=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
dm8tbr | hi, uds schedule desk just directed me here. | 08:18 |
---|---|---|
dm8tbr | would someone please be so kind to have a look at bug 1072818 ? | 08:18 |
ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1072818 in Summit "Can't log on to UDS page (and neither to linaro schedule) - The username (thomas-ruecker) with which you tried to log in is already in use for a different account." [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1072818 | 08:18 |
=== qengho_ is now known as qengho | ||
bigjools | dm8tbr: that looks like an SSO bug, can you try #canonical-support | 08:37 |
bigjools | ah wrong chan | 08:37 |
bigjools | who can remember it ... | 08:37 |
czajkowski | bigjools: #canonical-isd | 08:37 |
bigjools | that's the badger | 08:37 |
lifeless | mmm badget | 08:38 |
lifeless | mushroom! | 08:38 |
dm8tbr | k | 08:41 |
FloSoft | hi, how can I copy a existing package to "maverick" - I cant select that anymore :/ | 09:05 |
tsimpson | FloSoft: Maverick has reached end of life and is no longer supported | 09:09 |
FloSoft | tsimpson: hmm | 09:09 |
tsimpson | FloSoft: this is the announcement: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-announce/2012-April/000158.html | 09:11 |
LordOfTime | FloSoft, you can't have Maverick in PPAs anymore. when it went EOL, PPAs no longer built for maverick | 09:11 |
LordOfTime | any already-published Maverick packages i think will stay, but you can't copy new stuff to Maverick nor can they build for Maverick | 09:11 |
FloSoft | LordOfTime: hmm okay, thats what I wanted to know if I can still copy something to maverick | 09:12 |
FloSoft | how safe is it to upgrade the distribution? | 09:12 |
LordOfTime | tsimpson, got a link to the "EOL Upgrades" process? | 09:12 |
LordOfTime | he'd have to go from Maverick to at least Oneiric | 09:12 |
tsimpson | !eol | 09:13 |
ubot5 | End-Of-Life is the time when security updates and support for an Ubuntu release stop, see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases for more information. Looking to upgrade from an EOL release? See https://help.ubuntu.com/community/EOLUpgrades | 09:13 |
tsimpson | the last link ^ | 09:13 |
FloSoft | how safe is it to upgrade via ssh? ;) | 09:20 |
tsimpson | it should be ok, though you may want to start an sshd instance manually on another port so it doesn't get killed during the upgrade | 09:23 |
tsimpson | #ubuntu would be more helpful for those kinds of questions though | 09:23 |
FloSoft | tsimpson: okay thx | 09:33 |
FloSoft | tsimpson: I think I'll wait until tomorrow where I am directly at the server's location | 09:33 |
tsimpson | the last time I remember upgrading over ssh I remember it working quite well | 09:35 |
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
FloSoft | Is there a way to automate the "Copy Packages" - thing? i.e build package for karmic and copy them automatically to oneiric etc? | 10:50 |
maxb | FloSoft: Yes, there are http apis you can call from a script | 10:58 |
maxb | Although I have to point out.... karmic is incredibly obsolete now | 10:58 |
FloSoft | maxb: yes karmic was only an example - have you an url for that api? | 11:54 |
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
=== matsubara is now known as matsubara-lunch | ||
buzz_ | I appreciate the ppa service but - "Reduced PPA builder capacity" - this seems to be the norm rather than an exception in the last year | 15:30 |
buzz_ | certainly everytime I go to update my PPAs it's the case :/ | 15:30 |
dobey | there's something wrong with the builders page, but i don't see any especially reduced capacity there | 15:33 |
buzz_ | well it says in the channel topic here | 15:33 |
dobey | a few builders disabled, but mostly it's going fine | 15:33 |
buzz_ | 4 hour wait currently for an i386 build. and yesterday was the same | 15:33 |
dobey | well builders aren't infinite | 15:34 |
buzz_ | i suppose its good it's not 15 hours as it has been previously | 15:34 |
czajkowski | actaully the topic is out of date | 15:34 |
czajkowski | and our builder is ok | 15:34 |
dobey | right; i don't even pay attention to the topic | 15:34 |
=== czajkowski changed the topic of #launchpad to: Help contact:-| Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | User Guide: https://help.launchpad.net/ | Support: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad | ||
dobey | but https://launchpad.net/builders does seem to have a bit of an issue | 15:35 |
dobey | the status summary on the upper right says "empty" for some archs, when there are clearly several builds happening, and surely more queued | 15:36 |
buzz_ | there used to be more i386 builds im sure than the current 15 | 15:36 |
buzz_ | builders | 15:36 |
buzz_ | anyway, if 4-5 hours wait is usual, ill jsut have to be patient and not gripe. not much I can do :) cheers | 15:38 |
dobey | it would be nice if the builders had cpu time quotas for the builds, so things that take way too long get auto-killed | 15:40 |
micahg | dobey: there is a timeout | 15:41 |
dobey | micahg: only if things hang though, not if they're actively building, iirc | 15:42 |
micahg | dobey: right, but if they're building, what's the problem? | 15:43 |
dobey | micahg: there are some builds that take > 24 hours | 15:44 |
micahg | dobey: and, why shouldn't they be allowed to build (maybe having those as daily recipies would be problematic, but occassional builds...) | 15:47 |
dobey | micahg: right, it's the fact that they're daily builds that's problematic i think | 15:47 |
dobey | and to prevent DoS | 15:48 |
buzz_ | i have solved the 4 hour wait issue anyway, by deciding to go to the pub :) | 15:51 |
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
RobinJ | Using saved push location: bzr+ssh://bazaar.launchpad.net/~robinj/raspberrydroid/trunk/ | 17:45 |
RobinJ | ssh: connect to host bazaar.launchpad.net port 22: Connection refused | 17:45 |
RobinJ | bzr: ERROR: Connection closed: Unexpected end of message. Please check connectivity and permissions, and report a bug if problems persist. | 17:45 |
RobinJ | :/ | 17:45 |
RobinJ | Why does it reject my connection? | 17:45 |
beuno | RobinJ, authentication issue | 17:54 |
beuno | most likely | 17:54 |
beuno | try: sftp bazaar.launchpad.net | 17:55 |
beuno | may be a bit clearer on what the issue i | 17:55 |
beuno | *is | 17:55 |
beuno | have you set your launchpad username in bzr? | 17:55 |
dobey | or general network issues | 17:58 |
=== io-non-esisto is now known as mapreri | ||
=== FloSoft_ is now known as FloSoft | ||
zequence | Had a problem merging accounts. I guess it's being looked at without my involvement, but if I did want to ask someone about it, where would be the best place? | 20:34 |
dobey | zequence: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad probably | 20:37 |
zequence | dobey, Thanks. They do have merge requests there. Will try that | 20:39 |
=== matsubara is now known as matsubara-afk | ||
exarkun | is launchpad hosed for everyone or just me | 21:49 |
dobey | working ok here | 21:50 |
exarkun | just oopsed three times and then produced some other error page that looks even worse than an oops | 21:51 |
lifeless | exarkun: url ? | 21:51 |
wgrant | exarkun: OOPS IDs? | 21:51 |
wgrant | And URL, yes | 21:51 |
exarkun | submitting the form on https://bugs.launchpad.net/quotient/+bug/1073368/+addbranch | 21:51 |
ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1073368 in Quotient "pop3 grabber leaves old emails on server" [Undecided,New] | 21:51 |
exarkun | just did it again, it both succeeded and oopsed simultaneously | 21:51 |
exarkun | OOPS-3bf36767fbf7225bb8aba92fd5816968 | 21:51 |
ubot5 | https://oops.canonical.com/?oopsid=OOPS-3bf36767fbf7225bb8aba92fd5816968 | 21:51 |
exarkun | well, it /said/ it succeeded, I don't think it actually did | 21:52 |
wgrant | Oh, +addbranch, I bet the branch scanner is holding a lock on the branch row | 21:52 |
exarkun | so, try again tomorrow? | 21:53 |
wgrant | Actually, no, looking at the OOPS it's a search timeout. If you specify the full path to the branch, and not just the name, it'll work | 21:54 |
wgrant | Not sure why the search is timing out today, though | 21:54 |
czajkowski | lifeless: morning | 21:56 |
exarkun | Okay, thanks. | 21:56 |
lifeless | czajkowski: hi! how is UDS ? | 21:57 |
czajkowski | it's ok, horrible food. very busy but good. working on my ation items and catching up on LP work | 21:58 |
czajkowski | lifeless: but it's been nice to meet the folks from the rest of the team and put the faces to the names | 21:58 |
lifeless | czajkowski: yeah, thats good isn't it ;) | 21:59 |
czajkowski | yeah puts a whole new level on context | 21:59 |
czajkowski | so I can gague comments and humour | 21:59 |
czajkowski | so that's been nice for me | 21:59 |
czajkowski | lifeless: hope all is well with your new role | 22:05 |
lifeless | it is indeed! | 22:07 |
czajkowski | yay | 22:08 |
lifeless | of course, I'm now finding a whole new raft of bugs to tackle :) | 22:13 |
czajkowski | on launchpad :) | 22:13 |
lifeless | not so much :) | 22:13 |
lifeless | though I did just file a grub2 bug | 22:13 |
lifeless | with reproduction script | 22:14 |
czajkowski | lol | 22:14 |
slank | launchpad ping, are users able to change their own usernames? | 22:18 |
slank | never mind that, I've figured it out | 22:18 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!