
[21:12] <jbicha> I think we'll end up with some GNOME 3.8 apps, but not gnome-control-center/gnome-settings-daemon or evolution-data-server as those are too risky/painful
[21:12] <jbicha> without g-c-c/g-s-d we'll be stuck with gnome-shell 3.6
[21:14] <jbicha> we'll be talking a little bit more about g-c-c in http://summit.ubuntu.com/uds-r/meeting/21375/desktop-r-reduce-patch-burden/
[21:15] <jbicha> I should try to go to bed earlier tonight as there's some sessions I'm interested in during the morning
[21:16] <darkxst> ok, good night
[21:18] <everaldo> is there any way to watch sessions online?
[21:18] <darkxst> everaldo, I think only the pleneries are video streamed
[21:18] <everaldo> found live audio
[21:18] <darkxst> but all sessions should have an audio stream
[21:18] <jbicha> everaldo: absolutely, there's a link on each session for the audiostream, I use VLC to "play network stream"
[21:19] <jbicha> and then you can use IRC to talk to the session; each room has 2 projectors, 1 of which shows the IRC channel
[21:19] <everaldo> thanks
[21:20] <jbicha> and new this time is Google+/YouTube streaming, just find the room number at https://plus.google.com/117429523430977492101/posts
[21:21] <jbicha> there's also #ubuntu-uds if you have other questions
[21:24] <everaldo> nice, thanks
[21:24] <everaldo> join /ubuntu-uds
[21:24] <everaldo> ops
[21:55] <darkxst> everaldo, can you test this and tag as verification-done once done.. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1064354 (packages are in -proposed)
[22:07] <everaldo> darkxst, yes, let me test
[22:08] <everaldo> darkxst, is it already in repo?
[22:10] <darkxst> everaldo, Quantal-proposed (3.6.1-0ubuntu1.1): universe/gnome
[22:11] <darkxst> (gnome-shell)
[22:11] <everaldo> installing
[22:14] <everaldo> darkxst, don't need last gnome-screensaver?
[22:14] <darkxst> everaldo, no
[22:14] <darkxst> bug was in gnome-shell actually
[22:21] <everaldo> darkxst, perfect
[22:21] <everaldo> fix commited or fix released?
[22:21] <darkxst> no, add a tag 'verification-done'
[22:22] <darkxst> and a comment to say you have tested it
[22:23] <everaldo> done
[22:32] <darkxst> thanks